Value implication of digital transformation: the impact of the commodification of information

References

• Adair, S., 2010. The commodification of information and social inequality. Critical sociology, 36 (2), 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Akintola, A., Venkatachalam, S., and Root, D., 2020. Understanding BIM’s impact on professional work practices using activity theory. Construction management and economics, 38 (5), 447–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akintola, A., et al., 2021. Distilling agency in BIM-induced change in work practices. Construction innovation, 21 (3), 490–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnaggar, A., and Pitt, M., 2019. Lifecycle exchange for asset data (lead): a proposed process model for managing asset dataflow between building stakeholders using BIM open standards. Journal of facilities management, 17 (5), 385–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A., 1986. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: A. Appadurai, ed. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 3–63.
   Google Scholar
• Autodesk, 2017. Constructing with the power of digital [online]. Available from: https://damassets.autodesk.net/content/dam/autodesk/www/AEC-Solutions/pdf/fy18-aec-construction-manifesto-single-page_EN-US.pdf. [Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Baron, P., 2001. Databases and the commodification of information. Journal for the Copyright Society of the USA, 49 (1), 131–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerik-Gerber, B., et al., 2012. Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138 (3), 431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., and Volm, J.M., 2013. The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International journal of project management, 31 (7), 971–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., and Jahre, M., 2009. Balancing value creating logics in construction. Construction management and economics, 27 (7), 695–704.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Swärd, A.R., and Vaagaasar, A.L., 2016. Coordinating in construction projects and the emergence of synchronized readiness. International journal of project management, 34 (8), 1479–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C., 1997. Innovators dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicmil, S., and Marshall, D., 2005. Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building research & information, 33 (6), 523–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CMA, 2020. CMA advises government on new regulatory regime for tech giants [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-advises-government-on-new-regulatory-regime-for-tech-giants. [Accessed 08 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Çıdık, M.S., Boyd, D., and Thurairajah, N., 2017a. Ordering in disguise: digital integration in built-environment practices. Building research & information, 45 (6), 665–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çıdık, M.S., Boyd, D., and Thurairajah, N., 2017b. Innovative capability of building information modeling in construction design. Journal of construction engineering and management, 143 (8), 04017047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossick, C.S., and Neff, G., 2011. Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaboration using building information modelling. Engineering project organization journal, 1 (2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., et al., 2011. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling: for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors, 2nd ed.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• EU BIM, 2018. Handbook for the introduction of building information modelling by the European public sector [online]. Available from: http://www.eubim.eu/handbook/. [Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., 2014. Getting real about BIM. Critical Realist Descriptions as an Alternative to the Naïve Framing and Multiple Fallacies of Hype. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 47 (3), 405–422. 10.1108/IJMPB-12-2013-0073
   Google Scholar
• Gade, P.N., et al., 2019. A holistic analysis of a BIM-mediated building design process using activity theory. Construction management and economics, 37 (6), 336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giel, B.K., and Issa, R.R., 2013. Return on investment analysis of using building information modeling in construction. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 27 (5), 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., et al., 2015. Principles for the design and operation of engineer-to-order supply chains in the construction sector. Production planning & control, 26 (3), 203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C., 2005. Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building research & information, 33 (6), 512–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilburg J., 2020. Autodesk issues a response after architects speak out over Revit [online]. The architect’s newspaper. Available from: https://www.archpaper.com/2020/07/autodesk-issues-a-response-after-architects-speak-out-over-revit/.[Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2015. Digital built Britain: level 3 building information modelling – strategic plan. London: Department of Business Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Huizing, A., 2007. Objectivist by default: why information management needs a new foundation. In: A. Huizing and E.J. De Vries, eds. Information management: setting the scene. Oxford: Elsevier, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• IET, 2020. The future of construction is not 3D BIM objects [Online]. Institution of Engineering and Technology. Available from: https://communities.theiet.org/blogs/948/7054. [Accessed 17 Feb 2021].
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization, 2018. ISO 19650. Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling (BIM) – information management using building information modelling — Part 1: Concepts and principles.  https://www.iso.org/standard/68078.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jaradat, S., Whyte, J., and Luck, R., 2013. Professionalism in digitally mediated project work. Building research & information, 41 (1), 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K., et al., 2019. Changing business models: implications for construction. Transforming Construction Network Plus. Digest Series, no.1. https://majorprojects.org/resources/changing-business-models-implications-for-construction/
   Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J., 2007. The consequences of information: institutional implications of technological change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Khajavi, S.H., et al., 2019. Digital twin: vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE access., 7, 147406–147419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., et al., 2017. Measurement of construction BIM value based on a case study of a large-scale building project. Journal of management in engineering, 33 (6), 05017005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P., 1995. Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. The review of economic studies, 62, 515–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, T., and Windsperger, J., 2017. Seeing through the network: competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of organization design, 6 (1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., and Grover, V., 2008. Business value of IT: an essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the association for information systems, 9 (1), 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkonen, A., and Alin, P., 2016. Practitioners deconstructing and reconstructing practices when responding to the implementation of BIM. Construction management and economics, 34 (7–8), 578–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., and Ballard, G., 2006. Should project management be based on theories of economies or production? Building research & information, 34 (2), 154–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavikka, R., et al., 2018. Digital disruption of the AEC industry: technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths. Construction management and economics, 36 (11), 635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E., 2011. Towards project management 2.0. Engineering project organization journal, 1 (3), 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., et al., 2015. Critical barriers to BIM implementation in the AEC industry. International journal of marketing studies, 7 (6), 162–171.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., et al., 2014. A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners. Automation in construction, 37, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W., et al., 2015. Demystifying construction project time–effort distribution curves: BIM and non-BIM comparison. Journal of management in engineering, 31 (6), 04015010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, E., 2002. An introduction to Marxist economic theory. Chippendale, NSW, Australia: Resistance Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., 1990. Capital: a critique of political economy. Vol. 1. Trans. Ben Fowkes. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., 2018. The value of everything: making and taking in the global economy. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company, 2018. Voices on infrastructure: harnessing the promise of digital [online]. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/McKinsey/Industries/Capital%20Projects%20and%20Infrastructure/Our%20Insights/Voices%20on%20Infrastructure%20Harnessing%20the%20promise%20of%20digital/Voices-on-Infrastructure_Harnessing-the-promise-of-digital.PDF. [Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., and Gurbaxani, V., 2004. Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of it business value. MIS quarterly, 28 (2), 283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merschbrock, C., and Figueres-Munoz, A., 2015. Circumventing obstacles in digital construction design: a workaround theory perspective. Procedia economics and finance, 21, 247–255.
   Google Scholar
• Mosco, V., 2009. The political economy of communication. 2nd ed. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moum, A., 2010. Design team stories: exploring interdisciplinary use of 3D object models in practice. Automation in construction, 19 (5), 554–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muspratt, M.A., 1983. Computers for the construction industry. Project management quarterly, 14 (3), 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, G., Fiore-Silfvast, B., and Dossick, C.S., 2010. A case study of the failure of digital communication to cross knowledge boundaries in virtual construction. Information, Communication & society, 13 (4), 556–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, M., et al., 2015. Integrated system for BIM-based collaborative design. Automation in construction, 58, 196–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hear, J., 2020. Spacemaker, AI software for urban development, is acquired by Autodesk for $240M [online]. Tech Crunch. Available from: https://techcrunch.com/2020/11/17/spacemaker-ai-software-for-urban-development-is-acquired-by-autodesk-for-240m/. [Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., and Miettinen, R., 2019. Dynamics of design collaboration: BIM models as intermediary digital objects. Computer supported cooperative work, 28 (1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudham, S., 2009. Commodification. In: N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman and B. Rhoads, eds. A Companion to environmental geography. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 123–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, K.H., Mathiassen, L., and Rai, A., 2018. Managing digital platforms in user organizations: the interactions between digital options and digital debt. Information systems research, 29 (2), 419–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A., 2003. (De) commodification, consumer culture, and moral economy. Environment and planning d: society and space, 21 (3), 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarponcini, P., 1996. Editorial: time for an integrated approach to facility management. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 10 (1), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, R., 2011. Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 18 (2), 176–187.
   Google Scholar
• Setzke, D. S., Böhm, M. and Krcmar, H., 2019. Platform openness: a systematic literature review and avenues for future research [online]. Proceedings of International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI), Siegen, Germany. Atlanta, Georgia: AIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2019/track07/papers/9/.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A., 1987. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stabell, C.B., and Fjeldstad, Ø.D., 1998. Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shop, and networks. Strategic management journal, 19 (5), 413–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, J., 2015. On the openness of digital platforms/ecosystems. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 19-21 August 2015 San Francisco, California. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist, 2017. Data is giving rise to a new economy [online]. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21721634-how-it-shaping-updata-giving-rise-new-economy. [Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D., 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sørensen, C., 2010. Digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Research commentary. Information systems research, 21 (4), 748–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. and Kiron, D., 2017. Digital transformation on purpose [online]. MIT Sloan management review. Available from: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/digital-transformation-on-purpose/. [Accessed 8 Mar 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H. R., Farrell, J., and Shapiro, C., 2004. The economics of information technology: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vass, S., 2017. The business value of BIM: elaborating on content and perspective. Thesis (PhD). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Government 2016., Construction technologies: sector strategy. Melbourne: Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2011. Managing digital coordination of design: emerging hybrid practices in an institutionalized project setting. Engineering project organization journal, 1 (3), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2013. Beyond the computer: Changing medium from digital to physical. Information and organization, 23 (1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2019. How digital information transforms project delivery models. Project management journal, 50 (2), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G. M., 2002. Managing construction projects: an information processing approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 2006. Towards a theory of construction as production by projects. Building research & information, 23 (4), 571–573.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A.K., Wong, F.K., and Nadeem, A., 2011. Government roles in implementing building information modelling systems. Construction innovation, 11 (1), 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K., 2010. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information systems research, 21 (4), 724–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar