Discovering MOOC learner motivation and its moderating role

References

• Akyol, Z., and D. R. Garrison. 2008. “The Development of a Community of Inquiry Over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12: 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Akyol, Z., and D. R. Garrison. 2011. “Understanding Cognitive Presence in an Online and Blended Community of Inquiry: Assessing Outcomes and Processes for Deep Approaches to Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (2): 233–250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alraimi, K. M., H. Zo, and A. P. Ciganek. 2015. “Understanding the MOOCs Continuance: The Role of Openness and Reputation.” Computers & Education 80: 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelaina, S., and A. Jimoyiannis. 2012. “Analysing Students’ Engagement and Learning Presence in an Educational Blog Community.” Educational Media International 49 (3): 183–200. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.738012.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., M. Cleveland-Innes, S. R. Diaz, D. R. Garrison, P. Ice, J. C. Richardson, and K. P. Swan. 2008. “Developing a Community of Inquiry Instrument: Testing a Measure of the Community of Inquiry Framework Using a Multi-Institutional Sample.” The Internet and Higher Education 11 (3): 133–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, S., M. Goel, A. S. Sabitha, and D. Mehrotra. 2017. “Learner Groups in Massive Open Online Courses.” American Journal of Distance Education 31 (2): 80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. 2010. “The Impact of Instructor Immediacy and Presence for Online Student Affective Learning.” Cognition, and Motivation. Journal of Educators Online 7 (1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ904072.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., A. Watted, and H. Haick. 2016. “Motivation to Learn in Massive Open Online Courses: Examining Aspects of Language and Social Engagement.” Computers & Education 94: 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba, P. de, G. E. Kennedy, and M. D. Ainley. 2016. “The Role of Students’ Motivation and Participation in Predicting Performance in a MOOC.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 32 (3): 218–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., W. Y. Lan, Y. M. To, V. O. Paton, and S.-L. Lai. 2009. “Measuring Self-Regulation in Online and Blended Learning Environments.” The Internet and Higher Education 12 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernacki, M. L., A. C. Aguilar, and J. P. Byrnes. 2011. “Self-regulated Learning and Technology Enhanced Learning Environments: An Opportunity-Propensity Analysis.” Fostering Self-Regulated Learning Through ICT. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay, 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, E., K. Aoki, and L. Dlugosh. 2008. “Predictors of Learning Satisfaction in Japanese Online Distance Learners.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 9 (3). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/525.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, A., L. Corrin, P. De Barba, J. Lodge, and G. Kennedy. 2018. “A Tale of Two MOOCs: How Student Motivation and Participation Predict Learning Outcomes in Different MOOCs.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 34 (1): 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaño, C., I. Maiz, and U. Garay. 2015. “Design, Motivation and Performance in a Cooperative MOOC Course.” Online Submission 22 (44): 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Che, X., S. Luo, C. Wang, and C. Meinel. 2016. “An Attempt at MOOC Localization for Chinese-Speaking Users.” International Journal of Information and Education Technology 6 (2): 90.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Y.-H. Chang, F. Ouyang, and W. Zhou. 2018. “Fostering Student Engagement in Online Discussion Through Social Learning Analytics.” The Internet and Higher Education 37: 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-C., and C.-Y. Chen. 2018. “Exploring the Effect of Learning Styles on Learning Achievement in a u-Museum.” Interactive Learning Environments 26 (5): 664–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Q. Gao, and Q. Yuan. 2017. “DanMOOC: Enhancing Content and Social Interaction in MOOCs with Synchronized Commenting.” In Cross-Cultural Design, 509–520. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57931-3_40.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Q. Gao, Q. Yuan, and Y. Tang. 2019. “Facilitating Students’ Interaction in MOOCs Through Timeline-Anchored Discussion.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–19. doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1574056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-C., and S.-J. Jang. 2010. “Motivation in Online Learning: Testing a Model of Self-Determination Theory.” Computers in Human Behavior 26 (4): 741–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, K. F. T., and K. F. T. Hew. 2018. “Factors Influencing Peer Learning and Performance in MOOC Asynchronous Online Discussion Forum.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 34 (4): 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M.-H., and S. Tobias. 2016. “Should Instructors Require Discussion in Online Courses? Effects of Online Discussion on Community of Inquiry, Learner Time.” Satisfaction, and Achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17 (2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2342.
   Google Scholar
• Cisel, M. 2014. “Analyzing Completion Rates in the First French xMOOC.” In Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, 26. Lausanne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• De-Marcos, L., A. Domínguez, J. Saenz-de-Navarrete, and C. Pagés. 2014. “An Empirical Study Comparing Gamification and Social Networking on e-Learning.” Computers & Education 75: 82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Boston, MA: Springer US. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1991. “A Motivational Approach to Self: Integration in Personality.” Perspectives on Motivation 38: 237.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2002. Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester: University Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denker, K. J., J. Manning, K. B. Heuett, and M. E. Summers. 2018. “Twitter in the Classroom: Modeling Online Communication Attitudes and Student Motivations to Connect.” Computers in Human Behavior 79: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DomíNguez, A., J. Saenz-De-Navarrete, L. De-Marcos, L. FernáNdez-Sanz, C. PagéS, and J.-J. MartíNez-HerráIz. 2013. “Gamifying Learning Experiences: Practical Implications and Outcomes.” Computers & Education 63: 380–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., R. Heino, and J. Gibbs. 2006. “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 415–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaert, P., E. Opdecam, and S. Maussen. 2017. “The Relationship Between Motivation, Learning Approaches, Academic Performance and Time Spent.” Accounting Education 26 (1): 78–107. doi:10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J., L. Tang, J. Yang, and M. Peng. 2019. “Social Interaction in MOOCs: The Mediating Effects of Immersive Experience and Psychological Needs Satisfaction.” Telematics and Informatics 39: 75–91. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 1999. “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 2 (2): 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., and J. B. Arbaugh. 2007. “Researching the Community of Inquiry Framework: Review, Issues, and Future Directions.” The Internet and Higher Education 10 (3): 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Giesbers, B., B. Rienties, D. Tempelaar, and W. Gijselaers. 2013. “Investigating the Relations Between Motivation, Tool Use, Participation, and Performance in an E-Learning Course Using Web-Videoconferencing.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (1): 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillani, N., and R. Eynon. 2014. “Communication Patterns in Massively Open Online Courses.” The Internet and Higher Education 23: 18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, W., E. Ayub, S. Y. Wong, and C. L. Lim. 2017. “The Importance of Teacher’s Presence and Engagement in MOOC Learning Environment: A Case Study.” In 2017 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 127–132, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. 1988. “The Relationship Between Verbal Teacher Immediacy Behaviors and Student Learning.” Communication Education 37 (1): 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. 2009. Multivariate Data Analysis. https://works.bepress.com/joe_hair/2/.
   Google Scholar
• Hartigan, J. A., and M. A. Wong. 1979. “Algorithm AS 136: A k-Means Clustering Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 28 (1): 100–108.
   Google Scholar
• He, W. 2013. “Examining Students’ Online Interaction in a Live Video Streaming Environment Using Data Mining and Text Mining.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (1): 90–102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., and W. S. Cheung. 2014. “Students’ and Instructors’ use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Motivations and Challenges.” Educational Research Review 12: 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J.-Y., C.-C. Chen, and P.-F. Ting. 2018. “Understanding MOOC Continuance: An Empirical Examination of Social Support Theory.” Interactive Learning Environments 26 (8): 1100–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., and K. F. Hew. 2017. “Factors Influencing Learning and Factors Influencing Persistence: A Mixed-method Study of MOOC Learners’ Motivation.” In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information System and Data Mining, 103–110, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• IBL News. 2019. “XuetangX, China’s Open edX Platform, Reaches 16M Learners.” IBL News, January 3. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://iblnews.org/2019/01/03/xuetangx-open-edx-chinas-platform-reaches-16m-learners-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Jagušt, T., I. Botički, and H.-J. So. 2018. “Examining Competitive, Collaborative and Adaptive Gamification in Young Learners’ Math Learning.” Computers & Education 125: 444–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., and J. Lee. 2018. “Learning Engagement and Persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS).” Computers & Education 122: 9–22. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., and D. Kwak. 2013. “Online Learning Across Ethnicity and Age: A Study on Learning Interaction Participation, Perception, and Learning Satisfaction.” Computers & Education 61: 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. 2010. Motivational Design for Learning and Performance. Boston, MA: Springer US. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, M., C. Kastl, and M. Ebner. 2016. “Portraying MOOCs Learners: A Clustering Experience Using Learning Analytics.” In Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on Experiences and Best Practices in and around MOOCs (EMOOCS 2016), 265–278.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I. U., Z. Hameed, Y. Yu, T. Islam, Z. Sheikh, and S. U. Khan. 2018. “Predicting the Acceptance of MOOCs in a Developing Country: Application of Task-Technology Fit Model, Social Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory.” Telematics and Informatics 35 (4): 964–978. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilis, S., and Z. Yıldırım. 2018. “Investigation of Community of Inquiry Framework in Regard to Self-Regulation, Metacognition and Motivation.” Computers & Education 126: 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W. 2015. Learning Flow, Motivation, and Community of Inquiry in an Online Graduate Degree Program (PhD Thesis). Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., P. J. Guo, C. J. Cai, S.-W. Li (Daniel), K. Z. Gajos, and R. C. Miller. 2014. “Data-driven Interaction Techniques for Improving Navigation of Educational Videos.” In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 563–572.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., M. Pérez-Sanagustín, and J. J. Maldonado. 2017. “Self-regulated Learning Strategies Predict Learner Behavior and Goal Attainment in Massive Open Online Courses.” Computers & Education 104: 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., C. Piech, and E. Schneider. 2013. “Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses.” In In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 170–179, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., and E. Schneider. 2015. “Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners: Toward Data-Driven Design with the OLEI Scale.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22 (2): 6:1–6:24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambić, D. 2016. “Correlation Between Facebook Use for Educational Purposes and Academic Performance of Students.” Computers in Human Behavior 61: 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., N. Hood, C. Milligan, and P. Mustain. 2016. “Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and Self-Regulated Learning in MOOCs.” The Internet and Higher Education 29: 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., P. A. Ertmer, W. R. Watson, and S. L. Watson. 2017. “Adult MOOC Learners as Self-Directed: Perceptions of Motivation, Success, and Completion.” Online Learning 21 (2): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, K. R., and D. L. Freyberg. 2010. “The Effect of Social Presence on Affective and Cognitive Learning in an International Engineering Course Taught Via Distance Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (1): 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., and A. Littlejohn. 2017. “Why Study on a MOOC? The Motives of Students and Professionals.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18 (2): 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. 1989. “Editorial: Three Types of Interaction.” American Journal of Distance Education 3 (2): 1–7. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar, F., K. Muis, and M. Elizov. 2018. “Relations Between Psychological Needs Satisfaction, Motivation, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Medical Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study.” MedEdPublish 7. https://doi.org/mep.2018.0000087.1.
   Google Scholar
• Ngoyi, L., S. Mpanga, A. Ngoyi, V. V. Sudhir, A. S. N. Murthy, D. E. Rani, and P. Vikram. 2014. “The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Social Presence in Online Learning.” International Journal of Advances in Computer Science and Technology 3 (4): 242–247.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, L.-G. 2019. “Decision-making Determinants of Students Participating in MOOCs: Merging the Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-Regulated Learning Model.” Computers & Education 134: 50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., F. Han, and R. A. Ellis. 2017. “Combining University Student Self-Regulated Learning Indicators and Engagement with Online Learning Events to Predict Academic Performance.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 10 (1): 82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. 2002. “Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6 (1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Poquet, O., V. Kovanović, P. de Vries, T. Hennis, S. Joksimović, D. Gašević, and S. Dawson. 2018. “Social Presence in Massive Open Online Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. C., and A. M. Colman. 2000. “Optimal Number of Response Categories in Rating Scales: Reliability, Validity, Discriminating Power, and Respondent Preferences.” Acta Psychologica 104 (1): 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, H., and Q. Chen. 2015. “Visual Analytics for MOOC Data.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 35 (6): 69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., and K. Swan. 2003. “Examing Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students’ Perceived Learning and Satisfaction.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7 (1): 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rosé, C. P., P. Goldman, J. Zoltners Sherer, and L. Resnick. 2015. “Supportive Technologies for Group Discussion in MOOCs.” Current Issues in Emerging ELearning 2 (1): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. 2002a. “Building Sense of Community at a Distance.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 3 (1). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. 2002b. “Sense of Community, Perceived Cognitive Learning, and Persistence in Asynchronous Learning Networks.” The Internet and Higher Education 5 (4): 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P., M. J. Wighting, J. D. Baker, and L. D. Grooms. 2009. “Development of an Instrument to Measure Perceived Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Learning in Traditional and Virtual Classroom Higher Education Settings.” The Internet and Higher Education 12 (1): 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, T., and S. Benson. 2005. “Learning with Invisible Others: Perceptions of Online Presence and Their Relationship to Cognitive and Affective Learning.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 8 (1): 54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G., E. Pechenkina, A.-M. Chase, and B. Ross. 2017. “Designing Massive Open Online Courses to Take Account of Participant Motivations and Expectations.” British Journal of Educational Technology 48 (6): 1284–1294. doi:10.1111/bjet.12497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, H. B., C. H. Lee, N. E. W. Roth, K. Li, M. Çetinkaya-Rundel, and D. A. Canelas. 2017. “Understanding the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Student Experience: An Examination of Attitudes, Motivations, and Barriers.” Computers & Education 110: 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, J., R. D. Redondo, and A. F. Vilas. 2013. “A Social Gamification Framework for a K-6 Learning Platform.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (2): 345–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H.-J., and T. A. Brush. 2008. “Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment: Relationships and Critical Factors.” Computers & Education 51 (1): 318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staubitz, T., J. Renz, C. Willems, and C. Meinel. 2014. “Supporting Social Interaction and Collaboration on an Xmooc Platform.” EDULEARN14 Proceedings, 6667–6677.
   Google Scholar
• Sujatha, R., and D. Kavitha. 2018. “Learner Retention in MOOC Environment: Analyzing the Role of Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Perceived Effectiveness.” International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT 14 (2): 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K. 2001. “Virtual Interaction: Design Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning in Asynchronous Online Courses.” Distance Education 22 (2): 306–331.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., and L. F. Shih. 2005. “On the Nature and Development of Social Presence in Online Course Discussions.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9 (3): 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Y. 2009. The Relationship Between Motivation and Online Social Presence in an Online Class. University of Central Florida. http://search.proquest.com/openview/f64e7dc5aa99e3ea09beb6a81885e9f7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C.-H. 2001. “How Chinese Perceive Social Presence: An Examination of Interaction in Online Learning Environment.” Educational Media International 38 (1): 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Watted, A., and M. Barak. 2018. “Motivating Factors of MOOC Completers: Comparing Between University-Affiliated Students and General Participants.” The Internet and Higher Education 37: 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, J., D. Cotton, J. Gavin, and J. D. Yorke. 2010. “Effective e-Learning? Multi-Tasking, Distractions and Boundary Management by Graduate Students in an Online Environment.” ALT-J 18 (1): 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., and Y. Cui. 2018. “Learning Communities in the Crowd: Characteristics of Content Related Interactions and Social Relationships in MOOC Discussion Forums.” Computers & Education 122: 221–242. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., Y. Cui, and J. Vytasek. 2016. “Bringing Order to Chaos in MOOC Discussion Forums with Content-related Thread Identification.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 188–197, New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2883851.2883916
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., and Q. Bai. 2018. “Why Do the MOOC Learners Drop Out of the School? – Based on the Investigation of MOOC Learners on Some Chinese MOOC Platforms.” 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3), 299–304. doi:10.1109/IC3.2018.00039.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B., and X. Chen. 2017. “Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 67: 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, Y., H. Li, M. L. Kornhaber, H. K. Suen, B. Pursel, and D. D. Goins. 2015. “Examining the Relations Among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Global Education Review 2 (3). http://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/124.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, B., and D. Yang. 2016. “Motivation Classification and Grade Prediction for MOOCs Learners.” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2016: 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q. 2014. “Students Motivation in Asynchronous Online Discussions with MOOC Mode.” American Journal of Educational Research 2 (5): 325–330.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. C., B. Quadir, N.-S. Chen, and Q. Miao. 2016. “Effects of Online Presence on Learning Performance in a Blog-Based Online Course.” The Internet and Higher Education 30: 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., J. Bort, and Y. Huang. 2017. “Understanding Danmaku’s Potential in Online Video Learning.” In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems m3034–3040, New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/3027063.3053258.
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, A. M. F., M. A. Chatti, U. Schroeder, and M. Wosnitza. 2015a. “A Usability Evaluation of a Blended MOOC Environment: An Experimental Case Study.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 16 (2). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousef, A. M. F., M. A. Chatti, M. Wosnitza, and U. Schroeder. 2015b. “A Cluster Analysis of MOOC Stakeholder Perspectives.” Revista de Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento 12 (1): 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. J., G. Allon, and J. A. V. Mieghem. 2017. “Does Social Interaction Improve Learning Outcomes? Evidence From Field Experiments on Massive Open Online Courses.” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 19 (3): 347–367. doi:10.1287/msom.2016.0615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., L. Chen, and D. Burgos. 2018. The Development of MOOCs in China. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, S., M. B. Rosson, P. C. Shih, and J. M. Carroll. 2015. “Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors and Perceptions in MOOCs.” In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1882–1895, ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2675217
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. 2016. “Chinese University Students’ Acceptance of MOOCs: A Self-Determination Perspective.” Computers & Education 92–93: 194–203. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Chapter 2 - Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. San Diego: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7.
   Google Scholar