997
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examination of the effects of computer-based mathematics instruction methods in children with mathematical learning difficulties: a meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 913-923 | Received 28 Jul 2018, Accepted 05 Mar 2019, Published online: 27 Mar 2019

References

  • “* indicates references used for meta-analysis.”
  • Bacanlı, H. 2007. Eğitim Psikolojisi. (1. Press). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publication.
  • *Bartelet, D., D. Ansari, A. Vaessen, and L. Blomert. 2014. “Cognitive Subtypes of Mathematics Learning Difficulties in Primary Education.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 35: 657–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.12.010
  • Bavelier, D., C. S. Green, and M. W. G. Dye. 2010. “Children, Wired: For Better and for Worse.” Neuron 67 (5): 692–701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.035
  • *Beal, C. R., R. Walles, I. Arroyo, and B. P. Woolf. 2007. “On-line Tutoring for Math Achievement Testing: a Controlled Evaluation.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 (1): 43–55.
  • Borenstein, M., L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, and H. R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
  • *Bottge, B. A., X. Ma, L. Gassaway, M. D. Toland, M. Butler, and S. J. Cho. 2014. “Effects of Blended Instructional Models on Math Performance.” Exceptional Children 80 (4): 423–437. doi:10.1177/0014402914527240.
  • *Bottge, B. A., E. Rueda, T. S. Grant, A. C. Stephens, and P. T. Laroque. 2010. “Anchoring Problem-Solving and Computation Instruction in Context-Rich Learning Environments.” Exceptional Children 76 (4): 417–437. doi: 10.1177/001440291007600403
  • Boydak, A. 2001. Öğrenme Stilleri. (12. Press). İstanbul: Beyaz Publication.
  • *Brankaer, C., P. Ghesquière, and B. D. Smedt. 2014. “Numerical Magnitude Processing Deficits in Children with Mathematical Difficulties are Independent of Intelligence.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 35: 2603–2613. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.022
  • *Burns, M. K., R. Kanive, and M. DeGrande. 2012. “Effect of a Computer-Delivered Math Fact Intervention as a Supplemental Intervention for Math in Third and Fourth Grades.” Remedial and Special Education 33 (3): 184–191. doi: 10.1177/0741932510381652
  • Butterworth, B., and D. Laurillard. 2010. “Low Numeracy and Dyscalculia: Identification and Intervention.” ZDM Mathematics and Education 42 (6): 527–539. doi: 10.1007/s11858-010-0267-4
  • Card, N. 2012. Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Chodura, S., J.-T. Kuhn, and H. Holling. 2015. “Interventions for Children with Mathematical Difficulties.” Zeitschrift Für Psychologie 223 (2): 129–144. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000211
  • Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Marrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
  • Colley, H., P. Hodkinson, and J. Malcolm. 2003. Informality and Formality in Learning. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. Accessed 20 November 2017. www.isda.org.uk/files/PDF/1492.pdf.
  • Curado, J. 2017. How to combine formal, non-formal and informal learning in developing coaches. European Couching Council (ICCE), 2017.
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V). 2013. American Psychiatric Association. American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Accessed 8 August 2017. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/specific-learning-disorder/what-is-specific-learning-disorder.
  • Dinçer, S. 2014. Eğitim Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı Meta Analiz. (1. Press). Ankara: Pegem Academic Publication.
  • Duhon, G. J., S. H. House, and T. A. Stinnett. 2012. “Evaluating the Generalization of Math Fact Fluency Gains Across Paper and Computer Performance Modalities.” Journal of School Psychology 50: 335–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.003
  • Ekici, G. 2001. “Öğrenme Stiline Dayalı Biyoloji öğretiminin Analizi.” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Ekiz, D., and H. Ve Durukan. 2006. Eğitim Bilimine Giriş. (1. Press). İstanbul: Lisans Publication.
  • Geary, D. C. 2004. “Mathematics and Learning Disabilities.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (1): 4–15. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370010201
  • Gersten, S., D. J. Chard, M. Jayanthi, S. K. Baker, P. Morphy, and J. Flojo. 2009. “Mathematics Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: Meta-Analysis of Instructional Components.” Review of Educational Research 79 (3): 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431.
  • Jitendra, A. K., A. E. Lein, S. Im, A. A. Alghamdi, S. B. Hefte, and J. Mouanoutoua. 2018. “Mathematical Interventions for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities and Mathematical Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis.” Exceptional Children 84 (2): 177–196. doi:10.1177/0014402917737467.
  • *Kanive, R., P. M. Nelson, M. K. Burns, and J. Ysseldyke. 2014. “Comparison of the Effects of Computer-Based Practice and Conceptual Understanding Interventions on Mathematics Fact Retention and Generalization.” The Journal of Educational Research 107: 83–89. doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.759405.
  • Ke, F. 2008. “Computer Games Application Within Alternative Classroom Goal Structures: Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Affective Evaluation.” Educational Technology Research and Development 56 (5–6): 539–556. doi: 10.1007/s11423-008-9086-5
  • *Kumar, S. P., and B. W. D. Raja. 2010. “Computer-supported Instruction in Enhancing the Performance of Dyscalculics.” I-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology 5 (3): 36–41. doi: 10.26634/jsch.5.3.1087
  • Kunsch, C. A., A. K. Jitendra, and S. Sood. 2007. “The Effects of Peer-Mediated Instruction in Mathematics for Students with Learning Problems: A Research Synthesis.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22 (1): 1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00226.x
  • Laal, M., A. Laal, and A. Aliramaei. 2014. “Continuing Education; Lifelong Learning.” Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (2014): 4052–4056.
  • Levenberg, A., and A. Caspi. 2010. “Comparing Perceived Formal and Informal Learning in Face-to-Face Versus Online Environments.” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 6: 323–333. doi: 10.28945/1318
  • Li, Q., and X. Ma. 2010. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 22 (3): 215–243. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8
  • Loosli, S. V., M. Buschkuehl, W. J. Perrig, and S. M. Jaeggi. 2012. “Working Memory Training Improves Reading Processes in Typically Developing Children.” Child Neuropsychology 18 (1): 62–78. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2011.575772
  • Maccini, P., and C. A. Hudges. 1997. “Mathematics Interventions for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 12: 168–176.
  • Maccini, P., C. A. Mulcahy, and M. G. Wilson. 2007. “A Follow-up of Mathematics Interventions for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22 (1): 58–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00231.x
  • Maunonen-Eskelinen, I. 2007. Formal, Non-Formal, Informal Learning. Jyväskylä: Jyvaskyla University of Applied Sciences.
  • Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLoS Medicine 6 (6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  • Myers, J. A., J. Wang, M. T. Brownell, and C. J. Gagnon. 2015. “Mathematics Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities (LD) in Secondary School: A Review of the Literature.” Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal 13 (2): 207–235.
  • National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-2012). National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 10 (258). Accessed 1 August 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_2012_data_release.html.
  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. 2008. Foundations for Success: Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • *Nelson, P. M., M. K. Burns, R. Kanive, and J. E. Ysseldyke. 2013. “Comparison of a Math Fact Rehearsal and a Mnemonic Strategy Approach for Improving Math Fact Fluency.” Journal of School Psychology 51: 659–667. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.08.003
  • O’Malley, P., S. Jenkins, B. Wesley, C. Donehower, D. Rabuck, and M. Lewis. 2013. Effectiveness of Using i-Pads to Build Math Fluency. Texas: Council for Exceptional Children.
  • Özden, Y. 2000. Öğrenme ve Öğretme. (8. Press). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publication.
  • Papastergiou, M. 2009. “Digital Game-Based Learning in High School Computer Science Education: Impact on Educational Effectiveness and Student Motivation.” Computers & Education 52 (1): 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
  • Rubinsten, O., and R. Tannock. 2010. “Mathematics Anxiety in Children with Developmental Dyscalculia.” Behavioral and Brain Functions 6 (1): 46. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-6-46
  • Segal, J., G. Kemp, and M. Smith. 2017. Learning Disabilities and Disorders – Types of Learning Disorders and Their Signs. Accessed 7 February 2018. https://www.helpguide.org/articles/autism-learning-disabilities/learning-disabilities-and-disorders.html.
  • Senemoğlu, N. 2012. Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya. (21. Press). Ankara: Pegem Academic Publication.
  • Silver, C. H., L. B. Blackburn, S. Arffa, J. T. Barth, S. S. Bush, S. P. Koffler, N. H. Pliskin, et al. 2006. “The Importance of Neuropsychological Assessment for the Evaluation of Childhood Learning Disorders nan-Policy and Planning Committee.” Archieves of Clinical Neuropsychology 21: 741–744. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.006.
  • Sönmez, V., N. Senemoğlu, M. Tezcan, C. Alkan, and İ Bircan. 2004. Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş. (4. Press). Ankara: Anı Publication.
  • Stevens, C., J. Fanning, D. Coch, L. Sanders, and H. Neville. 2008. “Neural Mechanisms of Selective Auditory Attention are Enhanced by Computerized Training: Electrophysiological Evidence From Language-Impaired and Typically Developing Children.” Brain Research 1205: 55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.108
  • Stultz, S. L. 2017. “Computer – Assisted Mathematics Instruction for Students with Specific Learning Disability: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Special Education Technology 32 (4): 210–219. doi:10.1177/0162643417725881.
  • *Syah, N. E. M., N. A. Hamzaid, B. P. Murphy, and E. Lim. 2016. “Development of Computer Play Pedagogy Intervention for Children with low Conceptual Understanding in Basic Mathematics Operation Using the Dyscalculia Feature Approach.” Interactive Learning Environments 24 (7): 1477–1496. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1023205.
  • Temizöz, Y., and S. A. Özgün-Koca. 2008. “The Instructional Methods That Mathematics Teachers use and Their Perceptions on the Discovery Approach.” Education and Science 33 (149): 89–103.
  • Templeton, T. N., R. S. Neel, and E. Blood. 2008. “Meta-analysis of Math Interventions for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 16 (4): 226–239. doi: 10.1177/1063426608321691
  • US Census Bureau, Population Estimates and International Data Base. 2004. Accessed 7 August 2017. www.rightdiagnosis.com/l/learning_disabilities/stats-country.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.