Are we on the same page? Exploring construction professionals’ mental models of occupational health and safety

References

• Anandarajan, M., Paravastu, N. and Simmers, C.A. (2006) Perceptions of personal web usage in the workplace: a Q-methodology approach. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(3), 325–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson, A.R. and Westall, R. (2010) The relationship between integrated design and construction and safety on construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 28(9), 1007–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Baiden, B.K. and Price, A.D.F. (2011) The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, A.P. and Millward, L.J. (2007) Differentiating knowledge in teams: the effect of shared declarative and procedural knowledge on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 11(2), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, P.A., Edwards, P.J. and Lingard, H. (2013) Workplace stress among construction professionals in South Africa: the role of harassment and discrimination. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(6), 620–635.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R. (1970) On the use of variance designs in Q methodology. Psychological Record, 20, 179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R. (1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R. (1993) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. and Converse, S.A. (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making, in Castellan, N.J. Jr (ed.) Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 221–246.
   Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L.A. and Mesmer-Magnus, J.R. (2010) Measuring team mental models: a meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 14(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaghy, R. (2009) One Death Is Too Many: Inquiry into the Underlying Causes of Construction Fatal Accidents, Report to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, TSO, Norwich.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J.E., Salas, E. and Johnston, J.H. (1999) Does stress lead to a loss of team perspective? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 3(4), 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H. and Salas, E. (2003) Virtual teams: effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 7(4), 297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S. and Berejikian, J. (1993) Reconstructive democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espevik, R., Johnsen, B.H. and Eid, J. (2011) Communication and performance in co-located and distributed teams: an issue of shared mental models of team members? Military Psychology, 23(6), 616–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J.R., Swaffield, S.R., and Simmons, D.G. (1998). Understanding Visitors’ Experiences in Kaikoura Using Photographs of Landscapes and Q Method, Tourism Research and Education Centre (TREC) Report No. 5, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, S.M., Salas, E., Cuevas, H.M. and Bowers, C.A. (2003) Distributed coordination space: toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 340–364.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D.M., Bell, S.T., Dierdorff, E.C. and Belohlav, J.A. (2012) Facet personality and surface-level diversity as team mental model antecedents: implications for implicit coordination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 825–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A.D. and Moskowitz, G.B. (2000) Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambatese, J.A., Behm, M. and Rajendran, S. (2008) Design’s role in construction accident causality and prevention: perspectives from an expert panel. Safety Science, 46(4), 675–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth, R., Boqvist, A., Bjelkemyr, M. and Lindberg, B. (2013) Design for construction: utilizing production experiences in development. Construction Management and Economics, 31(2), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. and Odella, F. (1998) What do you mean by safety? Conflicting perspectives on accident causation and safety management in a construction firm. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(4), 202–213.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N.J., Vezich, S. and Shapiro, J.R. (2014) Perceived perspective taking: when others walk in our shoes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 941–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. (2005) Community perceptions of environmental and social change and tourism development on the island of Koh Samui, Thailand. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellermanns, F.W., Floyd, S.W., Pearson, A.W. and Spencer, B. (2008) The contingent effect of constructive confrontation on the relationship between shared mental models and decision quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R. and Mohammed, S. (1994) Team mental model: construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1969) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Richard D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, M.-Y., Chan, Y.S. and Olomolaiye, P. (2008) Impact of stress on the performance of construction project managers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(8), 644–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S. and Zaccaro, S.J. (2002) The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Cannon-Bowers, J.A. and Salas, E. (2005) Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. and Ale, B. (2010) Construction safety: an analysis of systems failure: the case of the multifunctional Bos & Lommerplein estate. Amsterdam. Safety Science, 48(2), 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prussia, G.E., Brown, K.A. and Willis, P.G. (2003) Mental models of safety: do managers and employees see eye to eye? Journal of Safety Research, 34(2), 143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resick, C.J., Dickson, M.W., Mitchelson, J.K., Allison, L.K. and Clark, M.A. (2010) Team composition, cognition, and effectiveness: examining mental model similarity and accuracy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 14(2), 174–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, A. and Koch, C. (2004) Integration, differentiation and ambiguity in safety cultures. Safety Science, 42(8), 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. and Allen, N. (2012) Examining the convergent validity of shared mental model measures. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1052–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, W.B. and Morris, N.M. (1986) On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A. and Tannenbaum, S.I. (1992) Toward an understanding of team performance and training, in Swezey, R.W. and Salas, E. (eds.) Teams: Their training and performance, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Sims, D.E. and Burke, C.S. (2005) Is there a ‘big five’ in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Campbell, G., Milanovich, D.M. and Reynolds, A.M. (2001) Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development and evaluation: two empirical studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Mathieu, J.E. and Kraiger, K. (2005) Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., Rosen, M.A., Priest, H.A., Burke, C.S., Goodwin, G.F. and Johnston, J.H. (2007) Distributed team performance: a multi-level review of distributed demography, and decision making, in Dansereau, F. and Yammarino, F.J. (eds) Multi-Level Issues in Organizations and Time, JAI Press, Oxford, pp. 11–58.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton-Rogers, R. (1995) Q methodology, in Smith, J.A., Harre, R. and van Langenhove, L. (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 178–192.
   Google Scholar
• Standifer, R. and Bluedorn, A. (2006) Alliance management teams and entrainment: sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations, 59(7), 903–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenner, P., Watts, S. and Worrell, M. (2008) Q methodology, in Willig, C. and Stainton-Rogers, W. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, Sage, London, pp. 215–39.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, R.J., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. and Milanovich, D.M. (1999) Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D. and Johnson, D.W. (1977) Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(6), 679–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trötschel, R., Huffmeier, J., Loschelder, D.D., Schwartz, K. and Gollwitzer, P.M. (2011) Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: when putting oneself into the opponent’s shoes helps to walk toward agreements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 771–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, M.J., Gupta, N. and Giambatista, R.C. (2004) Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance. Management Science, 50(11), 1534–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S. and Stenner, P. (2005) Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S. and Stenner, P. (2012) Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T., Danielson, S. and Tuler, S. (2009) Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research, Social and Environmental Research Institute, Greenfield, MA.
   Google Scholar