Ecosystems in construction management and urban development: a comprehensive review of conceptualizations and contributions

References

• Abend, G., 2008. The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological theory, 26 (2), 173–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, R. and Kapoor, R., 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31 (3), 306–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, R., 2006. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84 (4), 98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksenova, G., et al., 2019. From Finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Construction management and economics, 37 (6), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Gasim, Z., Senin, A.A., and bin Yusoff, M.E., 2021. A review and comprehensive analysis of the performance of university–construction industry collaboration. Civil engineering journal, 7 (4), 763–774.
   Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, J. and Boschma, R., 2017. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European planning studies, 25 (6), 887–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andion, C., Alperstedt, G.D., and Graeff, J.F., 2020. Social innovation ecosystems, sustainability, and democratic experimentation: a study in Florianopolis, Brazil. Revista de administração pública, 54, 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Ardito, L., et al., 2019. The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological forecasting and social change, 142, 312–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, E., 2022. Orchestrating ecosystems: a multi-layered framework. Innovation, 24 (1), 96–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R.M., et al., 2016. Temporary organizing: Promises, processes, problems. Organization studies, 37 (12), 1703–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M.A., 2008. Concept analysis as a method of inquiry. Nurse researcher, 15 (2), 49–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergek, A., et al., 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research policy, 37 (3), 407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, M. and Lansley, P., 1993. Construction management and economics: a review of the first ten years. Construction management and economics, 11 (4), 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Sutton, A., and Papaioannou, D., 2016. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R.P., Gupta, S., and Thomas, D., 2009. A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. Journal of management information systems, 26 (1), 17–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S. and Malerba, F., 1997. Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations, 1, 130–156.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., 2017. Being careful what we wish for? Challenges and opportunities afforded through engagement with business and management research. Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S., and Prencipe, A., 2013. The organization of innovation in ecosystems: problem framing, problem solving, and patterns of coupling. In: R. Adner, J.E. Oxley, and B.S. Silverman, eds. Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems, advances in strategic management. Vol. 30. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 167–194.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., et al., 1992. The management and evaluation of technological programs and the dynamics of techno-economic networks: The case of the AFME. Research policy, 21 (3), 215–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., and Stankiewicz, R., 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of evolutionary economics, 1 (2), 93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., and Balocco, R., 2019. Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 15 (4), 1291–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, P.W., 2020. Revisiting basics: theoretically-grounded interesting research that addresses challenges that matter. Construction management and economics, 38 (1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., et al., 2020. The roles of captains in megaproject innovation ecosystems: the case of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 28 (3), 662–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W., 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C., 1967. Wicked problems. Management science, 14 (4), 141–142.
   Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., et al., 2014. Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research policy, 43 (7), 1164–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S.J., and Ortt, J.R., 2018. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vasconcelos Gomes, L.A., et al., 2018. Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: evolution, gaps and trends. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48 (2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.E., 2002. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management and economics, 20 (7), 621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenfeld, J.R., 2000. Industrial ecology: paradigm shift or normal science? American behavioral scientist, 44 (2), 229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., et al., 2019. Projects in the business ecosystem: the case of short sea shipping and logistics. Project management journal, 50 (2), 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkman, S., 1997. Industrial ecology: an historical view. Journal of cleaner production, 5 (1–2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ferasso, M., Takahashi, A.R.W., and Gimenez, F.A.P., 2018. Innovation ecosystems: a meta-synthesis. International journal of innovation science, 10 (4), 495–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., 1987. Technology and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frosch, R.A., and Gallopoulos, N.E., 1989. Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261 (3), 144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and Cusumano, M.A., 2014. Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of product innovation management, 31 (3), 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., and Hamilton, A.L., 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16 (1), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelova, I., et al., 2021. Antecedents and consequences of digital entrepreneurial ecosystems in the interaction process with smart city development. Administrative sciences, 11 (3), 94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., 2002. The project ecology of advertising: tasks, talents and teams. Regional studies, 36 (3), 245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O., and Holgersson, M., 2020. Innovation ecosystems: a conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, M., et al., 2021. How does open innovation enhance productivity? An exploration in the construction ecosystem. Technological forecasting and social change, 168, 120740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groesser, S.N., 2014. Co-evolution of legal and voluntary standards: development of energy efficiency in Swiss residential building codes. Technological forecasting and social change, 87, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., and Tushman, M., 2012. Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic management journal, 33 (6), 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., Mejia, C., and Kajikawa, Y., 2019. Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing. Technological forecasting and social change, 147, 100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, M. and Tsvetkova, A., 2017. Transformative business studies: technology transfer in the social sciences. Technology and innovation, 19 (2), 537–552.
   Google Scholar
• Han, H., Chen, H., and Lee, J.B., 2021. Spatiotemporal changes in vertical heterogeneity: high-rise office building floor space in Sydney, Australia. Buildings, 11 (8), 374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedborg, S. and Karrbom Gustavsson, T., 2020. Developing a neighbourhood: exploring construction projects from a project ecology perspective. Construction management and economics, 38 (10), 964–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A., 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39 (8), 2255–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. and Zheng, W., 2021. Coupling mechanism of green building industry innovation ecosystem based on blockchain smart city. Journal of cleaner production, 307, 126766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, S.S., et al., 2021. Sustainable smart cities and industrial ecosystem: structural and relational changes of the smart city industries in Korea. Sustainability, 13 (17), 9917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N.H., 2022. Handcrafted concrete hybrids, the production of tradition and modern in the South Korea developmental state. Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering, 21 (3), 791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, H.L., Lazarevic, D., and Kivimaa, P., 2018. Technical skills, disinterest and non-functional regulation: barriers to building energy efficiency in Finland viewed by energy service companies. Energy policy, 114, 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, R. and Lee, J.M., 2013. Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: how organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic management journal, 34 (3), 274–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. and Ha, Y., 2021. Vitalization strategies for the building energy management system (BEMS) industry ecosystem based on AHP analysis. Energies, 14 (9), 2559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. and Kim, J., 2021. An integrated analysis of value-based adoption model and information systems success model for proptech service platform. Sustainability, 13 (23), 12974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, T., Cetindamar, D., and Borkert, M., 2021. A digital tale of two cities—observing the dynamics of the artificial intelligence ecosystems in Berlin and Sydney. Sustainability, 13 (19), 10564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarevic, D., et al., 2019. Understanding integrated-solution innovations in sustainability transitions: Reconfigurative building-energy services in Finland. Energy research and social science, 56, 101209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R. and Dainty, A., 2017. Construction management and economics: new directions. Construction management and economics, 35 (1-2), 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Wang, X., and Sheng, Z., 2012. Achieving ambidexterity in large, complex engineering projects: a case study of the Sutong Bridge project. Construction management and economics, 30 (5), 399–409.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, R., et al., 2021. A modified NK algorithm based on BP neural network and DEMATEL for evolution path optimization of urban innovation ecosystem. Complex and intelligent systems, 9, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A., 1992. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, E., and Mayer, H., 2016. The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban studies, 53 (10), 2118–2133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkinen, S.J., Kanniainen, J., and Peltola, I., 2014. Investigating adoption of free beta applications in a platform-based business ecosystem. Journal of product innovation management, 31 (3), 451–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, N., and Karimi, A., 2021. Entrepreneurial ecosystem big picture: a bibliometric analysis and co-citation clustering. Journal of research in marketing and entrepreneurship, 24, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS medicine, 6 (7), e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.F., 1993. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71 (3), 75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S., 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, C.A., III and Tushman, M.L., 2013. Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. Academy of management perspectives, 27 (4), 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, D.S., et al., 2016. Innovation ecosystems: a critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• olde Scholtenhuis, L.L. and Dorée, A.G., 2014. High reliability organizing at the boundary of the CM domain. Construction management and economics, 32 (7–8), 658–664.
   Google Scholar
• Packendorff, J., Lundin, I.R., and Packendorff, J., 1987. Temporary organizing: Integrating organization theory and project management. Proceedings of the IRNOP Conference on Temporary Organizations and Project Management, 4–1.
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi, A., et al., 2019. Designing an organizational system for economically sustainable demand-side management in district heating and cooling. Journal of cleaner production, 219, 433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M.A., and Ritala, P., 2019. A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technological forecasting and social change, 148, 119739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planko, J., et al., 2019. Coping with coopetition—facing dilemmas in cooperation for sustainable development: The case of the Dutch smart grid industry. Business strategy and the environment, 28 (5), 665–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., 1985. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E., 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Competitive intelligence review, 1 (1), 14–14.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doerr, L., 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 41, 116–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K.G., and Kenis, P., 2008. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18 (2), 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkka, L., et al., 2016. Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 34 (2), 129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajakallio, K., et al., 2018. Creating urban platforms—opportunities and challenges for innovation in commercial real estate development. Cities, 77, 92–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., and Almpanopoulou, A., 2017. In defense of ‘eco’in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60, 39–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runeson, G., 1997. The role of theory in construction management research: comment. Construction management and economics, 15 (3), 299–302.
   Google Scholar
• Sackey, E., Tuuli, M., and Dainty, A., 2015. Sociotechnical systems approach to BIM implementation in a multidisciplinary construction context. Journal of management in engineering, 31 (1), A4014005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säynäjoki, A., et al., 2017. Data commercialisation: extracting value from smart buildings. Buildings, 7 (4), 104.
   Google Scholar
• Scaringella, L., and Radziwon, A., 2018. Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: old wine in new bottles? Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 59–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, M., Hyrynsalmi, S., Manikas, K., and Suominen, A. (2017). Yet another ecosystem literature review: 10 + 1 research communities. In 2017 IEEE european technology and engineering management summit (E-TEMS), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, D., Crook, D., and Rooke, J., 1997. The role of theory in construction management: a call for debate. Construction management and economics, 15 (1), 117–119.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, D., Crook, D., and Rooke, J., 1998. The role of theory in construction management: reply to Runeson. Construction management and economics, 16 (1), 109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Shayakhmetov, U., et al., 2021. Methodological tools for university transfer of high-demand nanotechnologies to the regional building industry. Nanotekhnologii v Stroitel’stve, 13 (1), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H., 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderlund, J., Hobbs, B., and Ahola, T., 2014. Project-based and temporary organizing: Reconnecting and rediscovering. International journal of project management, 32 (7), 1085–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E., and Van de Ven, A., 2021. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small business economics, 56 (2), 809–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, F.C., and Spigel, B., 2017. Entrepreneurial ecosystems. USE discussion paper series, 16 (13), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Styre, A., 2017. Thinking about materiality: the value of a construction management and engineering view. Construction management and economics, 35 (1–2), 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., and Autio, E., 2020. Innovation ecosystems in management: A conceptual review. In: R. Aldag, ed. Oxford research encyclopaedia of business and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L.D., and Ritala, P., 2022. Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: a collective action view. Journal of management, 48 (3), 515–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, C.S., Karrbom Gustavsson, T., and Karvonen, A., 2021. Grand challenges facing our cities: where construction management research meets the urban field. Construction management and economics, 39 (10), 874–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., and Bush, A.A., 2010. Research commentary—Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information systems research, 21 (4), 675–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppinen, A., et al., 2019. Collaboration and shared logic for creating value-added in three Finnish wooden multi-storey building projects. Wood material science and engineering, 14 (5), 269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto, M., et al., 2018. A review of the ecosystem concept—towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsvetkova, A., and Gustafsson, M., 2012. Business models for industrial ecosystems: A modular approach. Journal of cleaner production, 29, 246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2022. The sustainable development goals report 2022. New York: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Valkokari, K., 2015. Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: how they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology innovation management review, 5 (8), 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vigren, O., Kadefors, A., and Eriksson, K., 2022. Digitalization, innovation capabilities and absorptive capacity in the Swedish real estate ecosystem. Facilities, 40 (15/16), 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigren, O. (2022). Digitalization, sustainability, and ecosystems: An application of social network analysis to the real estate sector. Doctoral dissertation. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Viholainen, N., et al., 2021. Bringing ecosystem thinking to sustainability-driven wooden construction business. Journal of cleaner production, 292, 126029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker, L., 2019. Looking out to look in: inspiration from social sciences for construction management research. Construction management and economics, 37 (1), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosman, L., Coenen, T. B., Volker, L., and Visscher, K. (2021). Exploring the innovation ecosystem concept for a construction industry in transition. In 37th ARCOM Conference and Annual General Meeting: Recover, Rebuild and Renew.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., and Watson, R.T., 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, 26, 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2019. How digital information transforms project delivery models. Project management journal, 50 (2), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, P.J. and De Meyer, A., 2012. Ecosystem advantage: how to successfully harness the power of partners. California management review, 55 (1), 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., et al., 2019. Platform-based business models: insights from an emerging AI-enabled smart building ecosystem. Electronics, 8 (10), 1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and Tang, W., 2018. Research on a 3d predator-prey evolutionary system in real estate market. Complexity, 2018, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Xie, H., 2020. Exploring cultivation path of building information modelling in China: an analysis from the perspective of an innovation ecosystem. Sustainability, 12 (17), 6902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, D., Ming, X., and Zhang, X., 2020. Sustainable and smart product innovation ecosystem: An integrative status review and future perspectives. Journal of cleaner production, 274, 123005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S.A. and Nambisan, S., 2012. Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business horizons, 55 (3), 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2018. From urban metabolism to industrial ecosystem metabolism: a study of construction in Shanghai from 2004 to 2014. Journal of cleaner production, 202, 428–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zygiaris, S., 2013. Smart city reference model: assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the knowledge economy, 4 (2), 217–231.
   Google Scholar