Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers

References

• Ballard, G. (2000) The Last Planner system of production control, Doctoral thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (1998) Shielding production: essential step in production control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1), 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelsen, S. (2004) Lean construction: where are we and how to proceed. Lean Construction Journal, 1(1), 46–69.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N.G. and Wakefield, R. (2009) Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 9(1), 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N.G., Pendlebury, M., Gibb, A.G.F. and Pasquire, C. (2005) Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(3), 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas, N.G., Pasquire, C. and Gibb, A.G.F. (2006) Benefits evaluation for off-site production in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 24(2), 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J. and Olofsson, T. (2012) Construction productivity measures for innovation projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(5), 670–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Building Commission (2002) Skärpning gubbar! Om konkurrensen, kvaliteten, kostnaderna och kompetensen i byggsektorn [About competition, quality, costs and competence in construction, in Swedish], SOU 2002:115, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Caerteling, J., Di Benedetto, A., Dorée, A., Halman, J. and Song, M. (2011) Technology development projects in road infrastructure: the relevance of government championing behavior. Technovation, 31(5–6), 270–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarelli, C., van Wee, B., Molin, E.J.E. and Flyvbjerg, B. (2012) Different cost performance: different determinants? The case of cost overruns in Dutch transport infrastructure projects. Transport Policy, 22(July), 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, R. and Winch, G. (2003) Re-engineering construction: the role of research and implementation. Building Research & Information, 31(2), 172–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Culmo, M.P. (2011) Accelerated Bridge Construction: Experience in Design, Fabrication and Erection of Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems, Federal Highway Administration Report No. FHWA-HIF-12-013, Alexandria, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction, Construction Task Force Report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M.K. and Buhl, S.L. (2004) What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects? Transport Review: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S., Marsh, L. and Cockerham, G. (2002) How building design imperatives constrain construction productivity and quality. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 9(5–6), 378–387.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M. (1996) Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan. Construction Management and Economics, 14(5), 437–450.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, A.G.F. (2001) Standardization and pre-assembly: distinguishing myth from reality using case study research. Construction Management and Economics, 19(3), 307–315.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, A.G.F. and Isack, F. (2003) Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers. Building Research & Information, 31(2), 146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G.R. (2002) Qualitative Data Analysis, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Höök, M. and Stehn, L. (2008) Applicability of lean principles and practices in industrialized housing production. Construction Management and Economics, 26(10), 1091–1100.
   Google Scholar
• Horman, M.J. and Kenley, R. (2005) Quantifying levels of wasted time in construction with meta-analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A.L., Chapman, R.E. and Butry, D.T. (2009) Metrics and Tools for Measuring Construction Productivity: Technical and Empirical Considerations, NIST Spec. Publ. 1101, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Hvam, L., Mortensen, N.H. and Riis, J. (2008) Product Customization, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., Olofsson, T. and Johnsson, H. (2012) Configuration through the parameterization of building components. Automation in Construction, 23, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J. and Tseng, M.M. (2004) Customizability analysis in design for mass customization. Computer-Aided Design, 36(8), 745–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., Zhang, L. and Pokharel, S. (2003) Process platform planning for mass customization. Paper presented at the 2nd Interdisciplinary World Congress on Mass Customization and Personalization, Munich, Germany, 6–8 October.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, P.-E. and Saukkoriipi, L. (2005) Slöseri i byggprojekt – behov av förändrat synsätt [Waste in construction projects, in Swedish], FoU-Väst 0507, Göteborg, , Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A. (1995) Institutions in building projects: implications for flexibility and change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. (2000) An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction, Doctoral thesis, Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Liker, J.K. (2008) The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer, McGraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Minchin, E., Lewis, D. and McLeod, L. (2011) Improving productivity on a troubled bridge project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(5), 364–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance (2009) Återkrav inom välfärdssystemen: förslag till lagstiftning [Repayment in welfare, proposals for legislation, in Swedish], SOU 2009:6, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Mossman, A. (2009) Creating value: a sufficient way to eliminate waste in lean design and lean production. Lean Construction Journal, 2009, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquire, C. and Gibb, A.G.F. (2002) Considerations of assessing the benefits of standardisation and pre-assembly in construction. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 7(3), 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Committee (2012) Vägar till förbättrad produktivitet och innovationsgrad i anläggningsbranschen [Ways to improve productivity and innovation in civil engineering, in Swedish], SOU 2012:39 for the Ministry of Enterprise, Energy, and Communications, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Sawney, M.S. (1998) Leveraged high-variety strategies: from portfolio thinking to platform thinking. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segerstedt, A. and Olofsson, T. (2010) Supply chains in the construction industry. Supply Chain Management, 15(5), 347–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsson, P. (2011) Buildability of concrete structures: processes, methods and material, Doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, T.W., Siddique, Z. and Jiao, R.J. (2005) Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Teicholz, P., Goodrum, P. and Haas, C. (2001) Discussion: US construction labor productivity trends, 1970–1998. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(5), 427–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(427)
   Google Scholar
• Voordijk, H., Meijboom, B. and de Han, J. (2006) Modularity in supply chain: a multiple case study in the construction industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(6), 600–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R. and Koskela, L. (2005) Revisiting the three peculiarities of production in construction. Paper presented at the 13th International Group for Lean Construction, Sydney, Australia, 19-21 July.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M. (2003) Models of manufacturing and the construction process: the genesis of re-engineering construction. Building Research & Information, 31(2), 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar