An empirical study on the integrative pre-implementation model of technology acceptance in a mandatory environment

References

• Abraham, C., and P. Sheeran. 2003. “Implications of Goal Theories for the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behaviour.” Current Psychology 22: 264–280. doi: 10.1007/s12144-003-1021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A., J. B. Bernerth, J. P. Pitts, and H. J. Walker. 2007. “Organizational Change Recipients” Beliefs Scale: Development of an Assessment Instrument.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 43 (4): 481–505. doi: 10.1177/0021886307303654
   Google Scholar
• Armenakis, A. A., and S. G. Harris. 2002. “Crafting a Change Message to Create Transformational Readiness.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 15 (2): 169–183. doi: 10.1108/09534810210423080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. 1992. “The Self-Regulation of Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior.” Social Psychology Quarterly 55 (2): 178–204. doi: 10.2307/2786945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P. 2007. “The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4): 244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1982. “Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency.” American Psychologist 37: 122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2): 164–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. A., A. P. Massey, M. M. Montoya-Weiss, and J. R. Burkman. 2002. “Do I Really Have to? User Acceptance of Mandated Technology.” European Journal of Information Systems 11: 283–295. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. 1998. “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling.” In Modern Methods for Business Research, edited by G. A. Marcoulides, 195–336. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., and E. R. McLean. 1992. “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable.” Information Systems Research 3: 60–95. doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H., and E. R. McLean. 2003. “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten Year Update.” Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4): 60–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, L., D. J. Neufeld, and C. Higgins. 2008. “Testing Klein and Sorra’s Innovation Implementation Model: An Empirical Examination.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 25 (4): 237–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and F. L. Bookstein. 1982. “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory.” Journal of Marketing Research. 19: 440–452. doi: 10.2307/3151718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frambach, R., and N. Schillewaert. 2002. “Organizational Innovation Adoption: A Multi-Level Framework of Determinants and Opportunities for Future Research.” Journal of Business Research 55 (2): 163–176. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair Jr, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2013. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet.” The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (2): 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Herscovitch, L., and J. P. Meyer. 2002. “Commitment to Organizational Change: Extension of a Three-Component Model.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 474–487. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, J. R., and H. J. Klein. 1987. “Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Problems, Prospects, and Proposals for Future Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (2): 212–220. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y. 2005. “Investigating Enterprise Systems Adoption: Uncertainty Avoidance, Intrinsic Motivation, and the Technology Acceptance Model.” European Journal of Information Systems 14 (2): 150–161. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E. 1999. “Symbolic Adoption of Information Technology.” Paper presented at the proceedings of decision sciences international conference, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., and D. W. Straub. 1997. “The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use.” Information & Management 35: 237–250. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany. 1999. “Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs.” MIS Quarterly 23 (2): 183–213. doi: 10.2307/249751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. C. 1958. “Compliance, Identification, and Internalization Three Processes of Attitude Change.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2: 51–60. doi: 10.1177/002200275800200106
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., and J. S. Sorra. 1996. “The Challenge of Innovation Implementation.” The Academy of Management Review 21 (4): 1055–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. J., M. J. Wesson, J. R. Hollenbeck, and B. J. Alge. 1999. “Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Conceptual Clarification and Empirical Synthesis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 885–896. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., K. A. Kozar, and K. Larsen. 2003. “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (50): 752–780.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., J. Ingham, and P. Collerette. 2003. “Why do People use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information & Management 40: 191–204. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, E. T. K., S. L. Pan, and C. W. Tan. 2005. “Managing User Acceptance Towards Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems – Understanding the Dissonance Between User Expectations and Managerial Policies.” European Journal of Information Systems 14 (2): 135–149. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., G. P. Latham, and M. Erez. 1988. “The Determinants of Goal Commitment.” Academy of Management Review 13: 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., K. R. Shaw, L. M. Saari, and G. P. Latham. 1981. “Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1968-1980.” Psychological Bulletin 90: 125–152. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., and N. J. Allen. 1991. “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment.” Human Resource Management Review 1: 61–89. doi: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., and L. Herscovitch. 2001. “Commitment in the Workplace: Toward a General Model.” Human Resource Management Review 11 (3): 299–326. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X
   Google Scholar
• Nah, F. F., J. Lau, and J. Kuang. 2001. “Critical Factors for Successful Implementation of Enterprise Systems.” Business Process Management Journal 7 (3): 285–296. doi: 10.1108/14637150110392782
   Google Scholar
• Osei-Bryson, K., L. Dong, and O. Ngwenyama. 2008. “Exploring Managerial Factors Affecting ERP Implementation: An Investigation of the Klein-Sorra Model Using Regression Splines.” Information Systems Journal 18 (5): 499–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawstorne, P., R. Jayasuriya, and P. Caputi. 1998. “An Integrative Model of Information Systems use in Mandatory Environments.” Proceedings of the nineteenth international conference on information systems, Helsinki, Finland, 325–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., M. Sarstedt, and D. W. Straub. 2012. “Editor’s Comments: A Critical Look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): iii–xiv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., and J. Pfeffer. 1978. “A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design.” Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (2): 224–253. doi: 10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers, J., and M. Wetzels. 2007. “A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model: Investigating Subjective Norm and Moderation Effects.” Information & Management 44 (1): 90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, R. W. 1981. “Differentiating Organizational Commitment Form Expectancy as a Motivating Force.” Academy of Management Review 6: 589–599.
   Google Scholar
• Sussmann, M., and R. P. Vecchio. 1982. “A Social Influence Interpretation of Worker Motivation.” Academy of Management Review 7: 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and P. A. Todd. 1995. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.” Information Systems Research 6 (2): 144–176. doi: 10.1287/isre.6.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S., V. K. Lim, and R. Y. Lai. 1999. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage.” Omega 27 (1): 25–37. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., D. Compeau, and C. A. Higgins. 2006. “Intentions to Use Information Technologies.” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 18 (3): 25–46. doi: 10.4018/joeuc.2006070102
   Google Scholar
• Urbach, N., and F. Ahlemann. 2010. “Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares.” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 11 (2): 5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala. 2008. “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.” Journal of Information Technology 39: 273–315.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. J. 2009. “A Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change.” Implementation Science 4 (1): 112–123. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R., and A. Bandura. 1989. “Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 407–415. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M. Y., and F. D. Davis. 2003. “Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition.” Information Systems Research 14 (2): 146–169. doi: 10.1287/isre.14.2.146.16016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M. Y., J. D. Jackson, J. S. Park, and J. C. Probst. 2006. “Understanding Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: Toward an Integrative View.” Information & Management 43 (3): 350–363. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar