428
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Social Interaction Online

The influence of cognitive conflict on the result of collaborative editing in Wikipedia

, &
Pages 1361-1370 | Received 18 Apr 2012, Accepted 09 Apr 2013, Published online: 20 May 2013

References

  • Auray, N., Pouat, C., and Pons, P., 2007. Democratizing scientific vulgarization, the balance between cooperation and conflict in French Wikipedia. Observatorio Journal, 1(3), 185–199.
  • Ang, C.S., Zaphiris, P., and Wilson, S., 2011. A case study analysis of a constructionist knowledge building community with activity theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30 (5), 537–554. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.490921
  • Arazy, O., et al., 2011. Information quality in Wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27 (4), 71–98. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270403
  • Brandes, U. and Lerner, J., 2008. Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias. Information Visualization, 7 (1), 34–48. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500171
  • Cress, U. and Kimmerle, J., 2008. A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3 (2), 105–122. doi: 10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z
  • Collier, B. and Bear, J., 2012. Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia contributions. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, Washington. New York, NY: ACM Press, 383–392.
  • Dondio, P. and Barrett, S., 2007. Computational trust in web content quality: a comparative evaluation on the Wikipedia project. Informatica – An International Journal of Computing and Informatics, 31 (2), 151–160.
  • Duan, C.He., 2007. Initiating cognitive conflict and optimizing the cognitive structure of Physics. Journal of Mudanjiang Teachers College (Natural Sciences Edition), 57 (1), 64–65. (in Chinese)
  • Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–550.
  • Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., and Riedl, J., 2011. Don't bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on wikis and open collaboration, Mountain View. New York, NY: ACM Press, 163–172.
  • Hu, M., et al., 2007. Measuring article quality in Wikipedia: models and evaluation. CIKM ’07: proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on information and knowledge management, Lisboa, Portugal. New York, NY: ACM Press, 243–252.
  • Huberman, D.W.B., 2007. Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 157–164.
  • Javanmardi, S., et al., 2010. Statistical measure of the effectiveness of the open editing model of Wikipedia [online]. Available from: http://www.icwsm.org/2010/papers/icwsm10dcw_3.pdf. [Accessed 21 December 2010].
  • Kittur, A. and Kraut, R.E., 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: quality through coordination. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, San Diego, California. New York, NY: ACM Press, 37–46.
  • Kittur, A., et al., 2007. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. Proceeding CHI ‘07 proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California. New York, NY: ACM Press, 453–462.
  • Kluwe, R.H., 1995. Single case studies and models of complex problem solving. In: P. A. Frensch and J. Funke, eds. Complex problem solving: The European perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 269–291.
  • Lih, A., 2004. Wikipedia as participatory journalism: reliable sources metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. Proceedings of fifth international symposium on online journalism [online], April, Austin, 16–17. Available from: https://online.journalism.utexas.edu/2004/papers/wikipedia.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2013].
  • Liu, X.H., 2007. Research on instructional strategies of initiating cognitive conflict. Jiangxi Educational Research, no. 2, 117–119. (in Chinese)
  • Liu, Y.X. and Xu W., 2005. CoEditor: edit system for group cooperative writing. Computer Engineering and Design, 26 (9), 2530–2532. (in Chinese)
  • Miller, 2012. Characterizing conflict in Wikipedia. Honors Projects. Available from: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/mathcs_honors/25 [Accessed 25 September 2012].
  • Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., and Cress, U., 2008. Learning and knowledge building with Wikis: the impact of incongruity between people's knowledge and a Wiki's information. ICLS’08 proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences, 23–28 June 2008, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, 99–106.
  • Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., and Cress, U., 2009. Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25 (6), 549–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00331.x
  • Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., and Ang, C.S., 2006. Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (1), 88–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00316.x
  • Patton, M.Q., 1987. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London: Sage.
  • Piaget, J., 1970. Carmichael's manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.
  • Roessing, T., 2008. Opinion formation in Wikipedia theory, measurement, and findings. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, no. 2, 163–176.
  • Shi, L. and Xu, B.M., 2002. Human human interaction interface in CSCW system. Computer Applications and Software, 19 (3), 23–24, 33. (in Chinese)
  • Stvilia, B., et al., 2005a. Information quality discussions in Wikipedia, ICKM05. Available from: http://mailer.fsu.edu bstvilia/papers/qualWiki.pdf [Accessed 25 September 2007].
  • Stvilia, B., et al., 2005b. Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on information quality, Cambridge, MA: MITIQ, 442–454. Available from: http://mailer.fsu.edu/ bstvilia/papers/quantWiki.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2013]
  • Viégas, F.B., Wattenberg, M., and Dave, K., 2004. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria. New York, NY: ACM Press, 575–582.
  • Wilkinson, D.M. and Huberman, B.A., 2007a. Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12 (4), 1–14. doi: 10.5210/fm.v12i4.1763
  • Wilkinson, D.M. and Huberman, B.A., 2007b. Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, Montréal, Québec, Canada. New York, NY: ACM Press, 157–164.
  • Wang, D.D., 2009. The quality assurance process of Wikipedia under self-organization. Information Science, 27 (5), 696–698, 703. (in Chinese)
  • Yang, H.L. and Lai, C.Y., 2011. Understanding knowledge-sharing behavior in Wikipedia. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30 (1), 131–142. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.516019
  • Yin, R., 2002. Case study: research design and methods. New Delhi: Sage Publication.
  • Zhang, B., Zhang, W.Y., and Zhang, S.W., 2001. Cooperative editing system based on CSCW. Computer Engineering and Applications, 37 (5), 80–82. (in Chinese)
  • Zhang, N.F., 2009. The application research of cognitive conflict in senior biology teaching. Thesis (PhD). Soochow University. (in Chinese)
  • Zhou, Q.S. and Wang, J.S., 2007. On the information self-organization mode of Wikipedia. Information and Documentation Services, no. 2, 29–32. (in Chinese)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.