The role of blockchain in enabling inter-organisational supply chain alignment for value co-creation in the construction industry

References

• Af Hällström, A., et al., 2021. The role of social ties in collaborative project networks: a tale of two construction cases. Construction management and economics, 39 (9), 723–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, U.A., and Narayana, S.A., 2020. Impact of relational communication on buyer–supplier relationship satisfaction: role of trust and commitment. Benchmarking, 27 (8), 2459–2496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, W., and Rashidi, M.Z., 2022. Developing supply chain risk management capabilities by aligning strategies: integrating triple-A model. Measuring business excellence, 26 (3), 326–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksenova, G., et al., 2019. From Finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Construction management and economics, 37 (6), 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadisheykhsarmast, S., and Sonmez, R., 2020. A smart contract system for security of payment of construction contracts. Automation in construction, 120, 103401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mudimigh, A.S., Zairi, M., and Ahmed, A.M.M., 2004. Extending the concept of supply chain: the effective management of value chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 87 (3), 309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rakhami, M., and Al-Mashari, M., 2022. Interoperability approaches of blockchain technology for supply chain systems. Business process management journal, 28 (5/6), 1251–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsudiri, T., Al-Karaghouli, W., and Eldabi, T., 2013. Alignment of large project management process to business strategy: a review and conceptual framework. Journal of enterprise information management, 26 (5), 596–615.
   Google Scholar
• Altuntas Vural, C., 2017. Service-dominant logic and supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 32 (8), 1109–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeles, R., and Nath, R., 2001. Partner congruence in electronic data interchange (EDI)‐enabled relationships. Journal of business logistics, 22 (2), 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Azzi, R., Chamoun, R.K., and Sokhn, M., 2019. The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Computers & industrial engineering, 135, 582–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baah, C., et al., 2022. Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking, 29 (2), 434–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badi, S., et al., 2021. Technological, organisational and environmental determinants of smart contracts adoption: UK construction sector viewpoint. Construction management and economics, 39 (1), 36–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier, C., Hartman, E., and Moser, R., 2008. Strategic alignment and purchasing efficacy: an exploratory analysis of their impact on financial performance. Journal of supply chain management, 44 (4), 36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barima, O., 2017. Leveraging the blockchain technology to improve construction value delivery: the opportunities, benefits and challenges’. In: K. Hall, ed. Construction projects. New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, R., Webster, M., and Campbell, K.M., 2005. An evaluation of partnership development in the construction industry. International journal of project management, 23 (8), 611–621.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, K., and Janssen, M.F.W.H.A., 2020. Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology. International journal of information management, 52, 101969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S., and Momaya, K.S., 2021. Actionable strategy framework for digital transformation in AECO industry. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 28 (5), 1397–1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidbach, C.F., and Maglio, P.P., 2016. Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices. Industrial marketing management, 56, 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G., and Dainty, A., 2005. Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal? Supply chain management, 10 (4), 319–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bvuchete, M., Grobbelaar, S.S., and Van Eeden, J., 2020. Best practices for demand-driven supply chain management in public healthcare sector: a systematic literature review. South African journal of industrial engineering, 31 (2), 11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, M., Karrbom Gustavsson, T., and Eriksson, P.E., 2021. Front-end value co-creation in housing development projects. Construction management and economics, 39 (3), 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, M., et al., 2010. Supply chain collaboration: conceptualisation and instrument development. International journal of production research, 48 (22), 6613–6635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, M., and Zhang, Q., 2011. Supply chain collaboration: impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of operations management, 29 (3), 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centobelli, P., et al., 2022. Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain. Information & management, 59 (7), 103508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharya, S., and Dobrzykowski, D.D., 2014. Impact of supply chain collaboration on value co-creation and firm performance: a healthcare service sector perspective. Procedia economics and finance, 11 (2014), 676–694.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A.P., Chan, D.W., and Ho, K.S., 2003. An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong. Construction management and economics, 21 (5), 523–533.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F.T., and Qi, H.J., 2003. An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply chain management, 8 (3), 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.E., and Chen, Y., 2020. When blockchain meets supply chain: A systematic literature review on current development and potential applications. IEEE access. 8, 62478–62494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Hadi, S. A., and Price, B., 2001. Regression analysis by example. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Chen, S., and Xue, H., 2011. Large correlation analysis. Applied mathematics and computation, 217 (1), 9041–9052.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., et al., 2021. Identifying enablers for coordination across construction supply chain processes: a systematic literature review. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 28 (4), 1083–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D., et al., 2020. Factors affecting organisations’ resistance to the adoption of blockchain technology in supply networks. Sustainability, 12 (21), 8882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, M.M.H., Quaddus, M., and Agarwal, R., 2019. Supply chain resilience for performance: role of relational practices and network complexities. Supply chain management, 24 (5), 659–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çıdık, M.S., and Boyd, D., 2022. Value implication of digital transformation: the impact of the commodification of information. Construction management and economics, 40 (11–12), 903–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R., Stevenson, M., and Aitken, J., 2019. Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply chain management, 24 (4), 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltman, T., and Devinney, T.M., 2013. Modelling the operational capabilities for customized and commoditized services. Journal of operational management, 31 (7/8), 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16 (3), 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dania, W.A.P., Xing, K., and Amer, Y., 2018. Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: a systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, 186, 851–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, M., Luo, H., and Cheng, J.C., 2020. Securing interim payments in construction projects through a blockchain-based framework. Automation in construction, 118, 103284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, M., Tao, X., and Cheng, J.C., 2021. BIM security: A critical review and recommendations using encryption strategy and blockchain. Automation in construction, 126, 103682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, D., Shrein, J.M., and Gupta, K.D., 2019. A survey of blockchain from security perspective. Journal of banking and financial technology, 3, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., and Foropon, C.R., 2022. Improving information alignment and coordination in humanitarian supply chain through blockchain technology. Journal of enterprise information management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2022-0251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J.H., and Singh, H., 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23 (4), 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghaish, F., Abrishami, S., and Hosseini, M.R., 2020. Integrated project delivery with blockchain: an automated financial system. Automation in construction, 114, 103182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghaish, F., et al., 2023. Digitalised circular construction supply chain: an integrated BIM-blockchain solution. Automation in construction, 148, 104746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstsen, S.N., et al., 2021. How innovation champions frame the future: three visions for digital transformation of construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 147 (1), 05020022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., and Alkassim, R.S., 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5 (1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., and Jukes, S., 2000. Improving co‐development through process alignment. International journal of operations & production management, 20 (8), 979–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcone, E., Kent, J., and Fugate, B., 2020. Supply chain technologies, interorganizational network and firm performance: a case study of Alibaba Group and Cainiao. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 50 (3), 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S.E., et al., 2021. Overcoming the collaborative challenge: commitment as a super-ordinate enabler of value co-creation. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 51 (9), 1022–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcael, E., et al., 2020. Construction 4.0: a literature review. Sustainability, 12 (22), 9755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, G.A., 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16 (1), 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garr, N.G., 2003. IT doesn’t matter. Harvard business review, 81, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattorna, J.L., 1998. Strategic supply chain alignment. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Gattorna, J.L., 2009. Dynamic supply chain alignment. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, B., 2008. Developing a questionnaire. London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, J., Bygballe, L.E., and Hall, D., 2022. Transforming construction: the multi-scale challenges of changing and innovating in construction. Construction management and economics, 40 (11–12), 855–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, F., et al., 2022. Investigating social factors and their impact on value co-creation in supply chain ecosystems. Journal of global operations and strategic sourcing, 16 (1), 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C., 2011. A service perspective on business relationships: The value creation, interaction and marketing interface. Industrial marketing management, 40 (2), 240–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, G., 2022. Sustainability co‐creation in digitalised global value chains. Strategic change, 31 (1), 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, W., et al., 2023. The role of supply chain alignment in coping with resource dependency in blockchain adoption: empirical evidence from China. Journal of enterprise information management, 36 (2), 605–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., and McGaughey, R.E., 2004. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International journal of production economics, 87 (3), 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadaya, P., and Cassivi, L., 2012. Joint collaborative planning as a governance mechanism to strengthen the chain of IT value co-creation. The journal of strategic information systems, 21 (3), 182–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., et al., 2014. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Edinburgh: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hald, K.S., and Kinra, A., 2019. How the blockchain enables and constrains supply chain performance. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 49 (4), 376–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfpenny, P., 1982. Positivism and sociology: explaining social science. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hamledari, H., and Fischer, M., 2021. Construction payment automation using blockchain-enabled smart contracts and robotic reality capture technologies. Automation in construction, 132, 103926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargaden, V., Papakostas, N., Newell, A., Khavia, A., and Scanlon, A. (2019). The role of blockchain technologies in construction engineering project management. