A critical inquiry into the hyperreality of digitalization in construction

References

• Anderson, M., 2003. Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artificial intelligence, 149 (1), 91–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autodesk (2007), Parametric building modeling: BIM's foundation. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/5879710/REVIT_BUILDING_INFORMATION_MODELING_Parametric_Building_Modeling_BIMs_Foundation [Accessed 26 November 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, A., 2014. Aristotle's theory of abstraction. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bafna, S., 2008. How architectural drawings work—and what that implies for the role of representation in architecture. Journal of architecture, 13 (5), 535–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J., 1994. Simulacra and simulation, Sheila Glaser (Trans). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booker, P.J., 1979. A history of engineering drawing. Northgate: Bury St Edmunds.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., and Madzima, S., 2017. Exploring conflicting views of time in construction projects. CIB International Conference, Salford.
   Google Scholar
• Braimah, N., 2013. Construction delay analysis techniques—a review of application issues and improvement needs. Buildings, 3, 506–531.
   Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J., 2009. Construction metaphors in Aristotle: knowledge, purpose, process. Construction management and economics, 27 (5), 515–523.
   Google Scholar
• BS 1192. 2007. Collaborative production of architectural, engineering and construction information. Code of practice. London: British Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN ISO 19650. 2018. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling – Information management using building information modelling: Concepts and principles. International Organisation for Standarisation, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P (2012) Constructing a sense of time in projects: Implications of a Bergsonian view of time. In: S.D. Smith, ed. Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3–5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 497–507.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., 1981. Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Çıdık, M.S., Boyd, D., and Thurairajah, N., 2017. Ordering in disguise: digital integration in built environment practices. Building research & information, 45 (6), 665–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainty, A., et al., 2017. BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective. Building research & information, 45 (6), 696–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalova M. (2018), The ‘digital twin’ – a bridge between the physical and the digital world, CoBuilder 15th July. https://cobuilder.com/en/the-digital-twin-a-bridge-between-the-physical-and-the-digital-world/. [Accessed 11 September 20].
   Google Scholar
• Dossick, C.S., and Neff, G., 2011. Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaboration using Building Information Modelling. Engineering project organization journal, 1 (2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Dotov, D.G., Nie, L., and De Wit, M.M., 2012. Understanding affordances: history and contemporary development of Gibson’s central concept. Avant: the journal of the philosophical-interdisciplinary vanguard, 3 (2), 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., 1992. What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. New York: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eves, H. 1990. An Introduction to the History of Mathematics, 6th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., 2016. The 4th revolution: how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., 2014. Getting real about BIM: Critical realist descriptions as an alternative to the naïve framing and multiple fallacies of hype. International journal of managing projects in business, 7 (3), 405–422.
   Google Scholar
• Gade, P.N., et al., 2019. A holistic analysis of a BIM-mediated building design process using activity theory. Construction management and economics, 37 (6), 336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giunchiglia, F., and Walsh, T., 1992. A theory of abstraction. Artificial intelligence journal, 56 (2–3), 323–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanville, R., 2015. A (cybernetic) musing: wholes and parts, chapter. Cybernetics and human knowing, 22 (1), 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H., 1960. Art and illusion: a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Franco, M., and Lanier, J., 2017. Model of illusions and virtual reality. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K., and Georg, S., 2018. Energy performance gaps: promises. Building research & information, 46 (1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandy, G., and Mills, A., 2004. Strategy as simulacra? A radical and reflexive look at the discipline and practice of strategy. Journal of management studies, 41/ (7), 1153–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnad, S., 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena, 42, 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. 2019. As important as the internet: Are digital twins the next big thing for construction? Building magazine, 13 November 2019, London.Available at https://www.building.co.uk/digital-transformation/as-important-as-the-internet-are-digital-twins-the-next-big-thing-for-construction/5102682.article#:∼:text=Its%20primary%20function%20and%20benefits,performance%20and%20sustainability%3B%20and%20using [accessed 23-03-21].
   Google Scholar
• Harty C.,2005. Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building research & information, 33 (6), 512–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa, S. I., 1990. Language in thought and action. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Inc.
   Google Scholar
• HM Gov. 2013. Construction 2025: industrial strategy for construction - government and industry in partnership, BIS/13/955, Dept. of Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
   Google Scholar
• HM Gov. 2015. Digital built britain level 3, building information modelling - strategic plan,URN BIS/15/155, Dept. of Business, Innovation and Skills, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, T., Langevin, J., and Sun, K., 2018. Building simulation: ten challenges. Building Simulation, 11, 871–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellings, D., 2017. Is a single source of truth a prerequisite for Level 3 BIM?, 5 February BIM+, CIOB. Available from: https://www.bimplus.co.uk/people/single-source-truth-prerequisite-level-3-bim/ [accessed 26 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, N., et al., 2010. Putting it in context: the use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative research, 10 (2), 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P.N., 2010. Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 107 (43), 18243–18250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G., 1955. The psychology of personal constructs. (2 vols.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kensek, K., 2014. Building information modeling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khajavi, S.H., et al., 2019. Digital twin: vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE Access, 7, 147406–147419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., 1998. A critique of Baudrillard’s hyperreality: towards a sociology of postmodernism. Philosophy & social criticism, 24 (6), 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Korzybski, A., 1933. Science and Sanity, an introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Lancaster, PA: International Non-Aristotelian Library.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, J., and Fischer, M., 2020. Virtual design and construction. Construction management and economics, 38 (4), 355–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, O., 2016. Building it twice, once virtually, Press Release, 24th February. Available from: https://www.laingorourke.com/media/news-releases/2016/building-it-twice-once-virtually.aspx, [accessed 26 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1999. Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1986. Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes. In: Knowledge and society - studies in the sociology of culture past and present, 6, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P., 2012. Car crashes without cars: lessons about simulation technology and organizational change from automotive design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Burtler, J., 2010. Universal principles of design. Beverly, MA: Rockport.
   Google Scholar
• Mahamadu, A.-M., et al., 2019. Building information modelling (BIM) capability and delivery success on construction projects. Construction innovation, 19 (2), 170–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D., 2009. Concepts of space and power in theory and in political practice. Doc. Anàl. Geogr, 55, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. 2017. Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Merschbrock, C., and Figueres-Munoz, A., 2015. Circumventing obstacles in digital construction design‐a workaround theory perspective. Procedia economics and finance, 21, 247–255.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., and Paavola, S., 2014. Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Automation in construction, 43, 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., 2000. The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems. Journal of the operational research society, 51 (11), 1256–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pbctoday (2019), Survey reveals promising results for mainstream digital twin usage, 1st March, BIM News. Available from: https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/bim-news/mainstream-digital-twin-usage/53285/ [Accessed 26 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C.S., 1955. Philosophical writing of Peirce, J. Bulcher, Ed.; New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., 1929. The child's conception of the world. New York: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, G., 2018. Abstract Objects. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2009/entries/abstract-objects/
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., and Williams, P. 2013. Financial management in construction contracting. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saitta, L., and Zucker, J.-D., 2013. Abstraction in artificial intelligence and complex systems. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. S., 1995. A beginner's guide to constructing the universe: mathematical archetypes of nature, art, and science. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A., and Baranfeld, M., 1969. Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving. Psychological review, 76, 473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styre, A., 2017. Thinking about materiality: the value of a construction management and engineering view. Construction management and economics, 35 (1-2), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S., 2009. Simulation and its discontents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S., and Davies, S.-J., 2014. Examining hybrid digital/material resources in networked learning: a critical realist approach. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014, pp. 315–322. Available from: file:///C:/Users/id001697/Downloads/Examining%20hybrid%20digital%20material%20resources%20in%20networked.pdf [Accessed 27 February 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N., 1925/1967. Science and the modern world. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2013. Beyond the computer: changing medium from digital to physical. Information and organization, 23 (1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar