Investigating the influence of age, social capital affinity, and flow on positive outcomes reported by e-commerce site users

References

• Agarwal, R., and E. Karahanna. 2000. “Time Flies When You Are Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage.” MIS Quarterly 24: 665–694. doi: 10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. Q., and L. Rainie. 2012. Millennials Will Benefit and Suffer Due to Their Hyperconnected Lives. Accessed December 19, 2014. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Future_of_Internet_2012_Young_brains_PDF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, H. S., and P. A. Voyer. 2000. “Word-of-mouth Processes Within a Services Purchase Decision Context.” Journal of Service Research 3: 166–177. doi: 10.1177/109467050032005
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V. 2012. “A Generational Comparison of Social Networking Site Use: The Influence of Age and Social Identity.” The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 74: 163–187. doi: 10.2190/AG.74.2.d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V., D. M. Dozier, A. SchmitzWeiss, and D. L. Borden. 2013. “Facebook ‘Friends’: Effects of Social Networking Site Intensity, Social Capital Affinity, and Flow on Reported Knowledge-gain.” Journal of Social Media in Society 2: 76–97.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V., D. M. Dozier, A. Schmitz Weiss, and D. L. Borden. 2014. “Harnessing Peer Potency: Predicting Positive Outcomes from Social Capital Affinity and Online Engagement with Participatory Websites.” New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814530291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. 2008. Getting into the Flow. American School Board Journal March: 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, A., E. Grundy, and M. Farquhar. 1995. “Changes in Network Composition Among the Very Old Living in Inner London.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10: 331–347. doi: 10.1007/BF00972333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carstensen, L. L. 1991. “Selectivity Theory: Social Activity in Life-Span Context.” Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics 11: 195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, L. L. 1995. “Evidence for a Life-Span Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 4: 151–156. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, L. L. 1998. “A Life-Span Approach to Social Motivation.” In Motivation and Self-regulation Across the Life Span, edited by J. Heckhausen and C. Dweck, 341–364. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casaló, L. V., C. Flavián, and M. Guinaliu. 2008. “The Role of Satisfaction and Website Usability in Developing Customer Loyalty and Positive Word-of-mouth in the E-banking Services.” The International Journal of Bank Marketing 26: 399–417. doi: 10.1108/02652320810902433
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2009. Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. 2006. “Flow on the Net: Detecting Web Users’ Positive Affects and their Flow States.” Computers in Human Behavior 22: 221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S-C., D. C. Yen, and M. I. Hwang. 2012. “Factors Influencing the Continuance Intention to the Usage of Web 2.0: An Empirical Study.” Computers in Human Behavior 28: 933–941. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S-C., and S. M. Choi. 2011. “Electronic Word-of-mouth in Social Networking Sites: A Cross-Cultural Study of the United States and China.” Journal of Global Marketing 24: 263–281. doi: 10.1080/08911762.2011.592461
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. M. Y., and P. R. Darke. 2006. “The Consumer as Advocate: Self-relevance, Culture and Word-of-mouth.” Marketing Letters 17: 269–279. doi: 10.1007/s11002-006-8426-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., and C. E. Lance. 2010. “What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research.” Journal of Business and Psychology 25: 325–334. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Custodero, L. A. 2002. “Seeking Challenge, Finding Skill: Flow Experience and Music Education.” Arts Education Policy Review 103: 3–9. doi: 10.1080/10632910209600288
   Google Scholar
• Doh, S-J., and J-S. Hwang. 2009. “How Consumers Evaluate eWOM (Electronic Word of Mouth) Messages.” Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12: 193–197. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duggan, M., and A. Smith. 2014. Social Media Update 2013. Accessed February 27, 2014. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-Media-Update.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J. 2003. “A Study of Flow Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 87: 499–518. doi: 10.1111/1540-4781.00204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einav, L., J. Levin, I. Popov, and N Sundaresan. 2014. “Growth, Adoption, and Use of Mobile E-commerce.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 104 (5): 489–494. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.5.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Exploring the Relationship between College Students’ Use of Online Social Networks and Social Capital.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12: 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMarketer. 2013a. “ Baby Boomers in the Marketplace: How the ‘Ever Young’ Generation Approaches Shopping, Health and Retirement.” Accessed October 22, 2013. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Digital-Shopping-Baby-Boomers-Favor-Desktop-Over-Mobile/1010130.
   Google Scholar
• Emarketer. 2013b. “ How Millennials Shop Online.” Accessed October 22, 2013. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/How-Millennials-Shop-Online/1010031#G3H1o4W6E9XQJjst.99.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, L. 2008. “Adventure Education and Csikszentmihalyi's Flow Theory: A Critical Analysis of Stress and Optimal Experience as Learning Tools.” Research in Outdoor Education 9: 89–90.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., and L. L. Carstensen. 1990. “Choosing Social Partners: How Old Age and Anticipated Endings Make People More Selective.” Psychology and Aging 5: 335–347. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, H. H., L. L. Carstensen, and F. Lang. 2001. “Age-Related Patterns in Social Networks among European Americans and African Americans: Implications for Socioemotional Selectivity Across the Life Span.” The international Journal of Aging and Human Development 52: 185–206. doi: 10.2190/1ABL-9BE5-M0X2-LR9V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghani, J. A. 1995. “Flow in Human-Computer Interactions: Test of a Model.” In Human Factors in Information Systems: Emerging Theoretical Bases, edited by J. M. Carey, 291–311. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. M., and M. S. Poole. 2008. “Antecedents of Flow in Online Shopping: A Test of Alternative Models.” Information Systems Journal 18: 1–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2013. An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., K. P. Gwinner, and D. D. Gremler. 2002. “Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes: An Integration of Relational Benefits and Relationship Quality.” Journal of Service Research 4: 230–247. doi: 10.1177/1094670502004003006
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, M. D. 2012. “A Model of Flow Experience as Determinant of Positive Attitudes Toward Online Advergames.” Journal of Promotion Management 17: 315–326. doi: 10.1080/10496491.2011.596761
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., and T. P. Novak. 2009. “Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 23: 23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogeoom, D. L., R. J. McDermott, K. M. Perrin, H. Osman, and B. A. Bell-Ellison. 2010. “Internet Use and Social Networking among Middle-Aged and Older Adults.” Educational Gerontology 36: 93–111. doi: 10.1080/03601270903058507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., and H-S. Park. 2012. “Computer-mediated Persuasion in Online Reviews: Statistical Versus Narrative Evidence.” Computers in Human Behavior 28: 906–919. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M-H. 2003. “Designing Website Attributes to Induce Experiential Encounters.” Computers in Human Behavior 19: 425–442. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00080-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. A., and H. W. Marsh. 1996. “Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Optimal Experience: The Flow State Scale.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 18: 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Joines, J. L., C. W. Scherer, and D. A. Scheufele. 2003. “Exploring Motivations for Consumer Web Use and their Implications for E-commerce.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 20: 90–108. doi: 10.1108/07363760310464578
   Google Scholar
• Kiili, K. 2005. “Content Creation Challenges and Flow Experience in Educational Games: The IT-Emperor Case.” The Internet and Higher Education 8: 183–198. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., R. Filip, and S. Hoffmann. 2003. “Flow Experience and Positive Affect During Hypermedia Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 34: 309–327. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufaris, M. 2002. “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior.” Information Systems Research 13: 205–223. doi: 10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, F. R., U. M. Staudinger, and L. L. Carstensen. 1998. “Perspectives on Socioemotional Selectivity in Later Life: How Personality and Social Context do (and do not) Make a Difference.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 53B: P21–P30. doi: 10.1093/geronb/53B.1.P21
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T-P., Y-T. Ho, Y-W. Li, and E. Turban. 2011. “What Drives Social Commerce: The Role of Social Support and Relationship Quality.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 16: 69–90. doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathwick, C., and E. Rigdon. 2004. “Play, Flow, and the Online Search Experience.” Journal of Consumer Research 31: 324–332. doi: 10.1086/422111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri, M., P. Cipresso, A. Balgera, M. Villamira, and G. Riva. 2011. “Why Is Facebook So Successful? Psychophysiological Measures Describe a Core Flow State While Using Facebook.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14: 723–731. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2002. “The Concept of Flow.” In Handbook of Positive Psychology, edited by S. J. Lopez and C. R. Snyder, 89–105. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. 2012. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/trust-in-advertising-C3A2C280C293-paid-owned-and-earned.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. 2013. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2013/the-reviews-are-in--yelp-users-are-four-star-consumers.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. 2014. http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2014%20Reports/nielsen-millennial-report-feb-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, T. P., D. L. Hoffman, and Y-F. Yung. 2000. “Measuring the Flow Construct in Online Environment: A Structural Modeling Approach.” Marketing Science 19: 22–42. doi: 10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cass, A., and J. Carlson. 2010. “Examining the Effects of Website-Induced Flow in Professional Sporting Team Websites.” Internet Research 20: 115–134. doi: 10.1108/10662241011032209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packiam-Alloway, T., and R. G. Alloway. 2012. “The Impact of Engagement with Social Networking Sites (SNSs) on Cognitive Skills.” Computers in Human Behavior 28: 1748–1754. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnila, S., and Warsta, J. 2010. Online Shopping Viewed from a Habit and Value Perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 29 (6), 621–632. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.501115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai, P-Y., and H-T. Tsai. 2011. “How Virtual Community Participation Influences Consumer Loyalty Intentions in Online Shopping Contexts: An Investigation of Mediating Factors.” Behaviour and Information Technology 30: 603–615. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.553742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., and T. M. Lee. 2009. “Information Direction, Website Reputation and eWOM Effect: A Moderating Role of Product Type.” Journal of Business Research 62: 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2010. Millennials, Media, and Information. Accessed October 23, 2013. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1516/millennials-panel-two-millennials-media-information.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2013. Demographics of Internet users. Accessed October 23. http://pewinternet.org/Trend-Data-(Adults)/Whos-Online.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeil, U., R. Arjan, and P Zaphiris. 2009. “Age Differences in Online Social Networking: A Study of User Profiles and the Social Capital Divide among Teenagers and Older Users in MySpace.” Computers in Human Behavior 25: 643–654. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40: 879–891.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L. 2013. Internet Adoption Becomes Nearly Universal among Some Groups, But Others Lag Behind. Accessed April 24, 2014. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/05/30/internet-adoption-becomes-nearly-universal-among-some-groups-but-others-lag-behind/.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, D. W. 2000. “Optimal Motivation for Talent Development.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 23: 187–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, D. 2013. “Online Promotional Games: Impact of Flow Experience on Word-of-mouth and Personal Information Sharing.” International Business Research 6: 93–100. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v6n9p93
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Del Bosque, I., and Á. Herrero Crespo. 2011. “How Do Internet Surfers Become Online Buyers? An Integrative Model of E-commerce Acceptance.” Behaviour & Information Technology 30: 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossin, D., Y. K. Ro, B. D. Klein, and Y. M. Guo. 2009. “The Effects of Flow on Learning Outcomes in an Online Information Management Course.” Journal of Information Systems Education 20: 87–98. http://search.proquest.com/docview/200167242?accountid=13758.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, H., and D. Parsons. 2012. “Risky Business or Sharing the Load? – Social Flow in Collaborative Mobile Learning.” Computers and Education 58: 707–720. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., M. Czikszentmihalyi, B. Shneider, and E. S. Shernoff. 2003. “Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory.” School Psychology Quarterly 18: 158–176. doi: 10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D-Hee. 2013. “User Experience in Social Commerce: In Friends We Trust.” Behaviour & Information Technology 32 (1): 52–67. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.692167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skadberg, Y. X., and J. R. Kimmel. 2004. “Visitors’ Flow Experience While Browsing a Website: Its Measurement, Contributing Factors and Consequences.” Computers in Human Behavior 20: 403–422. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00050-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekpe, J. S. 2005. “An Examination of the Multidimensionality of Flow Construct in a Computer-Mediated Environment.” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 6: 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. S. 2005. “Flow Theory and GIS: Is there a Connection for Learning?” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 14: 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. 1967. The Play Theory of Mass Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suanet, B, T. G. van Tilburg, and M. I. Broese van Groenou. 2013. “Nonkin in Older Adults’ Personal Networks: More Important among Later Cohorts?” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 68: 633–643. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Trevino, L. K., and J. Webster. 1992. “Flow in Computer-mediated-communication: Electronic Mail and Voice Mail Evaluation and Impacts.” Communication Research 19: 539–573. doi: 10.1177/009365092019005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Heide, B., B. K. Johnson, and M. H. Vang. 2013. “The Effects of Product Photographs and Reputation Systems on Consumer Behavior and Product Cost on eBay.” Computers in Human Behavior 29: 570–576. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., C. T. Carr, S. S. W. Choi, D. C. DeAndrea, J. Kim, T. S. Tong, and B. Van der Heide. 2011. “Interaction of Interpersonal, Peer, and Media Influence Sources Online: A Research Agenda for Technology Convergence.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Z. Papacharissi, 17–38. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Y-J. Liang, T. Ganster, D. E. Wohn, and J. Emington. 2012. “Online Reviews, Helpful Ratings, and Consumer Attitudes: An Extension of Congruity Theory to Multiple Sources in Web 2.0.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18: 97–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., A. Quan-Haase, J. Witte, and K. Hampton. 2001. “Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?” American Behavioral Scientist 45: 436–455. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemsen, L. M., P. C. Neijens, F. Bronner, and J. A. de Ridder. 2011. ““Highly Recommended!” The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17: 19–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. 2006. “On and off the ‘Net’: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11: 593–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.-J., and Y-S. Chang. 2005. “Towards Understanding Members’ Interactivity, Trust and Flow in Online Travel Community.” Industrial Management and Data Systems 105: 937–954. doi: 10.1108/02635570510616120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, M., M. A. Rajan, and Q. Dai. 2010. “Experiencing Flow with Instant Messaging and its Facilitating Role on Creative Behaviors.” Computers in Human Behavior 26: 1009–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar