2,155
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A nomogram to predict the risk of scar pregnancy after caesarean section

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2142767 | Received 28 Jun 2022, Accepted 26 Oct 2022, Published online: 10 Nov 2022

References

  • Begam, M., et al., 2019. Caesarean scar pregnancy: time to explore indications of the caesarean sections? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: The Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 39 (3), 365–371.
  • Ben-Nagi, J., et al., 2009. Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 106 (1), 30–34.
  • Chen, Y., et al., 2017. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 296 (2), 355–361.
  • Chuang, J., et al., 2003. Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a caesarean section scar.pdf>. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 110 (9), 869–870.
  • Eytan, O., Elad, D. and Jaffa, A.J., 2007. Evaluation of the embryo transfer protocol by a laboratory model of the uterus. Fertility and Sterility, 88 (2), 485–493.
  • Gui, T., et al., 2017. Clinical and ultrasound parameters in prediction of excessive hemorrhage during management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 13, 807–812.
  • Family Planning Subgroup, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynocology, Chinese Medical Association 2016. [Expert opinion of diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (2016)]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 51, 568–572.
  • Henne, M.B. and Milki, A.A., 2004. Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 19 (3), 570–572.
  • Jiao, L., et al., 2008. Diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal = Chung-Kuo i Hsueh K'o Hsueh Tsa Chih, 23 (1), 10–15.
  • Liang, J., et al., 2018. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 360, k817.
  • Luo, L., et al., 2019. Early clinical features and risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study. Gynecological Endocrinology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 35 (4), 337–341.
  • Magro Malosso, E., et al., 2018. US trends in abortion and preterm birth. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of. Perinatal Obstetricians, 31, 2463–2467.
  • Martinelli, K., et al., 2021. Prelabor cesarean section: the role of advanced maternal age and associated factors. Revista de Saude Publica, 55, 9.
  • Miller, R., Timor-Tritsch, I. and Gyamfi-Bannerman, C., 2020. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 222, B2–B14.
  • Mwalwanda, C. and Black, K., 2013. Immediate post-partum initiation of intrauterine contraception and implants: a review of the safety and guidelines for use. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 53 (4), 331–337.
  • Naji, O., et al., 2012. Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology : The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40 (5), 557–561.
  • Naji, O., et al., 2013. Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 28 (6), 1489–1496.
  • Ozawa, N., et al., 2019. Maternal age, history of miscarriage, and embryonic/fetal size are associated with cytogenetic results of spontaneous early miscarriages. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36 (4), 749–757.
  • Park, S., et al., 2014. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for women with anterior wall adherence after cesarean section. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 18 (3), e2014.00315.
  • Pirjani, R., et al., 2017. Placental implantation and migration following a previous caesarean section scar. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 57 (1), 115–117.
  • Qian, Z., Guo, Q. and Huang, L., 2014. Identifying risk factors for recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study. Fertility and Sterility, 102 (1), 129–134.e1.
  • Raccah-Tebeka, B. and Plu-Bureau, G., 2015. Post-partum contraception: Guidelines for clinical practice. Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 44 (10), 1127–1134.
  • Roberge, S., et al., 2012. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. American Journal of Perinatology, 29 (6), 465–471.
  • Rotas, M., Haberman, S. and Levgur, M., 2006. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 107 (6), 1373–1381.
  • Saravelos, S. H., Wong , et al. 2016. How often does the embryo implant at the location to which it was transferred? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology : The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 48 (1), 106–112.
  • Shi, M., et al., 2018. Identifying risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study of 79 cases. Ginekologia Polska, 89 (4), 195–199.
  • Sun, Q., et al., 2019. Scoring system for the prediction of the successful treatment modality in women with cesarean scar pregnancy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 146 (3), 289–295.
  • Timor-Tritsch, I., et al., 2019. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 46 (4), 797–811.
  • Vial, Y., Petignat, P. and Hohlfeld, P., 2000. Pregnancy in a Cesarean scar. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology : The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16 (6), 592–593.
  • Wang, J.-H., et al., 2013. Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 123 (3), 240–243.,.
  • Wang, Q., et al., 2015. Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 195, 141–145.
  • Zhang, Y., et al., 2021. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 303 (2), 321–328.
  • Zhou, X., Li, H. and Fu, X., 2020. Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46 (2), 272–278.