The effect of precisely defined associative distance and stimulus acquisition mode in individual creativity support systems

References

• Althuizen, Niek, and Astrid Reichel. 2016. “The Effects of IT-Enabled Cognitive Stimulation Tools on Creative Problem Solving: A Dual Pathway to Creativity.” Journal of Management Information Systems 33 (1): 11–44. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2016.1172439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althuizen, Niek, and Berend Wierenga. 2014. “Supporting Creative Problem Solving with a Case-Based Reasoning System.” Journal of Management Information Systems 31 (1): 309–340. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222310112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, Douglas, Jillian Hender, Thomas Rodgers, and Eric Santanen. 2006. “Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 (10): 646–699. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugosh, Karen Leggett, and Paul B. Paulus. 2005. “Cognitive and Social Comparison Processes in Brainstorming.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (3): 313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugosh, Karen Leggett, Paul B. Paulus, Evelyn J. Roland, and Huei-Chuan Yang. 2000. “Cognitive Stimulation in Brainstorming.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5): 722–735. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, Joyce J., and Melissa Mead. 1990. “Can Software Influence Creativity?” Information Systems Research 1 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1287/isre.1.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, Andreas, Karl Koschutnig, Mathias Benedek, Gernot Reishofer, Anja Ischebeck, Elisabeth M. Weiss, and Franz Ebner. 2012. “Stimulating Creativity via the Exposure to Other People's Ideas.” Human Brain Mapping 33 (11): 2603–2610. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, A., D. Monticolo, M. Camargo, and M. Bourgault. 2016. “Creativity Support Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 21: 109–122. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, R. Brent, Lana M. Bastianutti, and William H. Cooper. 1991. “Unblocking Brainstorms.” Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (1): 137–142. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hender, Jillian M., Douglas L. Dean, Thomas L. Rodgers, and Jay F. Nunamaker. 2002. “An Examination of the Impact of Stimuli Type and GSS Structure on Creativity: Brainstorming versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a GSS Environment.” Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (4): 59–85. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Chun-Chieh, Ting-Kuang Yeh, Tsai-Yen Li, and Chun-Yen Chang. 2010. “The Idea Storming Cube: Evaluating the Effects of Using Game and Computer Agent to Support Divergent Thinking. (Report).” Journal of Educational Technology and Society 13 (4): 180–191.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T. H., Q. B. Zhao, Z. J. Zhou, and J. Z. Hong. 2016. “The Effect of Previous Original Knowledge on Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Community.” Information Studies: Theory and Application 39 (7): 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, Stefan Werner, and Graham Horton. 2015. “The Impact of Analogical Distance as a Mental Stimulus in Ideation Processes Using Change of Perspective: Jumping.” In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 226–235. Kauai: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Nicholas W., Paul B. Paulus, and Runa M. Korde. 2011. “Conceptual Combinations and Subsequent Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 23 (3): 203–210. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.595659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., T. Chen, G. Xie, and G. Liu. 2016. “Contact Free Cognitive Load Recognition Based on Eye Movement.” Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2016 (4): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Malaga, Ross A. 2000. “The Effect of Stimulus Modes and Associative Distance in Individual Creativity Support Systems.” Decision Support Systems 29 (2): 125–141. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00067-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massetti, Brenda. 1996. “An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation.” Mis Quarterly 20 (1): 83–97. doi: 10.2307/249543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, Sarnoff. 1962. “The Associative Basis of the Creative Process.” Psychological Review 69: 220–232. doi: 10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, Martha T., Sarnoff A. Mednick, and Charles C. Jung. 1964. “Continual Association as a Function of Level of Creativity and Type of Verbal Stimulus.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 69 (5): 511–515. doi: 10.1037/h0041086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolov, Chen, Corrado, and Dean. 2013. “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” arXiv preprint arXiv, 1301.3781.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C., I. Fridman, W. Soussou, D. Waghray, A. M. Olney, and S. K. D’Mello. 2017. “Put Your Thinking Cap on: Detecting Cognitive Load Using EEG During Learning.” In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 80–89. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Nijstad, Bernard A., and Wolfgang Stroebe. 2006. “How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (3): 186–213. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, Bernard A., Wolfgang Stroebe, and Hein F. M. Lodewijkx. 2002. “Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Groups: Exposure Effects in an Idea Generation Task.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (6): 535–544. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00500-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, Bernard A., Wolfgang Stroebe, and Hein F. M. Lodewijkx. 2003. “Production Blocking and Idea Generation: Does Blocking Interfere with Cognitive Processes?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (6): 531–548. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00040-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietzschel, Eric F., Bernard A. Nijstad, and Wolfgang Stroebe. 2007. “Relative Accessibility of Domain Knowledge and Creativity: The Effects of Knowledge Activation on the Quantity and Originality of Generated Ideas.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (6): 933–946. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santanen, Eric L., Robert O. Briggs, and Gert-Jan de Vreede. 2003. “The Impact of Stimulus Diversity on Creative Solution Generation: An Evaluation of the Cognitive Network Model of Creativity.” Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Santanen, Eric L., Robert O. Briggs, and Gert-Jan de Vreede. 2004. “Causal Relationships in Creative Problem Solving: Comparing Facilitation Interventions for Ideation.” Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (4): 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Siemon, Rarog, and Robra-Bissantz. 2016. “Semi-Automated Questions as a Cognitive Stimulus in Idea Generation.” In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 257–266. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Sun, Shengji Yao, and Juan A. Carretero. 2015. “A Pilot Study for Investigating Factors That Affect Cognitive Load in the Conceptual Design Process.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59: 180–184. doi: 10.1177/1541931215591037
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Kai, and Jeffrey V. Nickerson. 2017. “A Literature Review on Individual Creativity Support Systems.” Computers in Human Behavior 74: 139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar