1,450
Views
58
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Social networks

Explaining and predicting perceived effectiveness and use continuance intention of a behaviour change support system for weight loss

&
Pages 176-189 | Received 18 Feb 2013, Accepted 08 Nov 2013, Published online: 13 Jan 2014

References

  • Al-Natour, S. and Benbasat, I., 2009. The adoption and use of IT artifacts: a new interaction-centric model for the study of user-artifact relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10 (9), 661–685.
  • Al-Natour, S., Benbasat, I., and Cenfetelli, R.T., 2008. The effect of process and outcome similarity on user's evaluations of decision aids. Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 175–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00189.x
  • Arnott, D. and Pervan, G., 2008. Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline. Decision Support Systems, 44 (3), 657–672. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.003
  • Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J., and Oinas-Kukkonen, H., 2012. Influencing individually: fusing personalization and persuasion. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2 (2), 1–8. doi: 10.1145/2209310.2209312
  • Bhattacherjee, A., 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation–confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25 (3), 351–370. doi: 10.2307/3250921
  • Boudreau, M., Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W., 2001. Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 1–16. doi: 10.2307/3250956
  • Butler, B.S., 2001. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12 (4), 346–362. doi: 10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703
  • Centola, D., 2010. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329 (5996), 1194–1197. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231
  • Chatterjee, S. and Price, A., 2009. Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16 (2), 171–178. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2859
  • Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., and Newsted, P.R., 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14 (2), 189–217. doi: 10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
  • Chittaro, L. 2012. Passengers’ safety in aircraft evacuations: employing serious games to educate and persuade. Persuasive Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7284, 215–226. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_19
  • Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.-H., and Wang, E.T.G., 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42 (3), 1872–1888. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
  • Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A., 1995. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189–211. doi: 10.2307/249688
  • Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
  • Derrick, D., Jenkins, J., and Nunamaker, J., 2011. Design principles for special purpose, embodied, conversational intelligence with environmental sensors (SPECIES). AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (2), 62–81.
  • Everard, A. and Galletta, D.F., 2005. How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22 (3), 55–95.
  • Finneran, C.M. and Zhang, P., 2003. A person–artifact–task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59 (4), 475–496. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00112-5
  • Fogg, B.J., 2003. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Fogg, B.J. and Nass, C., 1997. Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46 (5), 551–561. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0104
  • Forget, A., et al., 2008. Persuasion for stronger passwords: motivation and pilot study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5033, 140–150. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_13
  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, (18) 1, 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M.C., 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4 (1), 1–78.
  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W., 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27 (1), 51–90.
  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E.E., and Straub, D.W., 2011. Editor's comment: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35 (2), pp. ii–xiv.
  • Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L., 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 213–236. doi: 10.2307/249689
  • Hassanein, K. and Head, M., 2007. Manipulating perceived social presence through the Web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (8), 689–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018
  • Hogg, M.A., 1992. The social psychology of group cohesiveness: from attraction to social identity. New York: New York University Press.
  • Hsu, C.-L. and Lu, H.-P., 2007. Consumer behavior in online game communities: a motivational factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (3), 1642–1659. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.09.001
  • Hwang, K.O., et al., 2010. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79 (1), 5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.10.003
  • Jenkin, T.A., Webster, J., and McShanea, L., 2011. An agenda for ‘green’ information technology and systems research. Information and Organization, 21 (1), 17–40. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.09.003
  • Jin, X.-L., Lee, M.K.O., and Cheung, M.K., 2010. Predicting continuance in online communities: model development and empirical test. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29 (4), 383–394. doi: 10.1080/01449290903398190
  • Kahn, B.E. and Isen, A.M., 1993. The influence of positive affect on variety-seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (2), 257–270. doi: 10.1086/209347
  • Kaptein, M.C. and Eckles, D., 2012. Heterogeneity in the effects of online persuasion. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26 (3), 176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.02.002
  • Klein, J., Moon, Y., and Picard, R.W., 2002. This computer responds to user frustration: theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers, 14 (2), 119–140. doi: 10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00053-4
  • Komiak, S.Y.X. and Benbasat, I., 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30 (4), 941–960.
  • Langrial, S., et al., 2012. Native mobile applications for personal well-being: a persuasive systems design evaluation. PACIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 93, 13–15 July 2012, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  • Lee, E.-J., 2009. I like you, but I won't listen to you: effects of rationality on affective and behavioral responses to computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67 (8), 628–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.03.003
  • Lehto, T. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H., 2012. Persuasive features in Web-based alcohol and smoking interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13 (3), e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1559
  • Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., and Drozd, F., 2011. Factors affecting perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system. ICIS 2012 Proceedings, 16–19 December 2012, Orlando, Florida.
  • Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P., 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57 (9), 705–717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
  • Looije, R., Neerincx, M.A., and Fokie, C., 2010. Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (6), 386–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.007
  • Lyytinen, K., 2010. HCI research: future directions that matter. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (2), 22–25.
  • Ma, M. and Agarwal, R., 2007. Through a glass darkly: information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research, 18 (1), 42–67. doi: 10.1287/isre.1070.0113
  • McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C., 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13 (3), 334–359. doi: 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  • Mo, P.K., Malik, S.H., and Coulson, N.S., 2009. Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: a systematic literature review of online health-related support groups. Patient Education and Counseling, 75 (1), 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.029
  • Nass, C. and Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1), 81–103. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00153
  • Neve, M., et al., 2010. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews, 11 (4), 306–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00646.x
  • Neve, M., Morgan, P.J., and Collins, C.E., 2011. Weight change in a commercial web-based weight loss program and its association with website use: cohort study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13 (4), e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1756
  • Oinas-Kukkonen, H., 2010. Behavior change support systems: a research model and agenda. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6137, 4–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_3
  • Oinas-Kukkonen, H., 2013. A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17 (6), 1223–1235. doi: 10.1007/s00779-012-0591-5
  • Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M., 2009. Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24 (28), 485–500.
  • Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H., 2013, Humanizing the web: change and social innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • O'Keefe, D.J., 2002. Persuasion: theory and research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ortiz de Guinea, A. and Markus, M.L., 2009. Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion. MIS Quarterly, 33 (3), 433–444.
  • Pavlou, P.A., Liang, H., and Xue, Y., 2007. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31 (1), 105–136.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., et al., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B., 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1 (1), 13–32.
  • Riedl, R., Hubert, M., and Kenning, P., 2010. Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34 (2), 397–428.
  • Rusman, E., et al., 2010. Fostering trust in virtual project teams: towards a design framework grounded in a TrustWorthiness ANtecedents (TWAN) schema. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (11), 834–850. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.07.003
  • Shin, D.H, 2013. User experience in social commerce: in friends we trust. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32 (1), 52–67. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.692167
  • Shumaker, S.A. and Brownell, A., 1984. Toward a theory of social support: closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40 (4), 11–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x
  • Tajfel, H., 1974. Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13 (2), 65–93. doi: 10.1177/053901847401300204
  • Tuunanen, T., Myers, M., and Cassab, H., 2010. A conceptual framework for consumer information systems development. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2 (1), 47–66.
  • Uchino, B.N., 2006. Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29 (4), 377–387. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9056-5
  • Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H., 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 273–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  • Venkatesh, V., et al., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478.
  • Venkatesh V., Thong J.Y.L., and Xu, X., 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36 (1), 157–178.
  • Vessey, I. and Galletta, D., 1991. Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2 (1), 63–84. doi: 10.1287/isre.2.1.63
  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
  • Wang, W. and Benbasat, I., 2009. Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: the influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quarterly, 33 (2), 293–320.
  • Wood, W., 2000. Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539–570. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539
  • Yoo, Y. and Alavi, M., 2001. Media and group cohesion: relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25 (3), 371–390. doi: 10.2307/3250922

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.