Impact of haemostasis methods during ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve: a pairwise and network meta-analysis

References

• Anderson, R.A., et al., 2022. Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency in children and women with cancer: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 28 (3), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angioli, R., et al., 2009. Feasibility of the use of novel matrix hemostatic sealant (FloSeal) to achieve hemostasis during laparoscopic excision of endometrioma. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 16 (2), 153–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgari, Z., et al., 2016. Comparing ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of endometriotic cysts and hemostasis achieved either by bipolar coagulation or suturing: a randomized clinical trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 293 (5), 1015–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ata, B., et al., 2015. Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision; comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar dessication. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 22 (3), 363–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgfeldt, C. and Andolf, E., 1999. Transvaginal sonographic ovarian findings in a random sample of women 25–40 years old. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 13, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canis, M., et al., 2001. Ovarian response during IVF–embryo transfer cycles after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for endometriotic cysts of >3 cm in diameter. Human Reproduction, 16 (12), 2583–2586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedars, M.I., 2022. Evaluation of female fertility—AMH and ovarian reserve testing. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 107 (6), 1510–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, C., et al., 2018. Usefulness of hemostatic sealants for minimizing ovarian damage during laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 44 (3), 532–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J., et al., 2019. Impact of haemostatic sealant versus electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Gynecology, 126 (10), 1267–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J.P.W., et al., 2021. Ovarian reserve and recurrence 1 year post-operatively after using haemostatic sealant and bipolar diathermy for haemostasis during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 43 (2), 310–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coric, M., et al., 2011. Electrocoagulation versus suture after laparoscopic stripping of ovarian endometriomas assessed by antral follicle count: preliminary results of randomized clinical trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 283 (2), 373–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cunha Araujo, R.S., et al., 2022. Ovarian function following use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for unilateral endometrioma: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 157 (3), 549–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniilidis, A., et al., 2023. Surgical management of ovarian endometrioma: impact on ovarian reserve parameters and reproductive outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12 (16), 5324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewailly, D., et al., 2014. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Human Reproduction Update, 20 (3), 370–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., et al., 2015. Comprehensive assessment of the impact of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 22 (7), 1252–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, A.D., et al., 2009. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy without bipolar coagulation or sutures using a gelantine–thrombin matrix sealant (FloSeal): first support of a promising technique. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 280 (1), 161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Behery, M.M., et al., 2011. Effect of laparoscopic ovarian drilling on vascular endothelial growth factor and ovarian stromal blood flow using 3-dimensional power Doppler. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 112 (2), 119–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahani, L. and Datta, S., 2016. Benign ovarian cysts. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 26 (9), 271–275.
   Google Scholar
• Farhat, S.A., et al., 2022. Targeting signaling pathways involved in primordial follicle growth or dormancy: potential application in prevention of follicular loss and infertility. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 22 (7), 871–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele, L., et al., 2004. Bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture of solitary ovary after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 11 (3), 344–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrero, S., et al., 2012. Hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture after surgical stripping of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 19 (6), 722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henes, M., et al., 2018. Ovarian cyst removal influences ovarian reserve dependent on histology, size and type of operation. Women’s Health, 14, 174550651877899.
   Google Scholar
• Iwase, A., et al., 2010. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone level is a useful marker for evaluating the impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve. Fertility and Sterility, 94 (7), 2846–2849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K.D., Christopher, J.G., and Sutton, 2000. Laparoscopic management of ovarian endometriomas: a critical review of current practice. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 12 (4), 309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalampokas, T., et al., 2013. AMH after laparoscopic surgery of the ovaries: a review. Gynecological Endocrinology, 29, 408–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-Z., et al., 2009. The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: a prospective clinical study of 191 patients. Fertility and Sterility, 92 (4), 1428–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, M.L., et al., 2011. Effect on ovarian reserve of laparoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation versus laparotomic hemostatic sutures during unilateral ovarian cystectomy. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 114 (1), 69–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolhuijsen, L.M.E. and Visser, J.A., 2020. Anti-Mullerian hormone and ovarian reserve: update on assessing ovarian function. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 105 (11), 3361–3373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owczarek, D., Malinowski, A., and Wilczyński, M., 2018. Ovarian reserve evaluation after laparoscopic cyst enucleation, depending on applied haemostasis technique and with particular consideration of endometrial cysts. Przeglad Menopauzalny = Menopause Review, 17 (1), 22–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Özgönen, H., et al., 2013. Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation and intracorporeal suture application to ovarian reserve in benign ovarian cysts. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 287 (4), 729–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E.Y., et al., 2020. Epinephrine minimizes the use of bipolar coagulation and preserves ovarian reserve in laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 20911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.J., et al., 2020. Preservation of ovarian reserve and hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 27 (7), S62.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S.J., et al., 2021. A randomized controlled trial of ovarian reserve preservation and hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 8495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters, A., Rindos, N.B., and Lee, T., 2017. Hemostasis during ovarian cystectomy: systematic review of the impact of suturing versus surgical energy on ovarian function. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 24 (2), 235–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poplawski, R. and Ma, K., 2022. Benign ovarian cysts in premenopausal women. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 32 (10), 234–239.
   Google Scholar
• Ragni, G., et al., 2005. Damage to ovarian reserve associated with laparoscopic excision of endometriomas: a quantitative rather than a qualitative injury. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193 (6), 1908–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, C., et al., 2017. Which should be the preferred technique during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: hemostatic sutures or bipolar electrocoagulation? A randomized controlled prospective study of long-term ovarian reserve. Reproductive Sciences, 24 (3), 393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaltout, M.F., et al., 2019. A randomized controlled trial of a new technique for laparoscopic management of ovarian endometriosis preventing recurrence and keeping ovarian reserve. Journal of Ovarian Research, 12 (1), 66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song, T., Lee, S.-H., and Kim, W.Y., 2014. Additional benefit of hemostatic sealant in preservation of ovarian reserve during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy: a multi-center, randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 29 (8), 1659–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanprasertkul, C., et al., 2014. Impact of hemostasis methods, electrocoagulation versus suture, in laparoscopic endometriotic cystectomy on the ovarian reserve: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 97 (Suppl. 8), S95–S101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Wolff, M., et al., 2019. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration and follicle density throughout reproductive life and in different diseases—implications in fertility preservation. Human Reproduction, 34 (12), 2513–2522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wolff, M., et al., 2020. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) concentration has limited prognostic value for density of primordial and primary follicles, questioning it as an accurate parameter for the ovarian reserve. Maturitas, 134, 34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., et al., 2019. Impact of hemostatic methods on ovarian reserve and fertility in laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 17 (4), 2689–2693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, S., et al., 2020. The pain symptoms and mass recurrence rates after ovarian cystectomy or uni/bilateral oophorectomy procedures in patients over 40 years old with endometriosis. Ginekologia Polska, 91 (6), 295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C.-H., Wu, L., and Li, P.-Q., 2016. Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 55 (4), 507–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar