Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects

References

• Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F. and Dainty, A.R.J. (2006) The extent of team integration within construction projects, International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F.H. and Barrett, B.E. (1996) Decision quality using ranked attribute weights, Management Science, 42(11), 1515–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. (2007) Deconstructing partnering in project-based organisation: seven pillars, seven paradoxes and seven deadly sins, International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 365–74.
   Google Scholar
• Buede, D.M. (2009) The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods, 2nd edn, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A.P.C. (2001) Time–cost relationship of public sector projects in Malaysia, International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 223–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A.P.C., Yung, E.H.K., Lam, P.T.I., Tam, C.M. and Cheung, S.O. (2001) Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects, Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), 699–718.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Zhang, G., Xie, Y.M. and Jin, X.H. (2012) Overview of alliancing research and practice in the construction industry, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(2), 103–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S.O., Suen, H.C.H. and Cheung, K.K.W. (2003) An automated partnering monitoring system – Partnering Temperature Index, Automation in Construction, 12(3), 331–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicmil, S. and Marshall, D. (2005) Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms, Building Research & Information, 33(6), 523–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constructing Excellence (2004) Effective Teamwork: A Best Practice Guide for the Construction Industry, Constructing Excellence, London, available at http://bit.ly/1ack99X (accessed 3 September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A.R.J., Cheng, M. and Moore, D.R. (2003) Redefining performance measures for construction project managers: an empirical evaluation, Construction Management and Economics, 21(2), 209–18.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J. (2002) Accelerating Change, A Report by the Strategic Forum for Construction, Rethinking Construction, London, available at http://bit.ly/18IHJxP (accessed 18 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Evbuomwan, N.F.O. and Anumba, C.J. (1998) An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction, Advances in Engineering Software, 29(7–9), 587–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frodell, M., Josephson, P.E. and Lindahl, G. (2008) Swedish construction clients’ views on project success and measuring performance, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(1), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gunhan, S. and Arditi, D. (2005) Factors affecting international construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(3), 273–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell, M.R. and Gambatese, J.A. (2009) Construction safety risk mitigation, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), 1316–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell, M.R. and Gambatese, J.A. (2010) Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, J., Walker, D.H.T., Hampson, K.D. and Peters, R.J. (2004) Project alliancing at National Museum of Australia – collaborative process, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), 143–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, C., Cho, K., Koo, K., Hong, T. and Moon, H. (2008) Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(7), 468–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, C.K., Costello, S.B. and Wilkinson, S. (2013a) Overview of key indicators of team integration in construction projects: New Zealand practitioners’ point of view. Paper presented at the World Building Congress 2013, Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Queensland, Australia, 5–9 May.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, K.I., Costello, S.B. and Wilkinson, S. (2013b) Key practice indicators of team integration in construction projects: a review, Team Performance Management, 19(3/4), 132–52.
   Google Scholar
• M.Jefferies, G.Brewer, S.Rowlinson, F.Cheung and A.Satchell (2006) Project alliances in the Australian construction industry: a case study of a water treatment project, in P. Mc Dermott and M.A. Khalfan Malik (eds.) Symposium on CIB W92: Sustainability and Value through Construction Procurement, Digital World Centre, Salford, UK, 29 November–2 December, pp. 247–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, J., Fischer, G.W. and Dyer, J.S. (1998) Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(2), 85–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, B. and Emmitt, S. (2009) Investigating the integration of design and construction from a ‘lean’ perspective, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 9(2), 225–40.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, S.M., Swarup, L. and Riley, D. (2013) Delivering sustainable, high-performance buildings: influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes, Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(1), 71–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M. and Anvuur, A.M. (2008) Selecting sustainable teams for PPP projects, Building and Environment, 43(6), 999–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M., Ling, F.Y.Y., Rahman, M.M. and Phng, S.T. (2005) Constructing relationally integrated teams, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1076–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laan, A., Noorderhaven, N., Voordijk, H. and Dewulf, G. (2011) Building trust in construction partnering projects: an exploratory case-study, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(2), 98–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P. (2011) Towards the use of project alliance: joint development of a team selection procedure as an example of steps taken. Paper presented at the Conference of Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 20–23 June.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P. (2012) Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery, Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M. (1994) Constructing the Team, Final Report of the Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Industry, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lendrum, T. (2011) Building High Performance Business Relationships: Rescue, Improve, and Transform Your Most Valuable Assets, 1st edn, Wiley, Milton, Qld.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Gunasekaran, A. and Li, H. (1998) Concurrent engineering: a strategy for procuring construction projects, International Journal of Project Management, 16(6), 375–83.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z., Cheng, E.W.L. and Li, H. (2002) A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), 2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Mistry, D. and Davis, P.R. (2010) Price competitive alliance projects: identification of success factors for public clients, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 947–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoliadis, O.G., Tsolas, I. and Nakou, A. (2006) Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: a Delphi study, Construction Management and Economics, 24(2), 113–20.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, I.(2010) Project Alliance Boards – The Infrastructure World’s Board Revolution, New Zealand Management, available at http://bit.ly/19mU7jf (accessed 5 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X. (2012) The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction, International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 188–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R. and Dainty, A.R.J. (1999) Integrated project teams’ performance in managing unexpected change events, Team Performance Management, 5(7), 212–22.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S.D. (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, J., Hyun, C.T., Liu, L.Y. and Kim, M.K. (1996) Relationship between project interaction and performance indicators, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(2), 165–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney, G. (2009) Project alliancing: the process architecture of a relationship based project delivery system for complex infrastructure projects, available at http://bit.ly/16wx5o7 (accessed 12 January 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. (2009) Alliance contracting: lessons learned from the Australian experience. Paper prepared for Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, the Association of German Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Sakal, M.W. (2005) Project alliancing: a relational contracting mechanism for dynamic projects, Lean Construction Journal, 2(1), 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Scheublin, F.J.M. (2001) Project alliance contract in The Netherlands, Building Research & Information, 29(6), 451–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R.C. (1997) Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques, Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D.J. (2004) Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, 3rd edn, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.H.T. (2002) Enthusiasm, commitment and project alliancing: an Australian experience, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 2(1), 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.H.T., Hampson, K. and Peters, R. (2002) Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(2), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, B. and Chan, A.P.C. (2012) Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(1), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C., Chiang, Y.H. and Chan, D.W.M. (2010) A critical review of performance measurement in construction, Journal of Facilities Management, 8(4), 269–84.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C., Chan, D.W.M. and Li, L.K. (2007a) Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study, Construction Management and Economics, 25(12), 1219–37.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C. and Chan, D.W.M. (2007b) The definition of alliancing in construction as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept, International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 219–31.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C. and Chan, D.W.M. (2008) Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong, Construction Management and Economics, 26(3), 277–301.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, J.F.Y., Chan, A.P.C. and Chan, D.W.M. (2009) Developing a performance index for relationship-based construction projects in Australia: Delphi study, Journal of Management in Engineering, 25(2), 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar