456
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparative analysis of outcomes under PPP and traditional modes of delivery: a study of schools in Melbourne

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 894-911 | Received 03 Mar 2021, Accepted 12 Oct 2021, Published online: 05 Nov 2021

References

  • Agasisti, T., and Longobardi, S., 2014. Inequality in education: can Italian disadvantaged students close the gap? Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 52, 8–20.
  • Alexander, W.R.J., Haug, A.A., and Jaforullah, M., 2010. A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. Journal of productivity analysis, 34 (2), 99–110.
  • Alspaugh, J., 2004. School size as a factor in elementary school achievement. ERS spectrum, 22 (2), 28–34.
  • Alspaugh, J.W., and Harting, R.D., 1995. Transition effects of school grade-level organization on student achievement. Journal of research & development in education, 28 (3), 145–149.
  • Barrett, N., and Toma, E.F., 2013. Reward or punishment? Class size and teacher quality. Economics of education review, 35, 41–52.
  • Berman, J.D., et al., 2018. School environmental conditions and links to academic performance and absenteeism in urban, mid-Atlantic public schools. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 221 (5), 800–808.
  • Blackburn, V., Brennan, S., and Ruggiero, J., 2014. Measuring efficiency in Australian schools: a preliminary analysis. Socio-economic planning sciences, 48 (1), 4–9.
  • Bovaird, T., 2010. A brief intellectual history of the public-private partnership movement. In: G.A. Hodge, C. Greve, and A.E. Boardman, eds. International handbook on public-private partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 43–67.
  • Buddin, R., and Zamarro, G., 2009. Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of urban economics, 66 (2), 103–115.
  • Carbonara, N., and Pellegrino, R., 2018. Revenue guarantee in public–private partnerships: a win–win model. Construction management and economics, 36 (10), 584–598.
  • Chakraborty, K., and Blackburn, V.C., 2013. Efficiency and equity in funding for government schools in Australia. Australian Economic Papers, 52 (3–4), 127–142.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2 (6), 429–444.
  • Chowdhury, N., Chen, P.H., and Tiong, R.L.K., 2011. Analysing the structure of public-private partnership projects using network theory. Construction management and economics, 29 (3), 247–260.
  • Conroy, S.J., and Arguea, N.M., 2008. An estimation of technical efficiency for Florida public elementary schools. Economics of education review, 27 (6), 655–663.
  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., and Tone, K., 2007. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software: Second edition. New York: Springer.
  • Cryan, J.R., et al., 1992. Success outcomes of full-day kindergarten: more positive behavior and increased achievement in the years after. Early childhood research quarterly, 7 (2), 187–203.
  • Dancer, D., and Blackburn, V., 2017. What are the effective public schools? Insights from New South Wales’ secondary schools using a Stochastic Frontier Analysis with a panel dataset. Australian journal of education, 61 (2), 141–163.
  • Department of Education, 2009. Partnerships Victoria in Schools Project Summary Prepared by the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development in conjunction with the Department of Treasury and Finance. Melbourne: Department of Education. Available at: www.partnerships.vic.gov.au [accessed 28 February 2021].
  • Department of Education, 2016. New schools PPP project. Melbourne: Department of Education. Available at: www.dtf.vic.gov.au [accessed: 28 February 2021].
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., and Thoreson, A., 2001. Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23 (1), 57–77.
  • Dolan, R.C., and Schmidt, R.M., 1987. Assessing the impact of expenditure on achievement: some methodological and policy considerations. Economics of education review, 6 (3), 285–299.
  • Dorward, P. N., 2009. A study of the relationship between principal leadership style and student achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Earthman, G., 1996. Review of research on the relationship between school buildings, student achievement, and student behavior. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Educational Facility Planners, International.
  • Elliott, K.M., and Shin, D., 2002. Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of higher education policy and management, 24 (2), 197–209.
  • Emrouznejad, A., and Yang, G., 2018. A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-economic planning sciences, 61, 4–8.
  • Erdogdu, F., and Erdogdu, E., 2015. The impact of access to ICT, student background and school/home environment on academic success of students in Turkey: an international comparative analysis. Computers and education, 82, 26–49.
  • Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series A (general), 120 (3), 253–290.
  • Finn, J.D., and Achilles, C.M., 1990. Answers and questions about class size: a statewide experiment. American educational research journal, 27 (3), 557–577.
  • Fetler, M., 2001. Student mathematics achievement test scores, droupout rates, and teacher characteristics. Teacher education quarterly, 28 (1), 151–168.
  • Førsund, F.R., and Sarafoglou, N., 2002. On the origins of data envelopment analysis. Journal of productivity analysis, 17, 23–40.
  • Geng, L., et al., 2020. Reliability-based decision support framework for major changes to social infrastructure PPP contracts. Applied sciences, 10 (21), 7659.
  • Gershberg, A.I., and Schuermann, T., 2001. The efficiency-equity trade-off of schooling outcomes: public education expenditures and welfare in Mexico. Economics of education review, 20 (1), 27–40.
  • Goldhaber, D.D., and Brewer, D.J., 1997. Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. The journal of human resources, 32 (3), 505–523.
  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., and Laine, R.D., 1996. The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of educational research, 66 (3), 361–396.
  • Hanushek, E.A., 1997. Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 19 (2), 141–164.
  • Hanushek, E.A., and Rivkin, S.G., 2006. Teacher quality. Handbook of the economics of education, 2, 1051–1078.
  • Hanushek, E.A., and Woessmann, L., 2017. School resources and student achievement: a review of cross-country economic research. In: M. Rosén, K.Y. Hansen, and U. Wolff, eds. Cognitive abilities and educational outcomes. Cham: Springer, 149–171.
  • Harris, D.N., and Sass, T.R., 2011. Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of public economics, 95 (7–8), 798–812.
  • Harrison, J., and Rouse, P., 2014. Competition and public high school performance. Socio-economic planning sciences, 48 (1), 10–19.
  • Javier, J.R., et al., 2016. Parenting intervention for prevention of behavioral problems in elementary school-age Filipino-American children: a pilot study in churches. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics, 37 (9), 737.
  • Jehangir, K., Glas, C.A., and van den Berg, S., 2015. Exploring the relation between socio-economic status and reading achievement in PISA 2009 through an intercepts-and-slopes-as-outcomes paradigm. International journal of educational research, 71, 1–15.
  • Johnes, G., and Virmani, S., 2020. The efficiency of private and public schools in urban and rural areas: moving beyond the development goals. International transactions in operational research, 27 (4), 1869–1885.
  • Johnes, J., 2015. Operational research in education. European journal of operational research, 243 (3), 683.
  • Kantabutra, S., 2012. Relating shared vision components to Thai public school performance. Journal of applied business research, 28 (6), 1159–1170.
  • Katharaki, M., and Katharakis, G., 2010. A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International journal of educational research, 49 (4–5), 115–128.
  • Kirjavainen, T., and Loikkanent, H.A., 1998. Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: an application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of education review, 17 (4), 377–394.
  • Kleinfeld, J. S., Mcdiarmid, G. W., and Hagstrom, D., 1985. Alaska’s small rural high schools are they working? ISER Report Series No. 58.
  • Kordi, N.E., Belayutham, S., and Che Ibrahim, C.K.I., 2021. Mapping of social sustainability attributes to stakeholders’ involvement in construction project life cycle. Construction management and economics, 39 (6), 513–532.
  • Lee, B.L., Worthington, A., and Wilson, C., 2019. Learning environment and primary school efficiency: a DEA bootstrap truncated regression analysis. International journal of educational management, 33 (4), 678–697.
  • Leung, M.Y., and Fung, I., 2005. Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviors of students. Facilities, 23 (13/14), 585–594.
  • Liouaeddine, M., Elatrachi, M., and Karam, E.M., 2018. The analysis of the efficiency of primary schools in Morocco: modelling using TIMSS database (2011). The journal of North African studies, 23 (4), 624–647.
  • Liu, J., et al., 2014. Public-Private Partnerships: a review of theory and practice of performance measurement. International journal of productivity and performance management, 63 (4), 499–512.
  • McGiverin, J., Gilman, D., and Tillitski, C., 1989. A meta-analysis of the relation between class size and achievement. The elementary school journal, 90 (1), 47–56.
  • Memon, S., Goswami, P., and Memon, I.A., 2016. Effects of schooling and parental education on student’s achievement in medical entrance test. Journal of Liaquat university of medical and health sciences, 15 (03), 116–120.
  • Miningou, É.W., and Vierstraete, V., 2013. Households' living situation and the efficient provision of primary education in Burkina Faso. Economic modelling, 35, 910–917.
  • Monk, D.H., 1994. Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of education review, 13 (2), 125–145.
  • Narbaev, T., De Marco, A., and Orazalin, N., 2020. A multi-disciplinary meta-review of the public–private partnerships research. Construction management and economics, 38 (2), 109–125.
  • Nyhan, R.C., and Alkadry, M.G., 1999. The impact of school resources on student achievement test scores. Journal of education finance, 25 (2), 211–227.
  • O’shea, C., Palcic, D., and Reeves, E., 2019. Comparing PPP with traditional procurement: the case of schools procurement in Ireland. Annals of public and cooperative economics, 90 (2), 245–267.
  • Okpala, C.O., Okpala, A.O., and Smith, F.E., 2001. Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement. Journal of educational research, 95 (2), 110–115.
  • Okpala, C.O., et al., 2000. A clear link between school and teacher characteristics, student demographics, and student achievement. Education, 120 (3), 487–487.
  • O’Neill, D. J., 2000. The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate at selected Texas middle schools in Region XIII ESC. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
  • Philbin, L. P., 1997. Transformational leadership and the secondary school principal. Dissertation, Purdue University.
  • Prasetyo, A.D., and Zuhdi, U., 2013. The government expenditure efficiency towards the human development. Procedia economics and finance, 5, 615–622.
  • Pugh, G., et al., 2015. School expenditure and school performance: evidence from New South Wales schools using a dynamic panel analysis. British educational research journal, 41 (2), 244–264.
  • Raisbeck, P., Duffield, C., and Xu, M., 2010. Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia. Construction management and economics, 28 (4), 345–359.
  • Regan, M., Smith, J., and Love, P., 2011. Infrastructure procurement: Learning from private-public partnership experiences “down under”. Environment and planning C: government and policy, 29 (2), 363–378.
  • Rivkin, S.G., Hanushek, E.A., and Kain, J.F., 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73 (2), 417–458.
  • Ruiz Díaz, G., 2020. What drives the failure of private participation in infrastructure projects? International journal of managing projects in business, 13 (6), 1167–1185.
  • Saeed, A.M., Duffield, C., and Hui, F.K.P., 2018. An enhanced framework for assessing the operational performance of public-private partnership school projects. Built environment project and asset management, 8 (2), 194–214.
  • Schlaffer, J., and Burge, G., 2020. The asymmetric effects of school facilities on academic achievement: evidence from Texas bond votes. The social science journal, 1–19.
  • Schofield, J. W., 1990. Black & white in school: trust, tension, or tolerance? New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Scippacercola, S., and D’Ambra, L., 2014. Estimating the relative efficiency of secondary schools by stochastic frontier analysis. Procedia economics and finance, 17, 79–88.
  • Slavitt, D., et al., 1986. Index of work satisfaction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Smith, D.G., 2004. Diversity challenged: evidence on the impact of affirmative action (review). The review of higher education, 27 (2), 292–293.
  • Suharyanto, A., and Simanjuntak, M. R. A., 2020. Risk identification of design and build at school building construction project in central Jakarta. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1007 (1), 012090.
  • Tajalli, H., and Opheim, C., 2005. Strategies for closing the gap: Predicting student performance in economically disadvantaged schools. Educational research quarterly, 28 (4), 44–54.
  • Tanner, C. K., and Lackney, J. A., 2006. Educational facilities planning: Leadership, architecture, and management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Treputtharat, S., and Tayiam, S., 2014. School climate affecting job satisfaction of teachers in primary education, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 116, 996–1000.
  • Uline, C., and Tschannen-Moran, M., 2008. The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of educational administration, 46 (1), 55–73.
  • Wolszczak-Derlacz, J., and Parteka, A., 2011. Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: a two-stage multicountry approach. Scientometrics, 89 (3), 887–917.
  • Yescombe, E. R., 2011. Public-private partnerships: principles of policy and finance. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.