Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users

References

• Adukaite, A., A. M. Reimann, E. Marchiori, and L. Cantoni. 2013. Hotel Mobile Apps. The Case of 4 and 5 Star Hotels In European German-speaking Countries. Information and communication technologies in Tourism 2014, 45–57. Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Á. Hernández-García, and F. J. Pascual-Miguel. 2014. “Behavioral Intention, Use Behavior and the Acceptance of Electronic Learning Systems: Differences Between Higher Education and Lifelong Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 34: 301–314. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda-Filho, E. J. M., J. A. Cabusas, and N. Dholakia. 2010. “Social Behavior and Brand Devotion among iPhone Innovators.” International Journal of Information Management 30 (6): 475–480. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda Filho, Emílio José Montero, R. M. Chaves Lima, and M. M. Lennon. 2014. “How to Justify Purchase of an iPad: Users of the Latest Launch.” Journal of Technology Management &Innovation 9 (3): 106–119. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000300008
   Google Scholar
• Basoglu, N., A. E. Ok, and T. U. Daim. 2017. “What Will it Take to Adopt Smart Glasses: A Consumer Choice Based Review?” Technology in Society 50: 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodine, K., and F. Gemperle. 2003. Effects of functionality on perceived comfort of wearables. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’03) (Vol. 1530, No. 0811/03, pp. 17–00).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., R. V. Kozinets, and J. F. Sherry Jr. 2003. “Teaching old Brands new Tricks: Retro Branding and the Revival of Brand Meaning.” Journal of Marketing 67 (3): 19–33. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.67.3.19.18657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canhoto, A. I., and S. Arp. 2017. “Exploring the Factors that Support Adoption and Sustained Use of Health and Fitness Wearables.” Journal of Marketing Management 33 (1–2): 32–60. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2016.1234505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchinato, M. E., A. L. Cox, and J. Bird. 2015. Smartwatches: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly? Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2133–2138. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, J. M. 2009. “Consumer Acceptance Model of Smart Clothing According to Innovation.” International Journal of Human Ecology 10 (1): 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, A. 2013. “From IBM to Microsoft – A Brief History of the Smartwatch”, International Business Times, 52–60. Accessed April 7, 2014. www.ibtimes.co.uk/smartwatch-history-appleiwatch-samsung-galaxy-gear-503752.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., and S. Kim. 2016. “Is the Smartwatch an IT Product or a Fashion Product? A Study on Factors Affecting the Intention to use smartwatches.” Computers in Human Behavior 63: 777–786. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, S. H. W., P. A. Rauschnabel, N. Krey, B. Nguyen, T. Ramayah, and S. Lade. 2016. “Wearable Technologies: The Role of Usefulness and Visibility in Smartwatch Adoption.” Computers in Human Behavior 65: 276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coorevits, L., and T. Coenen. 2016. "The Rise and Fall of Wearable Fitness Trackers." In Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13: 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., R. Riedl, J. vom Brocke, and A. B. Randolph. 2015. Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lubbock: Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M. 2016. “An Assessment Towards Adoption and Diffusion of Smart Wearable Technologies by Consumers: The Cases of Smart Watch and Fitness Wristband Products.” In HT (Extended Proceedings), Halifax, July 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M., and R. M. Dangelico. 2017. Smart wearable technologies: Current status and market orientation through a patent analysis. Industrial Technology (ICIT), 2017 IEEE International Conference on, 1570–1575. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M., and M. Tumer. 2015. “A Research on Effectiveness of Facebook Advertising on Enhancing Purchase Intention of Consumers.” Computers in Human Behavior 49: 597–600. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., and D. H. Jonassen, eds. 2013. Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y. M., and C.-C. Chang. 2016. “Users’ Psychological Perception and Perceived Readability of Wearable Devices for Elderly People.” Behaviour & Information Technology 35 (3): 225–232. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1114145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner. 2015. “Wearable Technology beyond Smartwatches.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/wearable-technology-beyond-smartwatches-3/.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Z., J. Wei, and F. Xu. 2016. “An Empirical Study on Factors Influencing Consumers” Initial Trust in Wearable Commerce.” Journal of Computer Information Systems 56 (1): 79–85. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2015.11645804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, T., B. Beijnon, S. Kim, S. Lee, and J. H. Kim. 2017. “Examining User Perceptions of Smartwatch Through Dynamic Topic Modeling.” Telematics and Informatics 34 (7): 1262–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi, M. R., M. Laroche, and M.-O. Richard. 2014. “Brand Communities Based in Social Media: How Unique Are They? Evidence from Two Exemplary Brand Communities.” International Journal of Information Management 34 (2): 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., O. K. Lee, and W. Suh. 2013. “A Study of the Continuous Usage Intention of Social Software in the Context of Instant Messaging.” Online Information Review 37 (5): 692–710. doi: 10.1108/OIR-08-2011-0144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., P. H. Lin, and P.-C. Hsieh. 2017. “The Effect of Consumer Innovativeness on Perceived Value and Continuance Intention to Use smartwatch.” Computers in Human Behavior 67: 264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. L. 2017. “What Drives smartwatch Adoption Intention? Comparing Apple and Non-Apple Watches.” Library Hi Tech 35 (1): 186–206. doi: 10.1108/LHT-09-2016-0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDC. 2015a. IDC Forecasts Worldwide Shipments of Wearables to Surpass 200 Million in 2019, Driven By Strong Smartwatch Growth. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS40846515.
   Google Scholar
• IDC. 2016. IDC Forecasts Wearables Shipments to Reach 213.6 Million Units Worldwide in 2020 with Watches and Wristbands Driving Volume While Clothing and Eyewear Gain Traction. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS41530816
   Google Scholar
• Jayanti, R. K., and A. C. Burns. 1998. “The Antecedents of Preventive Health Care Behavior: An Empirical Study.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (1): 6–15. doi: 10.1177/0092070398261002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., S. Kim, and B. Choi. 2016. “Consumer Valuation of the Wearables: The Case of Smartwatches.” Computers in Human Behavior 63: 899–905. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantari, M., and P. Rauschnabel. 2018. “Exploring the Early Adopters of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: The Case of Microsoft HoloLens.” In Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, 229–245. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J. 2016. “Round or Square? How Screen Shape Affects Utilitarian and Hedonic Motivations for Smartwatch Adoption.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19 (12): 733–739. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J. 2017. “Shape and Size Matter for Smartwatches: Effects of Screen Shape, Screen Size, and Presentation Mode in Wearable Communication.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22: 124–140. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., and T. Ammeter. 2014. “Predicting Personal Information System Adoption Using an Integrated Diffusion Model.” Information & Management 51 (4): 451–464. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., and D.-H. Shin. 2015. “An Acceptance Model for Smart Watches: Implications for the Adoption of Future Wearable Technology.” Internet Research 25 (4): 527–541. doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., and J.-B. Sim. 2012. “Acceptance-diffusion Strategies for Tablet-PCs: Focused on Acceptance Factors of Non-users and Satisfaction Factors of Users.” Etri Journal 34 (2): 245–255. doi: 10.4218/etrij.12.0111.0198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 1997. “‘I Want to Believe’: A Netnography of the X-Philes’ Subculture of Consumption.” Advances in Consumer Research 24: 470–475.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2002. “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 61–72. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, F. B., and P. W. Goodell. 1993. “Identifying the Health Conscious Consumer.” Marketing Health Services 13 (3): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kwee-Meier, S. T., J. E. Bützler, and C. Schlick. 2016. “Development and Validation of a Technology Acceptance Model for Safety-enhancing, Wearable Locating Systems.” Behaviour & Information Technology 35 (5): 394–409. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1141986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamkin, P. 2015. Just How Big Can Wearable Tech Get. Forbes < http://www.forbes.com/sites/paullamkin/2015/03/31/just-how-big-can-wearable-techget/#2715e4857a0b7a2ea43b7812.
   Google Scholar
• Leue, M., and T. H. Jung. 2014. “A Theoretical Model of Augmented Reality Acceptance.” e-Review of Tourism Research 5: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lowrey, T. M. 1991. “The Use of Diffusion Theory in Marketing: A Qualitative Approach to Innovative Consumer Behavior.” NA-Advances in Consumer Research 18: 644–650.
   Google Scholar
• Magrath, V., and H. McCormick. 2013. “Marketing Design Elements of Mobile Fashion Retail Apps.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 17 (1): 115–134. doi: 10.1108/13612021311305173
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. 2013. “Before iWatch: The Timely History of the Smartwatch”, TechRadar, 3–10. Accessed April 7, 2014. www.techradar.com/news/portable-devices/before-iwatch-the-timely-historyof- the-smartwatch-1176685.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. 2014. “Wearable Computing in the Workplace to be Dependent On Apps and Services”, Forbes, 19–24. Accessed March 15, 2014. www.forbes.com/sites/gartnergroup/2014/03/ 06/wearable-computing-in-the-workplace-to-be-dependent-on-apps-and-services.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, E. P. 2007. “Life Cycle, Sustainability and the Transcendent Quality of Building Materials.” Building and Environment 42 (3): 1329–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda, P., J. Bos, K. L. Kramer, C. Hay, and J. Ignacz. 2008. “Effect of Smartphone Aesthetic Design on Users' Emotional Reaction: An Empirical Study.” The TQM Journal 20 (4): 348–355. doi: 10.1108/17542730810881339
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, S., and Y. Yurder. 2015. “Consumers’ and Physicians’ Perceptions About High Tech Wearable Health Products.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195: 1261–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.279
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y., and J. V. Chen. 2007. “Acceptance and Adoption of the Innovative Use of Smartphone.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 107 (9): 1349–1365. doi: 10.1108/02635570710834009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., and M. Fygenson. 2006. “Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior.” MIS Quarterly 30: 115–143. doi: 10.2307/25148720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potnis, D., D. Demissie, and K. Deosthali. 2017. “Students’ Intention to Adopt Internet-based Personal Safety Wearable Devices: Extending UTAUT with Trusting Belief.” First Monday 22 (9): 1–9. doi: 10.5210/fm.v22i9.7808
   Google Scholar
• Rageh, A., T. C. Melewar, and A. Woodside. 2013. “Using Netnography Research Method to Reveal the Underlying Dimensions of the Customer/Tourist Experience.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 16 (2): 126–149. doi: 10.1108/13522751311317558
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., A. Brem, and B. S. Ivens. 2015. “Who Will Buy Smart Glasses? Empirical Results of Two Pre-market-entry Studies on the Role of Personality in Individual Awareness and Intended Adoption of Google Glass Wearables.” Computers in Human Behavior 49: 635–647. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., D. W. Hein, J. He, Y. K. Ro, S. Rawashdeh, and B. Krulikowski. 2016. “Fashion or Technology? A Fashnology Perspective on the Perception and Adoption of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses.” i-com 15 (2): 179–194. doi: 10.1515/icom-2016-0021
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., and Y. K. Ro. 2016. “Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: An Investigation of Technology Acceptance Drivers.” International Journal of Technology Marketing 11 (2): 123–148. doi: 10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690
   Google Scholar
• Rogers Everett, M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saleem, K., B. Shahzad, M. A. Orgun, J. Al-Muhtadi, J. J. Rodrigues, and M. Zakariah. 2017. “Design and Deployment Challenges in Immersive and Wearable Technologies.” Behaviour & Information Technology 36: 687–698. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1275808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. 2005. Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. Irwin: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan, N. 2015. “Reflective Thoughts on the Potential and Challenges of Wearable Technology for Healthcare Provision and Medical Education.” International Journal of Information Management 35 (5): 521–526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarute, A., S. Nikou, and R. Gatautis. 2017. “Mobile Application Driven Consumer Engagement.” Telematics and Informatics 34 (4): 145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunca, S., and J. Fueller. 2009. “Impression Formation in a World Full of Fake Products.” NA-Advances in Consumer Research 36: 287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Turhan, G. 2013. “An Assessment Towards the Acceptance of Wearable Technology to Consumers in Turkey: The Application to Smart Bra and T-shirt Products.” Journal of the Textile Institute 104 (4): 375–395. doi: 10.1080/00405000.2012.736191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C., N. Tsikriktsis, and M. Frohlich. 2002. “Case Research in Operations Management.” International Journal of Operations &Production Management 22 (2): 195–219. doi: 10.1108/01443570210414329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L., A. A. Fan, and A. S. Mattila. 2015. “Wearable Technology in Service Delivery Processes: The Gender-moderated Technology Objectification Effect.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 51: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. H., K. Motohashi, and J.-R. Chen. 2009. “Are New Technology-based Firms Located on Science Parks Really More Innovative? Evidence from Taiwan.” Research Policy 38 (1): 77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., J. Yu, H. Zo, and M. Choi. 2016. “User Acceptance of Wearable Devices: An Extended Perspective of Perceived Value.” Telematics and Informatics 33 (2): 256–269. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, X., C. Yu, W. Shi, and Y. Shi. 2017. “Is It Too Small?: Investigating the Performances and Preferences of Users When Typing on Tiny QWERTY Keyboards.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 106: 44–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., M. Luo, R. Nie, and Y. Zhang. 2017. “Technical Attributes, Health Attribute, Consumer Attributes and Their Roles in Adoption Intention of Healthcare Wearable Technology.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 108: 97–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar