Beyond “platformania” in the construction sector: Conceptualisations and implications of product platformisation in the UK

References

• Aksenova, G., Kiviniemi, A., Kocaturk, T. and Lejeune, A., 2019. From Finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Construction Management and Economics, 37 (6), 317–335. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2018.1481985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altfeld, H. H., 2016. Commercial aircraft projects: Managing the development of highly complex products (1st Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315572833
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M., 2006. Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND journal of economics, 37 (3), 668–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, B. C., 2000a. Developing theoretical foundations of DfM (vol. 1). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, K. B., 2000b. Design rules: the power of modularity (vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C.Y., and Clark, K.B., 2003. Managing in an age of modularity. Managing in the modular age, 149, 84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C.Y., and Woodard, C.J., 2009. The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Platforms, markets and innovation, 32.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., and Sexton, M., 2006. Innovation in small, project‐based construction firms. British journal of management, 17 (4), 331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, G., 1994. Product design for manufacture and assembly. Computer-aided design, 26 (7), 505–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., and Knight, W. A., 2010. Product design for manufacture and assembly. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420089288
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., and Marshall, N., 2001. Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 8 (5/6), 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden Wood. 2017a. Data driven infrastructure: from digital tools to manufactured components. London, UK, Bryden Wood. Available from: https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/data_driven_infrastructure_screen.pdf [Accessed 18 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Bryden Wood. 2017b. Delivery platforms for government assets: creating a marketplace for manufactured spaces. London, UK, Bryden Wood. Available from: https://www.brydenwood.com/filedownload.php?a=13710-5ff83c85a072d [Accessed 18 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Bryden Wood. 2018. Platforms bridging the gap between construction + manufacturing. London, Bryden Wood. Available from: https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/files/platforms_bridging_the_gap_small.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryden Wood. 2021. Delivery platforms for government assets: creating a marketplace for manufactured spaces. London, UK: Bryden Wood. Available from: https://www.brydenwood.com/filedownload.php?a=17725-613f434f0f64c [Accessed 8 April 2022].
   Google Scholar
• BuildingSMART. (n.d.). Industry foundation classes (IFC). Available from: https://www.buildingsmart.org/standards/bsi-standards/industry-foundation-classes/
   Google Scholar
• Caffrey, R. T., Simpson, T. W., Henderson, R., and Crawley, E., 2002. The strategic issues with implementing open avionics platforms for spacecraft. Paper presented at the Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 9-16 March 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, B., Skibniewski, M.J., and Kwak, Y.H., 2009. Developing ERP systems success model for the construction industry. Journal of construction engineering and management, 135 (3), 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIH. 2020. BIM interoperability expert group (BEIG). Construction Innovation Hub. Available from: https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/files/cih_bim_interoperability_expert_group_report_april_2020_final_wm_removed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIH. 2021a. Platform design programme: defining the need. UK: Construction Innovation Hub. Accessible fom: https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/construction-innovation-hub-defining-the-need-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIH. 2021b. Platform programme: the road to the rulebook. Construction Innovation Hub. Accessible from: https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/CIH_Platform-Programme_The-Road-to-the-Rulebook-002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIH. 2022. The product platform rulebook. Construction innovation hub UK research and innovation. Accessible from: https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CIH_The-Product-Platform-Rulebook_Consultation_May2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and Braun, V., 2014. Thematic analysis. In: T. Teo ed. Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer, 1947–1952.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and Braun, V., 2015. Thematic analysis. In: K. Hefferon and L. Waters, eds. Commentary for a special edition on qualitative research of the Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 222-248. Accessed via: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/2292/43968/Thematic%20analysis_Journal%20Positive%20Psychology_ACCEPTED..pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Braun, V., and Hayfield, N., 2015. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, 3, 222–248.
   Google Scholar
• Colin, B., Raj, K., Jason, C., Christopher, D., Neil, P., Richard, P., 2018. Enhancing high-rise residential construction through design for manufacture and assembly – a UK case study. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers - management, procurement and law, 171(4), 164–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., Kraus, C., and Uihlein, M.S., 2020. Interview with Craig Curtis: industrialized construction at Katerra. Technology|Architecture + Design, 4 (2), 151–156. DOI: 10.1080/24751448.2020.1804755
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., and Yoffie, D. B., 2019. The business of Platforms: strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M., 2020. Guidepost: the evolution of research on sector platforms. Academy of Management Discoveries, (August 2020), 8(1), 7-14. dx.doi.org/10.5465/ amd.2020.0091.
   Google Scholar
• Dainty, A., et al., 2017. BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective. Building research and information, 45 (6), 696–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P.A., and Greenstein, S., 1990. The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of innovation and new technology, 1 (1-2), 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L., and Eyquem-Renault, M., 2009. What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research policy, 38 (10), 1559–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., et al., 2011. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction. Report of the construction task force. London: Department of Trade and Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., and Van Alstyne, M.W., 2006. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard business review, 84 (10), 92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPSRC. 1999. IMI construction research: achievements and future directions. EPSRC Conference Proceedings. Loughborough University, 29–30 September 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ethiraj, S.K., and Levinthal, D., 2004. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management science, 50 (22), 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and Muir-Cochrane, E., 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5 (1), 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Gehman, J., and Giuliani, A.P., 2014. Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: a narrative perspective. Research policy, 43 (7), 1177–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., 2014. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Research policy, 43 (7), 1239–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., 2020. Digital platforms’ boundaries: the interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 102045, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and Cusumano, M. A., 2002. Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation (vol. 5). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., and Cusumano, M.A., 2013. Sector platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of product innovation management, 31 (3), 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. 2019. Modern methods of construction: unintended consequences. Buildings and cities. Available from: https://www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/commentaries/modern-methods-of-construction.html
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. D., 2011. Making sense of construction improvement. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. D., 2021. Critical reflections on the construction playbook [Commentary]. Buildings & Cities. Available from: https://www.buildingsandcities.org/insights/commentaries/modern-methods-of-construction.html
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell Tower Inquiry. 2019. Grenfell tower inquiry: phase 1 report. Report of the public inquiry into the fire at Grenfell Tower on 14 June 2017 (vol 1). Available from: https://assets.grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk/GTI%20-%20Phase%201%20full%20report%20(large%20print)%20-%20volume%201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., and Namey, E. E., 2012. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., and Tushman, M., 2012. Meta‐organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic management journal, 33 (6), 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., and Wright, J., 2015. Multi-sided platforms. International journal of industrial organization, 43, 162–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M., Whyte, J.K., and Lessing, J., 2020. Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms: a comparative case study. Construction management and economics, 38 (4), 322–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halman, J.I.M., Hofer, A.P., and Van Vuuren, W., 2003. Platform-driven development of product families: linking theory with practice. Journal of product innovation management, 20 (2), 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C.E., and Raubitschek, R.S., 2018. Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research policy, 47 (8), 1391–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbolling, S., et al., 2021. Sustaining complement quality for digital product platforms: a case study of the philips hue ecosystem. Journal of product innovation management, 38 (1), 21–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. 2017. Autumn budget 2017. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. 2020. National infrastructure strategy – Fairer, faster, greener. London: HM Treasury
   Google Scholar
• HMG. 2012. Building Information Modelling. Industrial strategy: government and sector in partnership. HM Government. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34710/12-1327-building-information-modelling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HMG. 2013. Industrial Strategy – government and sector in practice. Construction 2025. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HMG. 2015. Digital built britain. Level 3 building information modelling - strategic plan. UK: Crown Copyright 2015.
   Google Scholar
• HMG. 2018. Industrial strategy – construction sector deal. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HMG. 2020. The construction playbook: government guidance on sourcing and contracting public works projects and programmes. London: HM Government, Cabinet Office. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941536/The_Construction_Playbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horn, P.M., 2005. The changing nature of innovation. Research-technology management, 48 (6), 28–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, G. A., 1999. What is lean construction? In Tommelein, D. ed. Proceedings of the seventh conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. IGLC, UC Berkeley, California, 26-28 July 1999, pp.1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., and Levien, R., 2004. Keystones and dominators: framing operating and technology strategy in a business ecosystem. Boston: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• IPA. 2019. Proposal for a new approach to building: call for evidence. London: Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
   Google Scholar
• IPA. 2020. Transforming infrastructure performance: roadmap to 2030. London: Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
   Google Scholar
• IPA. 2021. Proposal for a new approach to building: call for evidence summary of responses. London: Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A., 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39 (8), 2255–2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J., Simpson, T.W., and Siddique, Z., 2007. Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 18 (1), 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson, H., et al., 2017. Development of product platforms: theory and methodology. Concurrent engineering, 25 (3), 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K., Mosca, L., Whyte, J., Davies, A. and Glass, J., 2021. Addressing specialization and fragmentation: product platform development in construction consultancy firms. Construction Management and Economics, 40 (11), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1983187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiviniemi, A., 2011. The effects of integrated BIM in processes and business models.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and Kiviniemi, A., 2012. The IFC standard: a review of history, development, and standardization, information technology. ITcon, 17 (9), 134–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lamba, N., and Elahi, E., 2012. When supply chain strategy does not match supply chain capabilities: Lessons that can be learnt from the supply chain of Boeing 787. In Cases on supply chain and distribution management: issues and principles. IGI Global, 159–177, USA: Business Science Reference. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0065-2.ch008
   Google Scholar
• Latham, M., 1994. Constructing the team. Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Sector. Available from: http://constructingexcellence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Constructing-the-team-The-Latham-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R., 2020. Sustainable Construction through Industry Self-Regulation: the development and role of building environmental assessment methods in achieving green building. Sustainability, 12 (21), 8853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R., Gottlieb, S.C., Fang, Y. and Mo, X., 2022. In search of sustainable construction: the role of building environmental assessment methods as policies enforcing green building. Construction Management and Economics, 40(2), 104–122, DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2021.2021259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, U., 2013. The collaboration of innovation intermediaries and manufacturing firms in the markets for technology. Journal of product innovation management, 30 (S1), 142–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G., 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, W., Tan T., Xu, J., Wang, J., Chen, K., Gao, S. and Xue, F., 2021. Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in construction: the old and the new. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17 (1-2), 77–91. DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2020.1768505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus, L., and Christer, K., 2005. Inter-firm product platform development in the automotive sector. International journal of innovation management, 09 (02), 155–181.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, K., and Johnston, J., 2019. Automated construction: boosting on-site productivity using a platform-based approach. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers – civil engineering, 172 (6), 23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D.P., and Srinivasan, A., 2017. Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal, 38 (1), 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. H., and Lehnerd, A. P., 1997. The power of product platforms: building value and cost leadership. Columbia, MD: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.H., 1997. Revitalize your product lines through continuous platform renewal. Research-technology management, 40 (2), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.H., Osiyevskyy, O., Libaers, D., and Hugten, M. V. , 2018. Does product platforming pay off? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35 (1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.H., Cassis, J., Osiyevskyy, O. and Libaers, D., 2020. Implementing product platforms in the global enterprise: Lessons from an LED sector leader. Business Horizons, 63 (4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., and Paavola, S., 2014. Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modelling. Automation in construction, 43, 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca, L., Jones, K., Davies, A., Whyte, J., Glass, J., 2020. Platform Thinking for Construction, Transforming Construction Network Plus, Digest Series, No.2
   Google Scholar
• Muffatto, M., and Roveda, M., 2000. Developing product platforms: analysis of the development process. Technovation, 20 (11), 617–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., and Sawhney, M., 2011. Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: evidence from the field. Academy of management perspectives, 25 (3), 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NBS. 2019. NBS national BIM report 2019. National Building Specification, Newcastle UK.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. 2020. NBS National BIM Report 2020. National Building Specification, Newcastle UK.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. 2020. The 10th NBS National BIM Report 2020. National Building Specification, Newcastle UK.
   Google Scholar
• Oti-Sarpong, K., et al., 2022. Transforming the construction sector: an institutional complexity perspective. Construction innovation, 22 (2), 361–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzar, J. C. and Willig, R. D., 1975. Economies of scale and economies of scope in multi-output production. Bell laboratories economic discussion paper, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Panzar, J. C., and Willig. R. D., 1981. Economies of scope. The American economic review, 71 (2), 268–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M.W., and Jiang, X., 2016. Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly, 41 (1), 255-266.
   Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., Salter, A.J., and Gann, D.M., 2005. Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK. Construction management and economics, 23 (6), 631–644.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, J., Ploog, J.N., and Nieborg, D.B., 2020. Coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of management discoveries, 6 (3), 488–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., 2012. Coopetition strategy–when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British journal of management, 23 (3), 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D., and Ulrich, K., 1998. Planning for product platforms. Sloan management review, 39 (4), 19–31. https://repository.upenn.edu/oid_papers/266
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J., 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seaden, G., and Manseau, A., 2001. Public policy and construction innovation. Building research information, 29 (3), 182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergeeva, N., and WInch, G.M., 2020. Narrative interactions: How project-based firms respond to Government narratives of innovation. International journal of project management, 38 (6), 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhar, A.J., et al., 2016. The challenge of innovation in highly complex projects: what can we learn from boeing’s dreamliner experience? Project management journal, 47 (2), 62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T.W., 2004. Product platform design and customization: status and promise. Artificial intelligence for engineering design, analysis and manufacturing, 18 (1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T.W., Maier, J.R., and Mistree, F., 2001. Product platform design: method and application. Research in engineering design, 13 (1), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui Pheng, L., and Ke‐Wei, P., 1996. A framework for implementing TQM in construction. The TQM magazine, 8 (5), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C.S., Zimmerman, J.D., and Nelson, J.I., 2009. Managing new product development and supply chain risks: the boeing 787 case. Supply chain forum, 10 (2), 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J.,1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 1 (3), 223–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 3 (1), 39–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43 (2–3), 172–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., 2017. Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In: J. Furman, A. Gawer, B. S. Silverman, S. Stern, eds. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms (advances in strategic management) (vol. 37). UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220170000037008
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., 2018. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research policy, 47 (8), 1367–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., and Bush, A. A., 2010. Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information systems research, 21 (4), 675–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D., 2016. Product design and development (vol. 6). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K., 1995. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research policy, 24 (3), 419–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEF. 2016. Shaping the future of construction – A breakthrough in mindset and technology. Geneva: World Economic Forum (WEF).
   Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, S. C., and Clark, K. B., 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G., 2003a. Models of manufacturing and the construction process: the genesis of re-engineering construction. Building research & information, 31 (2), 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, G., 2003b. How innovative is construction? Comparing aggregated data on construction innovation and other sectors – a case of apples and pears. Construction management and economics, 21 (6), 651–654.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, G.M., 1998. Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building research & information, 26 (5), 268–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIPO. 2020. The global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation?. Cornell University, INSEAD, and World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yigit, A.S., Ulsoy, A.G., and Allahverdi, A., 2002. Optimizing modular product design for reconfigurable manufacturing. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 13 (4), 309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., von Delft, S., Morgan-Thomas, A. and Buck, T., 2020. The evolution of platform business models: exploring competitive battles in the world of platforms. Long Range Planning, 101892, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101892
   Google Scholar
• Zomer, T., Neely, A., Sacks, R. and Parlikad, A., 2021. Exploring the influence of socio-historical constructs on BIM implementation: an activity theory perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 39 (1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2020.1792522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zott, C., and Amit, R., 2017. Business model innovation: how to create value in a digital world. Marketing intelligence review, 9 (1), 18–23.
   Google Scholar