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanova, H., et al., 2019. A survey on blockchain cybersecurity vulnerabilities and possible countermeasures. International journal of network management, 29 (2), e2060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., et al., 2022. Prioritising collaborative scheduling practices based on their impact on project performance. Construction management and economics, 40 (7–8), 618–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heale, R., and Twycross, A., 2015. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based nursing, 18 (3), 66–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunhevicz, J.J., Motie, M., and Hall, D.M., 2022. Digital building twins and blockchain for performance-based (smart) contracts. Automation in construction, 133, 103981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., and Kaeschel, J. 2010. A multi-structural framework for adaptive supply chain planning and operations control with structure dynamics considerations. European journal of operational research, 200(2), 409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, K.C., Kumar, R., and Singh, S.P., 2020. Understanding the role of contractor capability in risk management: a comparative case study of two similar projects. Construction management and economics, 38 (3), 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, V.R., and Tan, K.C., 2010. Supply chain integration: cluster analysis of the impact of span of integration. Supply chain management, 15 (3), 207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewell, B., Adams, R., and Parry, G., 2017. Blockchain for good? Strategic change, 26 (5), 429–437.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, D., Jung, L.T., and Hashmani, M.A., 2021. Systematic literature review of challenges in blockchain scalability. Applied sciences, 11 (20), 9372.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, K.I.A., Flanagan, R., and Lu, S.L., 2016. Managing information complexity using system dynamics on construction projects. Construction management and economics, 34 (3), 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., and Justl, J.M., 2018. Potential antitrust risks in the development and use of blockchain. Journal of taxation & regulation of financial institutions, 31 (3), 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnapriya, V., and Baral, R., 2014. Supply chain integration – A competency based perspective. International journal of managing value and supply chains, 5 (3), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and Singh, R.K., 2022. Supply chain management practices, retail outlets attributes and organisational performance: a case of organised food retailers in India. Journal of global operations and strategic sourcing, 16, 568–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D.M., García‐Dastugue, S.J., and Croxton, K.L., 2005. An evaluation of process‐oriented supply chain management frameworks. Journal of business logistics, 26 (1), 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lavikka, R., et al., 2018. Digital disruption of the AEC industry: technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths. Construction management and economics, 36 (11), 635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., et al., 2021. Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects. Automation in construction, 127, 103688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., 2004. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard business review, 82 (10), 102–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, J., Småros, J., and Holmström, J., 2005. The effect of demand visibility in product introductions. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 35 (2), 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Zhang, Y., and Xu, Y. 2022. Factors influencing the adoption of blockchain in the construction industry: A hybrid approach using P LS-SEM and fsQCA. Buildings, 12(9), 1349.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Greenwood, D., and Kassem, M., 2019. Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: a systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Automation in construction, 102, 288–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and Kassem, M., 2021. Applications of distributed ledger technology (DLT) and Blockchain-enabled smart contracts in construction. Automation in construction, 132, 103955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., and Lin, B., 2006. Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decision support systems, 42 (3), 1641–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, H., and Guerrero, J.R., 2020. Client’s role in promoting BIM implementation and innovation in construction. Construction management and economics, 38 (5), 468–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Liu, N., and Chen, Y., 2021. Diagnostic test decision for suppliers in cruise-building supply chain with information asymmetry. Advanced engineering informatics, 49, 101350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2019. The co-creation of values-in-use at the front end of infrastructure development programs. International journal of project management, 37 (5), 684–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W., et al., 2021. Exploring smart construction objects as blockchain oracles in construction supply chain management. Automation in construction, 129, 103816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, O., Nylén, D., and Sandberg, J., 2022. Unpacking construction site digitalisation: the role of incongruence and inconsistency in technological frames. Construction management and economics, 40 (11–12), 987–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström, A., Savolainen, J., and Kostiainen, E., 2016. Case study: developing campus spaces through co-creation. Architectural engineering and design management, 12 (6), 409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R.F., and Vargo, S.L., 2014. Service-dominant logic: premises, perspectives, possibilities, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mačiulienė, M., and Skaržauskienė, A., 2016. Evaluation of co-creation perspective in networked collaboration platforms. Journal of business research, 69 (11), 4826–4830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmudnia, D., Arashpour, M., and Yang, R., 2022. Blockchain in construction management: applications, advantages and limitations. Automation in construction, 140, 104379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, S., 2017. Building the blockchain world: technological commonwealth or just more of the same? Strategic change, 26 (5), 511–522.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, A.J., and Sepasgozar, S.M., 2021. Intelligent contract adoption in the construction industry: concept development. Automation in construction, 122, 103452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mik, E., 2017. Smart contracts: terminology, technical limitations and real world complexity. Law, innovation and technology, 9 (2), 269–300.
