sFlt-1 to PlGF ratio cut-offs to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in early-onset FGR and SGA: a prospective observational study

References

• Akobeng AK. 2007. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatrica 96:644–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun OA, Khanagura RK, Kregel HR, Amro FH, Sibai BM, Chauhan SP. 2018. Preterm preeclampsia with severe features: composite maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with fetal growth restriction. American Journal of Perinatology 35:785–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhig KE, Myers J, Seed PT, Sparkes J, Lowe J, Hunter RM, et al. 2019. Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 393:1807–1818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Gratacós E. 2014. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 36:86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN, et al. 2016. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 48:333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. 1985. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 151:333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. 2018. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 52:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herraiz I, Quezada MS, Rodríguez-Calvo J, Gómez-Montes E, Villalaín C, Galindo A. 2018. Longitudinal changes of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in singleton pregnancies with early-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 52:631–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, et al. 2004. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. New England Journal of Medicine 350:672–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. 2009. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop Report on Electronic Fetal Monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 29:117–118.
   Google Scholar
• Marchi L, Gaini C, Franchi C, Mecacci F, Bilardo C, Pasquini L. 2017. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of third trimester uterine artery pulsatility index. Prenatal Diagnosis 37:1198–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. 1999. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine 340:1234–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NICE] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2016. PlGF-based testing to help diagnose suspected pre-eclampsia (Triage PlGF test, Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, DELFIA Xpress PlGF 1-2-3 test, and BRAHMS sFlt-1 Kryptor/BRAHMS PlGF plus Kryptor PE ratio) [online]. United Kingdom: NICE. p. 1–47. [accessed 2017 Jun 8]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg23/chapter/1-Recommendations.
   Google Scholar
• Paules C, Youssef L, Rovira C, Crovetto F, Nadal A, Peguero A, et al. 2019. Distinctive patterns of placental lesions in pre-eclampsia vs small-for-gestational age and their association with fetoplacental Doppler. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 54:609–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quezada MS, Rodríguez‐Calvo J, Villalaín C, Gómez‐Arriaga PI, Galindo A, Herraiz I. 2020. sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio and timing of delivery in early‐onset fetal growth restriction with antegrade umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 56:549–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson HP, Fleming JE. 1975. A critical evaluation of sonar ‘crown-rump length’ measurements. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 82:702–710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savchev S, Figueras F, Sanz-Cortes M, Cruz-Lemini M, Triunfo S, Botet F, et al. 2014. Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early-and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 36:99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinohara S, Uchida Y, Kasai M, Sunami R. 2017. Association between the high soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor ratio and adverse outcomes in asymptomatic women with early-onset fetal growth restriction. Hypertension in Pregnancy 36:269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan H, Herraiz I, Schlembach D, Verlohren S, Brennecke S, Chantraine F, et al. 2015. Implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for prediction and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia in singleton pregnancy: implications for clinical practice. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 45:241–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan H, Hund M, Andraczek T. 2020. Combining biomarkers to predict pregnancy complications and redefine preeclampsia: the angiogenic-placental syndrome. Hypertension 75:918–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan OM, Turan S, Gungor S, Berg C, Moyano D, Gembruch U, et al. 2008. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 32:160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlohren S, Herraiz I, Lapaire O, Schlembach D, Moertl M, Zeisler H, et al. 2012. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and its prognostic potential in preeclamptic patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 206:58.e1–58.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F, Vatish M, Staff AC, Sennström M, et al. 2016. Predictive value of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. New England Journal of Medicine 374:13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar