How takt production contributes to construction production flow: a theoretical model

References

• Alhava, O., et al., 2019. Can a takt plan ever survive beyond the first contact with the trades on-site? 27th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 July 2019 Dublin, Ireland, 453–464.
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, D., Sikangwan, P., and Tokdemir, O.B., 2002. Scheduling system for high rise building construction. Construction management and economics, 20 (4), 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, G. and Howell, G., 1998. What kind of production is construction. 6th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 13–15 August Guarujá, Brazil, 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, H.G., 2000. The last planner system of production control. Doctoral dissertation. University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Binninger, M., Dlouhy, J., and Haghsheno, S., 2017a. Technical takt planning and takt control in construction. 25th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 9–12 July 2017 Heraklion, Greece, 605–612.
   Google Scholar
• Binninger, M., Dlouhy, J., and Haghsheno, S. 2019. Flow in takted projects – a practical analysis of flow and resource efficiency. 27th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 July 2019 Dublin, Ireland, 1271–1282.
   Google Scholar
• Binninger, M., et al., 2017b. Adjustment mechanisms for demand-oriented optimisation in takt planning and takt control. 25th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 9–12 July 2017 Heraklion, Greece, 613–620.
   Google Scholar
• Binninger, M., et al., 2018. Short takt time in construction – a practical study. 26th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 18–20 July 2018 Chennai, India, 1133–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Brodetskaia, I., Sacks, R., and Shapira, A., 2013. Stabilizing production flow of interior and finishing works with reentrant flow in building construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139 (6), 665–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and Clark, V. L. P., 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dlouhy, J., Binninger, M., and Haghsheno, S., 2019. Buffer management in takt planning – an overview of buffers in takt systems. 27th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 July 2019 Dublin, Ireland, 429–440.
   Google Scholar
• Dlouhy, J., et al., 2016. Three-level method of takt planning and takt control – a new approach for designing production systems in construction. 24th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 20–22 July 2016 Boston, USA, Sect. 2, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dlouhy, J., et al., 2018. Large scale project using takt planning and takt control-creating and sustaining multitasking flow. 26th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 18–20 July 2018 Chennai, India, 1334–1343.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50 (1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emiliani, M.L., and Seymour, P.J., 2011. Frank George Woollard: forgotten pioneer of flow production. Journal of management history, 17, 66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fiallo C.M. and Howell, G., 2012. Using production system design and takt time to improve project performance. 20th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 18–20 July 2012 San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Frandson, A.G. and Tommelein, I.D., 2014. Development of a takt-time plan: a case study. In Construction research congress 2014. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1646–1655.
   Google Scholar
• Frandson, A.G. and Tommelein, I.D., 2016. Takt time planning of interiors on a pre-cast hospital project. 24th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 20–22 July 2016 Boston, USA, Sect. 6, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Frandson, A.G., 2019. Takt time planning as a work structuring method to improve construction work flow. Doctoral dissertation. UC Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Frandson, A.G., Berghede, K., and Tommelein, I.D., 2013. Takt time planning for construction of exterior cladding. 21st annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 31 July–2 August 2013 Fortaleza, Brazil, 527–536.
   Google Scholar
• Frandson, A.G., Seppänen, O., and Tommelein, I.D., 2015. Comparison between location based management and takt time planning. 23rd annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 29–31 July 2015 Perth, Australia, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gardarsson, M.H., Lædre, O., and Svalestuen, F., 2019. Takt time planning in Porsche Consulting, the Boldt Company and Veidekke. 27th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 July 2019 Dublin, Ireland, 551–562.
   Google Scholar
• Haghsheno, S., et al., 2016. History and theoretical foundations of takt planning and takt control. 24th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 20–22 July 2016 Boston, USA, 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen, A. and Seppänen, O., 2016. Takt time planning in cruise ship cabin refurbishment: lessons for lean construction. 24th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 20–22 July 2016 Boston, USA, 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hopp, W. J., and Spearman, M. L., 2011. Factory physics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horman, M., and Kenley, R., 1998. Process dynamics: identifying a strategy for the deployment of buffers in building projects. International journal of logistics research and applications, 1 (3), 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Horman, M. J., 2000. Process dynamics: buffer management in building project operations. Doctoral dissertation. University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Horman, M.J., and Thomas, H.R., 2005. Role of inventory buffers in construction labor performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131 (7), 834–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, G., Ballard, G., and Hall, J., 2001. Capacity utilization and wait time: a primer for construction. 9th annual meeting of the international group for lean construction, 6–8 August 2001 Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Kala, T., Mouflard, C., and Seppänen, O., 2012. Production control using location-based management system on a hospital construction project. 20th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 18–20 July 2012 San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kenley, R., and Seppänen, O., 2010. Location-based management for construction: planning, scheduling and control. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 1992. Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Technical report (Vol. 72). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2000. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., 2004. Making-do – the eighth category of waste. 12th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 August 2004 Helsingor, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L. J., 1999. Management of production in construction: a theoretical view. 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. 26–28 July 1999 Berkeley, CA, USA, 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., Howell, G., Pikas, E., and Dave, B., 2014. If CPM is so bad, why have we been using it so long? 22nd annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 25–27 June 2014 Oslo, Norway, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L.J. and Vrijhoef, R., 2000. The prevalent theory of construction is a hindrance for innovation. 8th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 17–19 July 2000, Brigthon, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.R., 1993. Re-entrant lines. Queueing systems, 13 (1–3), 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Liker, J. K., 2005. The Toyota way. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Linnik, M., Berghede, K., and Ballard, G., 2013. An experiment in takt time planning applied to non-repetitive work. 21st annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 31 July–2 August 2013 Fortaleza, Brazil, 609–618.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. C., and Graves, S., 2008. Little’s law. In: D. Chhajed andT. Lowe, eds. Building intuition, international series, operations research and management science. New York, NY: Springer, 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsden, P., 1968. The line-of-balance method. Oxford: Pergamon Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, W., 1979. Project management and control (in the building industry). 2nd ed. Melbourne: Department of Architecture and Building, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Nezval, J., Olonschek, E., and Walter, R., 1960. Grundlagen der fliessfertigumg in der bauproduktion: bearb. von e. olonschek: aus dem Tschech (Fundamentals of flow production in construction). Berlin: Verlag für Bauwesen.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno, T., 1988. Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olivieri, H., et al., 2019. Survey comparing critical path method, last planner system, and location-based techniques. Journal of construction engineering and management, 145 (12), 04019077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri, H., Seppänen, O., and Denis Granja, A., 2018. Improving workflow and resource usage in construction schedules through location-based management system (LBMS). Construction management and economics, 36 (2), 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paez, O., et al., 2005. Moving from lean manufacturing to lean construction: toward a common sociotechnological framework. Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing and manufacturing, 15 (2), 233–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 1999. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34 (5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pe’er, S., 1974. Network analysis and construction planning. Journal of the construction division, 100, 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnick, F., and O’Brien, J., 2009. CPM in construction management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rother, M., Shook, J., and Womack, J. P., 2003. Learning to see: value stream mapping to add value and eliminate muda. A Lean tool kit method and workbook. Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A., and Wong, W., 1993. New generation of planning structures. Journal of construction engineering and management, 119 (2), 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., and Harel, M., 2006. An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behaviour. Construction management and economics, 24 (8), 869–881.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., and Partouche, R., 2010. Empire state building project: archetype of “mass construction.” Journal of construction engineering and management, 136 (6), 702–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., 2016. What constitutes good production flow in construction? Construction management and economics, 34 (9), 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., et al., 2017. Construction flow index: a metric of production flow quality in construction. Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmenner, R.W., and Swink, M.L., 1998. On theory in operations management. Journal of operations management, 17 (1), 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, O., 2009. Empirical research on the success of production control in building construction projects. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, O., Evinger, J., and Mouflard, C., 2014. Effects of the location-based management system on production rates and productivity. Construction management and economics, 32 (6), 608–624.
   Google Scholar
• Shingo, S., and Dillon, A. P., 1989. A study of the Toyota production system: from an industrial engineering viewpoint. New York, NY: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tetik, M., et al., 2019. Combining takt production with industrialized logistics in construction. 27th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 3–5 July 2019 Dublin, Ireland, 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• Tommelein, I.D., 2017. Collaborative takt time planning of non-repetitive work. 25th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 9–12 July 2017 Heraklion, Greece, 745–752.
   Google Scholar
• Uusitalo, P., et al., 2019. Applying level of detail in a BIM-based project: an overall process for lean design management. Buildings, 9 (5), 109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, C. P., et al., 2013. Benefits of batch size reduction: a case study in a residential project. 21st annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 31 July–2 August 2013 Fortaleza, Brazil, 1029–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Vatne, M.E. and Drevland, F., 2016. Practical benefits of using takt time planning: a case study. 24th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 20–22 July 2016 Boston, USA, Sect. 6, 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, C., and Friedman, D., 1998. Building the empire state. New York, NY: WW Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T., 2003. Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Woollard, F.G., and Morris, W.R., 1925. Morris production methods: system of continuous flow as applied to mechanical manufacture by Morris Engines (Coventry), Ltd. Machinery, 25, 773–803.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K., 2014. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar