Front-end value co-creation in housing development projects

References

• Adam, A., and Lindahl, G., 2017. Applying the dynamic capabilities framework in the case of a large public construction client. Construction management and economics, 35 (7), 420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, D., and Varey, R.J., 2006. Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing theory, 6 (3), 335–348.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, T., et al., 2010. Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project management journal, 41 (1), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and Kern, K., 2006. Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban studies, 43 (12), 2237–2259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caesar, C., 2016. Municipal land allocations: integrating planning and selection of developers while transferring public land for housing in Sweden. Journal of housing and the built environment, 31 (2), 257–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., et al., 2013. Reconceptualising mega project success in Australian Defence: Recognising the importance of value co-creation. International journal of project management, 31, 1139–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A., et al., 2014. Making innovation happen in a megaproject: London’s Crossrail suburban railway system. Project management journal, 45 (6), 25–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., and Gadde, L.E., 2002. Systemic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553–560.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri, P., and Skålén, P., 2011. Co-creation and co-destruction: a practice-theory based study of interactive formation. Marketing theory, 11 (3), 351–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edkins, A.E., et al., 2013. Exploring the front-end of project management. Engineering project organization journal, 3 (2), 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A., and McManus, S., 2007. Methodological Fit in Management Field Research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E., Leiringer, R., and Szentes, H., 2016. The role of co- creation in enhancing explorative and exploitative learning in project-based settings. Project management journal, 48 (4), 22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12 (2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, M., 2019. Co-creation and co-destruction of experiential value: a service perspective in projects. Built environment project and asset management, 9 (1), 100–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, M., Smyth, H., and Davies, A., 2019. Co-creation of value outcomes: a client perspective on service provision in projects. International journal of project management, 37 (5), 696–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, P.D., and Simmons, J.E.L., 1995. Case explorations in construction conflict management. Construction management and economics, 13, 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Geraldi, J., and Söderlund, J., 2018. Project studies: what it is, where it is going. International journal of project management, 36 (1), 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C., 2012. Conceptualising value co-creation: a journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of marketing management, 28 (13–14), 1520–1534.
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C., 2017. On value and value creation in service: a management perspective. Journal of creating value, 3 (2), 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G., 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational technology research and development, 29 (2), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., Reymen, I.M.M.J., and Van Oosterom, G., 2008. Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients. Building research & information, 36 (5), 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havenvid, M.I., et al., 2016. Renewal in construction projects: tracing effects of client requirements. Construction management and economics, 34 (11), 790–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellgren, B., and Stjernberg, T., 1995. Design and Implementation in major investments – a project network approach. Scandinavian journal of management, 11 (4), 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. and Cicmil. S., eds. 2006. Making projects critical. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ivory, C., 2005. The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client-focused construction industry? Construction management and economics, 23 (8), 861–870.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, M., and Roth, P., 2014. Towards a shift in mindset: partnering projects as engagement platforms. Construction management and economics, 32 (5), 419–432.
   Google Scholar
• Kalbro, T., and Lindgren, E., 2018. Markexploatering. 6th ed. Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Karrbom Gustavsson, T., and Hallin, A., 2015. Goal seeking and goal oriented projects – trajectories of the temporary organization. International journal of managing projects in business, 8 (2), 368–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, M., and Svejvig, P., 2016. Taking stock of project value creation: a structured literature review with future directions for research and practice. International journal of project management, 34 (4), 736–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H., and Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2020. Public clients ability to drive industry change: the case of implementing BIM. Construction Management and Economics.   https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1807032.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A.M.M., Fellows, R., and Chan, I.Y.S., 2014. Fostering value co-creation in construction: a case study of an airport project in India. International journal of architecture, engineering and construction, 3 (2), 120–130.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2019. The co-creation of values-in-use at the front end of infrastructure development programs. International journal of project management, 37 (5), 684–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, M., Nguyen, B.T., and Denis, N., 2000. An investigation into the merits of encouraging conflict in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 18 (4), 447–456.
   Google Scholar
• Luotola, H., et al., 2017. Embracing uncertainty in value-based selling by means of design thinking. Industrial marketing management, 65, 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M.M., Vuorinen, L., and Killen, C., 2019. Lifecycle-oriented framing of value at the front end of infrastructure projects. International journal of managing projects in business, 12 (3), 617–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, C., 2011. Conflicts and value co-creation in project networks. Industrial marketing management, 40, 1377–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, G.R.W., and Razmdoost, K., 2016. Managing value co-creation/destruction: a longitudinal education capital programme/project case study. Construction management and economics, 34 (4–5), 286–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näsholm, M.H., and Blonquist, T., 2015. Co-creation as a strategy for program management. International journal of managing projects in business, 8 (1), 58–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrinelli, S., 1997. Programme management: organising project-based change. International journal of project management, 15 (3), 141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C.K., and Ramaswamy, V., 2004. Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18 (3), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A., 2015. Managing conflict in organizations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M.A., 1983. A measure of styles of handling inter- personal conflict. Academy of management journal, 26 (2), 368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samset, K., and Volden, G.H., 2016. Front-end definition of projects: Ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance. International journal of project management, 34, 297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skålen, P., et al., 2015. Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43 (2), 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedby, N., 2016. Assessing local governance experiments for building energy efficiency – the case of Malmö. Environment and planning C: government and policy, 34 (2), 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedby, N., and Quitzau, M.B., 2016. Municipal governance and sustainability: the role of local governments in promoting transitions. Environmental policy and governance, 26 (5), 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, H., et al., 2016. Editorial for the special issue on business development and marketing in construction. Construction management and economics, 34 (4–5), 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, H., Lecoeuvre, L., and Vaesken, P., 2018. Co-creation of value and the project context: towards application on the case of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power. International journal of project management, 36 (1), 170–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J., 2004. On the broadening scope of the research on projects: a review and a model for analysis. International journal of project management, 22 (8), 655–667.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R., 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholms Stad 2017. Sustainable urban development programme; Stockholm Royal Seaport is leading the way to a sustainable future. Stockholm: City of Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vaaland, T.I., and Håkansson, H., 2003. Exploring interorganizational conflict in complex projects. Industrial marketing management, 32, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., and Lusch, R.F., 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., and Lusch, R.F., 2008. Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36 (1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., 2011. It’s all B2B…and beyond: toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial marketing management, 40 (2), 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennström, A., and Eriksson, P.-E., 2010. Client perceived barriers to change of the construction process. Construction innovation, 10 (2), 126–137.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, M., and Szczepanek, T., 2008. Projects and programmes as value creation processes: a new perspective and some practical implications. International journal of project management, 26 (1), 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., 2014. Thinking interpretively: Philosophical presuppositions and the human science. In D. Yanow, and P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: empirical research and the interpretive turn, 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 5–26.
   Google Scholar