Visual perception of multi-column-layout text: insight from repeated and non-repeated reading

References

• Andrienko, G., N. Andrienko, M. Burch, and D. Weiskopf. 2012. “Visual Analytics Methodology for Eye Movement Studies.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18: 2889–2898. doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. R. 2005. “Is Multiple-Column Online Text Better? It Depends.” Usability News 7 (July 2). http://usabilitynews.org/is-multiple-column-online-text-better-it-depends/.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., C. H. Liao, and M. Mills. 2001. “The Effects of Font Type and Size on the Legibility and Reading Time of Online Text by Older Adults.” CHI’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (March) 175–176. doi:10.1145/634164.634173.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., B. Lida, S. Riley, T. Hackler, and K. Janzen. 2002. “A Comparison of Popular Online Fonts: Which Size and Type Is Best.” Usability News 4 (January). http://www.tbook.it/download/Usability_News%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bojko, A. A. 2009. “Informative or Misleading? Heat Maps Deconstructed.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 5610. Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends, edited by J. A. Jacko, 30–39. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Bouma, H. 1980. “Visual Reading Processes and the Quality of Text Displays.” IPO Annual Progress Report 15: 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., L. Miccoli, M. A. Escrig, and P. J. Lang. 2008. “The Pupil as a Measure of Emotional Arousal and Autonomic Activation.” Psychophysiology 45: 602–607. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassil, J. T., S. Low, N. F. Maxemchuk, and L. O’Gorman. 1995. “Electronic Marking and Identification Techniques to Discourage Document Copying.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 13: 1495–1504. doi:10.1109/49.464718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumberger, E. 2004. “The Rhetoric of Typography: Effects on Reading Time, Reading Comprehension, and Perceptions of Ethos.” Technical Communication 51 (1): 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscher, G., A. Dengel, R. Biedert, and L. V. Elst. 2012. “Attentive Documents: Eye Tracking as Implicit Feedback for Information Retrieval and Beyond.” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 1: 9. doi:10.1145/2070719.2070722.
   Google Scholar
• Cakir, A., D. J. Hart, and T. F. M. Stewart. 1980. Visual Display Terminals: A Manual Covering Ergonomics, Workplace Design, Health and Safety, Task Organisation. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, A. 2010. “The Effect of a Timed Reading Activity on EFL Learners: Speed, Comprehension, and Perceptions.” Reading in a Foreign Language 22 (2): 284–303.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, A. C., and S. Millett. 2013. “Improving Reading Rates and Comprehension Through Timed Repeated Reading.” Reading in a Foreign Language 25: 126–148.
   Google Scholar
• Chigona, W., and T. Strothotte. 2003. “ Improving Readability of Contextualized Text Explanations.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa, February, 141–150. Cape Town: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Coscarelli, C. V., and J. Coiro. 2015. “Reading Multiple Sources Online.” Revista Linguagem & Ensino 17: 751–776.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J., T. Kristensen, and K. Grønhaug. 2013. “Understanding Consumers’ In-Store Visual Perception: The Influence of Package Design Features on Visual Attention.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 20 (2): 234–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Creed, A., I. Dennis, and S. Newstead. 1987. “Proof-Reading on VDUs.” Behaviour & Information Technology 6: 3–13. doi:10.1080/01449298708901814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkir, K. 2005. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, M. C. 2004. “How Physical Text Layout Affects Reading from Screen.” Behaviour & Information Technology 23: 377–393. doi:10.1080/01449290410001715714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, M. C., and M. Haselgrove. 2001. “The Influence of Reading Speed and Line Length on the Effectiveness of Reading from Screen.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54 (4): 585–612. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, M. C., and G. J. Kipping. 1997. “The Legibility of Screen Formats: Are Three Columns Better than One?” Computers & Graphics 21: 703–712. doi:10.1016/s0097-8493(97)00048-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foasberg, N. M. 2014. “Student Reading Practices in Print and Electronic Media.” College & Research Libraries 75: 705–723. doi: 10.5860/crl.75.5.705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganayim, D., and R. Ibrahim. 2013. “How Do Typographical Factors Affect Reading Text and Comprehension Performance in Arabic?” Human Factors 55 (2): 323–332. doi:10.1177/0018720812452302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribbons, W. M. 1992. “Organization by Design: Some Implications for Structuring Information.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 22 (1): 57–75. doi: 10.2190/9BD5-3QFX-PB7J-EBH2
   Google Scholar
• Harley, L., K. Kline, C. Price, A. Jones, S. Mosley, S. Farmer, and B. Fain. 2013. A Web Based Voting Application Study of Display Layouts for Older Adult Voters with Arthritis. Working Paper No. 012. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Accessible Voting Technology Initiative. http://elections.itif.org/wp-content/uploads/AVTI-012-GTRI-DisplayLayouts-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G., and B. A. Rupp. 1984. “An Overview of Standards and Guidelines for Visual Display Terminals.” Applied Ergonomics 15 (3): 185–195. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(84)90060-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeks, B., and W. J. Levelt. 1993. “Pupillary Dilation as a Measure of Attention: A Quantitative System Analysis.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25: 16–26. doi: 10.3758/BF03204445
   Google Scholar
• Hooge, I. T. C., and C. J. Erkelens. 1996. “Control of Fixation Duration in a Simple Search Task.” Perception &Psychophysics 58: 969–976. doi:10.3758/bf03206825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, I. T. C., and C. J. Erkelens. 1998. “Adjustment of Fixation Duration in Visual Search.” Vision Research 38: 1295–1302. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00287-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., A. Pollatsek, M. I. Posner, and K. Rayner. 1989. “Covert Attention and Eye Movements During Reading.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (1): 63–89. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y. M., R. Mallipeddi, and M. Lee. 2014. “Identification of Human Implicit Visual Search Intention Based on Eye Movement and Pupillary Analysis.” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24 (4): 315–344. doi: 10.1007/s11257-013-9142-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, V., N. Kaur, and R. Wason. 2014. “ Font Legibility for Printed Text and Onscreen Text.” In 2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 629–631. doi:10.1109/IndiaCom.2014.6828038.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsler, V., and R. H. Carpenter. 1995. “Saccadic Eye Movements while Reading Music.” Vision Research 35: 1447–1458. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)98724-n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniawan, S. H., and P. Zaphiris. 2001. “ Reading Online or on Paper: Which Is Faster?” In Poster Sessions: Abridged Proceedings of HCI International 2001, edited by M. J. Smith, M. R. Kasdorf, and G. Salvendy, 220–222. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• La, L., N. Wang, and D. P. Zhou. 2015. “Improving Reading Comprehension Step by Step Using Online-Boost Text Readability Classification System.” Neural Computing and Applications 26: 929–939. doi: 10.1007/s00521-014-1770-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laarni, J., J. Simola, I. Kojo, and N. Risto. 2004. “Reading Vertical Text from a Computer Screen.” Behaviour & Information Technology 23 (2): 75–82. doi: 10.1080/01449290310001648260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge, G. E., and C. A. Bigelow. 2011. “Does Print Size Matter for Reading? A Review of Findings from Vision Science and Typography.” Journal of Vision 11: 8. doi:10.1167/11.5.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longman, C. S., A. Lavric, and S. Monsell. 2013. “More Attention to Attention? An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Selection of Perceptual Attributes During a Task Switch.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 39 (4): 1142–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muter, P. 1996. “Interface Design and Optimization of Reading of Continuous Text.” In Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing, edited by H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul, 161–180. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Näsänen, R., H. Ojanpää, and I. Kojo. 2001. “Effect of Stimulus Contrast on Performance and Eye Movements in Visual Search.” Vision Research 41: 1817–1824. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00056-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno, T., N. Mukawa, and A. Yoshikawa. 2002. “Free Gaze: A Gaze Tracking System for Everyday Gaze Interaction.” In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, 125–132. doi:10.1145/507097.507098.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., S. Sargent, and M. Moreland. 2014. “Evaluating the Efficacy of Using a Digital Reading Environment to Improve Reading Comprehension Within a Reading Clinic.” Reading Psychology 35: 397–421. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.683236
   Google Scholar
• Pinkney, A. J. 2015. “ Improving Typography and Minimising Computation for Documents with Scalable Layouts.” Doctoral diss., University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Rauthmann, J. F., C. T. Seubert, P. Sachse, and M. R. Furtner. 2012. “Eyes as Windows to the Soul: Gazing Behavior Is Related to Personality.” Journal of Research in Personality 46: 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124: 372–422. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.3.372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., T. J. Slattery, and N. N. Bélanger. 2010. “Eye Movements, the Perceptual Span, and Reading Speed.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17: 834–839. doi:10.3758/pbr.17.6.834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., and A. Siyanova-Chanturia. 2013. “Using Eye-Tracking to Investigate Topics in L2 Acquisition and L2 Processing.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35 (02): 213–235. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos Lonsdale, M. 2007. “Does Typographic Design of Examination Materials Affect Performance?” Information Design Journal 15 (2): 114–138. doi: 10.1075/idj.15.2.04lon
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos Lonsdale, M. 2014. “The Effect of Text Layout on Performance.” Information Design Journal (IDJ) 21 (3): 279–299. doi: 10.1075/idj.21.3.09san
   Google Scholar
• Schrier, E., M. Dontcheva, C. Jacobs, G. Wade, and D. Salesin. 2008. “ Adaptive Layout for Dynamically Aggregated Documents.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 99–108. doi:10.1145/1378773.1378787.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C., and S. K. Dubey. 2014. “ Analysis of Eye Tracking Techniques in Usability and HCI Perspective.” In 2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), March, 607–612. doi:10.1109/indiacom.2014.6828034.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. G., and N. E. Day. 1984. “The Design of Case-Control Studies: The Influence of Confounding and Interaction Effects.” International Journal of Epidemiology 13 (3): 356–365. doi: 10.1093/ije/13.3.356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. B., D. P. Alenquer, and J. Borisch. 2004. “Type, Motion and Emotion: A Visual Amplification of Meaning.” In Design and Emotion: The Experience of Everyday Things, edited by D. McDonagh, P. Hekkert, J. van Erp, and D. Gyi, 212–219. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Strick, M., R. W. Holland, R. Van Baaren, and A. Van Knippenberg. 2009. “Humor in the Eye Tracker: Attention Capture and Distraction from Context Cues.” The Journal of General Psychology: Experimental, Psychological, and Comparative Psychology 137: 37–48. doi:10.1080/00221300903293055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unema, P. J., S. Pannasch, M. Joos, and B. M. Velichkovsky. 2005. “Time Course of Information Processing During Scene Perception: The Relationship Between Saccade Amplitude and Fixation Duration.” Visual Cognition 12: 473–494. doi:10.1080/13506280444000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, B. N., E. A. Over, and I. T. Hooge. 2005. “Saccadic Search Performance: The Effect of Element Spacing.” Experimental Brain Research 167: 246–259. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0032-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, W., E. Park, and K. Cho. 2011. “E-book Readability, Comprehensibility and Satisfaction.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. doi:10.1145/1968613.1968660.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. 2014. “A Study of Print and Computer-Based Reading to Measure and Compare Rates of Comprehension and Retention.” New Library World 115: 376–393. doi: 10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0051
   Google Scholar