Developing a procurement path determination chart SEM-based approach

References

• Aibinu, A.A., Ling, F.Y.Y. and Ofori, G. (2011) Structural equation modelling of organizational justice and cooperative behaviour in the construction project claims process: contractors’ perspectives. Construction Management and Economics, 29(5), 463–481.10.1080/01446193.2011.564195
   Google Scholar
• Anumba, C.J. and Evbuomwan, N.F. (2002) Capturing Client Requirements in Construction Projects, Thomas Telford, London.10.1111/bjom.1999.10.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Bae, B. (2005) LISREL Structural Equation Model: Understanding and Application, Chunglam Publi., Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Baiden, B., Price, A. and Dainty, A. (2006) The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13–23.10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Bajari, P. and Tadelis, S. (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: a theory of procurement contracts. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387–407.10.2307/2696361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (2002) Decentralization of governance and development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205.10.1257/089533002320951037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M. (2007) On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 825–829.10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. Grice, A. and Brandon, P. (1990) Procurement systems for buildings, BSPProfessional Books, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, P., Basden, A., Hamilton, I. and Stockley, J. (1988) Expert Systems: The Strategic Planning of Construction Projects, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brochner, J. (1990) Impacts of information technology on the structure of construction. Construction Management and Economics, 8(2), 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C.T. (2007) Fuzzy procurement selection model for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 25(6), 611–618.10.1080/01446190701209933
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. P., Tam, C., Lam, K., and So, A. (1994) A multi-attribute approach for procurement selection: an Australian model, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Loughborough University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A.P., Yung, E.H., Lam, P.T., Tam, C. and Cheung, S. (2001) Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management & Economics, 19(7), 699–718.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C., and Ive, G. (2000) A comparison of two ways of applying transaction costs approach(I): methodological debates, Research Paper. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. and Ive, G. (2002) Rethinking the multi-attribute utility approach based procurement route selection technique. Construction Management and Economics, 20(3), 275–284.10.1080/01446190110117608
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S., Lam, T., Leung, M. and Wan, Y. (2001) An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method. Construction Management and Economics, 19(4), 427–437.10.1080/014461901300132401
   Google Scholar
• Cibinic, J. Jr, Nash, R.C. Jr and Nagle, J.F. (2006) Administration of Government Contracts, CCH Incorporated, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. (1937) The nature of the firm. Econometrica, 4(16), 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, N., Rajakaruna, R. and Bandara, K. (2008) Challenges faced by the construction industry in Sri Lanka: perspective of clients and contractors, School of the Built Environment, University of Salford. UK, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Building Resilience, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D. (2002) Surveys in Social Research, Psychology Press, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Isola, M., Licameli, J. and Arnold, C. (1998) How to form a decision matrix for selecting a project delivery system. Design-Build Strategies, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Dudkin, G. and Valila, T. (2005) Transaction Costs in Public-Private Partnerships: A First Look at the Evidence (H54, L33, C14), European Investment Bank, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, C.Frics. (2009) Quantity Surveyor’s Pocket Book, 1st edn, ELSEVIER, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R.G. (1981) Bureaucratic versus craft administration: the relationship of market structure to the construction firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 449–469.10.2307/2392517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edum-Fotwe, F. and McCaffer, R. (2000) Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 18(2), 111–124.10.1016/S0263-7863(98)90075-8
   Google Scholar
• Farajian, M. (2010) Transaction Cost Estimation Model for US Infrastructure Public Private Partnerships, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, J. (1990) Building Procurement Systems, Chartered Institute of Building, Englemere, Ascot.
   Google Scholar
• Gabre-Madhin, E.Z. (2001) Market Institutions: Transaction Costs and Social Capital in the Ethiopian Grain Market, Vol. 124, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC..
   Google Scholar
• Gebken, R.J. and Gibson, G.E. (2006) Quantification of costs for dispute resolution procedures in the construction industry. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132(3), 264–271.10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(264)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 186–192.10.2307/3172650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C.M. (1994) Choosing appropriate construction contracting method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(1), 196–210.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:1(196)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, M.C., Lee, H. and Ken, S.G. (2006) Strategy As Action: Competitive, Dynamics, and Competitive Advantage, OXFORD University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani, V. and Whang, S. (1991) The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P. and Page, M. (2007) Research Methods for Business, John Wiley & Sons Chichester, England.10.1016/0148-2963(94)00010-C
   Google Scholar
• Ho, P. and Tsui, C. (2009, 5-7 November) The transaction costs of Public-Private Partnerships: implications on PPP governance design, Presented at the meeting of the Lead 2009 Specialty Conference: Global Governance in Project Organisations, South Lake Tahoe, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J.E. (1996) A transaction cost approach to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 1(2), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, W.P., Hillebrandt, P., Greenwood, D.G. and Kwawu, W.E.K. (2006) Procurement in the Construction Industry: The Impact and Cost of Alternative Market and Supply Processes, Taypor and Francis, London.
   Google Scholar
• Inman, R.A., Sale, R.S., Green Jr, K.W. and Whitten, D. (2011) Agile manufacturing: relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobin, D. (2008) A transaction cost-based approach to partnership performance evaluation. Evaluation, 14(4), 437–465.10.1177/1356389008095487
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.Y., Han, S.H., Kim, H. and Park, H. (2009) Structuring the prediction model of project performance for international construction projects: a comparative analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1961–1971.10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, M. and Susong, M. (2006) The Construction Project: Phases, People, Terms, Paperwork, Processes, American Bar Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy, M.M. and Dissanayaka, S.M. (1998) Linking procurement systems to project priorities. Building Research & Information, 26(4), 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasch, R. and Janker, C.G. (2005) Supplier selection and controlling using multivariate analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(6), 409–425.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Arditi, D. and Wang, Z. (2012) Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Construction Management and Economics, 30(2), 151–164.10.1080/01446193.2012.655254
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Arditi, D. and Wang, Z. (2013) Factors that affect transaction costs in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 60–68.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, G. and Ryd, N. (2007) Clients’ goals and the construction project management process. Facilities, 25(3/4), 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A. (1994) From act to outcome-a cognitive model of construction procurement. In Proceedings of the CIB-W92 Procurement Systems Symposium, Hong Kong, 4–7 December, pp. 169–78.
   Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M. (2003) Essentials of Construction Project Management, NewSouth Publishing, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P., Skitmore, M. and Earl, G. (1998) Selecting a suitable procurement method for a building project. Construction Management and Economics, 16(2), 221–233.10.1080/014461998372501
   Google Scholar
• Luu, D.T., Ng, S.T. and Chen, S.E. (2003) Parameters governing the selection of procurement system - an empirical survey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(3), 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D.T. (1996) A Transaction Cost Framework for Evaluating Construction Project Organisations, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, A.A. (2005) Management Strategy: Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill, London.
   Google Scholar
• Melese, F. and Franck, R. (2005) A transaction cost economics view of DOD outsourcing, Naval Postgraduate School, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 2nd Annual Acquisition Research Symposium of the Naval Postgraduate School, California.
   Google Scholar
• Mincks, W.R. and Johnston, H. (2010) Construction Jobsite Management, Cengage Learning, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, K., Washington, S. and Diekmann, J. (2000) Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(4), 268–277.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:4(268)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morledge, R. and Smith, A. (2013). Building Procurement, John Wiley & Sons, IOWA.
   Google Scholar
• NEDO. (1985) Thinking about Building, National Economic Development Office. HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G.R. and Streiner, D.L. (2012) PDQ statistics, (Missouri, USA: Mosby. Year Book, 4(19).
   Google Scholar
• Pryke, S. and Pearson, S. (2006) Project governance: case studies on financial incentives. Building Research & Information, 34(6), 534–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.M. and Kumaraswamy, M.M. (2004) Contracting relationship trends and transitions. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(4), 147–161.10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:4(147)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reve, T. and Levitt, R.E. (1984) Organization and governance in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 2(1), 17–25.10.1016/0263-7863(84)90054-1
   Google Scholar
• Ryall, M.D. and Samspson, R.C. (2008) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: evidence from technology development projects. Management Science, 55(6), 906–925.
   Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn, R.J., Hunt, G.J. and Osborn, N.R. (2002) Organizational Behavior, 7th edn, New York, NY: JOHN WILEY & SONS.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (1990) Selection of appropriate project delivery system for construction projects, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the CIB W-90 International Symposium on Building Economics and Construction Management, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Skitmore, M. and Marsden, E. (1988) Which procurement systems? Towards a universal procurement selection technique. Construction Management & Economics, 6, 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Solino, A.S. and Gago de Santos, P. (2010) Transaction costs in transport public - private partnerships: comparing procurement procedures. Transport Reviews, 30(3), 389–406.10.1080/01441640903037941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. and Jackson, T. (2007) Sustainable procurement in practice: lessons from local government. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(3), 421–444.10.1080/09640560701261695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J.R. and Simister, S.J. (2001) Project contract management and a theory of organization. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), 457–464.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, S., and Ambrose, M. (1999) Procurement system evaluation in a changing construction environment CICE, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Proceedings of Conference on Construction Process Re-engineering, Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J.B. and Bentler, P.M. (2012) Structural equation modeling, in Handbook of Psychology, 2nd edn, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. and Pryke, S. (2009, 10-11 September). Role, dimensions, and degrees of incompleteness in construction contract documentationCOBRA, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Proceedings of the RICS Annual Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. and Rowlinson, S. (2007) Procurement Systems: A Cross-Industry Project Management Perspective, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. and Shen, Y.J. (2002) Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies. Construction Management & Economics, 20(1), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, J. (2008) The Transaction Cost Economies of Highway Project Delivery: Design-Build in Three States, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.10.1086/227496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. (1985) Assessing Contract. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1(1), 177–208.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E. (1998) Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De Economist, 146(1), 23–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M. (1989) The construction firm and the construction project: a transaction cost approach*. Construction Management and Economics, 7(4), 331–345.10.1080/01446198900000032
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M. (2001) Governing the project process: a conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics, 19(8), 799–808.10.1080/01446190110074264
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J.N. and Race, P. (2004) The Management of Service Operations, 2nd edn, Thomson, London.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Shen, G.Q., Ho, M., Drew, D.S. and Chan, A.P. (2009) Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), 337–348.10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.337-348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H. and Bentler, P.M. (2000) Three likelihood - based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar