Student teachers’ satisfaction for blended learning via Edmodo learning management system

References

• Akkoyunlu, B., and M. Y. Soylu. 2008. “A Study of Student’s Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles.” Educational Technology & Society 11 (1): 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., and J. Seaman. 2007. “Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning.” Sloan Consortium Report. http://www.sloanc.org/publications/freedownloads.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ates Cobanoglu, A., and B. Yurdakul. 2014. “The Effect of Blended Learning on Students’ Achievement, Perceived Cognitive Flexibility Levels and Self-Regulated Learning Skills.” The Journal of Education and Practice 5 (22): 176–196.
   Google Scholar
• Aycock, Balasubramanian, K. Jaykumar, V. and L, and N. Fukey. 2014. “A Study on Student Preference Towards the Use of Edmodo as a Learning Platform to Create Responsible Learning Environment.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 144 (20): 416–422. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.311
   Google Scholar
• Baran, B., E. Kılıç, A. Çörez-Bakar, and K. Çağıltay. 2010. “Turkish University Students’ Technology Use Profiles and Their Thoughts About Distance Education.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET) 9 (1): 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Block, A., B. Undermann, M. Felix, D. Reineke, and S. Murray. 2008. “Achievement in On-Line Versus a Traditional Health and Wellness Course.” Merlot Journal of On-Line Learning and Teaching 4 (1): 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., and S. K. Biklen. 1998. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bülbül, A. H., U. Tuğtekin, U. İlic, A. Kuzu, and H. F. Odabaşı. 2016. “Community of Inquiry in Online Environments: A Guideline for Faculty.” Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty 17 (2): 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B. H., and H. H. Chiou. 2014. “Learning Style, Sense of Community and Learning Effectiveness in Hybrid Learning Environment.” Interactive Learning Environments 22 (4): 485–496. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2012.680971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. I., S. C. Chen, and D. C. Yen. 2015. “Continuance Intention of E-Portfolio System: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model.” Computer Standards and Interfaces 42 (2015): 17–23. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigdem, H., and A. Topcu. 2015. “Predictors of Instructors’ Behavioral Intention to Use Learning Management System: A Turkish Vocational College Example.” Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015): 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colakoglu, O. M., and O. Akdemir. 2010. “Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 11 (2): 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dang, Y., Y. Zhang, S. Ravindran, and T. Osmonbekov. 2016. “Examining Student Satisfaction and Gender Differences in Technology-Supported Blended Learning.” Journal of Information Systems Education 27 (2): 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Deghaidy, H., and A. Nouby. 2008. “Effectiveness of a Blended e-Learning Cooperative Approach in an Egyptian Teacher Education Programme.” Computers & Education 51 (3): 988–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findik Coskuncay, D., and S. Ozkan. 2013. “A Model for Instructors’ Adoption of Learning Management Systems: Empirical Validation in Higher Education Context.” TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 12 (2): 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., et al. 2009. “Communities of Inquiry in Online Learning.” In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, edited by P. L. Rogers, 352–355. IGI Global Hershey: PA.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2010. “The First Decade of the Community of Inquiry Framework: A Retrospective.” The Internet and Higher Education 13 (1–2): 5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., and J. B. Arbaugh. 2007. “Researching the Community of Inquiry Framework: Review, Issues, and Future Directions.” Internet and Higher Education 10 (3): 157–172. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., and H. Kanuka. 2004. “Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 7 (2): 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. 2006. “Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions.” In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk, and C. R. Graham, 3–21. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., W. Woodfield, and J. B. Harrison. 2013. “A Framework for Institutional Adoption and Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Internet and Higher Education 18 (2013): 4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurevych, R., and M. Kademiya. 2017. “Blended Learning and Innovative Technologies in Training of Future Specialists in Foreign Higher Education Institutions.” Comparative Professional Pedagogy 7 (1): 8–13. doi: 10.1515/rpp-2017-0001
   Google Scholar
• Holland, C., and L. Muilenburg. 2011. “Supporting Student Collaboration: Edmodo in the Classroom.” In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011, edited by M. Koehler, and P. Mishra, 3232–3236. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, B. 1995. Theory and Practice of Distance Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). 2014. ISTE Standards Teachers. http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., S. H. Park, S. Y. Park, S. M. Kim, E. K. Kim, and J. Y. Kim. 2009. “Relationships Among Learners” Satisfaction, Academic Achievement and Learning Transfer in the Corporate Cyber Education.” In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009, edited by G. Siemens, and C. Fulford, 3930–3933. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Karadeniz, Ş. 2012. “Development of Student Satisfaction on Blended Learning Questionnaire.” Electronic Journal of Social Sciences 11 (40): 161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Karatas, I. 2014. “Changing Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs About Using Computers for Teaching and Learning Mathematics: The Effect of Three Different Models.” European Journal of Teacher Education 37 (3): 390–405. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2013.870993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehrwald, B., P. Rawlins, and M. Simpson. 2011. “Learner Experiences of Online Learning in a Blended Learning Situation: Different Cohorts, Different Needs.” Paper presented at the Ascilite 2011, Wrest Point, Hobart Tasmania Australia, December 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. 1999. “Motivation in Cyber Learning Environments.” International Journal of Educational Technology 1 (1): 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. 2008. “First Principles of Motivation to Learn and E3-Learning.” Distance Education 29 (2): 175–185. doi: 10.1080/01587910802154970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongchan, C. 2012. How a Non-Digital-Native Teacher Makes Use of Edmodo. http://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL2012/common/download/Paper_pdf/90-IBT18-FP-Kongchan-ICT2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laster, S., G. Otte, A. G. Picciano, and S. Sorg. 2005. “Redefining Blended Learning.” Presentation at the Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning, Chicago, IL, April 18.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. C. 2010. “Explaining and Predicting Users” Continuance Intention Toward e-Learning: An Extension of the Expectation–Confirmation Model.” Computers & Education 54 (2010): 506–516. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., C. Lim, and H. Kim. 2017. “Development of an Instructional Design Model for Flipped Learning in Higher Education.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65: 427–453. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., K. C. Barrett, and G. A. Morgan. 2008. SPSS for Intermediate Statistics use and Interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• LTC (Learning Technology Center). 2015. Hybrid Courses. http://www4.uwm.edu/ltc/hybrid/about_hybrid/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D., and D. Hamilton. 2006. “Factors Affecting Student Performance and Satisfaction: Online Versus Traditional Course Delivery.” Journal of Computer Information Systems 46 (2): 25–32. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2006.11645880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. F. Murphy, and M. Baki. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Teachers College Record 115 (3): 1–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones. 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: Center for Technology in Learning, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, B. F., H. W. Bland, and J. Chopak-Foss. 2009. “Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning Versus Traditional General Health Course Designs.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (1): 26. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. P., D. V. Hayward, W. Dunn, M. Carbonaro, and C. G. Amrhein. 2015. “Blending for Student Engagement: Lessons Learned for MOOCS and Beyond.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31 (6): 657–670. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskal, P., C. Dziuban, and J. Hartman. 2013. “Blended Learning: A Dangerous Idea?” Internet and Higher Education 18 (2013): 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAU (Northern Arizona University). 2017. Digital learning initiatives. https://nau.edu/blended-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Nee, C. K. 2014. “The Effect of Educational Networking on Students’ Performance in Biology.” International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE) 3 (1): 21–41. doi: 10.5121/ijite.2014.3102
   Google Scholar
• Owston, R. D., D. R. Garrison, and K. Cook. 2006. “Blended Learning at Canadian Universities: Issues and Practices.” In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk, and C. R. Graham, 338–350. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. ISBN:978-0-7879-7758-0
   Google Scholar
• Owston, R., D. York, and S. Murtha. 2013. “Student Perceptions and Achievement in a Blended Learning Strategic Initiative.” Internet & Higher Education 18: 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastergiou, M., and C. Solomonidou. 2005. “Gender Issues in Internet Access and Favourite Internet Activities among Greek High School Pupils Inside and Outside School.” Computers & Education 44 (4): 377–393. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, H. 2014. The Top 5 Blended and Flipped Classroom Tools. http://www.edudemic.com/blended-and-flipped-classroom-tools/
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, R., and J. Merisotis. 1999. What’s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., F. Siddiq, and T. Teo. 2015. “Becoming More Specific: Measuring and Modeling Teachers” Perceived Usefulness of ICT in the Context of Teaching and Learning.” Computers & Education 88 (2015): 202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P. 2007. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Learning in Blended Environments.” In Blended Learning Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano, and C. D. Dziuban, 19–36. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• So, H.-J., and T. Brush. 2008. “Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment: Relationships and Critical Factors.” Computers & Education 51 (1): 318–336. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, E., and P. Gerbic. 2008. Success Factors for Blended Learning. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/stacey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. W., P. D. Shen, and M. C. Tsai. 2011. “Developing an Appropriate Design of Blended Learning with Web-Enabled Self-Regulated Learning to Enhance Students” Learning and Thoughts Regarding Online Learning.” Behaviour & Information Technology 30 (2): 261–271. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.514359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. E. 1997. “Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior 13 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.-H., R. D. Tennyson, and T.-L. Hsia. 2010. “A Study of Student Satisfaction in a Blended e-Learning System Environment.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., R. D. Tennyson, T. L. Hsia, and Y. W. Liao. 2008. “Analysis of e-Learning Innovation and Core Capability Using a Hypercube Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (5): 1851–1866. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunkul, E., and S. Cankaya. 2017. “Students’ Attitudes Towards Edmodo, a Social Learning Network: A Scale Development Study.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE 18 (2): 16–29. doi: 10.17718/tojde.306554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar