535
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Experiments and studies

Effect of driving experience on collision avoidance braking: an experimental investigation and computational modelling

, , , &
Pages 929-940 | Received 26 Sep 2013, Accepted 03 Mar 2014, Published online: 11 Jun 2014

REFERENCES

  • Abe, G. and Richardson, J., 2006. The influence of alarm timing on driver response to collision warning systems following system failure. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25 (5), 443–452. doi: 10.1080/01449290500167824
  • Alm, H. and Nilsson, L., 1995. The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27 (5), 707–715. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00026-V
  • An, P.E. and Harris, C.J., 1996. An intelligent driver warning system for vehicle collision avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 26 (2), 254–261. doi: 10.1109/3468.485752
  • Anderson, J.R. and Lebiere, C., 1998. The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J.R., et al., 2004. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111 (4), 1036–1060. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036
  • Ben-Yaacov, A., Maltz, M., and Shinar, D., 2002. Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance. Human Factors, 44 (2), 335–342. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497925
  • Breyer, F., et al., 2010. Negative behavioral adaptation to lane-keeping assistance systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, IEEE, 2 (2), 21–32. doi: 10.1109/MITS.2010.938533
  • Broen, N.L. and Chiang, D.P., 1996. Braking response times for 100 drivers in the avoidance of an unexpected obstacle as measured in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40 (18), 900–904. doi: 10.1177/154193129604001807
  • Brown, T.L., Lee, J.D., and McGehee, D.V., 2001. Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors, 43 (3), 462–482. doi: 10.1518/001872001775898250
  • Burnett, G., et al., 2012. Designing touchpad user-interfaces for right-hand drive vehicles: an investigation into where the touchpad should be located. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32 (9), 874–887. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.664784
  • Cao, S. and Liu, Y., 2011. Integrating queueing network and ACT-R cognitive architectures. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55 (1), 836–840. doi: 10.1177/1071181311551174
  • Cao, S. and Liu, Y., 2012a. An integrated cognitive architecture for cognitive engineering applications. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56 (1), 323–327. doi: 10.1177/1071181312561075
  • Cao, S. and Liu, Y., 2012b. QN-ACTR modeling of multitask performance of dynamic and complex cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56 (1), 1015–1019. doi: 10.1177/1071181312561212
  • Cao, S. and Liu, Y., 2013. Queueing network-adaptive control of thought rational (QN-ACTR): an integrated cognitive architecture for modelling complex cognitive and multi-task performance. International Journal of Human Factors Modelling and Simulation, 4 (1), 63–86. doi: 10.1504/IJHFMS.2013.055790
  • Cao, S., et al., 2011. Modeling the effect of driving experience on collision avoidance braking in a cognitive architecture. Paper presented at the 2011 International conference on network and computational intelligence (ICNCI), May 21, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Cao, S., Qin, Y., and Shen, M., 2013. Modeling the effect of driving experience on lane keeping performance using ACT-R cognitive architecture. Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version), 58 (21), 2078–2086. doi: 10.1360/972012-1360
  • Dingus, T.A.,et al. 1998. Human factors design issues for crash avoidance systems. In: W. Barfield and T.A. Dingus, eds. Human factors in intelligent transportation systems. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 55–93.
  • Gkikas, N. and Richardson, J., 2011. The impact of verbal interaction on driver lateral control: an experimental assessment. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31 (6), 605–616. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.518247
  • Gray, W.D., et al., 2006. The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113 (3), 461–482. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461
  • Green, M., 2000. “How long does it take to stop?” Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transportation Human Factors, 2 (3), 195–216.
  • Green, P., 2004. Driver distraction, telematics design, and workload managers: safety issues and solutions (SAE 2004-21-0022). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
  • Groeger, J.A., 2000. Understanding driving: applying cognitive psychology to a complex everyday task. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Groot, S.D., et al., 2011. The effect of concurrent bandwidth feedback on learning the lane-keeping task in a driving simulator. Human Factors, 53 (1), 50–62. doi: 10.1177/0018720810393241
  • Gupta, N., Bisantz, A.M., and Singh, T., 2002. The effects of adverse condition warning system characteristics on driver performance: an investigation of alarm signal type and threshold level. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21 (4), 235–248. doi: 10.1080/0144929021000013473
  • Kiefer, R.J., LeBlanc, D.J., and Flannagan, C.A., 2005. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers’ last-second braking and steering judgments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37 (2), 295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.003
  • Knipling, R.R., et al., 1993. Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance: rear-end crashes (DOT HS 807 995). Available from: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/769.pdf [Accessed 3 March 2014].
  • Laird, J.E., Newell, A., and Rosenbloom, P.S., 1987. Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33 (1), 1–64. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90050-6
  • Lamble, D., et al., 1999. Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31 (6), 617–623. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00018-4
  • Lee, J.D., 2008. Fifty years of driving safety research. Human Factors, 50 (3), 521–528. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288376
  • Lee, J.D., et al., 2002. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44 (2), 314–334. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497844
  • Lerner, N.D., 1993. Brake perception-reaction times of older and younger drivers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 37 (2), 206–210.
  • Li, B., et al., 2014. A comparative study of two wayfinding aids for simulated driving tasks – single-scale and dual-scale GPS aids. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33 (4), 361–371. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.719032
  • Liebermann, D.G., et al., 1995. A field study on braking responses during driving. I. Triggering and modulation. Ergonomics, 38 (9), 1894–1902. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925237
  • Lings, S., 1991. Assessing driving capability: a method for individual testing. The significance of paraparesis inferior studied in a controlled experiment. Applied Ergonomics, 22 (2), 75–84. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90305-2
  • Liu, Y., 2009. QN-ACES: integrating queueing network and ACT-R, CAPS, EPIC, and soar architectures for multitask cognitive modeling. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25 (6), 554–581. doi: 10.1080/10447310902973182
  • Liu, Y., Feyen, R., and Tsimhoni, O., 2006. Queueing network-model human processor (QN-MHP): a computational architecture for multitask performance in human-machine systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13 (1), 37–70. doi: 10.1145/1143518.1143520
  • McCall, J.C. and Trivedi, M.M., 2007. Driver behavior and situation aware brake assistance for intelligent vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95 (2), 374–387. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.888388
  • McGehee, D.V., Mazzae, E.N., and Baldwin, G.H.S., 2000. Driver reaction time in crash avoidance research: validation of a driving simulator study on a test track. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44 (3), 320–323.
  • Najm, W.G. and Smith, D.L., 2004. Modeling driver response to lead vehicle decelerating. SAE Technical Paper Series No. 2004-01-0171.
  • Najm, W.G., et al., 2006. Evaluation of an automotive rear-end collision avoidance system. (DOT HS 810 569). Available from: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/14303_files/14303.pdf [Accessed 3 March 2014].
  • Newell, A., 1990. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • NHTSA, 2005. “Automotive collision avoidance system field operational test final program report” performed by General Motors Corporation and Delphi-Delco Electronic Systems, DOT HS 809 866. Available from: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/2005/ACAS%20FOT%20Final%20Program%20Report%20DOT%20HS%20809%20886.pdf [Accessed 3 March 2014].
  • Park, K.S., Lee, A.J., and Koh, B.K., 2001. Drivers’ characteristics in the perception of a lead vehicle's deceleration level. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5 (2), 125–136. doi: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0502_3
  • Pradhan, A.K., et al., 2005. Using eye movements to evaluate effects of driver age on risk perception in a driving simulator. Human Factors, 47 (4), 840–852. doi: 10.1518/001872005775570961
  • Ritter, F.E. and Reifers, A.L., 2007. Lessons from defining theories of stress. In: W.D. Gray, ed. Integrated models of cognitive systems (IMoCS). New York: Oxford University Press, 254–262.
  • Rudin-Brown, C.M. and Parker, H.A., 2004. Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7 (2), 59–76.
  • Sagberg, F. and Bjørnskau, T., 2006. Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38 (2), 407–414. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.014
  • Salmoni, A.W., Schmidt, R.A., and Walter, C.B., 1984. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 355–386. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
  • Salvucci, D.D., 2006. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors, 48 (2), 362–380. doi: 10.1518/001872006777724417
  • Schmidt, R.A. and Wulf, G., 1997. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39 (4), 509–525. doi: 10.1518/001872097778667979
  • Skinner, B.F., 1953. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
  • Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., and Johnston, W.A., 2003. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9 (1), 23–32.
  • Summala, H. and Koivisto, I., 1990. Unalerted drivers’ brake reaction times: older drivers compensate their slower reaction times by driving more slowly. In: T. Benjamin, ed. Driving behaviour in a social context. Caen: Paradigme, 680–683.
  • Summala, H., Nieminen, T., and Punto, M., 1996. Maintaining lane position with peripheral vision during in-vehicle tasks. Human Factors, 38 (3), 442–451. doi: 10.1518/001872096778701944
  • Summala, H., Lamble, D., and Laakso, M., 1998. Driving experience and perception of the lead car's braking when looking at in-car targets. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30 (4), 401–407.
  • Sutton, R.S. and Barto, A.G., 1998. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Taieb-Maimon, M., 2007. Learning headway estimation in driving. Human Factors, 49 (4), 734–744. doi: 10.1518/001872007X215809
  • Taoka, G.T., 1989. Brake reaction times of unalerted drivers. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, 59 (3), 19–21.
  • Ward, N.J. and Hirst, S., 1997. In-vehicle intelligent information technologies as safety benefit systems: consideration of philosophy and function. Behaviour and Information Technology, 16 (2), 88–97. doi: 10.1080/014492997119932
  • Warshawsky-Livne, L. and Shinar, D., 2002. Effects of uncertainty, transmission type, driver age and gender on brake reaction and movement time. Journal of Safety Research, 33 (1), 117–128. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00006-3
  • Wright, G.R. and Shephard, R.J., 1978. Brake reaction time – effects of age, sex, and carbon monoxide. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal, 33 (3), 141–150. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1978.10667324
  • Wu, C. and Liu, Y., 2008. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP). Psychological Review, 115 (4), 913–954. doi: 10.1037/a0013123
  • Wu, C., et al., 2013. Navigating a car in an unfamiliar country using an internet map: effects of street language formats, map orientation consistency, and gender on driver performance, workload and multitasking strategy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32 (5), 425–437. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.566941
  • Zhang, W., et al., 2006. Driver's views and behaviors about safety in China – what do they NOT know about driving? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38 (1), 22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.015

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.