Nutrient quality characteristics of fresh tomatoes subjected to various transportation and disinfection treatments under commercial conditions in South African supply chains

References

• Abraham AO, Laing MD, Bower JP. 2010. Isolation and in vivo screening of yeast and Bacillus antagonists for the control of Penicillium digitatum of citrus fruit. Biol Control. 53(1):32–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrocinco. 2018. Nemo-Netta tomato variety. Agrocinco; [accessed 2018 Nov 13]. http://agrocinco.com.br/2013/en/produto_detalhes.asp?idprod=2&idcat=1&idsub=1.
   Google Scholar
• Arhin SA, Noel EC, Ribbiso A. 2015. Acceptable international roughness index thresholds based on present serviceability rating. J Civil Eng Res. 5(4):90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin E, Nisperos-Carriedo M, Moshonas M. 1991. Quantitative analysis of flavor and other volatiles and for certain constituents of two tomato cultivars during ripening. Journal of the Am Soc Hortic Sci. 116(2):265–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.116.2.265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckles DM. 2012. Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 63(1):129–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukobza F, Taylor AJ. 2002. Effect of postharvest treatment on flavour volatiles of tomatoes. Postharvest Biol Technol. 25(3):321–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00037-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt S, Pék Z, Barna É, Lugasi A, Helyes L. 2006. Lycopene content and colour of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. J Sci Food Agric. 86(4):568–572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccheri M, Cantwell M. 2014. Damage to intact fruit affects quality of slices from ripened tomatoes. LWT Food Sci Technol. 59(1):327–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakmak B, Alayunt F, Akdeniz C, Can Z, Aksoy U. 2010. The assessment of the quality losses of fresh fig fruits during transportation. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi. 16(3 180–193.
   Google Scholar
• Canene-Adams K, Campbell JK, Zaripheh S, Jeffery EH, Erdman JW. 2005. The tomato as a functional food. J Nutr. 135(5):1226–1230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.5.1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-H, Lin H-Y, Chang C-Y, Liu Y-C. 2006. Comparisons on the antioxidant properties of fresh, freeze-dried and hot-air-dried tomatoes. J Food Eng. 77(3):478–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherono K, Workneh T. 2018. A review of the role of transportation on the quality changes of fresh tomatoes and their management in South Africa and other emerging markets. Int Food Res J. 25(6):2211–2228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAFF. 2013. A profile of the South African tomato market value chain. South African Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (SADAFF); [accessed 2015 May 15]. www.nda.agric.za/doaDev/sideMenu/Marketing/Annual%20Publications/Commodity%20Profiles/field%20crops/Tomato%20Value%20Chain%20Profile%20%202012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davies JN, Kempton RJ. 1975. Changes in the individual sugars of tomato fruit during ripening. J Sci Food Agric. 26(8):1103–1110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740260808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AR, Fish WW, Perkins-Veazie P. 2003. A rapid spectrophotometric method for analyzing lycopene content in tomato and tomato products. Postharvest Biol Technol. 28(3):425–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00203-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorais M, Ehret DL, Papadopoulos AP. 2008. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer. Phytochem Rev. 7(2):231–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-007-9085-x.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Craig W, Ashby BH. 1990. Reducing transportation damage to grapes and strawberries. J Food Distrib Res. 21(1):193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Georgelis N, Scott J, Baldwin E. 2004. Relationship of tomato fruit sugar concentration with physical and chemical traits and linkage of RAPD markers. Journal of the Am Soc Hortic Sci. 129(6):839–845. doi:https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.129.6.0839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goula A, Adamopoulos K. 2006. Retention of ascorbic acid during drying of tomato halves and tomato pulp. Drying Technol. 24(1):57–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930500538709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim A, Kaukovirta E, Pehu E, Voipio I. 1997. Effect of hot water, immersion time, and length of storage on chilling injury of tomato fruit. J Veg Crop Prod. 3(2):17–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/J068v03n02_04.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidi E, Kalamaki MS, Engineer C, Pateraki I, Alexandrou D, Mellidou I, Giovannonni J, Kanellis AK. 2009. Expression profiling of ascorbic acid-related genes during tomato fruit development and ripening and in response to stress conditions. J Exp Bot. 60(2):663–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javanmardi J, Kubota C. 2006. Variation of lycopene, antioxidant activity, total soluble solids and weight loss of tomato during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 41(2):151–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitinoja L, Kader AA. 2002. Small-scale postharvest handling practices: a manual for horticultural crops. 3rd ed. Carlifonia: University of California, Davis, Postharvest Technology Research and Information Center.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Gereffi G, Beauvais J. 2012. Global value chains and agrifood standards: challenges and possibilities for smallholders in developing countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 109(31):12326–12331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913714108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kader A. 2000. Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biol Technol. 20(3):207–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00133-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw A, Jordaan D, Ndanga L, Kirsten JF. 2008. Alternative marketing options for small-scale farmers in the wake of changing agri-food supply chains in South Africa. Agrekon. 47(3):287–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2008.9523801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie S 1998. Postharvest heat treatments of horticultural crops. HORTICULTURAL REVIEWS-WESTPORT THEN NEW YORK-. 22:91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Malherbe S 2016. The interactions between biotic and abiotic factors that influence the sustainability of tomato production in South Africa [PhD in Agronomy]. University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Malundo TMM, Shewfelt RL, Scott JW. 1995. Flavor quality of fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels. Postharvest Biol Technol. 6(1):103–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5214(94)00052-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marfil P, Santos E, Telis V. 2008. Ascorbic acid degradation kinetics in tomatoes at different drying conditions. LWT Food Sci Technol. 41(9):1642–1647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul F, Sargent S, Sims C, Baldwin E, Balaban M, Huber D. 2000. Tomato flavor and aroma quality as affected by storage temperature. J Food Sci. 65(7):1228–1237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10270.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missio JC, Renau RM, Artigas FC, Cornejo JC. 2015. Sugar-and-acid profile of Penjar tomatoes and its evolution during storage. Sci Agric. 72(4):314–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutari A, Debbie R. 2011. The effects of postharvest handling and storage temperature on the quality and shelf of tomato. Afr J Food Sci. 5(7):340–348.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes MCN, Emond JP, Rauth M, Dea S, Chau KV. 2009. Environmental conditions encountered during typical consumer retail display affect fruit and vegetable quality and waste. Postharvest Biol Technol. 51(2):232–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzanza B 2011. Seedling quality, plant growth and fruit yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in response to Trichoderma harzianum and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [PhD]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Paull R. 1999. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on fresh commodity quality. Postharvest Biol Technol. 15(3):263–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00090-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull R, Jung NC. 2000. Heat treatment and fruit ripening. Postharvest Biol Technol. 21(1):21–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00162-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Alegria C, Abreu M, Sol M, Gonçalves EM, Silva CL. 2014. Postharvest quality of refrigerated tomato fruit (Solanum lycopersicum, cv. Zinac) at two maturity stages following heat treatment. J Food Process Preserv. 39(6):697–709. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltveit ME. 1999. Effect of ethylene on quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Technol. 15(3):279–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00091-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibomana M, Ziena L, Schmidt S, Workneh T. 2017. Influence of transportation conditions and postharvest disinfection treatments on microbiological quality of fresh market tomatoes (cv. Nemo-Netta) in a South African supply chain. J Food Prot. 80(2):345–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobratee N, Workneh TS. 2015. Evaluation of chemical, biochemical and microbiological quality in tomato using multivariate analysis. Int J Food Eng. 11(2):173–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2014-0099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens R, Page D, Gouble B, Garchery C, Zamir D, Causse M. 2008. Tomato fruit ascorbic acid content is linked with monodehydroascorbate reductase activity and tolerance to chilling stress. Plant Cell Environ. 31(8):1086–1096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01824.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suslow T 2005. Chlorination in the production and postharvest handling of fresh fruits and vegetables.
   Google Scholar
• Tigist M, Workneh T, Woldetsadik K. 2013. Effects of variety on the quality of tomato stored under ambient conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 50(3):477–486. English. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0378-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilahun S, Park DS, Taye AM, Jeong CS. 2017. Effects of storage duration on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). 원예과학기술지. 35(1):88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Tolesa GN, Workneh TS. 2017. Influence of storage environment, maturity stage and pre-storage disinfection treatments on tomato fruit quality during winter in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Food Sci Technol. 54(10):3230–3242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2766-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolesa G, Workneh T, Melesse S. 2018. Logistic regression analysis of marketability of tomato fruit harvested at different maturity stages and subjected to disinfection, storage condition and storage period treatments. Biol Agric Hortic. 34(1):40–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2017.1368414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toor RK, Savage GP. 2005. Antioxidant activity in different fractions of tomatoes. Food Res Int. 38(5):487–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toor RK, Savage GP. 2006. Changes in major antioxidant components of tomatoes during post-harvest storage. Food Chem. 99(4):724–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yu T, Xia J, Yu D, Wang J, Zheng X. 2010. Biocontrol of postharvest gray mold of cherry tomatoes with the marine yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum. Biol Control. 53(2):178–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Pretorius J, Hugo C. 2003. Comparison of anolyte and chlorinated water as a disinfecting dipping treatment for stored carrots. J Food Qual. 26(6):463–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2003.tb00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn M. 2009. Integrated agrotechnology with preharvest ComCat® treatment, modified atmosphere packaging and forced ventilation evaporative cooling of tomatoes. Afr J Biotechnol. 8(5 860–872).
   Google Scholar
• Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn M. 2012. Effects of preharvest treatment, disinfections, packaging and storage environment on quality of tomato. J Food Sci Technol. 49(6):685–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0391-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zantsi S, Greyling J, Vink N. 2019. Towards a common understanding of ‘emerging farmer’in a South African context using data from a survey of three district municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province. S Afr J Agric Extension. 47(2):81–93.
   Google Scholar