Let the computer evaluate your idea: evaluation apprehension in human-computer collaboration

References

• Aleksander, I. 2017. “Partners of Humans: A Realistic Assessment of the Role of Robots in the Foreseeable Future.” Journal of Information Technology 32 (1): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 357–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., and M. G. Pratt. 2016. “The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning.” Research in Organizational Behavior 36: 157–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., L. Rainie, and A. Luchsinger. 2018. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humans. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. 2014. Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barczak, G., F. Lassk, and J. Mulki. 2010. “Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture.” Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (4): 332–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki, H., and A. Pinsonneault. 2001. “Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality Is Electronic Brainstorming the Most Effective Approach?” Small Group Research 32 (2): 158–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., M. A. Runco, and L. A. Vegaxy. 2000. “Understanding How Creative Thinking Skills, Attitudes and Behaviors Work Together: A Causal Process Model.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 34 (2): 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besold, T. R., M. Schorlemmer, and A. Smaill. 2015. Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines (1. Aufl., Bd. 7). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. 1998. “Creativity and Artificial Intelligence.” Artificial Intelligence 103 (1–2): 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. 2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Hove: Psychology Press. http://books.google.com/books?hl = en&lr = &id = 6Zkm4dz32Y4C&oi = fnd&pg = PR9&dq = info:xYBtAZt-STIJ:scholar.google.com&ots= 9cYSkatZjs&sig = qsumsJOVR1IzJj2r-qMSLVK1oDY.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. 2009. “Computer Models of Creativity.” AI Magazine 30 (3): 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., and W. D. Crano. 2014. “Research Design and Issues of Validity.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, edited by H. T. Reis and C. M. Judd, 11–26. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho, M. L., and P. B. Paulus. 1995. “The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (6): 1071–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N., K. C. Collimore, and G. J. G. Asmundson. 2007. “Social Anxiety and Fear of Negative Evaluation: Construct Validity of the BFNE-II.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21 (1): 131–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., L. Zhang, and J. Latimer. 2014. “How Much has my co-Worker Contributed? The Impact of Anonymity and Feedback on Social Loafing in Asynchronous Virtual Collaboration.” International Journal of Information Management 34 (5): 652–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, S., R. López de Mantaras, and O. Stock. 2009. “Computational Creativity: Coming of Age.” AI Magazine 30 (3): 11–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, S., and G. A. Wiggins. 2012. Computational Creativity: The Final Frontier? Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-098-7-21.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., L. M. Jessup, and J. S. Valacich. 1990. “Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups.” Management Science 36 (6): 689–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, N. B., D. L. Wack, G. J. Sekerak, and R. H. Rittle. 1968. “Social Facilitation of Dominant Responses by the Presence of an Audience and the Mere Presence of Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (3): 245–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, A. S., and F. Wu. 2016. “Utilizing Customer Knowledge in Innovation: Antecedents and Impact of Customer Involvement on new Product Performance.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 44 (4): 516–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., and R. H. Lengel. 1986. “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design.” Management Science 32 (5): 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlbäck, N., A. Jönsson, and L. Ahrenberg. 1993. “Wizard of Oz Studies—Why and how.” Knowledge-based Systems 6 (4): 258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty, P. R., H. J. Wilson, and R. Chowdhury. 2018. Using Artificial Intelligence to Promote Diversity. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/using-artificial-intelligence-to-promote-diversity/.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D. L., J. M. Hender, T. L. Rodgers, and E. L. Santanen. 2006. “Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 (1): 646–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellermann, D., P. Ebel, M. Söllner, and J. M. Leimeister. 2019. “Hybrid Intelligence.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 61 (5): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., and M. L. Williams. 2003. “Electronic Brainstorming: Theory, Research, and Future Directions.” In Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration, edited by P. B. Paulus, and B. A. Nijstad, 160–178. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vreede, G.-J., and R. O. Briggs. 2019. “A Program of Collaboration Engineering Research and Practice: Contributions, Insights, and Future Directions.” Journal of Management Information Systems 36 (1): 74–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, S., A. Brendel, S. Morana, and L. Kolbe. 2022. “On the Design of and Interaction with Conversational Agents: An Organizing and Assessing Review of Human-Computer Interaction Research.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16. doi:10.17705/1jais.00724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., and W. Stroebe. 1987. “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (3): 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., and W. Stroebe. 1991. “Productivity Loss in Idea-Generating Groups: Tracking Down the Blocking Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (3): 392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiLiello, T. C., and J. D. Houghton. 2008. “Creative Potential and Practised Creativity: Identifying Untapped Creativity in Organizations.” Creativity and Innovation Management 17 (1): 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Feine, J., U. Gnewuch, S. Morana, and A. Maedche. 2019. “A Taxonomy of Social Cues for Conversational Agents.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 132: 138–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A., K. Koschutnig, M. Benedek, G. Reishofer, A. Ischebeck, E. M. Weiss, and F. Ebner. 2012. “Stimulating Creativity via the Exposure to Other People’s Ideas.” Human Brain Mapping 33 (11): 2603–2610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, A., D. Monticolo, M. Camargo, and M. Bourgault. 2016. “Creativity Support Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 21: 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., and D. W. Straub. 1997. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model.” Management Information Systems Quarterly 21 (4): 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., and D. W. Straub. 2004. “Consumer Trust in B2C e-Commerce and the Importance of Social Presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services.” Omega 32 (6): 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. 2009. Using Improvisation to Enhance the Effectiveness of Brainstorming. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518718.
   Google Scholar
• Gnewuch, U., S. Morana, and A. Maedche. 2017. Towards Designing Cooperative and Social Conversational Agents for Customer Service. ICIS 2017 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2017/HCI/Presentations/1.
   Google Scholar
• große Deters, F., S. Tams, A. Johnston, and J. Thatcher. 2019. Designing Experimental Studies. ICIS 2019 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/pdws/pdws/8.
   Google Scholar
• Henchy, T., and D. C. Glass. 1968. “Evaluation Apprehension and the Social Facilitation of Dominant and Subordinate Responses.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10 (4): 446–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., and T. M. Amabile. 2010. “Creativity.” Annual Review of Psychology 61 (1): 569–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever, I. J., D. van Knippenberg, W. P. van Ginkel, and H. G. Barkema. 2012. “Fostering Team Creativity: Perspective Taking as key to Unlocking Diversity’s Potential.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (5): 982–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. G., and P. M. DiBartolo. 2014. Social Anxiety: Clinical, Developmental, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., and T.-L. Han. 2007. “A Procedure for Studying Online Conversational Processing Using a Chat bot.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (1): 156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z., L. Liu, W. Zheng, X. Tan, and X. Zhao. 2015. “Walking the Straight and Narrow: The Moderating Effect of Evaluation Apprehension on the Relationship Between Collectivism and Corruption.” PLoS ONE 10 (3): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S.-Y., H.-M. Lai, D. C. Yen, and C.-Y. Chen. 2017. “Exploring the Effects of Team Collaborative Norms and Team Identification on the Quality of Individuals’ Knowledge Contribution in Teams.” SIGMIS Database 48 (4): 80–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, A. H.-C., and A. S. Won. 2021. IdeaBot: Investigating Social Facilitation in Human-Machine Team Creativity. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445270.
   Google Scholar
• Isbister, K., and C. Nass. 2000. “Consistency of Personality in Interactive Characters: Verbal Cues, Non-Verbal Cues, and User Characteristics.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 (2): 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrahi, M. H. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making.” Business Horizons 61 (4): 577–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup, L. M., T. Connolly, and J. Galegher. 1990. “The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task.” MIS Quarterly 14 (3): 313–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli, A., B. C. Y. Tan, and K.-K. Wei. 2005. “Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation.” MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 113–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., I. Benbasat, R. Bapna, and A. Rai. 2018. “Editor’s Comments: Opportunities and Challenges for Different Types of Online Experiments.” MIS Quarterly 42 (4): iii–iix.
   Google Scholar
• Karau, S. J., and K. D. Williams. 1993. “Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (4): 681–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karau, S. J., and K. D. Williams. 2014. “Understanding Individual Motivation in Groups: The Collective Effort Model.” In Groups at Work: Theory and Research, 127–156. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-H., C.-Y. Chiu, S. Peng, H. Cai, and W. Tov. 2010. “Explaining East-West Differences in the Likelihood of Making Favorable Self-Evaluations: The Role of Evaluation Apprehension and Directness of Expression.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41 (1): 62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, K. L., and J. L. King. 1988. “Computer-based Systems for Cooperative Work and Group Decision Making.” ACM Comput. Surv 20 (2): 115–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C., A. von der Pütten, and S. Eimler. 2012. “Human-Agent and Human-Robot Interaction Theory: Similarities to and Differences from Human-Human Interaction.” In Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective, edited by M. Zacarias, and J. V. de Oliveira, 215–240. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. 1983. “A Brief Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9 (3): 371–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., K. Y. Lee, and L. Sheehan. 2019. “Hey Alexa! A Magic Spell of Social Glue?: Sharing a Smart Voice Assistant Speaker and Its Impact on Users’ Perception of Group Harmony.” Information Systems Frontiers 11: 563–583.
   Google Scholar
• Licuanan, B. F., L. R. Dailey, and M. D. Mumford. 2007. “Idea Evaluation: Error in Evaluating Highly Original Ideas.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 41 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebbecke, C., and A. Picot. 2015. “Reflections on Societal and Business Model Transformation Arising from Digitization and Big Data Analytics: A Research Agenda.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 24 (3): 149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. 2005. “How Can Computers Be Partners in the Creative Process: Classification and Commentary on the Special Issue.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63 (4–5): 365–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., S. Tong, Z. Fang, and Z. Qu. 2019. “Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases.” Marketing Science 38 (6): 937–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maedche, A., S. Morana, S. Schacht, D. Werth, and J. Krumeich. 2016. “Advanced User Assistance Systems.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 58 (5): 367–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., and D. H. Fisher. 2012. Using AI to evaluate creative designs. DS 73-1 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity Volume 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mamykina, L., L. Candy, and E. Edmonds. 2002. “Collaborative Creativity.” Communications of the ACM 45 (10): 96–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massetti, B. 1996. “An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation.” MIS Quarterly 20 (1): 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., M. L. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. E. Shannon. 2006. “A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955.” AI Magazine 27 (4): 12–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTear, M., Z. Callejas, and D. Griol. 2016. “The Conversational Interface.” Springer 6 (94): 102.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., K. E. Medeiros, and P. J. Partlow. 2012. “Creative Thinking: Processes, Strategies, and Knowledge.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 46 (1): 30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., B. J. Fogg, and Y. Moon. 1996. “Can Computers be Teammates?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (6): 669–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., and Y. Moon. 2000. “Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (1): 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., L. M. Applegate, and B. R. Konsynski. 1987. “Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System.” Journal of Management Information Systems 3 (4): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., A. R. Dennis, J. S. Valacich, D. Vogel, and J. F. George. 1991. “Electronic Meeting Systems.” Communications of the ACM 34 (7): 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parise, S., S. Kiesler, L. Sproull, and K. Waters. 1999. “Cooperating with Life-Like Interface Agents.” Computers in Human Behavior 15 (2): 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., M. Dzindolet, and N. W. Kohn. 2012. “Collaborative Creativity—Group Creativity and Team Innovation.” In Handbook of Organizational Creativity, edited by Michael D. Mumford, 327–357. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123747143000148.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G. P. 2015. “You Need an Innovation Strategy.” Harvard Business Review 93 (6): 44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porra, J., M. Lacity, and M. S. Parks. 2019. ““Can Computer Based Human-Likeness Endanger Humanness?” – A Philosophical and Ethical Perspective on Digital Assistants Expressing Feelings They Can’t Have”.” Information Systems Frontiers 22: 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, D. J., and R. Sharda. 2009. “Decision Support Systems.” In Springer Handbook of Automation, edited by Shimon Y. Nof, 1539–1548. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., and I. Benbasat. 2009. “Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems.” Journal of Management Information Systems 25 (4): 145–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, V. S. C. 1992. “Group Support Systems in Organizations: The Potential Effects of Anonymity.” Journal of Information Technology Management 3 (2): 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., and C. I. Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and new Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenberger, J., M. Schwarz, D. König, F. H. Wilhelm, U. Voderholzer, A. Hillert, and J. Blechert. 2015. “Angst vor Negativer Sozialer Bewertung: Übersetzung und Validierung der Furcht vor Negativer Evaluation–Kurzskala (FNE-K).” Diagnostica 62 (3): 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. 1961. “An Analysis of Creativity.” The Phi Delta Kappan 42 (7): 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickenberg, R., and B. Reeves. 2000. The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332406.
   Google Scholar
• Riek, L. D. 2012. “Wizard of oz Studies in hri: A Systematic Review and new Reporting Guidelines.” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 1 (1): 119–136.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. 2003. “Idea Evaluation, Divergent Thinking, and Creativity.” In Critical Creative Processes, edited by M. A. Runco, 69–94. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., and G. J. Jaeger. 2012. “The Standard Definition of Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 24 (1): 92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J., and P. Norvig. 2020. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th Ed. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rzepka, C., and B. Berger. 2018. User Interaction with AI-enabled Systems: A Systematic Review of IS Research. ICIS 2018 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/general/Presentations/7.
   Google Scholar
• Santanen, E. L., R. O. Briggs, and G.-J. D. Vreede. 2004. “Causal Relationships in Creative Problem Solving: Comparing Facilitation Interventions for Ideation.” Journal of Management Information Systems 20 (4): 167–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K., and S. DeZutter. 2009. “Distributed Creativity: How Collective Creations Emerge from Collaboration.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3 (2): 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, I., E. Bittner, R. O. Briggs, T. de Vreede, G.-J. de Vreede, A. Elkins, R. Maier, et al. 2019. “Machines as Teammates: A Research Agenda on AI in Team Collaboration.” Information & Management 57 (2): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, I., L. Waizenegger, S. Seidel, S. Morana, I. Benbasat, and P. B. Lowry. 2020. “Collaborating with Technology-Based Autonomous Agents.” Internet Research 30 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J., E. B. Zechmeister, and J. S. Zechmeister. 2000. Research Methods in Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. M., R. O. Briggs, B. A. Reinig, J. Yen, and J. F. Nunamaker. 1995. “Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity.” Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (3): 155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Siemon, D., L. Eckardt, and S. Robra-Bissantz. 2015. Tracking Down the Negative Group Creativity Effects with the Help of an Artificial Intelligence-Like Support System. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.37.
   Google Scholar
• Siemon, D., T. Strohmann, and S. Michalke. 2022. “Creative Potential Through Artificial Intelligence: Recommendations for Improving Corporate and Entrepreneurial Innovation Activities.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemon, D., T. Strohmann, and S. Robra-Bissantz. 2018. “The Virtual Collaborator—A Definition and Research Agenda.” International Journal of E-Collaboration (IJeC) 14 (4): 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, L. S., and C. W. Turner. 1976. “Evaluation Apprehension, Hypothesis Awareness, and the Weapons Effect.” Aggressive Behavior 2 (1): 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., and A. Drach-Zahavy. 2013. “Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation The Role of Team Composition and Climate for Innovation.” Journal of Management 39 (3): 684–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., S. S. Kahai, and B. J. Avolio. 1998. “Transformational Leadership and Dimensions of Creativity: Motivating Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups.” Creativity Research Journal 11 (2): 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinella, L. 2018. Intelligent Virtual Assistants 101. Franklin, MA: Interactions Resource Center. https://resources.interactions.com/library/intelligent-virtual-assistants-101/.
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., M. Subramani, S. Kiesler, J. H. Walker, and K. Waters. 1996. “When the Interface is a Face.” Human-computer Interaction 11 (2): 97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., F. Brachten, and T. Kissmer. 2018. Defining Bots in an Enterprise Context. International Conference on Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmann, T., D. Siemon, and S. Robra-Bissantz. 2017. brAInstorm: Intelligent Assistance in Group Idea Generation. International Conference on Design Science Research in Information System and Technology, 457–461.
   Google Scholar
• Tasa, K., S. Taggar, and G. H. Seijts. 2007. “The Development of Collective Efficacy in Teams: A Multilevel and Longitudinal Perspective.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (1): 17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., J. A. Hall, F. D. Miller, J. R. Dewhirst, G. A. Fine, M. Taylor, and R. L. Rosnow. 1979. “Evaluation Apprehension, Social Desirability, and the Interpretation of Test Correlations.” Social Behavior and Personality 7 (2): 193–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbach, N., F. Ahlemann, and Others. 2010. “Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares.” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 11 (2): 5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Varshney, L. R., F. Pinel, K. Varshney, D. Bhattacharjya, A. Schörgendorfer, and Y.-M. Chee. 2019. “A big Data Approach to Computational Creativity: The Curious Case of Chef Watson.” IBM Journal of Research and Development 63 (1): 7–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, T., J. Van Nes, F. Feldberg, and W. Van Dolen. 2014. “Virtual Customer Service Agents: Using Social Presence and Personalization to Shape Online Service Encounters.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 529–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., B. Dong, and J. Ma. 2019. Towards Computational Assessment of Idea Novelty (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3393611). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract = 3393611.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., and J. V. Nickerson. 2017. “A Literature Review on Individual Creativity Support Systems.” Computers in Human Behavior 74: 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., C. Schneider, and J. S. Valacich. 2015. “Enhancing Creativity in Group Collaboration: How Performance Targets and Feedback Shape Perceptions and Idea Generation Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 42: 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., and M. Song. 2011. “Ckmeans. 1d. Dp: Optimal k-Means Clustering in one Dimension by Dynamic Programming.” The R Journal 3 (2): 29–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson, D., and R. Friend. 1969. “Measurement of Social-Evaluative Anxiety.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33 (4): 448–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 2013. Brainstorming and Beyond: A User-Centered Design Method. Burlington, MA: Newnes.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, S., K. Dautenhahn, and C. Kaouri. 2005. Is someone watching me? - Consideration of social facilitation effects in human-robot interaction experiments. 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIRA.2005.1554254.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. F. 2013. “The Relationship Between Young Adults’ Beliefs About Anonymity and Subsequent Cyber Aggression.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16 (12): 858–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., and S.-O. Leung. 2017. “Can Likert Scales be Treated as Interval Scales?—A Simulation Study.” Journal of Social Service Research 43 (4): 527–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J. (Kevin), D. E. Leidner, and H. Benbya. 2018. “Differential Innovativeness Outcomes of User and Employee Participation in an Online User Innovation Community.” Journal of Management Information Systems 35 (3): 900–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., and Q. Zhu. 2014. “Evaluation on Crowdsourcing Research: Current Status and Future Direction.” Information Systems Frontiers 16 (3): 417–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., B. Delidabieke, H. Zhai, H. Zeng, and X. Cao. 2019. “Exposure to Ideas, Evaluation Apprehension, and Incubation Intervals in Collaborative Idea Generation.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar