557
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ICT and Health

Technology-mediated information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters

&
Pages 259-270 | Received 27 Feb 2012, Accepted 13 Feb 2013, Published online: 14 Apr 2013

References

  • Ahern, D.K., et al., 2011. Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40 (5), S162–S172. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.005
  • Almquist, J.R., et al., 2009. Consultation room design and the clinical encounter: the space and interaction randomized trial. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3 (1), 41–78.
  • Als, A.B., 1997. The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs’ and patients’ perceptions. Family Practice, 14 (1), 17–23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.17
  • Bakeman, R., 2000. Behavioural observation and coding. In: H.T. Reis and C.M. Judd, eds. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138–159.
  • Bates, D.W. and Bitton, A., 2010. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Affairs, 29 (4), 614–621. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0007
  • Beck, R., Daughtridge, R., and Sloane, P., 2002. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 15 (1), 25–38.
  • Booth, N., Robinson, P., and Kohannejad, J., 2004. Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. Informatics in Primary Care, 12 (2), 75–83.
  • Chaudhry, B., et al., 2006. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144 (6), E-12–E-22.
  • Chen, Y., et al., 2011. Unpacking exam-room computing: negotiating computer-use in patient-physician interactions. In: D.S. Tan, et al., eds. Proceedings of Chi 2011, 7–12 May 2011, Vancouver, BC. New York: ACM Press, 3343–3352.
  • Creswell, J.W., 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.
  • Creswell, J.W., et al., 2011. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences [online]. Washington, DC: Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Available from: http://obssr.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/methodology/mixed_methods_research/pdf [Accessed 15 August 2011].
  • Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., and Kinnersley, P., 1999. Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. The British Journal of General Practice, 49 (443), 477–482.
  • Frankel, R., et al., 2005. Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20 (8), 677–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0163.x
  • Helman, C., 1991. Research in primary care: the qualitative approach. In: P.G. Norton, ed. Primary care research: traditional and innovative approaches. London: Sage, 105–124.
  • Holden, R.J., 2011. Social and personal normative influences on healthcare professionals to use information technology: towards a more robust social ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 13 (5), 546–569. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2010.549249
  • Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., and Stick, S.L., 2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods, 18 (1), 3–20. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05282260
  • Karsh, B.T., Beasley, J., and Hagenauer, M.E., 2004. Are electronic medical records associated with improved perceptions of the quality of medical records, working conditions, or quality of working life? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23 (5), 327–335. doi: 10.1080/01449290410001693845
  • Lelievre, S. and Schultz, K., 2010. Does computer use in patient-physician encounters influence patient satisfaction? Canadian Family Physician, 56 (1), E6–E12.
  • Lown, B.A. and Rodriguez, D., 2012. Lost in translation? How electronic health records structure communication, relationships, and meaning. Academic Medicine, 87 (4), 392–394. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318248e5ae
  • Margalit, R.S., et al., 2006. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 61 (1), 134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004
  • Miles, M.B. and Hubberman, A.M., 1994. Data management and analysis methods. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 428–444.
  • Montague, E., et al., 2011. Modeling eye gaze patterns in clinician–patient interaction with lag sequential analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53 (5), 502–516. doi: 10.1177/0018720811405986
  • Pearce, C., et al., 2009. Doctor, patient and computer – a framework for the new consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78 (1), 32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.002
  • Piper, A.M. and Hollan, J.D., 2011. Supporting medical communication for older patients with a shared touch-screen computer. International Journal of Medical Informatics. Available online 14 April 2011. (in press).
  • Plano Clark, V.L., 2010. The adoption and practice of mixed methods: us trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16 (6), 428–440. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364609
  • Pratt, W., et al., 2004. Incorporating ideas from computer-supported cooperative work. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37 (2), 128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.04.001
  • Robles, E., Nass, C., and Kahn, A., 2009. The social life of information displays: how screens shape psychological responses in social contexts. Human–Computer Interaction, 24 (1), 48–78. doi: 10.1080/07370020902739320
  • Roter, D., et al., 2006. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behaviour in medical visits. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21 (S1), S28–S34. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00306.x
  • Savage, J., 2000. Ethnography and health care. British Medical Journal, 321 (7273), 1400–1402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400
  • Shachak, A. and Reis, S., 2009. The impact of electronic medical records on patient–doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15 (4), 641–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01065.x
  • Shachak, A., et al., 2009. Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24 (4), 341–348. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0892-6
  • Stewart, M.A., 1995. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152 (9), 1423–1433.
  • Theadom, A., et al., 2003. Using three-channel video to evaluate the impact of the use of the computer on the patient-centredness of the general practice consultation. Informatics in Primary Care, 11, 149–156.
  • Unruh, K.T., et al., 2010. Transforming clinic environments into information workspaces for patients. Proceedings of Chi 2010, 10–15 April 2010, Atlanta, GA. New York: ACM Press, 183–192.
  • Ventres, W., et al., 2005. Clinician style and examination room computers: a video ethnography. Family Medicine, 37 (4), 276–281.
  • Wang, H. and Blevis, E., 2004. Concepts that support collocated collaborative work inspired by the specific context of industrial designers. In: J.D. Herbsleb and G.M. Olson, eds. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, 6–10 November 2004, Chicago, IL. New York: ACM Press, 546–549.
  • Wilcox, L., et al., 2010. Designing patient-centric information displays for hospitals. In: E.D. Mynatt, et al., eds. Proceedings of Chi 2010, 10–15 April 2010, Atlanta, GA. New York: ACM Press, 2123–2132.
  • Zandbelt, L., et al., 2006. Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians’ patient-centred communication matter? Patient Education and Counseling, 65 (3), 396–406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.