Schedule health assessment of construction projects

References

• Association for Project Management. (2012) The Scheduling Maturity Model. APM, High Wycombe.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Project Management. (2015) APM Competence Framework. 2nd edn, v. 1.0, APM, High Wycombe.
   Google Scholar
• Birrell, G.S. (1980) Construction planning – beyond the critical path. Journal of the Construction Division American Society Civil Engineers, 106(3), 389–407.
   Google Scholar
• Bragadin, M.A. and Kahkonen, K. (2014) Schedule health assessment for construction projects. Proceedings ICEC IX World Congress Re-Engineering Total Cost Management, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bragadin M.A. and Kahkonen K. (2015) Safety, space and structure quality requirements in construction scheduling. Proceedings 8th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, M.T., Quackenbush, D.G. and Rowings, J.R. (1992) Construction Project Scheduling, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• De La Garza, J.M. (1990) Knowledge-elicitation study in construction scheduling domain. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 4(2), 135–53.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1990)4:2(135)
   Google Scholar
• De La Garza J.M., East E.W. and Yau N.J. 1990 A Knowledge Engineering Approach to Analysis and Evaluation of Construction Schedules. USACERL Tecnical Report P-90/07 (USACERL) February 1990, ASCE, Reston, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, E.E. (2006) Recommended Practice No. 14R-90: Responsibility and Required Skills for a Project Planning and Scheduling Professional, AACE International, Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, E.E. (2009) Recommended Practice No. 48R-06: Schedule Constructability Review, AACE International, Morgantown, WV.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, E.E. and Gransberg, D.D. (2009) Recommended Practice No. 30R-03: Implementing Project Constructability, AACE International.
   Google Scholar
• Dzeng, R.-J. and Lee, H-Y. (2000) Automated schedule advisory system, in Proceedings of the 17th ISARC, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Dzeng, R.-J. and Lee, H.-Y. (2004) Critiquing contractors’ scheduling by integrating rule-based and case-based reasoning. Automation in Construction, 13, 665–78.10.1016/j.autcon.2004.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzeng, R.-J. and Tommelein, I.D. (2004) Product modeling to support case-based construction planning and scheduling. Automation in Construction, 13, 341–60.10.1016/j.autcon.2003.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, P.D. (2005) CPM Scheduling and How the Industry Views Its Use, AACE International Transactions, Morgantown, WV.
   Google Scholar
• Gantt, H.L. (1913) Work, Wages and Profit, The Engineering Magazine Co., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, A.F. (2005) Scheduling practices and project success. AACE International Transactions. ( Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R.B. (1978) Precedence and Arrows Networking Techniques for Construction, Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, R. and Wearne, S. (2005) Problems and needs of project management in the process and other industries. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A4) 372–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand. (2008) Practice Note No. 13: Constructability, Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• International Project Management Association. (2006) ICB – IPMA Competence Baseline, Version 3.0. International Project Management Association, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, S. and Navon, R. (2014) Can project monitoring and control be fully automated? Construction Management and Economics, 32(6), 495–505.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2005) ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems - fundamentals and vocabulary, ISO, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Kenley, R. (2014) Editorial – Productivity improvement in the construction process. Construction Management and Economics, 32(6) 489–494.
   Google Scholar
• Kenley, R. and Seppanen, O. (2010) Location – Based Management for Construction: Planning, Scheduling and Control, Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, A. and Tucker, R.L. (1987) Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process. Construction Management and Economics, 5(3) 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, K. (2000) The Constructive Research Approach, available at www.metodix.com (accessed September 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, K. and Kasanen, E. (1995) The problem of generalizability: anecdotes and evidence in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(5), 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi, S.F. (2012) Assessment and Evaluation of Detailed Schedules in Building Construction, MSc Thesis, Concordia University, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi, S. F. and Moselhi, O. (2012) Schedule assessment and evaluation, in Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress 2012 , ASCE, Reston, VA, USA, pp. 535–544.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi, S.F. and Moselhi, O. (2014) Review of Detailed Schedules in Building Construction. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 6(3), 05014001-9.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J.J. and Plotnick, F.L. (2006) CPM in Construction Management, 6th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, J.P., Couillard, J. and Ferrand, D.J. (2000) Assessing and controlling the quality of a project end product: the earned quality method. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(1), 88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Program Management System Committee. (2012) Planning and Scheduling Excellence Guide (PASEG) v. 2.0, National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA), Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. (2007) Practice Standard for Scheduling, PMI Project Management Institute, Inc, Newton Square, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. (2013) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, PMI Project Management Institute, Inc, Newton Square, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A.D., Tran, N. and Staub-French, S. (2014) Searching for value: construction strategy exploration and linear planning. Construction Management and Economics, 32(6), 520–547.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A.D. and Udaipurwala, A. (2000) Assessing the quality of a construction schedule, in Proceedings of the Construction Congress VI: Building together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly complex World , ASCE, Reston, VA, USA, pp. 928–937.
   Google Scholar
• Uher, T.E. (2003) Programming and Scheduling Techniques, University of New South Wales Press Ltd, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. (2009) GAO Cost estimating and assessment guide, GAO-9-.3SP, U.S. GAO, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• United States Government Accountability Office. (2012) GAO Schedule Assessment guide, GAO-12-120G, U.S. GAOWashington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Defense Contract Management Agency. (2012) Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Program Analysis Pamphlet (PAP), U. S Department of Defense DCMA, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zwikael, O. and Globerson, S. (2004) Evaluating the quality of project planning: a model and field results. International Journal of Production Research, 42(8), 1545–56.10.1080/00207540310001639955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar