Same same but different: dynamics of a pre-procurement routine and its influence on relational contracting models

References

• Addyman, S., Pryke, S., and Davies, A., 2020. Re-creating organizational routines to transition through the project life cycle: a case study of the reconstruction of London’s Bank underground station. Project management journal, 51, 522–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annosi, M.C., et al., 2020. Learning in an agile setting: a multilevel research study on the evolution of organizational routines. Journal of business research, 110, 554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham, M.B., 2013. Leading by example: new professionalism and the government client. Building research & information, 41, 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. and Davies, A., 2004. Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization studies, 25, 1601–1621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet, M., Fachin, F. and Langley, A., 2021. Studying projects processually. International journal of project management, 39, 834–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A. and Swan, J., 2004. Embedding new management knowledge in project-based organizations. Organization studies, 25, 1535–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A. and Swan, J., 2005a. Implementing change in construction project organizations: exploring the interplay between structure and agency. Building research & information, 33, 547–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A. and Swan, J., 2005b. Organizational routines, situated learning and processes of change in project-based organizations. Project management journal, 36, 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N., 2010. Projects and partnerships: institutional processes and emergent practices. In: P.W.G. Morris, J.K. Pinto & J. Söderlund eds. The Oxford handbook of project management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., 2007. The consequences of decision-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Jahre, M. and Swärd, A., 2010. Partnering relationships in construction: a literature review. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16, 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E. and Swärd, A., 2019. Collaborative project delivery models and the role of routines in institutionalizing partnering. Project management journal, 50, 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Swärd, A. and Vaagaasar, A.L., 2021. A routine dynamics lens on the stability-change dilemma in project-based organizations. Project management journal, 52, 278–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A. R. and Vaagaasar, A. L., 2020. Temporal shaping of routine patterning. In: J. Reinecke, R. Suddaby, A. Langley & H. Tsoukas eds. Time, temporality, and history in process organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatori, E. and Prencipe, A., 2021. Project-based temporary organizing and routine dynamics. In M. Feldman, B. Pentland, L. D’adderio, K. Dittrich, C. Rerup & D. Seidl eds. Cambridge handbook of routines dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohendet, P. and Llerena, P., 2003. Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm. Industrial and corporate change, 12, 271–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’adderio, L., 2011. Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of institutional economics, 7, 197–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D., 2016. Unravelling the motor of patterning work: toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization science, 27, 633–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A., et al., 2018. The long and winding road: routine creation and replication in multi-site organizations. Research policy, 47, 1403–1417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A., Macaulay, S.C. and Brady, T., 2019. Delivery model innovation: insights from infrastructure projects. Project management journal, 50, 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E., 2002a. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management and economics, 20, 621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E., 2002b. Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of business research, 55, 553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, R. and Graham, M., 2014. Analysing the advantages of early contractor involvement. International journal of procurement management, 7, 661–676.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A., 1998. What is agency? American journal of sociology, 103, 962–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P.E., 2017. Procurement strategies for enhancing exploration and exploitation in construction projects. Journal of financial management of property and construction, 22, 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, T. and Kadefors, A., 2017. Organisational design and development in a large rail tunnel project—Influence of heuristics and mantras. International journal of project management, 35, 492–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M.S. and Pentland, B.T., 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative science quarterly, 48, 94–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M.S., et al., 2016. Beyond routines as things: introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization science, 27, 505–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2014. What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview. Project management journal, 45, 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadde, L.-E. and Dubois, A., 2010. Partnering in the construction industry – problems and opportunities. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 16, 254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehman, J., et al., 2018. Finding theory–method fit: a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of management inquiry, 27, 284–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G. and Hamilton, A.L., 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16, 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., 2002. Cool projects, boring institutions: temporary collaboration in social context. Regional studies, 36, 205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., 2004. Temporary architectures of learning: knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization studies, 25, 1491–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M. and Scott, W.R., 2019. Early stages in the institutionalization of integrated project delivery. Project management journal, 50, 128–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. and Dorée, A., 2015. Learning between projects: more than sending messages in bottles. International journal of project management, 33, 341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., et al., 2014. Procuring complex performance: the transition process in public infrastructure. International journal of operations & production management, 34, 174–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedborg, S., Eriksson, P.-E. and Gustavsson, T.K., 2020. Organisational routines in multi-project contexts: coordinating in an urban development project ecology. International journal of project management, 38, 394–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J.A., 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organization science, 16, 618–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.P., 2008. Contemporary sociological theory. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, V., 2012. Negotiating bureaucrats. Public administration, 90, 1032–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadefors, A., 1995. Institutions in building projects: implications for flexibility and change. Scandinavian journal of management, 11, 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, M. and Choi, T., 2014. Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of operations management, 32, 232–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuitert, L., Volker, L. and Hermans, M.H., 2019. Taking on a wider view: public value interests of construction clients in a changing construction industry. Construction management and economics, 37, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulatunga, K., et al., 2011. Client’s championing characteristics that promote construction innovation. Construction innovation, 11, 380–398.
   Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, P., 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction management and economics, 30, 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, B. and March, J.G., 1988. Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14, 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H. and Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2020. Public clients ability to drive industry change: the case of implementing BIM. Construction management and economics, 39, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, K., 2006. The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry. Construction management and economics, 24, 1295–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, K. and Chen, L., 2016. The impact of client characteristics on the time and cost performance of collaborative infrastructure projects. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 23, 511–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M. and Huemann, M., 2021. Designing case study research. International journal of project management, 39, 417–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. and Huberman, M. A., 1994. Quallitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moretto, A., et al., 2020. Procurement organisation in project-based setting: a multiple case study of engineer-to-order companies. Production planning & control, 33, 847–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1997. Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction management and economics, 15, 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Patrucco, A.S., et al., 2019. Which shape fits best? Designing the organizational form of local government procurement. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 25, 100504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, F.T.T., 2006. When is construction partnering likely to happen? An empirical examination of the role of institutional norms. Construction management and economics, 24, 615–624.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, H., Voordijk, H. and Dorée, A., 2020. Moving beyond one-off procurement innovation; an ambidexterity perspective. Journal of public procurement, 20, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennstam, J. and Kärreman, D., 2019. Understanding control in communities of practice: constructive disobedience in a high-tech firm. Human relations, 73, 864–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rerup, C. and Feldman, M.S., 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. The academy of management journal, 54, 577–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijter, H., et al., 2020. ‘Filling the mattress’: trust development in the governance of infrastructure megaprojects. International journal of project management, 39, 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C. and Rerup, C., 2018. Routine regulation: balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative science quarterly, 63, 170–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOU 39., 2012. Vägar till förbättrad produktivitet och innovationsgrad i anläggningsbranschen. Stockholm: Produktivitets Komittens betänkande.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R.E., 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, J. and Windeler, A., 2020. Temporary organizing and permanent contexts. Current sociology, 68, 480–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J., Vaagaasar, A.L. and Andersen, E.S., 2008. Relating, reflecting and routinizing: developing project competence in cooperation with others. International journal of project management, 26, 517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J., 2015. Project based organizations. In: F. Chiocchio, E.K. Kelloway & B. Hobbs (eds.) The psychology and management of project teams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S.F. and Rindova, V., 2012. A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization science, 23, 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafikverket., 2010. Upphandlingspolicy, TDOK 2010:119.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket., 2016. Riktlinje Kontraktsmodell Samverkan Hög, TDOK 2016:0199.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket., 2016. Affärsstrategi för entreprenader och tekniska konsulter, TDOK 2016:0233.
   Google Scholar
• Volker, L. and Hoezen, M., 2017. Client learning across major infrastructure projects. In: K. Haugbølle & D. Boyd (eds.) Clients and users in construction: agency, governance and innovation. London: Routledge, 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. H. T. and Lloyd-Walker, B. M., 2015. Collaborative project procurement arrangements. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, T., et al., 2020. Practices of isolation: the shaping of project autonomy in innovation projects. International journal of project management, 38, 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M. and Cha, J., 2020. Owner challenges on major projects: the case of UK government. International journal of project management, 38, 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzell, J., 2019. Physical planning in an era of marketization: conflicting governance perspectives in the Swedish Transport Administration. European planning studies, 27, 1413–1431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar