Reconfiguring the construction value chain: analysing key sources of friction in the business model archetypes of AEC companies in strategic partnerships

References

• Abuzeinab, A., Arif, M., & Thompson, W. (2014). Green business models in the UK construction sector: Empirical study. In: Iie Annual Conference and Expo 2014, Montréal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Abuzeinab, A., Arif, M., and Qadri, M.A., 2017. Barriers to MNEs green business models in the UK construction sector: An ISM analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 160, 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R., and Zott, C., 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic management journal, 22 (6/7), 493–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle [350 BCE, trans. Jowett, B.] 1999. Politics. Ontario: Batoche books.
   Google Scholar
• Awuzie, B., and McDermott, P., 2017. An abductive approach to qualitative built environment research: A viable system methodological exposé. Qualitative research journal, 17 (4), 356–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badi, S., and Murtagh, N., 2019. Green supply chain management in construction: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of cleaner production, 223, 312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-de Vos, M., Wamelink, J.W.F.H., and Volker, L., 2016. Trade-offs in the value capture of architectural firms: the significance of professional value. Construction management and economics, 34 (1), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-De Vos, M., Volker, L., & Wamelink, H. (2016). Real estate development by architectural firms: Is the business model future-proof? In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2016. Manchester, UK: ARCOM, 1049–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Bos-De Vos, M., & Volker, L. (2017). Constructing business models around identity: Tensions in architectural firms. In: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Arcom - 33rd Annual Conference 2017, Proceeding p. 491–500. Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, D., 2003. Management of procurement. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, T., Davies, A., and Gann, D., 2005. Can integrated solutions business models work in construction? Building research & information, 33 (6), 571–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brege, S., Stehn, L., and Nord, T., 2014. Business models in industrialized building of multi-storey houses. Construction management and economics, 32 (1–2), 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Jahre, M., and Swärd, A., 2010. Partnering relationships in construction: A literature review. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16 (4), 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P., 2011. Engineering project organization: defining a line of inquiry and a path forward. Engineering project organization journal, 1 (1), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C.M., Bartman, T., and Van Bever, D., 2016. The hard truth about business model innovation. Harvard business review, 58 (1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A.A., and Tavares, L.V., 2012. Social e-business and the Satellite Network model: Innovative concepts to improve collaboration in construction. Automation in construction, 22 (SI), 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, N., et al., 2016. Developing a sustainable housing marketplace: New business models to optimize value generation from retrofit. International journal for housing science and its applications, 40 (3), 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14 (4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E., 2013. Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies. International journal of project management, 31 (3), 333–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E.R.E., 2010. Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? Construction management and economics, 28 (9), 905–917.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, R., and Liu, A.M.M., 2012. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: Addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction management and economics, 30 (8), 653–671.
   Google Scholar
• Fielt, E., 2013. Conceptualising business models: definitions, frameworks and classifications. Journal of business models, 1 (1), 85–105.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, N., and Gottlieb, S.C., 2019. Hybrid organisational arrangements and the role of multimodality. In: ARCOM 2019 Conference. Leeds, UK: ARCOM, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, N., Fredslund, L., and Gottlieb, S.C., 2019. The hybridity of strategic partnerships and construction supply chain management. 10th Nordic conference on construction economics and organization, 2, 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gadde, L.-E., and Dubois, A., 2010. Partnering in the construction industry-Problems and opportunities. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16 (4), 254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, S.C., et al., 2020. Hybrid organisations as trading zones: responses to institutional complexity in the shaping of strategic partnerships. Construction management and economics, 38 (7), 603–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M., Whyte, J.K., and Lessing, J., 2020. Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms: a comparative case study. Construction management and economics, 38 (4), 322–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, Ł., 2009. The history of transaction cost economics and its recent developments. Erasmus journal for philosophy and economics, 2 (1), 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J., et al., 2019. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP, 80, 619–624.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government 2018. Industrial Strategy - Construction Sector Deal. Policy paper - Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, D., 2009. Sense-making across collaborating disciplines in the early stages of architectural design. PhD (Embedded Practice), RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Höök, M., Stehn, L., and Brege, S., 2015. The development of a portfolio of business models: a longitudinal case study of a building material company. Construction management and economics, 33 (5–6), 334–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y., et al., 2019. Business models and performance of international construction companies. Sustainability, 11 (9), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M., and Kagermann, H., 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard business review, 86 (12), 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, T., Gluch, P., Stiller, N., & Femenías, P. (2017). Developing a business model for sustainable renovation of public housing. In: 9th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization. Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A., Thomassen, M. A., and Jørgensen, M. N., 2013. Long term strategic collaboration in the construction industry. Denmark: Realdania.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, R., Levitt, R. E., and Sheffer, D., 2018. Systemic innovation of complex one-off products: The case of green buildings. In: Advances in strategic management Vol. 40. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. p. 299–328.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.K., and Min, S., 2015. Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business modelbenefit an incumbent? Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 9 (1), 34–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interview: det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndvaerk. Hans Reitzels Forlag. Retrieved from https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/2265486154
   Google Scholar
• Laan, A., Voordijk, H., and Dewulf, G., 2011. Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance. International journal of managing projects in business, 4 (4), 660–679.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30 (1), 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, E., Alhava, O., Peltokorpi, A., & Seppänen, O. (2017). Platform ecosystems: Unlocking the subcontractors’ business model opportunities. In: IGLC 2017 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, II(July), Heraklion, Greece, 177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M., 1994. Constucting the team: joint review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the United Kingdom construction industry. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, J., and Brege, S., 2018. Industrialized building companies’ business models: multiple case study of Swedish and north American companies. Journal of construction engineering and management, 144 (2).DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., and Li, S., 2016. Business models for foreign firms offering construction-related consultancy services in China. Construction management and economics, 34 (4–5), 218–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhlesian, S., and Holmén, M., 2012. Business model changes and green construction processes. Construction management and economics, 30 (9), 761–775.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., Steen, E., and Haugbølle, K., 2010. Byggeriets Produktivitet Udvikling i boligbyggeriets standard. Dokumentationsrapport 2.
   Google Scholar
• Nußholz, J.L.K., Nygaard Rasmussen, F., and Milios, L., 2019. Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy. Resources, conservation and recycling, 141, 308–316. (March 2018),
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., 2004. The Business Model Ontology - a proposition in a design science approach. Lausanne, Switzerland: Universite de lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Pekuri, A., Pekuri, L., and Haapasalo, H., 2013. The role of business models in finnish construction companies. Construction economics and building, 13 (3), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rajakallio, K., et al., 2017. Business model renewal in context of integrated solutions delivery: a network perspective. International journal of strategic property management, 21 (1), 72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., 2008. The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic change, 17 (5–6), 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, D., Flores, M., Vallejo, C., & Molina, A. (2016). Towards a novel living Lab Model for sustainable innovation in the construction industry. In: 2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference, ICE 2009. Leiden, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A., 2008. Research methods for business students. United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, A., 2012. Managing Green Business Model Transformations, Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management. Managing Green Business Model Transformations. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Staykova, G., and Underwood, J., 2017. Assessing collaborative performance on construction projects through knowledge exchange A UK rail strategic alliance case study. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 24 (6), 968–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., and Timmermans, S., 2014. Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D.J., 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43 (2–3), 172–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen, M. A., 2004. The economic organisation of building processes. Lyngby, Denmark: DTU Byg.
   Google Scholar
• UKRI. (2021). Transforming construction challenge. [Accessed 18 March 2021], Available from: https://www.ukri.org/our-work/our-main-funds/industrial-strategy-challenge-fund/clean-growth/transforming-construction-challenge/
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O.E., 1989. Chapter 3 Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135–182.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Hwang, B.G., and Lu, Q., 2018. Typology of business model innovations for delivering zero carbon buildings. Journal of cleaner production, 196, 1213–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Pan, W., and Lu, W., 2016. Business model innovation for delivering zero carbon buildings. Sustainable cities and society, 27 (2016), 253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar