How perceptions of incivility and social endorsement in online comments (Dis) encourage engagements

References

• Billig, Michael, and Henri Tajfel. 1973. “Social Categorization and Similarity in Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 3 (1): 27–52. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420030103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, Porismita. 2013. “Interactions of News Frames and Incivility in the Political Blogosphere: Examining Perceptual Outcomes.” Political Communication 30 (3): 456–473. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, Porismita. 2014. “Does it Matter Where you Read the News Story? Interaction of Incivility and News Frames in the Political Blogosphere.” Communication Research 41 (6): 809–827. doi: 10.1177/0093650212449353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., and R. J. Brown. 1998. “Intergroup Relations.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, edited by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and L. Gardner, 554–594. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, Michael, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald T., and Julian C. Stanley. 1963. “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by N. L. Gage, 171–246. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, and Stephen A. Rains. 2014. “Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments.” Journal of Communication 64 (4): 658–679. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darr, Christopher R. 2007. “Civility and Social Responsibility: “Civil Rationality” in the Confirmation Hearings of Justices Roberts and Alito.” Argumentation and Advocacy 44 (2): 57–74. doi: 10.1080/00028533.2007.11821678
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber, and Ebonya Washington. 2010. “Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 720–744. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, Bryan T. 2014. “Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the use of Incivility in Political Expression.” Political Communication 31 (4): 564–583. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.852640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, Bryan T. 2015. “Incivility Online: Affective and Behavioral Reactions to Uncivil Political Posts in a Web-Based Experiment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12 (2): 167–185. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.997416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, Carroll J., Ronald E. Ostman, and Daniel G. McDonald. 1995. “Opinions, Perception, and Social Reality.” In Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, edited by T. L. Glasser, and C.T. Salmon, 249–277. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F., and L. Wallnau. 2014. Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Soo-Hye, and LeAnn M. Brazeal. 2015. “Playing Nice: Modeling Civility in Online Political Discussions.” Communication Research Reports 32 (1): 20–28. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2014.989971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardaker, Claire. 2010. “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2): 215–242. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2010.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, Susan. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Jaehyun, and Hee Sun Park. 2011. “User Ratings and Willingness to Express Opinions Online.” International Journal of Marketing Studies 3 (2): 2–15. doi: 10.5539/ijms.v3n2p2
   Google Scholar
• Horton, John J., David G. Rand, and Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2011. “The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market.” Experimental Economics 14 (3): 399–425. doi: 10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Hyunseo, Porismita Borah, Kang Namkoong, and A. Veenstra. 2008. “Does Civility Matter in the Blogosphere? Examining the Interaction Effects of Incivility and Disagreement on Citizen Attitudes.” 58th Annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Hyunseo, Youngju Kim, and Catherine U. Huh. 2014. “Seeing is Believing: Effects of Uncivil Online Debate on Political Polarization and Expectations of Deliberation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58 (4): 621–633. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2014.966365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Hyunseo, Youngju Kim, and Yeojin Kim. 2016. “Influence of Discussion Incivility on Deliberation: An Examination of the Mediating Role of Moral Indignation.” Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650215616861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Hyunseo, Michael Schmierbach, Hye-Jin Paek, Homero Gil de Zuniga, and Dhavan Shah. 2006. “Media Dissociation, Internet use, and Antiwar Political Participation: A Case Study of Political Dissent and Action Against the War in Iraq.” Mass Communication and Society 9 (4): 461–483. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0904_5
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Bruce Hardy. 2012. “What is Civil Engaged Argument and Why Does Aspiring to it Matter?” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (3): 412–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Jiwon. 2014. “Scan and Click: The Uses and Gratifications of Social Recommendation Systems.” Computers in Human Behavior 33: 184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, Roger E. 1995. “Experimental Design. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.” Cole Publishing Co 147, no. 194: 48.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Nikhil Sharma, Derek L. Hansen, and Scott Alter. 2005. “Impact of Popularity Indications on Readers’ Selective Exposure to Online News.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49 (3): 296–313. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. “Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition.” Political Communication 30 (4): 565–581. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., and C. S. Taber. 2005. “The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 26 (3): 455–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano-Reich, Nina M., and Dana L. Cloud. 2009. “The Uncivil Tongue: Invitational Rhetoric and the Problem of Inequality.” Western Journal of Communication 73 (2): 220–226. doi: 10.1080/10570310902856105
   Google Scholar
• Masullo Chen, Gina, and Shuning Lu. 2017. “Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 61 (1): 108–125. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C., and Byron Reeves. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’sullivan, Patrick B., and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2003. “Reconceptualizing ‘Flaming’ and Other Problematic Messages.” New Media & Society 5 (1): 69–94. doi: 10.1177/1461444803005001908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–283. doi: 10.1177/1461444804041444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2015. Abortion. Accessed October 30, 2015. http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/domestic-issues/abortion/.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, Kristopher J., and Andrew F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40 (3): 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, Sarah, and Jeffrey M. Berry. 2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication 28 (1): 19–41. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60 (3): 556–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, Charles S., Damon Cann, and Simona Kucsova. 2009. “The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments.” Political Behavior 31 (2): 137–155. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Vol. 1., edited by W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by S. Worchel, and W. G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Westland, J. C. 2010. “Lower Bounds on Sample Size in Structural Equation Modeling.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9 (6): 476–487. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Wendy. 2000. “Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence.” Annual Review of Psychology 51 (1): 539–570. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemke, Dean A. 1980. “Selective Exposure in a Presidential Campaign Contingent on Certainty and Salience.” Annals of the International Communication Association 4 (1): 497–511. doi: 10.1080/23808985.1980.11923821
   Google Scholar