Aesthetics on the web: effects on approach and avoidance behaviour

References

• Banse, R. 2001. “Affective Priming with Liked and Disliked Persons: Prime Visibility Determines Congruency and Incongruency Effects.” Cognition and Emotion 15 (4): 501–520. doi: 10.1080/02699930126251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S.-L., and G. E. Schwartz. 1980. “Relationships Between Facial Electromyography and Subjective Experience During Affective Imagery.” Biological Psychology 11 (1): 49–62. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(80)90026-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., R. E. Petty, M. E. Losch, and H. S. Kim. 1986. “Electromyographic Activity Over Facial Muscle Regions Can Differentiate the Valence and Intensity of Affective Reactions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 260–268. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catledge, L. D., and J. E. Pitkow. 1995. “Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web.” Paper presented at the International World-Wide Web Conference on Technology, Tools and Applications, Darmstadt.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A., and B. McKenzie. 2001. “What Do Web Users Do? An Empirical Analysis of Web Use.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 54 (6): 903–922. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• DIN. 2010. “DIN en ISO 9241–210:2010.” In Prozess zur Gestaltung interaktiver Systeme. Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., and T. M. Thrash. 2002. “Approach-avoidance Motivation in Personality: Approach and Avoidance Temperaments and Goals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (5): 804–818. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu, S. A., K. A. Machleit, and L. M. Davis. 2003. “Empirical Testing of a Model of Online Store Atmospherics and Shopper Responses.” Psychology & Marketing 20 (2): 139–150. doi: 10.1002/mar.10064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A.-G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. “G*power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (2): 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechner, G. T. 1876. Vorschule der Aesthetik. 2 Vols. Leipzig: Breitkopf.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., C. Soohoo, D. R. Danielson, L. Marable, J. Stanford, and E. R. Tauber. 2003. “How Do Users Evaluate the Credibility of Web Sites?: A Study with Over 2500 Participants.” Paper presented at the Conference on Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B. 2010. Sensation and Perception. 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, W., S. Mecklenbräuker, H. Möller, and R. Westermann. 1985. “Emotionsgehalt, Bildhaftigkeit, Konkretheit und Bedeutungshaltigkeit von 580 Adjektiven: Ein Beitrag zur Normierung und zur Prüfung einiger Zusammenhangshypothesen.” Archiv für Psychologie 137 (2): 75–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, R. H., and P. Hanna. 2004. “The Impact of Web Page Text-background Colour Combinations on Readability, Retention, Aesthetics and Behavioural Intention.” Behaviour & Information Technology 23 (3): 183–195. doi: 10.1080/01449290410001669932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, I., and W. Schweibenz. 2002. “Usability-evaluation von Web-angeboten mit dem web Usability Index.” Paper presented at the DGI-online Tagung, Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. 2008. “Aesthetics in Interactive Products: Correlates and Consequences of Beauty.” In Product Experience, edited by H. N. J. Schifferstein, and P. Hekkert, 287–302. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., A. Beu, and M. Burmester. 2001. “Engineering Joy.” IEEE Software 18 (1): 70–76. doi: 10.1109/52.903170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., A. Platz, M. Burmester, and K. Lehner. 2000. “Hedonic and Ergonomic Quality Aspects Determine a Software's Appeal.” Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P. 2006. “Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design.” Psychology Science 48 (2): 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, D., J. De Houwer, and P. Eelen. 1994. “The Affective Priming Effect: Automatic Activation of Evaluative Information in Memory.” Cognition and Emotion 8 (6): 515–533. doi: 10.1080/02699939408408957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irtel, H. 2007. “The Psychological Experiments Laboratory.” http://www.pxlab.de.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. W. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1790. Critik der Urtheilskraft. Berlin: Libau.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst-Wilson, W. R., and R. B. Zajonc. 1980. “Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that Cannot be Recognized.” Science 207 (4430): 557–558. doi: 10.1126/science.7352271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., M. K. Greenwald, M. M. Bradley, and A. O. Hamm. 1993. “Looking at Pictures: Affective, Facial, Visceral and Behavioral Reactions.” Psychophysiology 30 (3): 261–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, M. O., and B. Schneiderman. 2006. Research-based Web Design and Usability Guidelines. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print Office.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., B. Belke, A. Oeberst, and D. Augustin. 2004. “A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments.” British Journal of Psychology 95 (4): 489–508. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and R. J. Koubek. 2010. “Understanding User Preferences Based on Usability and Aesthetics Before and After Actual Use.” Interacting with Computers 22 (6): 530–543. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G., C. Dudek, D. Sen, L. Sumegi, and P. Noonan. 2011. “An Exploration of Relations Between Visual Appeal, Trustworthiness and Perceived Usability of Homepages.” ACM Transactions Computer–Human Interaction 18 (1): 1–30. doi: 10.1145/1959022.1959023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G., G. Fernandes, C. Dudek, and J. Brown. 2006. “Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression!” Behaviour & Information Technology 25 (2): 115–126. doi: 10.1080/01449290500330448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, P. J., and S. Horton. 2008. Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahlke, S., M. Minge, and M. Thüring. 2006. “Measuring Multiple Components of Emotions in Interactive Contexts.” Paper presented at the CHI'06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., and J. A. Russell. 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, H., and W. Hager. 1991. “Angenehmheit, (p), Bedeutungshaltigkeit (m’), Bildhaftigkeit (i) und Konkretheit (c) von 452 Adjektiven: Ein Beitrag zur Normierung.” Sprache & Kognition 10 (1): 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., J. Musch, and A. S. Göritz. 2009. “A Blessing, Not a Curse: Experimental Evidence for Beneficial Effects of Visual Aesthetics on Performance.” Ergonomics 52 (10): 1311–1320. doi: 10.1080/00140130903061717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., and M. T. Thielsch. 2010. “Facets of Visual Aesthetics.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 68 (10): 689–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummalaneni, V. 2005. “An Empirical Investigation of Web Site Characteristics, Consumer Emotional States and On-line Shopping Behaviors.” Journal of Business Research 58 (4): 526–532. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00143-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., and R. B. Zajonc. 1993. “Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming with Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (5): 723–739. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeeke, K., T. Djadjadiningrat, C. Hummels, and S. Wensveen. 2002. “Beauty in Usability: Forget About Ease of Use.” In Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability, edited by W. S. Green and P. W. Jordan, 9–17. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, S. 2004. “A Grounded Theory of the Flow Experiences of Web Users.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 60 (3): 327–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porat, T., R. Liss, and N. Tractinsky. 2007. “E-stores Design: The Influence of E-store Design and Product Type on Consumers’ Emotions and Attitudes.” In Human–Computer Interaction: HCI Applications and Services, edited by J. Jacko, 712–721. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Porat, T., and N. Tractinsky. 2012. “It's a Pleasure Buying Here: Effects of Web Store Design on Consumers’ Emotions and Attitudes.” Human–Computer Interaction 27 (3): 235–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, D., J. Holmes, and M. Stansbury. 2010. “Consumer Health Information on the Web: The Relationship of Visual Design and Perceptions of Credibility.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (1): 13–29. doi: 10.1002/asi.21224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkman, B. N., and F. U. Jönsson. 2000. “Aesthetics and Preferences of Web Pages.” Behaviour & Information Technology 19 (5): 367–377. doi: 10.1080/014492900750000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillence, E., P. Briggs, P. Harris, and L. Fishwick. 2006. “A Framework for Understanding Trust Factors in Web-based Health Advice.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 64 (8): 697–713. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillings, J. H., and G. A. Mack. 1981. “On the Use of a Friedman-type Statistic in Balanced and Unbalanced Block Designs.” Technometrics 23 (2): 171–177. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1981.10486261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M. T., I. Blotenberg, and R. Jaron. 2014. “User Evaluation of Websites: From First Impression to Recommendation.” Interacting with Computers 26 (1): 89–102. doi: 10.1093/iwc/iwt033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M., and R. Jaron. 2012. “Das zusammenspiel von website-inhalten, usability und ästhetik.” Paper presented at the Mensch & Computer, Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N. 2004. “Toward the Study of Aesthetics in Information Technology.” Paper presented at the 25th International Conference on Information Systems, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., J. A. Bargas-Avila, K. Opwis, and F. H. Wilhelm. 2009. “Visual Complexity of Websites: Effects on Users’ Experience, Physiology, Performance, and Memory.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 67 (9): 703–715. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., E. E. Presslaber, M. Stöcklin, K. Opwis, and J. A. Bargas-Avila. 2012. “The Role of Visual Complexity and Prototypicality Regarding First Impression of Websites: Working Towards Understanding Aesthetic Judgments.” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 70 (11): 794–811. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. 2001. “Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites: The Case of a Generic Portal in The Netherlands.” Information and Management 40 (6): 541–549. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00079-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreich, H., H. Obendorf, E. Herder, and M. Mayer. 2008. “Not Quite the Average: An Empirical Study of Web Use.” ACM Transactions on the Web 2 (1): 5:1–5:31. doi: 10.1145/1326561.1326566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., and X. Fu. 2007. “Understanding, Measuring, and Designing User Experience: The Causal Relationship Between the Aesthetic Quality of Products and User Affect.” In Human–Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, edited by Julie A. Jacko, 340–349. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar