Innovative virtual and collaborative teaching methodologies

References

• Audi, D., and M. Watfa. 2011. “ A Technology Friendly Mathematics Teaching Methodology.” In The 16th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (ATCM 2011), Bolu, Turkey, 449–458.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L., and C. Bachman. 2011. “A Study of Classroom Response System Clickers: Increasing Student Engagement and Performance in a Large Undergraduate Lecture Class on Architectural Research.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research 22 (1): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Burnstein, R., and L. Lederman. 2001. “Using Wireless Keypads in Lecture Classes.” The Physics Teacher 39: 8–11. doi: 10.1119/1.1343420
   Google Scholar
• Cue, N. 1998. “ A Universal Learning Tool for Classrooms?” In Proceedings of the First Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference. Hong Kong International Trade and Exhibition Center (HITEC), Hong Kong SAR, China, December 10–12. http://celt.ust.hk/ideas/prs/pdf/Nelsoncue.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, L., M. Guinaldo, R. Heradio, and S. Dormido. 2015. “The Ball and Beam System: A Case Study of Virtual and Remote Lab Enhancement with Moodle.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 11 (4): 934–945. doi: 10.1109/TII.2015.2443721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, X., Dunn, D., and Lee, S. J. 2000. “An Integrated Approach to Instructional Technology.” Action in Teacher Education 22 (2): 1–13. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2000.10463034
   Google Scholar
• Draper, S. (2002). “Using Handsets at Glasgow University.” Accessed August 3, 2006. http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/%7Esteve/ilig/local.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P., A. Richardson, F. Oprescu, and C. McDonald. 2013. “Mobile-Phone-Based Classroom Response Systems: Students’ Perceptions of Engagement and Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 44 (8): 1160–1174. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2012.756548
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, C. 2002. “ Case Study: Economics Lectures Using a Personal Response System.” The Economics Centre of the Learning and Teaching Support Network. Accessed August 3, 2006. http://www.economics.ltsn.ac.uk/showcase/elliott_prs.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz. 1998. “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention: v. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students.” Journal of Engineering Education 87 (4): 469–480. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00381.x
   Google Scholar
• Gan, C. L. 2011. “ Effective Learning in Classrooms of Tomorrow at NTU.” Singapore. Paper presented at the E-learning Asia Forum 2011, Singapore, June 8, 2011. http://elfasia.org/elfa2011/download/presentation/Session%201C_Gan%20Chee%20Lip.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., and M. Hakel. 2003. “Applying the Science of Learning in Your Teaching.” Change 35 (4): 36–41. doi: 10.1080/00091380309604109
   Google Scholar
• Heradioa, R., L. Torreb, D. Galanb, F. Cabrerizoa, E. Herrera-Viedmac, and S. Dormidob. 2016. “Virtual and Remote Labs in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Computers and Education 98 (1): 14–38. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holderied, A. C. 2011. “Instructional Design for the Action: Employing Interactive Technologies and Active Learning Exercise to Enhance Information Literacy.” Journal of Information Literacy 5 (1): 23–32. doi: 10.11645/5.1.1519
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., and Q. Cutts. 2005. “The Association Between Students’ Use of an Electronic Voting System and Their Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21: 260–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-C., T.-C. Liu, and C.-C. Chu. 2011. “Implementing Clickers to Assist Learning in Science Lectures: The Clicker-Assisted Conceptual Change Model.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27 (6): 979–996. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/lin.html. doi: 10.14742/ajet.924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo-Kushnir, L. 2013. “The Clicker Way to an “A”! New Evidence for Increased Student Learning and Engagement: Understanding the Pedagogy Behind the Technology.” In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013, edited by Jan Herrington, 2212–2221. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C., N. Bu, and B. Min. 2000. “Learners’ Training Approach Preference: National Culture as a Determinant.” Cross Cultural Management – An International Journal 7 (1): 23–32. doi: 10.1108/13527600010797048
   Google Scholar
• Vesisenaho, M., and P. Dillon. 2013. “Localising and Contextualising Information and Communication Technology in Education: A Cultural Ecological Framework.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 21 (2): 239–259. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.759130
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2001. “Student Teachers’ Perception and Practice of the Teachers’ Role When Teaching with Computers.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 24 (4): 419–434. doi: 10.2190/3N80-0WM8-0EN4-UHKN
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., B. Lewis, M. Boyle, and T. Brown. 2011. “The Impact of Wireless Keypads in an Interprofessional Education Context with Health Science Students.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42: 337–350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01031.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar