Modelling user reactions expressed through graphical widgets in intelligent interactive systems

References

• Abowd, G. D., and R. Beale. 1991. “Users Systems and Interfaces: A Unifying Framework for Interaction.” In Proceedings of HCI'91: People and Computers VI, edited by D. Diaper and N. Hammond, 73–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adomavicius, G., J. C. Bockstedt, S. P. Curley, and J. Zhang. 2019. “Reeducing Recommender System Biases: An Investigation of Rating Display Designs.” MIS Quarterly 43 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adomavicius, G., and A. Tuzhilin. 2005. “Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering 17: 734–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2000. “Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces.” In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 446–453. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/332040.332473.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetti, D., F. Cena, C. Gena, E. Mensa, and F. Vernero. 2020. “A Color Map to Compare Reactions Tools in Interactive Systems.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. AVI 2020. Article no. 70, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, W. 1990. “A Three-State Model of Graphical Input.” In Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Third Interational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 449–456. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=647402.725582.
   Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., T. P. Moran, and A. Newell. 1980. “The Keystroke-Level Model for User Performance Time with Interactive Systems.” Communications of the ACM 23 (7): 396–410. doi:10.1145/358886.358895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S. K., T. P. Moran, and A. Newell. 1983. The Psychology of Human–Computer Interaction. Boca Raton: CRC Press. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/59953542.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., ed. 2003. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., and M. B. Rosson. 1987. “Paradox of the Active User.” In Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-computer Interaction, 80–111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cena, F., C. Gena, P. Grillo, T. Kuflik, F. Vernero, and A. J. Wecker. 2017. “How Scales Influence User Rating Behaviour in Recommender Systems.” Behaviour & Information Technology 36 (10): 985–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cena, F., and F. Vernero. 2015. “A Study on User Preferential Choices about Rating Scales.” International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 11 (1): 33–54. doi:10.4018/ijthi.2015010103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cena, F., F. Vernero, and C. Gena. 2010. “Towards a Customization of Rating Scales in Adaptive Systems.” In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, UMAP 2010, 369–374. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chernoff, H. 1973. “The Use of Faces to Represent Points in K-Dimensional Space Graphically.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 68 (342): 361–368. doi:10.1080/01621459.1973.10482434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M. K., and M. K. O. Lee. 2010. “A Theoretical Model of Intentional Social Action in Online Social Networks.” Decision Support Systems 49 (1): 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosley, D., S. K. Lam, I. Albert, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. 2003. “Is Seeing Believing?: How Recommender System Interfaces Affect Users' Opinions.” In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 585–592. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/642611.642713.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, H. S. M., V. Evers, S. Ramlal, L. Rutledge, N. Stash, and B. J. Wielinga. 2008. “The Effects of Transparency on Trust in and Acceptance of a Content-Based Art Recommender.” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18 (5): 455–496. doi:10.1007/s11257-008-9051-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix, A. 2003. “Upside-Down As and Algorithms–Computational Formalisms and Theory.” In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, edited by J.M. Carroll. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, M. D., and M. C. Willemsen. 2016. “Behaviorism is Not Enough: Better Recommendations through Listening to Users.” In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 221–224. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2959100.2959179.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H., P. J. Herskovitz, and S. Pollack. 1994. “The Biasing Effect of Scale-Checking Styles on Response to a Likert Scale.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Annual Conference: Survey Research Methods, Vol. 792, 792–795.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, R. 1991. “The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable.” Marketing Bulletin 2 (1): 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., M. Roseman, and S. Greenberg. 1996. “A Usability Study of Awareness Widgets in a Shared Workspace Groupware System.” In Cscw.
   Google Scholar
• Han, M., and P. Park. 2009. “A Study of Interface Design for Widgets in Web Services Through Usability Evaluation.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, 1013–1018. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1655925.1656109.
   Google Scholar
• Hartson, H. R., A. C. Siochi, and D. Hix. 1990. “The UAN: A User-Oriented Representation for Direct Manipulation Interface Designs.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 8 (3): 181–203. doi:10.1145/98188.98191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlocker, J. L., J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. 2004. “Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22 (1): 5–53. doi:10.1145/963770.963772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogenboom, A., D. Bal, F. Frasincar, M. Bal, F. de Jong, and U. Kaymak. 2013. “Exploiting Emoticons in Sentiment Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 703–710. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ishanka, U. A. P., and A. Marasinghe. 2015. “Supporting User Interaction of Social Network Mobile Application with Multimodal Interaction.” In 2015 10th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies (APSITT), 1–3. doi:10.1109/APSITT.2015.7217086.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A., B. Berendt, S. Gabrielli, F. Cena, C. Gena, F. Vernero, and K. Reinecke. 2014. “Choice Architecture for Human-Computer Interaction.” Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 7 (1–2): 1–235. doi:10.1561/1100000028.
   Google Scholar
• Kieras, D. 1994. “A Guide to Goms Task Analysis.” University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Kluver, D., T. T. Nguyen, M. Ekstrand, S. Sen, and J. Riedl. 2012. “How Many Bits per Rating?” In RecSys '12: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, September 2012, 99–106. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2365952.2365974.
   Google Scholar
• Konstan, J. A., and J. Riedl. 2012. “Recommender Systems: From Algorithms to User Experience.” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22 (1–2): 101–123. doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9112-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, H. E 2008. “The Use of Different Happiness Rating Scales: Bias and Comparison Problem?” Social Indicators Research 87 (2): 259–267. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9171-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S. 2003. “Motor Behaviour Models for Human-Computer Interaction.” In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, edited by J.M. Carroll, 27–54. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Meixner, G., F. Paternò, and J. Vanderdonckt. 2011. “Past, Present, and Future of Model-Based User Interface Development.” i-com 10 (3): 2–11. doi:10.1524/icom.2011.0026.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., D. Kluver, T. Y. Wang, P. M. Hui, M. Ekstrand, M. Willemsen, and J. Riedl. 2013. “Rating Support Interfaces to Improve User Experience and Recommender Accuracy.” 149–156. doi:10.1145/2507157.2507188.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 1993. “Iterative User-Interface Design.” Computer 26: 32–41. doi:10.1109/2.241424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Doubleday Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Paramythis, A., S. Weibelzahl, and J. Masthoff. 2010. “Layered Evaluation of Interactive Adaptive Systems: Framework and Formative Methods.” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 20 (5): 383–453. doi:10.1007/s11257-010-9082-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R., J. Cacioppo, and R. Goldman. 1981. “Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (5): 847–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. C., and A. M. Colman. 2000. “Optimal Number of Response Categories in Rating Scales: Reliability, Validity, Discriminating Power, and Respondent Preferences.” Acta Psychologica 104 (1): 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi, P., and V. Singh. 2016. “Systematic Evaluation of Social Recommendation Systems: Challenges and Future Dimensions.” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 7 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezabek, L., and J. Cochenour. 1998. “Visual Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication: Supplementing Text with Emoticons.” Journal of Visual Literacy 18 (2): 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, F., L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor. 2010. Recommender Systems Handbook. 1st ed.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. 2012. HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary. 1st ed. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, S. L., U. Kirschenmann, and M. Wolpers. 2012. “We Have No Feelings, We Have Emoticons.” In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 642–646. USA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan, L. 2011. “Meaningful Signs–Emoticons.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1 (1): 91–94.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, T., P. Bennett, and T. Joachims. 2018. “Improving Recommender Systems Beyond the Algorithm.” ArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Shaftel, J., B. L. Nash, and S. Gillmor. 2012. “Effects of the Number of Response Categories on Rating Scales.” In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B., and B. B. Bederson. 2003. The Craft of Information Visualization: Readings and Reflections. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, R., and K. Swearingen. 2002. “The Role of Transparency in Recommender Systems.” In Chi'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 830–831.
   Google Scholar
• Sparling, E. I., and S. Sen. 2011. “Rating: How Difficult Is It?” In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 149–156. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2043932.2043961.
   Google Scholar
• Swearingen, K., and R. Sinha. 2002. “Interaction Design for Recommender Systems.” In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SOCIALCOM). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Usman, Z. H., F. A. Alghamdi, A. Tariq, and T. N. Puri. 2010. “Relative Ranking – A Biased Rating.” In Innovations and Advances in Computer Sciences and Engineering, edited by T. Sobh, 25–29. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van Barneveld, J., and M. Van Setten. 2004. “Designing Usable Interfaces for TV Recommender Systems.” In Personalized Digital Television: Targeting Programs to Individual Viewers, 259–285. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2164-X_10.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz, P. C., R. Ribeiro, and D. M. De Matos. 2013. “Understanding the Temporal Dynamics of Recommendations Across Different Rating Scales.” In UMAP 2013 Extended Proceedings - Late-Breaking Results, Project Papers and Workshop Proceedings of the 21st Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Rome, Italy, June 10–14, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Weijters, B., E. Cabooter, and N. Schillewaert. 2001. “Do Numeric Values Influence Subjects Responses to Rating Scales?” Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research 26: 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Weijters, B., E. Cabooter, and N. Schillewaert. 2010. “The Effect of Rating Scale Format on Response Styles: The Number of Response Categories and Response Category Labels.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 27 (3): 236–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, L. J. 2004. “Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-Retest Reliability.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (6): 956–972. doi:10.1177/0013164404268674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuasa, M., K. Saito, and N. Mukawa. 2006. “Emoticons Convey Emotions without Cognition of Faces: An fMRI Study.” CHI EA '06: CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 2006, 1565–1570. doi:10.1145/1125451.1125737.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, L., L. Xia, Z. Ding, J. Song, W. Liu, and D. Yin. 2019. “Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-Term User Engagement in Recommender Systems.” 2810–2818. doi:10.1145/3292500.3330668.
   Google Scholar