Technological work environment: instrument development and measurement

References

• Addas, S., and A. Pinsonneault. 2015. “The Many Faces of Information Technology Interruptions: A Taxonomy and Preliminary Investigation of Their Performance Effects.” Information Systems Journal 25 (3): 231–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agogo, D., and T. J. Hess. 2015. “Technostress and Technology Induced State Anxiety: Scale Development and Implications”. Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Fort Worth, 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. 2013. Facilities Management: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T., and G. Henn. 2007. The Organization and Architecture of Innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Almanasreh, E., R. Moles, and T. F. Chen. 2019. “Evaluation of Methods Used for Estimating Content Validity.” Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 15 (2): 214–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampaw, E. M., J. Chai, and J. Frempong. 2019. “Examining the Overarching Factors of Clients’ Loyalty Based on the Mobile Insurance Typology.” South African Journal of Business Management 50 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, E. M., B. M. Rothenberg, R. Panzer, P. Katz, and M. P. Mcdermott. 1998. “Selecting a Generic Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life for use among Older Adults: a Comparison of Candidate Instruments.” Evaluation & the Health Professions 21 (2): 244–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasoff, L., and M. A. Venable. 2017. “Technostress: Implications for Adults in the Workforce.” The Career Development Quarterly 65 (4): 326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayre, C., and A. J. Scally. 2014. “Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 47 (1): 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri, A., B. Boudreau-Trudel, and A. S. Souissi. 2018. “Occupational Health and Safety in the Industry 4.0 era: A Cause for Major Concern?” Safety Science 109: 403–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, L. K., and A. M. Santuzzi. 2015. “Please Respond Asap: Workplace Telepressure and Employee Recovery.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 20 (2): 172–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., E. Baruch, J. M. Balter, R. A. Steer, and D. M. Warman. 2004. “A new Instrument for Measuring Insight: The Beck Cognitive Insight Scale.” Schizophrenia Research 68 (2-3): 319–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. D., and A. K. Goodboy. 2020. “Evolving Considerations and Empirical Approaches to Construct Validity in Communication Science.” Annals of the International Communication Association 44 (3): 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Bölenius, K., C. Brulin, K. Grankvist, M. Lindkvist, and J. Söderberg. 2012. “A Content Validated Questionnaire for Assessment of Self Reported Venous Blood Sampling Practices.” BMC Research Notes 5 (1): 1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brougham, D., and J. Haar. 2017. “Employee Assessment of Their Technological Redundancy.” Labour & Industry: a Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 27 (3): 213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, H., H. Berthelsen, S. Moncada, M. Nübling, E. Dupret, Y. Demiral, J. Oudyk, T. S. Kristensen, C. Llorens, and A. Navarro. 2019. “The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.” Safety and Health at Work 10 (4): 482–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J. 2010. Who Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. Geneva: World Health Organisation. p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Butts, M. M., W. J. Becker, and W. R. Boswell. 2015. “Hot Buttons and Time Sinks: The Effects of Electronic Communication During Nonwork Time on Emotions and Work-Nonwork Conflict.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (3): 763–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayon, P., P. Hancock, N. Leveson, I. Noy, L. Sznelwar, and G. Van Hootegem. 2015. “Advancing a Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Workplace Safety–Developing the Conceptual Framework.” Ergonomics 58 (4): 548–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadburn, A., J. Smith, and J. Milan. 2017. “Productivity Drivers of Knowledge Workers in the Central London Office Environment.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 19 (2): 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesley, N. 2014. “Information and Communication Technology use, Work Intensification and Employee Strain and Distress.” Work, Employment and Society 28 (4): 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesley, N., and B. E. Johnson. 2015. “Technology Use and the New Economy: Work Extension, Network Connectivity, and Employee Distress and Productivity.” Work and Family in the New Economy 26: 61–99.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M., S. Kong, and D. Jung. 2012. “Computer and Internet Interventions for Loneliness and Depression in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis.” Healthcare Informatics Research 18 (3): 191–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen, R., and G. Knezek. 2017. “Validating the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment Questionnaire for 21st Century Learning (Tpsa c-21).” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 33 (1): 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, A., S. H. Ng, C. S. Tan, A. Win, D. Koh, and F. Müller-Riemenschneider. 2016. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Workplace Intervention Strategies to Reduce Sedentary Time in White-Collar Workers.” Obesity Reviews 17 (5): 467–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claus, L. 2019. “Hr Disruption—Time Already to Reinvent Talent Management.” BRQ Business Research Quarterly 22 (3): 207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S., and N. Kodate. 2018. “Understanding the State of Health Information in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Using a Socio-Technical Approach.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 114: 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2017. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., and R. J. Shavelson. 2004. “My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (3): 391–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damant, J., M. Knapp, P. Freddolino, and D. Lombard. 2017. “Effects of Digital Engagement on the Quality of Life of Older People.” Health & Social Care in the Community 25 (6): 1679–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., C. Gedikli, D. Watson, A. Semkina, and O. Vaughn. 2017. “Job Design, Employment Practices and Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies.” Ergonomics 60 (9): 1177–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. L. 1992. “Instrument Review: Getting the Most from a Panel of Experts.” Applied Nursing Research 5 (4): 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. C., and R. Challenger. 2015. “Environmentally Sustainable Work Behavior.” In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management; Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.), edited by P. C. Flood, and Y. Freeney, 1–3. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. C., D. J. Leach, and C. W. Clegg. 2011. “The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues.” In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by G. P. Hodgkinson, and J. K. Ford, 193–237. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A., S. Paquet, N. Scott, and L. Hambley. 2012. “Perceived Information and Communication Technology (ict) Demands on Employee Outcomes: The Moderating Effect of Organizational ict Support.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 17 (4): 473–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Rico, E., H. Carretero-Dios, and W. Ruch. 2012. “Content Validity Evidences in Test Development: An Applied Perspective.” International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology Espana 12 (3): 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J., C. Ceylan, and F. Jaspers. 2011. “Knowledge Workers’ Creativity and the Role of the Physical Work Environment.” Human Resource Management 50 (6): 715–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin, M., G. Mulholland, and A. Mccartan. 2015. “A Socio-Technical Perspective on Social Media Adoption: A Case from Retail Banking.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 33 (7): 944–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhang, S., J. Weidman, M. M. Kamani, J. Grossklags, and P. Liu. 2018. “Take it or Leave it: A Survey Study on Operating System Upgrade Practices”. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 490-504.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., A. Pehböck, and R. Riedl. 2019. “Is the Technostress Creators Inventory Still an up-to-date Measurement Instrument? Results of a Large-scale Interview Study”. In 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, 1820-1831. Siegen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, M., M. Amirpur, T. Grupp, A. Benlian, and T. Hess. 2016. “The Role of Software Updates in Information Systems Continuance—an Experimental Study from a User Perspective.” Decision Support Systems 83: 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gable, R. K., and M. B. Wolf. 2012. Instrument Development in the Affective Domain: Measuring Attitudes and Values in Corporate and School Settings. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Gauche, C., L. T. De Beer, and L. Brink. 2017. “Exploring Demands from the Perspective of Employees Identified as Being at Risk of Burnout.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 12 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights About Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33 (6-7): 897–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, A., C. Ren, and P. Stevens. 2012. “The Need for Speed: Impacts of Internet Connectivity on Firm Productivity.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 37 (2): 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapakangas, A., V. Hongisto, J. Varjo, and M. Lahtinen. 2018. “Benefits of Quiet Workspaces in Open-Plan Offices–Evidence from two Office Relocations.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 56: 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, H. M., Y. G. Ng, O. Talib, and S. B. Md Tamrin. 2019. “Content Validation of Flood Disaster Preparedness Action (Fdpa) Items among Small and Medium Enterprises (sme) Business.” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 10 (1): 2–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, B., L. Suckley, and N. Nunnington. 2017. “Workplace Productivity and Office Type.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 19 (2): 111–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W., Z. J. Zhang, and W. Li. 2021. “Information Technology Solutions, Challenges, and Suggestions for Tackling the Covid-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Information Management 57: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, E. V., and N. K. Öberg. 2015. “The Role of the Physical Work Environment for Creative Employees–a Case Study of Digital Artists.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 26 (14): 1889–1906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. R., G. Klein, and K. R. Laughery. 2002. “The State of Cognitive Systems Engineering.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 17 (1): 73–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalliath, T., and P. Kalliath. 2012. “Changing Work Environments and Employee Wellbeing: An Introduction.” International Journal of Manpower 33 (7): 729–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazanchi, S., T. A. Sprinkle, S. S. Masterson, and N. Tong. 2018. “A Spatial Model of Work Relationships: The Relationship-Building and Relationship-Straining Effects of Workspace Design.” Academy of Management Review 43 (4): 590–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köffer, S. 2015. “Designing the Digital Workplace of the Future–What Scholars Recommend to Practitioners”. In International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS). Fort Worth, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R., and M. Casey. 2009. Developing a Questioning Route. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. p. 35-62.
   Google Scholar
• Lawshe, C. H. 1975. “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Content Validity II Bowling Green State University.” Personnel Psychology 28: 563–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. L., S. A. Seubsman, and A. Sleigh. 2008. “Thai SF-36 Health Survey: Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, Reliability and Validity in Healthy men and Women.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6 (1): 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Llorens, S., M. Salanova, and M. Ventura. 2011. Guías de Intervención: Tecnoestrés [Intervention Guidelines: Technostress]. Madrid: Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. R. 1986. “Determination and Quantification of Content Validity.” Nursing Research 35 (6): 382–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliranta, M., and P. Rouvinen. 2006. “Informational Mobility and Productivity: Finnish Evidence.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (6): 605–616.
   Google Scholar
• Mastaglia, B., C. Toye, and L. J. Kristjanson. 2003. “Ensuring Content Validity in Instrument Development: Challenges and Innovative Approaches.” Contemporary Nurse 14 (3): 281–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayan, M. J. 2016. Essentials of Qualitative Inquiry. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mccoy, J. M. 2005. “Linking the Physical Work Environment to Creative Context.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 39 (3): 167–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneghello, F., M. Calore, D. Zucchetto, M. Polese, and A. Zanella. 2019. “Iot: Internet of Threats? A Survey of Practical Security Vulnerabilities in Real iot Devices.” IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6 (5): 8182–8201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and R. S. Grenier. 2019. Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. New York: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2017. The Employee Experience Advantage: How to win the war for Talent by Giving Employees the Workspaces They Want, the Tools They Need, and a Culture They Can Celebrate. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mubarik, M. S., S. Kusi-Sarpong, K. Govindan, S. A. Khan, and A. Oyedijo. 2021. “Supply Chain Mapping: a Proposed Construct.” International Journal of Production Research. doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1944390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Multanen, J., J. Ylinen, T. Karjalainen, H. Kautiainen, J. P. Repo, and A. Häkkinen. 2020. “Reliability and Validity of the Finnish Version of The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire among Surgically Treated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients.” Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 109 (4): 343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. 2019. “Technology Usage, Expected job Sustainability, and Perceived job Insecurity.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 138: 155–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. B., and S. Knardahl. 2019. “The Impact of Office Design on Medically Certified Sickness Absence.” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 46 (3): 330–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijp, H. H., D. G. Beckers, K. Van De Voorde, S. A. Geurts, and M. A. Kompier. 2016. “Effects of new Ways of Working on Work Hours and Work Location, Health and job-Related Outcomes.” Chronobiology International 33 (6): 604–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, R., and S. D. Russo. 2017. “Office Design and Dignity at Work in the Knowledge Economy.” In Dignity and the Organization, edited by M. Kostera, and M. Pirson, 197–220. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O'neill, M. J. 2016. Measuring Workplace Performance. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okkonen, J., V. Vuori, and N. Helander. 2018. “Enablers and Restraints of Knowledge Work–Implications by Certain Professions?” Cogent Business & Management 5 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., F. P. Morgeson, and G. Johns. 2017. “One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward.” Journal of Applied Psychology 102 (3): 403–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., and C. T. Beck. 2006. “The Content Validity Index: Are you Sure you Know What's Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations.” Research in Nursing & Health 29 (5): 489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F., J. Vischer, and E. White. 2015. Design Intervention (Routledge Revivals): Toward a More Humane Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan, T., M. Tarafdar, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and Q. Tu. 2008. “The Consequences of Technostress for end Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation.” Information Systems Research 19 (4): 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath-Cullimore, C. 2019. Challenge or Hindrance? The Moderating Role of Stress Appraisals in Technostress. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., and G. A. Marcoulides. 2006. “Estimation of Generalizability Coefficients via a Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Scale Reliability Evaluation.” International Journal of Testing 6 (1): 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M., Y.-H. Huang, and N. Larson. 2016. “The Relationship among Computer Work, Environmental Design, and Musculoskeletal and Visual Discomfort: Examining the Moderating Role of Supervisory Relations and co-Worker Support.” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 89 (1): 7–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salin, D. 2015. “Risk Factors of Workplace Bullying for men and Women: The Role of the Psychosocial and Physical Work Environment.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56 (1): 69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangoseni, O., M. Hellman, and C. Hill. 2013. “Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Effect of Online Learning on Behaviors, Attitudes, and Clinical Practices of Physical Therapists in the United States Regarding Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice.” Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 11 (2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzmüller, T., P. Brosi, D. Duman, and I. M. Welpe. 2018. “How Does the Digital Transformation Affect Organizations? Key Themes of Change in Work Design and Leadership.” Mrev Management Revue 29 (2): 114–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., and C. Willis-Esqueda. 2018. “Indigenous Perspectives on Violence Risk Assessment: A Thematic Analysis.” Punishment & Society 20 (5): 599–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrotryia, V. K., and U. Dhanda. 2019. “Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement.” SAGE Open 9 (1): 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, W. H., A. F. Jorm, K. A. Lawrence, and M. B. Yap. 2019. “Development and Evaluation of the Parenting to Reduce Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (Parcads): Assessment of Parental Concordance with Guidelines for the Prevention of Child Anxiety and Depression.” PeerJ 7: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. 2008. “The Unexpected Rewards of Qualitative Research in Assessment: A Case Example.” The Qualitative Report 13 (2): 278–300.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. 2000. “Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 (2): 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. 2008. “Focus Groups.” In The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods, edited by A. Pertti, L. Bickman, and J. Brannen, 357–370. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. 1992. Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stadin, M., M. Nordin, A. Broström, L. L. Magnusson Hanson, H. Westerlund, and E. I. Fransson. 2019. “Repeated Exposure to High ict Demands at Work, and Development of Suboptimal Self-Rated Health: Findings from a 4-Year Follow-up of the Slosh Study.” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 92 (5): 717–728. doi:10.1007/s00420-019-01407-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stich, J.-F., M. Tarafdar, and C. L. Cooper. 2018. “Electronic Communication in the Workplace: Boon or Bane?” Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance 5 (1): 98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Suckley, L., and J. Nicholson. 2018. “Enhancing Creativity Through Workspace Design.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work, edited by L. Martin, and N. Wilson, 245–263. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H. 2018. “Development of an Adoption Model to Assess User Acceptance of e-Service Technology: E-Service Technology Acceptance Model.” Behaviour & Information Technology 37 (2): 173–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H., S. Sahibuddin, and N. Jalaliyoon. 2014. “Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory.” In Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics, edited by B. Jerzy, 375–382. Gdansk: WSEAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., C. L. Cooper, and J. F. Stich. 2019. “The Technostress Trifecta-Techno Eustress, Techno Distress and Design: Theoretical Directions and an Agenda for Research.” Information Systems Journal 29 (1): 6–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., E. B. Pullins, and T. Ragu-Nathan. 2015. “Technostress: Negative Effect on Performance and Possible Mitigations.” Information Systems Journal 25 (2): 103–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., Q. Tu, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and T. Ragu-Nathan. 2007. “The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity.” Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (1): 301–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Hoeven, C. L., W. Van Zoonen, and K. L. Fonner. 2016. “The Practical Paradox of Technology: The Influence of Communication Technology use on Employee Burnout and Engagement.” Communication Monographs 83 (2): 239–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., S. D. Bot, M. R. de Boer, D. A. van der Windt, D. L. Knol, J. Dekker, … H. C. de Vet. 2007. “Quality Criteria Were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (1): 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley, E. E., P. R. Ulin, N. Mack, E. T. Robinson, and S. M. Succop. 2016. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ulin, P., E. Robinson, E. Tolley, and E. Mcneil. 2005. Qualitative Methods in Public Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Vallo Hult, H., and K. Byström. 2021. “Challenges to Learning and Leading the Digital Workplace.” Studies in Continuing Education. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2021.1879038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J. 2008. Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation and Human Dimensions. State College, PA: Venture Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. 2008. “Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People are Affected by Environments for Work.” Architectural Science Review 51 (2): 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. 2018. “Building-in-use Assessment: Foundation of Workspace Psychology.” In Building Performance Evaluation, edited by Wolfgang F. E. Preiser, Andrea E. Hardy, and Dr. Ulrich Schramm, 129–139. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C., and M. Wifi. 2017. “The Effect of Workplace Design on Quality of Life at Work.” In Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research, edited by G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, and O. Navarro, 387–400. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. H., N. A. Stanton, P. M. Salmon, and D. P. Jenkins. 2008. “A Review of Sociotechnical Systems Theory: A Classic Concept for new Command and Control Paradigms.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 9 (6): 479–499.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B., A. Onsman, and T. Brown. 2010. “Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Five-Step Guide for Novices.” Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 8 (3): 1–13. Accessed 07 September 2021. https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/93.
   Google Scholar
• Wynd, C. A., B. Schmidt, and M. A. Schaefer. 2003. “Two Quantitative Approaches for Estimating Content Validity.” Western Journal of Nursing Research 25 (5): 508–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., and M.-Y. Leung. 2015. “Exploring Factors of Preparing Public Engagement for Large-Scale Development Projects via a Focus Group Study.” International Journal of Project Management 33 (5): 1124–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanzadeh, V., A. Ghahramanian, M. Rassouli, A. Abbaszadeh, H. Alavi-Majd, and A. R. Nikanfar. 2015. “Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an Instrument for Measuring Patient-Centered Communication.” Journal of Caring Sciences 4 (2): 165–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zomorodi, M., and M. R. Lynn. 2010. “Instrument Development Measuring Critical Care Nurses’ Attitudes and Behaviors with end-of-Life Care.” Nursing Research 59 (4): 234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar