648
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exploring extraneous cognitive load in an instructional process via the web conferencing system

&
Pages 713-725 | Received 22 Sep 2015, Accepted 20 Dec 2016, Published online: 01 Feb 2017

References

  • Abrami, P. C., R. M. Bernard, E. M. Bures, E. Borokhovski, and R. M. Tamim. 2011. “Interaction in Distance and Online Learning: Using Evidence and Theory to Improve Practice.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 23: 82–103. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
  • Al Asraj, A., M. Freeman, and P. A. Chandler. 2011. “ Considering Cognitive Load Theory Within E-Learning Environments.” In PACIS 2011 Proceedings, 1–13. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
  • Baddeley, A. 1992. “Working Memory: The Interface Between Memory and Cognition.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4 (3): 281–288. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.281
  • Bannert, M. 2002. “Managing Cognitive Load-Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory.” Learning and Instruction 12 (1): 139–146. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00021-4
  • Bawane, J., and J. M. Spector. 2009. “Prioritization of Online Instructor Roles: Implications for Competency-Based Teacher Education Programs.” Distance Education 30 (3): 383–397. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236536
  • Bower, M. 2011. “Synchronous Collaboration Competencies in Web-Conferencing Environments – Their Impact on the Learning Process.” Distance Education 32 (1): 63–83. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.565502
  • Cappiccie, A., and P. Desrosiers. 2011. “Lessons Learned from Using Adobe Connect in the Social Work Classroom.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 29 (4): 296–302. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2011.638239
  • Chalmers, P. A. 2003. “The Role of Cognitive Theory in Human–Computer Interface.” Computers in Human Behavior 19 (5): 593–607. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00086-9
  • Chandler, P., and J. Sweller. 1991. “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.” Cognition & Instruction 8 (4): 293–332. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
  • Chang, T. W., J. M. Hsu, and P. T. Yu. 2011. “A Comparison of Single-and Dual-Screen Environment in Programming Language: Cognitive Loads and Learning Effects.” Educational Technology & Society 14 (2): 188–200.
  • Chang, C. C., and F. Y. Yang. 2010. “Exploring the Cognitive Loads of High-School Students as They Learn Concepts in Web-Based Environments.” Computers & Education 55 (2): 673–680. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.001
  • Chanlin, L. J. 1998. “Students Cognitive Styles and the Need of Visual Control in Animation.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 19 (4): 353–365. doi: 10.2190/EBXL-K70V-ELAY-K0YN
  • Chiu, C. H., H. Y. Yang, T. H. Liang, and H. P. Chen. 2010. “Elementary Students’ Participation Style in Synchronous Online Communication and Collaboration.” Behaviour & Information Technology 29 (6): 571–586. doi: 10.1080/01449291003686195
  • Clark, R. C., F. Nguyen, and J. Sweller. 2006. Efficiency in Learning, Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
  • Clark, J. M., and A. Paivio. 1991. “Dual Coding Theory and Education.” Educational Psychology Review 3 (3): 149–210. doi: 10.1007/BF01320076
  • Clarke, T., P. Ayres, and J. Sweller. 2005. “The Impact of Sequencing and Prior Knowledge on Learning Mathematics Through Spreadsheet Applications.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (3): 15–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02504794
  • Conaway, R. N., S. S. Easton, and W. V. Schmidt. 2005. “Strategies for Enhancing Student Interaction and Immediacy in Online Courses.” Business Communication Quarterly 68 (1): 23–35. doi: 10.1177/1080569904273300
  • Corbalan, G., L. Kester, and J. J. G. Van Merriënboer. 2009. “Dynamic Task Selection: Effects of Feedback and Learner Control on Efficiency and Motivation.” Learning and Instruction 19 (6): 455–465. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.07.002
  • Crooks, S. M., J. Cheon, F. Inan, F. Ari, and R. Flores. 2012. “Modality and Cueing in Multimedia Learning: Examining Cognitive and Perceptual Explanations for the Modality Effect.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (3): 1063–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.010
  • Darabi, A., and L. Jin. 2013. “Improving the Quality of Online Discussion: The Effects of Strategies Designed Based on Cognitive Load Theory Principles.” Distance Education 34 (1): 21–36. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.770429
  • De Jong, T. 2010. “Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, and Instructional Design: Some Food for Thought.” Instructional Science 38 (2): 105–134. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
  • Dikbaş, T. E. 2013. “Synchronous Interaction in Online Learning Environments with Adobe Connect Pro.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 106: 2492–2499. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.286
  • Falloon, G. 2011. “Making the Connection: Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance and Its Relevance to the Use of a Virtual Classroom in Postgraduate Online Teacher Education.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 43 (3): 187–209. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2011.10782569
  • Falloon, G. 2012. “Inside the Virtual Classroom: Student Perspectives on Affordances and Limitations.” Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning 16 (1): 108–126.
  • Gedera, D. S. 2014. “Students’ Experiences of Learning in a Virtual Classroom.” International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology 10 (4): 93–95.
  • Hollender, N., C. Hofmann, M. Deneke, and B. Schmitz. 2010. “Integrating Cognitive Load Theory and Concepts of Human–Computer Interaction.” Computers in Human Behavior 26 (6): 1278–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031
  • Jim, K. 2001. “Stimulation Collaboration and Discussion in Online Learning Environments.” Internet and Higher Education 4: 119–124. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00054-9
  • Kalyuga, S. 2012. “Interactive Distance Education: A Cognitive Load Perspective.” Jounal of Computing in Higher Education 24: 182–208. doi: 10.1007/s12528-012-9060-4
  • Karabulut, A., and A. Correia. 2008. “Skype, Elluminate, Adobe Connect, Ivisit: A Comparison of Web-Based Video Conferencing Systems for Learning and Teaching.” In Paper Presented at the Proceedings of Technology and Teacher Education International Conference in Society for Information, Las Vegas, Nevada, edited by Karen McFerrin, Roberta Weber, Roger Carlsen, and Dee Anna Willis, Vol. 19, 481–482. Chesapeake, VA: Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Kaufmann, R., and B. N. Frisby. 2013. “Let’s Connect: Using Adobe Connect to Foster Group Collaboration in the Online Classroom.” Communication Teacher 27 (4): 230–234. doi: 10.1080/17404622.2013.798014
  • Keir, S., and J. Elizondo. 2010. “Utilizing Elluminate® to Provide Professional Development for School Staff in the Pacific Region: ‘Bridge Events’ in Regional Educational Lab-Pacific.” In Paper Presented at the Proceedings of Technology and Teacher Education International Conference in Society for Information, San Diego, CA, edited by David Gibson and Bernie Dodge, Vol. 1, 2748–2753. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Kester, L., P. Kirschner, and G. Corbalan. 2007. “Designing Support to Facilitate Learning in Powerful Electronic Learning Environments.“ Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3): 1047–1054.
  • Kirschner, P. A. 2002. “Cognitive Load Theory: Implications of Cognitive Load Theory on the Design of Learning.” Learning and Instruction 12 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7
  • Kirschner, F., F. Paas, and P. A. Kirschner. 2009. “A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks.” Educational Psychology Review 21: 31–42. doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2
  • Liu, T. C., Y. C. Lin, M. J. Tsai, and F. Paas. 2012. “Split-attention and Redundancy Effects on Mobile Learning in Physical Environments.” Computers & Education 58 (1): 172–180.
  • Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R. E. 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R. E. 2009. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R. E. 2014. “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, edited by Richard E. Mayer, 43–71. Santa Barbara: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, R. E., and C. I. Johnson. 2008. “Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (2): 380–382. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380
  • Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 2002. “Aids to Computer-Based Multimedia Learning.” Learning and Instruction 12 (1): 107–119. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4
  • Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 2003. “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 43–52. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  • Mayer, R. E., and V. K. Sims. 1994. “For Whom Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Extensions of a Dual-Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (3): 389–390. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389
  • Merriënboer, J., and P. Ayres. 2005. “Research on Cognitive Load Theory and Its Design Implications for E-Learning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (3): 5–13. doi: 10.1007/BF02504793
  • Miller, C. 2011. “Aesthetics and E-Assessment: The Interplay of Emotional Design and Learner Performance.” Distance Education 32 (3): 307–337. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.610291
  • Moreno, R., and R. E. Mayer. 2000. “A Coherence Effect in Multimedia Learning: The Case for Minimizing Irrelevant Sounds in the Design of Multimedia Instructional Messages.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 117–125. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117
  • Moreno, R., and R. E. Mayer. 2002. “Verbal Redundancy in Multimedia Learning: When Reading Helps Listening.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (1): 156–161. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.156
  • Olson, J. S., and F. E. McCracken. 2014. “Is It Worth the Effort? The Impact of Incorporating Synchronous Lectures into an Online Course.” Online Learning: Official Journal of the Online Learning Consortium 19 (2): 1–7. doi: 10.24059/olj.v19i2.499
  • Oviatt, S. 2006. “Human-Centered Design Meets Cognitive Load Theory: Designing Interfaces That Help People Think.” In Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Santa Barbara, CA, edited by Klara Nahrstedt, Matthew Turk, Yong Rui, Wolfgang Klas, and Ketan Mayer-Patel, 871–880. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Paas, F., A. Renkl, and J. Sweller. 2003. “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 1–4. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
  • Paas, F., A. Renkl, and J. Sweller. 2004. “Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction Between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture.” Instructional Science 32 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0
  • Paas, F. G., J. J. Van Merriënboer, and J. J. Adam. 1994. “Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 79 (1): 419–430. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
  • Pollock, E., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2002. “Assimilating Complex Information.” Learning and Instruction 12 (1): 61–86. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0
  • Quinn, A. S., J. A. R. J. Regan, and D. Schoech. 2008. “Online Synchronous Audio and Video Environments for Education, Training, and Human Service Delivery: A Review of Three Products.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 26 (1): 89–104. doi: 10.1300/J017v26n01_07
  • Salden, R. J., V. Aleven, R. Schwonke, and A. Renkl. 2010. “The Expertise Reversal Effect and Worked Examples in Tutored Problem Solving.” Instructional Science 38 (3): 289–307. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9107-8
  • Sawicka, A. 2008. “Dynamics of Cognitive Load Theory: A Model-Based Approach.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (3): 1041–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.007
  • Scheiter, K., and P. Gerjets. 2007. “Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 285–307. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3
  • Schnotz, W., and T. Rasch. 2005. “Enabling, Facilitating, and Inhibiting Effects of Animations in Multimedia Learning: Why Reduction of Cognitive Load Can Have Negative Results on Learning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (3): 47–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02504797
  • Servonsky, E. J., W. L. Daniels, and B. L. Davis. 2005. “ Evaluation of Blackboards as a Platform for Distance Education Delivery.” The ABNF Journal (November/December).
  • Smith, E., P. Lye, B. Greatrex, M. Taylor, and I. Stupans. 2013. “Enriching Learning for First Year Chemistry Students: Introduction of Adobe Connect.” European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning 16 (1): 94–101.
  • Sweller, J. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 4 (4): 295–312. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
  • Sweller, J. 2003. “Evolution of Human Cognitive Architecture.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, edited by Brian Ross, Vol. 43, 215–266. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Sweller, J., J. J. Van Merrienboer, and F. G. Paas. 1998. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design.” Educational Psychology Review 10 (3): 251–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205
  • Thüring, M., J. Hannemann, and J. M. Haake. 1995. “Hypermedia and Cognition: Designing for Comprehension.” Communications of the ACM 38 (8): 57–66. doi: 10.1145/208344.208348
  • Vonderwell, S., and S. Zachariah. 2005. “Factors That Influence Participation in Online Learning.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38 (2): 213–230. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457
  • Wang, Q. 2008. “A Generic Model for Guiding the Integration of ICT into Teaching and Learning.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45 (4): 411–419. doi: 10.1080/14703290802377307
  • Wittrock, M. C. 1989. “Generative Processes of Comprehension.” Educational Psychologist 24 (4): 345–376. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2
  • Zimmerman, T. D. 2012. “Exploring Learner to Content Interaction as a Success Factor in Online Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13 (4): 152–165.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.