Observing the use of an input device for rehabilitation purposes

References

• Akhutina, T., et al. 2003. Improving spatial functioning in children with CP using computerized and traditional game tasks. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(24), 1361–1371. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001616358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax, M., et al. 2005. Proposed definition and classification of CP. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47(8), 571–576. doi: 10.1017/S001216220500112X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, J. G. 2002. Pediatric rehabilitation in children with CP: general management, classification of motor disorders. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 14(4), 143–149. doi: 10.1097/00008526-200212000-00004
   Google Scholar
• Betke, M., Gips, J., and Fleming, P. 2002. The camera mouse: visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2002.1021581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryanton, C., et al. 2006. Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conventional home exercise in children with CP. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(2), 123–128. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cloud, R. L., Betke, M., and Gips, J., 2002. Experiments with a camera-based human-computer interface system, Proceedings of the 7th ERCIM workshop ‘user interfaces for all’, UI4ALL 2002, Paris, France, 103–110
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, R., et al. 2007. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 4(3), 3339–3351.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C., et al., 2009. Movement and recovery analysis of a mouse-replacement interface for users with severe disabilities, 13th international conference on human-computer interaction (HCI International 2009), San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, J. E., et al. 2008. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with CP. Physical Therapy, 88(10), 1196–1207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonoll Salvador, J., and López Álvarez, S. 2007. SiMuove entre el juego y la rehabilitación. Comunicación y pedagogía Especial Necesidades Educativas Especiales, 219, 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Golomb, M. R., et al. 2010. In-home virtual reality videogame telerehabilitation in adolescents with hemiplegic CP. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. M., Charles, J., and Wolf, S. L. 2005. Methods of constraint-induced movement therapy for children with hemiplegic CP: development of a child-friendly intervention for improving upper-extremity function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(4), 837–844. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorodnichy, D., Dubrofsky, E., and Mohammad, A. A., 2007. Working with a computer hands-free using the nouse perceptual vision interface, Proceedings of the international workshop on video processing and recognition (VideoRec’07), NRC 49354, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M. K. 2005. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(3), 187–211. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornof, A., 2008. Working with children with severe motor impairments as design partners, Proceedings IDC’08, Chicago, USA, 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, J., Perales, F. J., and Guerrero, C. 2012. Medición del estado de concentracióna partir de interfaces BCI inalámbricos e interfaces perceptuales. In Turiel, J. P., Ceres, R., and Caminal, P. (Ed.), 4° Simposio CEA BioIngeniería 2012, (pp. 49–56). ValladolidSpain:
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, M., et al. 2001. Effects of a functional therapy program on motor abilities of children with CP. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 81(9), 1534–1545.
   Google Scholar
• King, S., et al. 2000. Can child centre for childhood disability research, children with disabilities in Ontario part one: children, families and services, Hamilton: McMaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, A., et al., 2008. Virtual environments increase participation of children with CP in robot-aided treadmill training, Virtual rehabilitation proceedings, Vancouver, Canada, 121–126
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., and Hochheiser, H. 2010. Research methods in human-computer interaction, London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Llaneza, F. J. 2009. In Lex, Nova (Ed.), Ergonomía y psicosociología aplicada, Valladolid, [Editorial].14a Edición
   Google Scholar
• Manresa-Yee, C. 2009. Advanced and natural interaction system for motion-impaired users, UIB. Tesis doctoral. Edicions
   Google Scholar
• Manresa-Yee, C., et al. 2010. User experience to improve the usability of a vision-based interface. Interacting with Computers, 22(6), 594–605. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclean, N., et al. 2000. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation. BMJ, 321, 1051–1054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, K., and Trey Crisco, J. J., 2010. Designing toys and technologies for rehabilitation, Proceedings designing for children – with focus on ‘play + learn’, Mumbai, India
   Google Scholar
• Plaisant, C., et al., 2000. A storytelling robot for pediatric rehabilitation, Proceedings ASSETS ’00, ACM, New York
   Google Scholar
• Raya, R., et al. 2008. Estrategias para el aprendizaje progresivo de niños con parálisis cerebral a través de un vehículo robótico. Actas XXVI Congreso Anual de la Sociedad Española de Ingeniera Biomédica, (pp. 340–343). CáceresSpain:
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. T. 2002a. Benefits of a virtual play rehabilitation environment for children with CP on perceptions of self-efficacy: a pilot study. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 5(3), 141–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid, D. T. 2002b. Changes in seated postural control in children with CP following a virtual play environment rehabilitation intervention. Israel Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11, 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. T. 2002c. The use of virtual reality to improve upper extremity efficiency skills in children with CP: a pilot study. Technology & Disability, 14(2), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. 2008. Essentials of behavioural research: methods and data analysis, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shull, P., et al., 2010. Haptic gait retraining for knee osteoarthritis treatment, Haptics symposium, IEEE, USA, Massachusetts, 409–416
   Google Scholar
• Siebes, R., Wijnorks, L., and Vermeer, A. 2002. Qualitative analysis of therapeutic motor intervention programmes for children with CP: an update. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44(9), 593–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00844.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieger, R. J., and Taylor, V. J. 2004. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001644932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider, L., Majnemer, A., and Darsaklis, V. 2010. Virtual reality as a therapeutic modality for children with CP. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13(2), 120–128. doi: 10.3109/17518420903357753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taieb-Maimon, M., et al. 2011. The effectiveness of a training method using self-modeling webcam photos for reducing musculoskeletal risk among office workers using computers. Applied Ergonomics, 43(2), 376–385. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varona, J., Manresa-Yee, C., and Perales, F. J. 2008. Hands-free vision-based interface for computer accessibility. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 31(4), 357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2003. Case study research, design and methods, 3rd ed. California: Sage.5, Applied Social Research Methods Series
   Google Scholar