Comparison of embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes for patients with low ovarian reserve in natural cycles and mildly stimulated cycles: a cohort study

References

• Ata, B., et al., 2008. Embryo implantation rates in natural and stimulated assisted reproduction treatment cycles in poor responders. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17 (2), 207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conforti, A., et al., 2019. Management of women with an unexpected low ovarian response to gonadotropin. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 10, 387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marco, M. P., et al., 2021. Natural cycle results in lower implantation failure than ovarian stimulation in advanced-age poor responders undergoing IVF: fertility outcomes from 585 patients. Reproductive Sciences , 28 (7), 1967–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Guardo, F., et al., 2022. Poor ovarian response and the possible role of natural and modified natural cycles. Therapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health, 16, 26334941211062026.
   Google Scholar
• DiMattina, M., et al., 2014. Follicular and estradiol parameters that improve success with natural cycle in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Med, 59, 267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakopoulos, P., et al., 2019. Modified natural cycle IVF versus conventional stimulation in advanced-age Bologna poor responders. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 39 (4), 698–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizur, S. E., et al., 2005. Modified natural cycle using GnRH antagonist can be an optional treatment in poor responders undergoing IVF. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 22 (2), 75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, E.,., et al., 2013. Fertility (update): summary of NICE guidance. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 346 (1), f650–f650. and
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Højgaard, A., Ingerslev, H. J. and Dinesen, J., 2001. Friendly IVF: patient opinions. Human Reproduction , 16 (7), 1391–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingerslev, H. J., et al., 2001. A randomized study comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrate. Human Reproduction , 16 (4), 696–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirge, P. R., 2016. Poor ovarian reserve. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 9 (2), 63–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joshi, N., et al., 2012. Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120 (4), 843–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel, R. M., 2010. Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 8 (1), 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko, T., et al., 2000. Effects of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on oocyte quality in terms of the incidence of apoptotic granulosa cells. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17 (10), 580–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedem, A., et al., 2014. Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with “genuine” poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation? Fertility and Sterility, 101 (6), 1624–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. H., et al., 2009. Minimal stimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone versus GnRH antagonist multiple-dose protocol in low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 92 (6), 2082–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolibianakis, E., et al., 2004. Modified natural cycle for IVF does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in poor responders with high day 3 FSH levels, as a last resort prior to oocyte donation. Human Reproduction , 30 (10), 2321–2330.
   Google Scholar
• Lainas, T. G., et al., 2015. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders. Human Reproduction, 30 (10), 2321–2330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindheim, S. R., et al., 1997. Poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation may benefit from an attempt at natural-cycle oocyte retrieval. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 14 (3), 174–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, T. J. and Vitrikas, K. R., 2015. Evaluation and treatment of infertility. Am Fam Physician, 91, 308–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahutte, N. G. and Arici, A., 2007. Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in poor responders. Fertility and Sterility, 87 (2), 241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgia, F., et al., 2004. A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 81 (6), 1542–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne, S., et al., 1997. Treatment-related chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Human Reproduction , 12 (4), 780–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H., et al., 2001. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer during natural cycles. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 46 (2), 95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelinck, M. J., et al., 2002. Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature. Human Reproduction Update, 8 (2), 129–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. J., et al., 2007. Controlled natural cycle IVF: experience in a world of stimulation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 14 (3), 356–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyzos, N. P., et al., 2012. Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. Human Reproduction, 27 (12), 3481–3486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, Medicine. 2015. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 103, e44-50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasool, S. and Shah, D., 2017. Fertility with early reduction of ovarian reserve: the last straw that breaks the Camel’s back. Fertil Res Pract, 3, 15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schimberni, M., et al., 2009. Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 92 (4), 1297–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom, J. and Davis, P., 2001. Differential effects of repeated ovarian stimulation on cytoplasmic and spindle organization in metaphase II mouse oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro. Human Reproduction, 16 (4), 757–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wolff, M., 2019. The role of natural cycle IVF in assisted reproduction. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 33 (1), 35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziebe, S., et al., 2004. Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles. Human Reproduction , 19 (6), 1457–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar