18
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Epidural analgesia for low risk labour determines the rate of instrumental deliveries but not that of caesarean sections

Pages 25-29 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

  • Bailey P. W. and Howard F. A. (1983) Foram epidural analgesia and forceps delivery: laying a bogey. Anaesthesia, 38, 282-285.
  • Cammu H., Verlaenen H., Amy J. J., De Koster K., Derde M.P. and Buekens P. (1994) Epidural analgesia in active management of labor. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 73, 235-239.
  • Doughty, A. (1969) Selective epidural analgesia and the forceps rate. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 41, 10581062.
  • Gribble R. K. and Meier P. R. (1991) Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean rate. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 78, 231-234.
  • Hemminki E. and Gissler M. (1996) Epidural analgesia as a risk factor for operative delivery, lnernational Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 53, 125-132.
  • Hoult I. J., MacLennan A. H. and Canfie L. E. S. (1977) Lumbar epidural analgesia in labour: relation to fetal malposition and instrumental delivery. British Medical Journal, i, 14-16.
  • Howell C. J. and Chalmers I. (1991) A review of prospectively controlled comparisons of epidural with nonepidural forms of pain relief during labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1, 93-110.
  • Jarvelin M-R., Hartikainen-Sorri A-L. and Rantakallio P. (1993) Labour induction policy in hospitals of different levels of specialisation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecotogy, 100, 310-315.
  • Lieherman E., Lang J. M., Cohen A., D'Agostino R., Datta S. and Frigoletto F. D. (1996) Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstetrics and Gyneeology, 88, 993-1000.
  • Morton S.C., Williams M. S., Keeler E. B., Gainbone J. C. and Kahn K. L. (1994) Effect of epidural analgesia for labour on the caesarean delivery rate. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 83, 1045 1052.
  • Notzon F. C. (1990) International differences in the use of obstetric interventions. J.A.M.A., 263, 3286-3291.
  • Paterson C. M., Saunders N. S. G. and Wadsworth J. (1992) The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25 069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region, 1988. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 99, 377-380.
  • Philipsen T. and Jensen N. H. (1989) Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour; a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveries. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 30, 27-33.
  • Ramin S. M., Gambling D. R. Lucas M. J., Sharma S. K., Sidawi J. E. and Leveno K. J. (1995) Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 86, 783-789.
  • Read A. W., Prendiville W. J., Dawes V. P. and Stanley F. J. (1994) Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 37-42.
  • Reynolds F. (1989) Epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Pros and cons for mother and baby. British Medical Journal. 299, 751 752.
  • Reynolds F. (1993) Pain relief in labour. Review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 100, 979-983.
  • Socol M. L., Garcia P. M., Peaceman A.M. and Dooley S. L. (1993) Reducing cesarean births at a primarily private university hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 168, 1748-1758.
  • Thorp J. A., Meyer B. A., Cohen G. R., Yeast J. D. and Hu D. (1994) Epidural analgesia in labour and caesarean delivery for dystocia. Obstetric and Gynecologieal Survey, 49, 362 369.
  • Thorp J. A., Hu D. H., Albin R. M., McNitt J., Meyer B. A., Cohen G. R. and Yeast J. D. (1993) The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 169, 851-858.
  • Yudkin P., Frumar A.M., Anderson A. B. M. and Turnbull A. C. (1979) A retrospective study of induction of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 86, 257 265.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.