Integrating product and process design in construction

References

• Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 2003. Managing in an age of modularity. Managing in the modular age: architectures, networks, and organizations, 149, 84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., 1999. Work structuring. White Paper 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G., et al., 2001. Production system design in construction. In: G. Ballard and D. Chua, eds. 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Singapore: Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsen, S., et al., 2006. Critical flow – towards a construction flow theory. 14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Santiago, Chile, 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Court, P.F., et al., 2009. Modular assembly with postponement to improve health, safety, and productivity in construction. Practice periodical on structural design and construction, 14, 81–89. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2009)14:2(81).
   Google Scholar
• da Rocha, C., Formoso, C., and Tzortzopoulos, P., 2015. Adopting product modularity in house building to support mass customisation. Sustainability, 7, 4919–4937. doi:10.3390/su7054919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rocha, C.G. and Kemmer, S.L., 2013. Method to implement delayed product differentiation in construction of high-rise apartment building projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139, 5013001. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rocha, C.G. and Kemmer, S.L., 2015. Closure to “Method to Implement Delayed Product Differentiation in Construction of High-Rise Apartment Building Projects” by Cecília Gravina da Rocha and Sergio Luiz Kemmer. Journal of construction engineering and management, 141, 7014004. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rocha, C.G., Kemmer, S.L., and Meneses, L., 2016. Managing customization strategies to reduce workflow variations in house building projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142, 5016005. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, D. and Giannakis, M., 2011. An examination of a modular supply chain: a construction sector perspective. Supply chain management: an international journal, 16, 260–270. doi:10.1108/13598541111139071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenson, J.K., Prasad, G.J., and Zhang, Y., 2003. Product modularity: definitions and benefits. Journal of engineering design, 14, 295–313. doi:10.1080/0954482031000091068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, A. and Isack, F., 2003. Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers. Building research & information, 31, 146–160. doi:10.1080/09613210302000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., et al., 2016. Defining and categorizing modules in building projects: an international perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142, 4016062. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halman, J.I.M., Voordijk, J.T., and Reymen, I.M.M.J., 2008. Modular approaches in Dutch house building: an exploratory survey. Housing studies, 23, 781–799. doi:10.1080/02673030802293208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, E., Voordijk, H., and Halman, J., 2009. Matching supply networks to a modular product architecture in the house-building industry. Building research & information, 37, 31–42. doi:10.1080/09613210802628003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasanen, E., Lukka, K., and Siitonen, A., 1993. The constructive approach in management accounting research. Journal of management accounting research, 5, 243.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Krikke, H., le Blanc, I., and van de Velde, S., 2004. Product modularity and the design of closed-loop supply chains. California management review, 46, 23–39. doi:10.2307/41166208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R.M., Ogden, R.G., and Bergin, R., 2012. Application of modular construction in high-rise buildings. Journal of architectural engineering, 18, 148–154. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000057.
   Google Scholar
• Linner, T. and Bock, T., 2012. Evolution of large-scale industrialisation and service innovation in Japanese prefabrication industry. Construction innovation, 12, 156–178. doi:10.1108/14714171211215921.
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, K., 2003. The constructive research approach. In: L. Ojala and O.-P. Hilmola, eds. Case study research in logistics. Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Marchesan, P.R.C. and Formoso, C.T., 2001. Cost management and production control for construction companies. In: G. Ballard and D. Chua, eds. 9th annual conference of the international group for lean construction. Singapore: Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• March, S.T. and Smith, G.F., 1995. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15, 251–266. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad, A., et al., 2013. Use of modularization in design as a strategy to reduce component variety one-off projects. In: C.T. Formoso and P. Tzortzopoulos, eds. 21th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brazil, 289–298.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, A., Gehbauer, F., and Haghsheno, S., 2014. Improving the implementation of modularization and standardization of MEP systems in design. In: B.T. Kalsaas, L. Koskela, and T.A. Saurin, eds. 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway, 509–518.
   Google Scholar
• Nahmens, I. and Bindroo, V., 2011. Is customization fruitful in industrialized homebuilding industry? Journal of construction engineering and management, 137, 1027–1035. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, J.B., Naim, M.M. and Berry, D., 1999. Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International journal of production economics, 62, 107–118. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00223-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, W.J., et al., 2016. Advanced work packaging: from project definition through site execution (No. Research Report 272-12). Construction Industry Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Olhager, J., 2003. Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International journal of production economics, 85, 319–329. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00119-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., Gibb, A.G.F., and Sellars, A.B., 2008. Maintenance cost implications of utilizing bathroom modules manufactured offsite. Construction management and economics, 26, 1067–1077. doi:10.1080/01446190802422161.
   Google Scholar
• Piller, F. and Kumar, A., 2006. For each, their own: the strategic imperative of mass customization. Industrial engineer, 38, 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., 2016. What constitutes good production flow in construction? Construction management and economics, 34, 641–656. doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1200733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sako, M. and Murray, F., 1999. Modules in design, production, and use: implications for the global automobile industry. In: MIT IMVP Annual Sponsors Meeting. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2002. Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. Journal of operations management, 20, 549–575. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00027-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2002. How to mass customize: product architectures, sourcing configurations. Business horizons, 45, 61–69. doi:10.1016/S0007-6813(02)00228-8.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenwitz, M., Naim, M., and Potter, A., 2012. The nature of choice in mass customized house building. Construction management and economics, 30, 203–219. doi:10.1080/01446193.2012.664277.
   Google Scholar
• Spitler, L. and Wood, N., 2016. Work structuring at the boundary of realization: a case study analysis. In: 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., Riley, D.R., and Howell, G.A., 1999. Parade game: impact of work flow variability on trade performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, 125, 304–310. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(304).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, C.C.Y., 2005. Use of work structuring to increase performance of project-based production systems. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Tsao, C.C.Y. and Tommelein, I.D., 2004. Creating work structuring transparency in curtain wall design. In: S. Bertelsen and C.T. Formoso, eds. 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Helsingør, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Tsao, C.C.Y., et al., 2000. Case study for work structuring: installation of metal door frames. In: 8th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Brigthon, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tsao, C.C.Y., et al., 2004. Work structuring to achieve integrated product-process design. Journal of construction engineering and management, 130, 780–789. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(780).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaishnavi, V. and Kuechler, W., 2007. Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781420059335
   Google Scholar
• Van Aken, J.E., 2004. Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules: Paradigm of the design sciences. Journal of management studies, 41, 219–246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voordijk, H., Meijboom, B., and de Haan, J., 2006. Modularity in supply chains: a multiple case study in the construction industry. International journal of operations & production management, 26, 600–618. doi:10.1108/01443570610666966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R. and Koskela, L., 2000. The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 6, 169–178. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00013-7.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B. and Burns, N., 2003. Implications of postponement for the supply chain. International journal of production research, 41, 2075–2090. doi:10.1080/00207544031000077284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Burns, N.D., and Backhouse, C.J., 2004. Postponement: a review and an integrated framework. International journal of operations & production management, 24, 468–487. doi:10.1108/01443570410532542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar