The effects of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy for scar diverticulum resection and suture on blood loss, operation time and antibiotic time

References

• Abacjew-Chmylko A, Wydra DG, Olszewska H. 2017. Hysteroscopy in the treatment of uterine cesarean section scar diverticulum: a systematic review. Advances in Medical Sciences 62:230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casadio P, Ambrosio M, Verrelli L, Salucci P, Arena A, Seracchioli R. 2021. Conservative cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: local methotrexate injection followed by hysteroscopic removal with hysteroscopic tissue removal system. Fertility and Sterility 116:1417–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaliere AF, Perelli F, Zaami S, D’Indinosante M, Turrini I, Giusti M, et al. 2021. Fertility sparing treatments in endometrial cancer patients: the potential role of the new molecular classification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:12248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai ZY, Zhang SS, Hu XH, Liu MM, Qi F. 2018. Successful resection of an 11-week cesarean scar pregnancy with a combination of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 25:320–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucinella G, Gullo G, Etrusco A, Dolce E, Culmone S, Buzzaccarini G. 2021. Early diagnosis and surgical management of heterotopic pregnancy allows us to save the intrauterine pregnancy. Przeglad Menopauzalny = Menopause Review 20:222–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrandina G, Palluzzi E, Fanfani F, Gentileschi S, Valentini AL, Mattoli MV, et al. 2016. Endometriosis-associated clear cell carcinoma arising in caesarean section scar: a case report and review of the literature. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 14:300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullo G, Etrusco A, Cucinella G, Perino A, Chiantera V, Laganà AS, et al. 2021. Fertility-sparing approach in women affected by stage I and low-grade endometrial carcinoma: an updated overview. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:11825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullo G, Etrusco A, Fabio M, Cucinella G, Rossi C, Billone V. 2022. The reproductive potential of uterus transplantation: future prospects. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis 93:e2022138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He Y, Zhong J, Zhou W, Zeng S, Li H, Yang H, et al. 2020. Four surgical strategies for the treatment of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 27:593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawcharoenporn T, Kanoktipakorn P. 2021. Effectiveness of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral resection of the prostate in the era of antibiotic resistance. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 15:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rosa VL, Lucia V, Valenti G, Sapia F, Gullo G, Rapisarda A. 2018. Psychological impact of gynecological diseases: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 30:23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Garzon S, Raffaelli R, Gullo G, Franchi M. 2021. Robotic surgery in female-to-male transition: a possible way for further improvement. Journal of Investigative Surgery 34:651–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minovi CM, Minovi A, Dost P. 2015. Suture of the mucosa after the endoscopic LASER mucomyotomy of Zenker’s diverticulum. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 272:2947–2952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman EP, Mishra PR, Stringer MD. 2020. Laparoscopic diverticulectomy or laparoscopic-assisted resection of symptomatic Meckel diverticulum in children? A systematic review. Pediatric Surgery International 36:869–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savilo CE, Smith RB, Mourad J. 2020. Robotic resection and revision of uterine scar defect with hysteroscopic guidance. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 27:S89.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi A, Kimura F, Tsuji S, Yamanaka A, Takashima A, Takebayashi A, Murakami T. 2019. 1514 impact of hysteroscopic surgical management of cesarean scar syndrome on pregnancy rate: a prospective observational study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 26:S203.
   Google Scholar
• Tulandi T, Cohen A. 2016. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive-aged women. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 23:893–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbina P, Wu CZ, Vargas MV. 2019. Laparoscopic-assisted hysteroscopic resection of cesarean scar ectopic. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 26:S2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Yang Q, Zhang N, Wang Y, Wang G, Wang D. 2019. An effective assisted method using hysteroscopy transmittance test and a Foley catheter to repair previous cesarean scar defect by laparoscopy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 26:605–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Yao M, Wang H, Tan W, Chen P, Wang X. 2016. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula that resulted in improved postoperative menstruation. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 23:969–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, He X, Jiang L, Liang G, Zhu C, Pan H, et al. 2020. Effectiveness of hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean niche can be predicted: a prospective cohort study. Scientific Reports 10:17424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Z, Xiao S, Xue M. 2020. Clinical analysis of the preoperative condition and operative prognosis of post-cesarean section scar diverticulum: a case series. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 48:803–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar