Liminal roles in construction project practice: exploring change through the roles of partnering manager, building logistic specialist and BIM coordinator

References

• Beech, N., 2011. Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human relations, 64 (2), 285–302.10.1177/0018726710371235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, T., et al., 2010. Projects-as-practice: in search of project management research that matters. Project management journal, 41 (1), 5–16.10.1002/pmj.v41:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, E. and Söderlund, J., 2015. Liminality competence: an interpretative study of mobile project worker’s conception of liminality at work. Management learning, 46 (3), 260–279.10.1177/1350507613516247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema, P., et al., 2017. Barriers and facilitators for BIM use among Swedish medium-sized contractors – “We wait until someone tells us to use it”. Visualization in engineering, 5 (3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Boudeau, C., 2013. Design team meetings and the coordination of expertise: the roof garden of a hospital. Construction management and economics, 31 (1), 78–89.10.1080/01446193.2012.738301
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., 2008. Social research methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Jahre, M., and Sward, A., 2010. Partnering relationships in construction: a literature review. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16 (4), 239–253.10.1016/j.pursup.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicmil, S., et al., 2006. Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. International journal of project management, 24 (8), 675–686.10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., and Rhodes, C., 2004. Noise, parasites and translation: theory and practice in management consulting. Management learning, 35 (1), 31–44.10.1177/1350507604041163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. and Mazza, C., 2003. Consulting as a liminal space. Human relations, 56 (3), 267–290.10.1177/0018726703056003612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainty, A., Moore, D., and Murray, M., 2006. Communication in construction, theory and practice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E., 2002a. Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of business research, 55 (7), 553–560.10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.E., 2002b. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management and economics, 20 (7), 621–631.10.1080/01446190210163543
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J. and Hak, T. 2008. Case study methodology in business research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 25–32.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekeskär, A. and Rudberg, M., 2016. Third-party logistics in construction: the case of a large hospital project. Construction management and economics, 34 (3), 174–191.10.1080/01446193.2016.1186809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E., 2010. Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? Construction management and economics, 28 (9), 905–917.10.1080/01446190903536422
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., 2002. Casting the other. Production and maintenance of inequality in organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A.M.M., 2012. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction management and economics, 30 (8), 653–671.10.1080/01446193.2012.668199
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, K., 1999. Betwixt and between: temporary employees as liminal subjects in flexible organizations. Organization studies, 20 (4), 601–617.10.1177/0170840699204004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkingson, N., et al., 2015. Building information modelling: the tide is turning. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers – structure and buildings, 168 (2), 81–93.10.1680/stbu.12.00045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluch, P., 2009. Unfolding roles and identities of professionals in construction projects: exploring the informality of practices. Construction management and economics, 27 (10), 959–968.10.1080/01446190903179728
   Google Scholar
• Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2015. New boundary spanners: emerging management roles in collaborative construction projects. Procedia economics and finance, 21, 146–153.10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00161-6
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, A., Thomassen, B., and Wydra, H., eds., 2015. Breaking boundaries: varieties of liminality. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2016. Organizing to avoid project overload: the use and risks of narrowing strategies in multi-project practice. International journal of project management, 34 (1), 94–101.10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30 (1), 57–79.10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of management review, 24 (4), 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J., 1976. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 12, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, L., 2005. Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of management studies, 42 (6), 1189–1121.10.1111/joms.2005.42.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, M. and Briody, E.K., 2016. Working in liminal states: fluidity and transformation in organizations. Journal of business anthropology, special issue, 2, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B., 1988. Case study research in education: a qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B., 2002. Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J., eds., 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Räisänen, C. and Löwstedt, M., 2014. Stakes and struggles in liminal spaces: construction practitioners interacting with management-consultants. Engineering project organization journal, 4 (2–3), 123–133.10.1080/21573727.2014.918033
   Google Scholar
• Ruikar, K., Koskela, L., and Sexton, M., 2009. Communities of practice in construction case study organisations: questions and insights. Construction innovation, 9 (4), 434–448.10.1108/14714170910995967
   Google Scholar
• Segerstedt, A. and Olofsson, T., 2010. Supply chains in the construction industry. Supply chain management: an international journal, 15 (5), 347–353.10.1108/13598541011068260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J. and Borg, E., 2017. Liminality in management and organization studies: process, position and place. International journal of management review, 00, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A. and Wright, C., 2011. The active client: the boundary-spanning roles of internal consultants as gatekeepers, brokers and partners of their external counterparts. Management learning, 42 (5), 485–503.10.1177/1350507611401536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A., et al., 2009. Between innovation and legitimation—boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy. Organization, 16 (5), 627–653.10.1177/1350508409338435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., 2011a. In the circuit of credibility: construction workers and the norms of ‘a good job’. Construction management and economics, 29 (2), 199–209.10.1080/01446193.2010.526623
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A., 2011b. The overworked site manager: gendered ideologies in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 29 (9), 943–955.10.1080/01446193.2011.588955
   Google Scholar
• Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., and Ziebro, M., 2016. Liminal roles as source of creative agency in management: the case of knowledge-sharing communities. Human relations, 69 (3), 781–811.10.1177/0018726715599585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V., 1967. The forest of symbols: aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V., 1980. Social dramas and stories about them. Critical inquiry, 7 (1), 141–168.10.1086/448092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V., 1982. From ritual to theatre: the human seriousness at play. New York, NY: Performing Arts Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Underthun, A. and Jordhus-Lier, D.C., 2018. Liminality at work in Norwegian hotels. Tourism and labour geographies, 20 (1), 11–28.10.1080/14616688.2017.1314546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vass, S. and Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2017. Challenges when implementing BIM for industry change. Construction management and economics, 35 (10), 597–610.10.1080/01446193.2017.1314519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R. and Koskela, L., 2000. The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European journal of purchasing & supply, 6 (3–4), 169–178.10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00013-7
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice, learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G., 2010. Managing construction projects. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Zika-Viktorsson, A., Sundström P., and Engwall, M., 2006. Project overload: an explanatory study of work and management in multi-project settings. International journal of project management, 24 (5), 385–394.10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.010
   Google Scholar