   Google Scholar
• Milind Mehta, S., et al., 2022. An investigation of construction project efficiency: perception gaps and the interrelationships of critical factors. Buildings, 12 (10), 1559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, G.R., and Razmdoost, K., 2016. Managing value co-creation/destruction: a longitudinal education capital programme/project case study. Construction management and economics, 34 (4–5), 286–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., et al., 1996. The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases. 3rd ed. London: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Mora-Monge, C., et al., 2019. Trust, power and supply chain integration in Web-enabled supply chains. Supply chain management, 24 (4), 524–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, B., 2019. Organising for digitalisation through mutual constitution: the case of a design firm. Construction management and economics, 37 (7), 400–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubarik, M.S., Naghavi, N., and Mubarak, M.F., 2019. Impact of supplier relational capital on supply chain performance in Pakistani textile industry. Asian economic and financial review, 9 (3), 318–328.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, C., Scott, J. Z., Warren, S., & Rangaswami, J. P. (2018). Blockchain beyond the hype: a practical framework for business leaders. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/48423_Whether_Blockchain_WP.pdf [Accessed April 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Nanayakkara, S., et al., 2021. Blockchain and smart contracts: a solution for payment issues in construction supply chains. Informatics, 8 (2), 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, I. C., Nudurupati, S. S., and Tasker, P., 2010. Value co-creation in the delivery of outcome-based contracts for business-to-business service [Online]. Available from: shorturl.at/zCHV0.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha, D., et al., 2019. Is there a performance tradeoff in managing order fulfillment and the bullwhip effect in supply chains? The role of information sharing and information type. International journal of production economics, 208, 529–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdyke, A., et al., 2017. Inter-organisational resource coordination in post-disaster infrastructure recovery. Construction management and economics, 35 (8–9), 514–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, C., and Yildizbaşi, A., 2020. Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example. Soft computing, 24, 14771–14789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, X., et al., 2022. Blockchain and deep learning technologies for construction equipment security information management. Automation in construction, 136, 104186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E., and Wamelink, H., 2017. Inter- and intraorganizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM. Building research & information, 45 (6), 649–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera, S., et al., 2020. Blockchain technology: is it hype or real in the construction industry? Journal of industrial information integration, 17, 100125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, X., and Papadonikolaki, E., 2021. Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 28 (2), 584–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz, M.M., Telles, R., and Bonilla, S.H., 2020. Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supply chain management, 25 (2), 241–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, A., et al., 2022. A paradigm of blockchain and supply chain performance: a mediated model using structural equation modeling. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2022-0543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejeb, A., Keogh, J.G., and Treiblmaier, H., 2019. Leveraging the internet of things and blockchain technology in supply chain management. Future internet, 11 (7), 161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejeb, A., et al., 2021. Potentials of blockchain technologies for supply chain collaboration: a conceptual framework. The international journal of logistics management, 32 (3), 973–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, D., and Molina, A., 2011. Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production planning & control, 22 (5–6), 447–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., 2016. What constitutes good production flow in construction? Construction management and economics, 34 (9), 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáenz, M.J., Revilla, E., and Acero, B., 2018. Aligning supply chain design for boosting resilience. Business horizons, 61 (3), 443–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, V., Goyal, P., and Jebarajakirthy, C., 2022. Value co-creation: a review of literature and future research agenda. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 37 (3), 612–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, K.-S., and Hoff, P., 2016. Digitisation in the construction industry – building Europe’s road to “construction 4.0”, Munich: Roland Berger Gmbh, Civil Economics, Energy & Infrastructure Competence Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schniederjans, D.G., Curado, C., and Khalajhedayati, M., 2020. Supply chain digitisation trends: an integration of knowledge management. International journal of production economics, 220, 107439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D.J., Broyd, T., and Ma, L., 2021. Exploratory literature review of blockchain in the construction industry. Automation in construction, 132, 103914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheel, A., and Nath, V., 2019. Effect of blockchain technology adoption on supply chain adaptability, agility, alignment and performance. Management research review, 42 (12), 1353–1374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, D., et al., 2020. Construction quality information management with blockchains. Automation in construction, 120, 103373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth, H., and Dattani, J., 2019. Overview of blockchain technology. Asian journal for convergence in technology (AJCT).
   Google Scholar
• Siaw, C.A., and Okorie, C., 2022. Value co‐creation on technology‐enabled platforms for business model responsiveness and position enhancement in global value chains. Strategic change, 31 (1), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Simatupang, T.M., and Sridharan, R., 2007. The architecture of supply chain collaboration. International journal of value chain management, 1 (3), 304–323.
   Google Scholar
• Simatupang, T.M., Wright, A.C., and Sridharan, R., 2002. The knowledge of coordination for supply chain integration. Business process management journal, 8 (3), 289–308.
   Google Scholar
• Skipworth, H., et al., 2015. Supply chain alignment for improved business performance: an empirical study. Supply chain management, 20 (5), 511–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenroos, L., and Jaakkola, E., 2012. Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem-solving process. Industrial marketing management, 41 (1), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratman, J.K., and Roth, A.V., 2002. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision sciences, 33 (4), 601–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., & Badi, S. (2020). Evaluating the impacts of IoT implementation on inter-organisational value co-creation in the chinese construction industry. In: Information Systems: 17th European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference, EMCIS 2020, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, November 25–26, Springer International Publishing, 698–714.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S., 2014. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Harlow Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, X., et al., 2021. Distributed common data environment using blockchain and interplanetary file system for secure BIM-based collaborative design. Automation in construction, 130, 103851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel, A., et al., 2020. Preparing construction supply chains for blockchain technology: an investigation of its potential and future directions. Frontiers of engineering management, 7, 547–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunberg, M., and Fredriksson, A., 2018. Bringing planning back into the picture–How can supply chain planning aid in dealing with supply chain-related problems in construction? Construction management and economics, 36 (8), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, N. B., Um, T. W., Zhou, B., & Lee, G. M. (2018). Strengthening the blockchain-based internet of value with trust. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., 1985. In defence of positivism. Sociological theory, 3 (2), 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Um, K.H., and Kim, S.M., 2019. The effects of supply chain collaboration on performance and transaction cost advantage: the moderation and nonlinear effects of governance mechanisms. International journal of production economics, 217, 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Groesen, W., and Pauwels, P., 2022. Tracking prefabricated assets and compliance using quick response (QR) codes, blockchain and smart contract technology. Automation in construction, 141, 104420.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., 2009. Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service‐dominant logic perspective. Journal of business & industrial marketing, 24 (5/6), 373–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Danwitz, S., 2018. Managing inter-firm projects: a systematic review and directions for future research. International journal of project management, 36 (3), 525–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosman, L., et al., 2023. Collaboration and innovation beyond project boundaries: exploring the potential of an ecosystem perspective in the infrastructure sector. Construction management and economics, 41 (6), 457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijhoef, R., 2011. Supply chain integration in the building industry: the emergence of integrated and repetitive strategies in a fragmented and project-driven industry. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wamba, S.F., Queiroz, M.M., and Trinchera, L., 2020. Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: an empirical investigation. International journal of production economics, 229, 107791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., et al., 2020. Blockchain-based framework for improving supply chain traceability and information sharing in precast construction. Automation in construction, 111, 103063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, H.L., and Wang, E.T., 2010. The strategic value of supply chain visibility: increasing the ability to reconfigure. European journal of information systems, 19, 238–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2019. How digital information transforms project delivery models. Project management journal, 50 (2), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A., et al., 1999. Relationships for quality improvement in the Hong Kong-China supply chain. International journal of quality & reliability management, 16 (1), 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C., et al., 2012. Towards a theory of supply chain alignment enablers: a systematic literature review. Supply chain management, 17 (4), 419–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voshmgir, S., 2017. Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strategic Change, 26 (5), 499–509.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., et al., 2022. Blockchain technology in the construction industry: current status, challenges, and future directions. Journal of construction engineering and management, 148 (10), 03122007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., 2020. Understanding trust in construction supply chain relationships. Successful Construction Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, 307–333.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Chong, H.Y., and Chi, M., 2022. Blockchain in the AECO industry: current status, key topics, and future research agenda. Automation in construction, 134, 104101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, R., et al., 2020. Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration. Automation in construction, 118, 103276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqub, S., et al., 2023. Nexus of block chain alignment, supply chain agility, supply chain performance and their impact on firm’s environmental performance: a developing country perspective. Journal of contemporary business and islamic finance, 3 (1), 250–263.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi, S., and Tosarkani, B.M., 2022. An analytical approach for evaluating the impact of blockchain technology on sustainable supply chain performance. International journal of production economics, 246, 108429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., and Huo, B., 2019. The impact of relational capital on supplier quality integration and operational performance. Total quality management & business excellence, 30 (11–12), 1282–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf, Y.Y., et al., 2004. Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. European journal of operational research, 159 (2), 379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, B., et al., 2020. Hyperledger fabric-based consortium blockchain for construction quality information management. Frontiers of engineering management, 7 (4), 512–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulu, S.L., and Khosrowshahi, F., 2021. A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 39 (7), 565–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar