Can virtuality be protective of team trust? Conflict and effectiveness in hybrid teams

References

• Alegre, J., and R. Chiva. 2008. “Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test.” Technovation 28 (6): 315–326. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. R., and M. A. West. 1998. “Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 19 (3): 235–258. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antino, M., R. Rico, and S. M. Thatcher. 2019. “Structuring Reality Through the Faultlines Lens: The Effects of Structure, Fairness, and Status Conflict on the Activated Faultlines–Performance Relationship.” Academy of Management Journal 62 (5): 1444–1470. doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, C. M., S. J. Fleck, and N. Turner. 2004. “Virtual Teams: Collaborating Across Distance.” International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 19: 205–248. doi:10.1002/0470013311.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, B. B., M. W. Dickson, M. P. Sherman, C. C. Bauer, and J. S. LaGanke. 2002. “Computer-mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 (1): 156–179. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, G. M., Z. R. Yang, Z. S. Xie, and M. J. Zhou. 2004. “The Dilemma of Trust and Commitment in the Construction of Innovative Team in Chinese Private Enterprises.” Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Singapore 1: 412–416. doi:10.1109/iemc.2004.1407146.
   Google Scholar
• Barczak, G., F. Lassk, and J. Mulki. 2010. “Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture.” Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (4): 332–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batarseh, F. S., J. J. Daspit, and J. M. Usher. 2017. “The Collaboration Capability of Global Virtual Teams: Relationships with Functional Diversity, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation.” International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management 13 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/17509653.2016.1275865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., K. D. Vohs, and D. C. Funder. 2007. “Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 2 (4): 396–403. doi:10.1111/j.17456916.2007.00051.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierly III, P. E., E. M. Stark, and E. H. Kessler. 2009. “The Moderating Effects of Virtuality on the Antecedents and Outcome of NPD Team Trust.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (5): 551–565. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00680.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. 2000. “Within-group Agreement, Nonindependence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis.” In Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations, edited by K. J. Klein, and S. W. J. Kozlowski, 349–381. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, C., J. Hüffmeier, and G. Hertel. 2016. “Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators.” Journal of Applied Psychology 101 (8): 1151–1177. doi:10.1037/apl0000113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model fit.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by K. A. Bollen, and J. S. Long, 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and D. Cramer. 2005. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A Guide for Social Scientists. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203498187.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C. S., D. E. Sims, E. H. Lazzara, and E. Salas. 2007. “Trust in Leadership: A Multi-Level Review and Integration.” The Leadership Quarterly 18 (6): 606–632. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., and D. E. Bailey. 1997. “What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite.” Journal of Management 23 (3): 239–290. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90034-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M. 2002. “Method Variance and Method Bias in Industrial and Organizational Psychology.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by S. G. Rogelberg, 344–365. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470756669.ch17.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. C., and N. Anderson. 2011. “Measuring Trust in Teams: Development and Validation of a Multifaceted Measure of Formative and Reflective Indicators of Team Trust.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 20 (1): 119–154. doi:10.1080/13594320903272083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. C., C. A. Fulmer, and N. R. Anderson. 2018. “Trust in Work Teams: An Integrative Review, Multilevel Model, and Future Directions.” Journal of Organizational Behaviour 39 (2): 169–184. doi:10.1002/job.2213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. C., R. A. Roe, and T. Taillieu. 2001. “Trust Within Teams: The Relation with Performance Effectiveness.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10 (3): 225–244. doi:10.1080/13594320143000654.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D. 2001. “The Mutual Knowledge Problem and its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration.” Organization Science 12 (3): 346–371. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., and S. G. Schruijer. 2010. “Does Conflict Shatter Trust or Does Trust Obliterate Conflict? Revisiting the Relationships Between Team Diversity, Conflict, and Trust.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 14 (1): 66–79. doi:10.1037/a0017104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., and A. E. Van Vianen. 2001. “Managing Relationship Conflict and the Effectiveness of Organizational Teams.” Journal of Organizational Behaviour: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behaviour 22 (3): 309–328. doi:10.1002/job.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., and L. R. Weingart. 2003. “Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (4): 741–749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B. A., and K. T. Dirks. 2012. “Beyond Shared Perceptions of Trust and Monitoring in Teams: Implications of Asymmetry and Dissensus.” Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (2): 391–406. doi:10.1037/a0026483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B. A., K. T. Dirks, and N. Gillespie. 2016. “Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects, Moderators, and Covariates.” Journal of Applied Psychology 101 (8): 1134–1150. doi:10.1037/apl0000110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, B. A., and T. Elfring. 2010. “How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams? the Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring, and Effort.” Academy of Management Journal 53 (3): 535–549. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.51468649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., R. Schalk, and P. L. Cursçeu. 2008. “Virtual Communicating, Conflicts and Performance in Teams.” Team Performance Management 14 (7/8): 364–380. doi:10.1108/13527590810912331.
   Google Scholar
• DeOrtentiis, P. S., J. K. Summers, A. P. Ammeter, C. Douglas, and G. R. Ferris. 2013. “Cohesion and Satisfaction as Mediators of the Team Trust – Team Effectiveness Relationship.” Career Development International 18 (5): 521–543. doi:10.1108/cdi-03-2013-0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., and J. L. Philips. 2001. “Do Smarter Teams do Better.” Small Group Research 32 (5): 507–532. doi:10.1177/104649640103200501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, F. R., L. L. Greer, and K. A. Jehn. 2012. “The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 97 (2): 360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimas, I. D., and P. R. Lourenço. 2015. “Intragroup Conflict and Conflict Management Approaches as Determinants of Team Performance and Satisfaction: Two Field Studies.” Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 8 (3): 174–193. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., and D. L. Ferrin. 2001. “The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings.” Organization Science 12 (4): 450–467. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eligio, U. X., S. E. Ainsworth, and C. K. Crook. 2012. “Emotion Understanding and Performance During Computer-Supported Collaboration.” Computers in Human Behaviour 28 (6): 2046–2054. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem, F., and J. Ozen. 2003. “Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Trust in Developing Team Performance.” Team Performance Management 9 (5/6): 131–135. doi:10.1108/13527590310493846.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., P. Claver, P. Pereira, and S. Thomaz. 2020. Remote Working and the Platform of the Future. Boston, MA: Boston Consulting Group. https://pulse.microsoft.com/uploads/prod/2020/10/BCG-Remote-Working-and-the-Platform-of-the-Future-Oct-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, C. A., and M. J. Gelfand. 2012. “At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust: Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels.” Journal of Management 38 (4): 1167–1230. doi:10.1177/0149206312439327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaggioli, A., E. Mazzoni, L. Milani, and G. Riva. 2015. “The Creative Link: Investigating the Relationship Between Social Network Indices, Creative Performance and Flow in Blended Teams.” Computers in Human Behavior 42: 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., K. R. Lakhani, and P. Puranam. 2020. “What has Changed? The Impact of Covid Pandemic on the Technology and Innovation Management Research Agenda.” Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/joms.12634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., and J. L. Gibbs. 2006. “Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (3): 451–495. doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grichanik, M. 2014. “The Effects of Collaborative Critical Thinking Training on Trust Development and Effectiveness in Virtual Teams.” Unpublished Master Thesis. University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., E. A. Mannix, and M. A. Neale. 2003. “Conflict and Virtual Teams.” In Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, edited by S. G. Cohen, and C. B. Gibson, 335–352. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, R. 2014. “Group Development in Virtual Teams: An Experimental Reexamination.” Computers in Human Behaviour 39: 213–222. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Han, G., and P. D. Harms. 2010. “Team Identification, Trust, and Conflict: A Mediation Model.” International Journal of Conflict Management 21: 20–43. doi:10.1108/10444061011016614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., N. Anderson, and J. F. Salgado. 2009. “Team-level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (5): 1128–1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf. 1993. “rwg: An assessment of Within-group Interrater Agreement.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (2): 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., K. Knoll, and D. E. Leidner. 1998. “Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams.” Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (4): 29–64. doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., and D. E. Leidner. 1999. “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams.” Organization Science 10 (6): 791–815. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., T. R. Shaw, and D. S. Staples. 2004. “Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams.” Information Systems Research 15 (3): 250–267. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. 1994. “Enhancing Effectiveness: An Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Value-based Intragroup Conflict.” International Journal of Conflict Management 5: 223–238. doi:10.1108/eb022744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. 1997. “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (3): 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., and E. A. Mannix. 2001. “The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 238–251. doi:10.5465/3069453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlow, J., H. Klecka, and E. Ruppel. 2020. “What the Differences in Conflict Between Online and Face-to-Face Work Groups Mean for Hybrid Groups: A State-of-the-art Review.” Review of Communication Research 8: 51–77. doi:10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai, P., and Y. Yoo. 2002. “Dynamic Nature of Trust in Virtual Teams.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (3-4): 187–213. doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00019-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli, A., B. C. Tan, and K. K. Wei. 2006. “Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams.” Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (3): 237–274. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. 1973. “The Processes of Causal Attribution.” American Psychologist 28 (2): 107–128. doi:10.1037/h0034225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., and J. L. Michela. 1980. “Attribution Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Psychology 31 (1): 457–501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. S., R. J. Breitenecker, V. Gustafsson, and E. J. Schwarz. 2015. “Innovative Entrepreneurial Teams: The Give and Take of Trust and Conflict.” Creativity and Innovation Management 24 (4): 558–573. doi:10.1111/caim.12152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, P., A. Rezvani, and N. M. Ashkanasy. 2020. “Emotional Intelligence: A Preventive Strategy to Manage Destructive Influence of Conflict in Large Scale Projects.” International Journal of Project Management 38 (1): 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfred, C. W. 2007. “The Downside of Self-management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-managing Teams.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 885–900. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. R., I. D. Dimas, and T. Rebelo. 2014. “Effective Workgroups: The Role of Diversity and Culture.” Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 30 (3): 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.rpto.2014.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Moreno, E., V. O. Castellá, and A. Z. Abad. 2012. “El papel del entrenamiento autoguiado en la relación entre el conflicto de tarea y la innovación en equipos virtuales.” Psicothema 24 (1): 29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. 1995. “Affect-and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 24–59. doi:10.5465/256727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, N. B., and D. Šmite. 2008. “Understanding a Lack of Trust in Global Software Teams: A Multiple-Case Study.” Software Process: Improvement and Practice 13 (3): 217–231. doi:10.1002/spip.378.
   Google Scholar
• Muethel, M., F. Siebdrat, and M. Hoegl. 2012. “When do we Really Need Interpersonal Trust in Globally Dispersed new Product Development Teams?” R&D Management 42 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00667.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peñarroja, V., V. Orengo, A. Zornoza, J. Sánchez, and P. Ripoll. 2015. “How Team Feedback and Team Trust Influence Information Processing and Learning in Virtual Teams: A Moderated Mediation Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 48: 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, L. M., and C. C. Manz. 2007. “Identifying Antecedents of Virtual Team Collaboration.” Team Performance Management 13 (3/4): 117–129. doi:10.1108/13527590710759865.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. S., and K. J. Behfar. 2003. “The Dynamic Relationship Between Performance Feedback, Trust, and Conflict in Groups: A Longitudinal Study.” Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 92 (1-2): 102–112. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K., and R. Kenda. 2021. “The Impact of Virtuality on Team Effectiveness in Organizational and non-Organizational Teams: A Meta-analysis.” Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/apps.12348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuram, S., N. S. Hill, J. L. Gibbs, and L. M. Maruping. 2019. “Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters.” Academy of Management Annals 13 (1): 308–341. doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, D. 2005. “The Influence of Relationship Conflict and Trust on the Transactive Memory: Performance Relation in Top Management Teams.” Small Group Research 36 (6): 746–771.doi:10.1177/1046496405281776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebelo, T., I. D. Dimas, P. R. Lourenço, and  Palácio. 2018. “Generating Team PsyCap Through Transformational Leadership: A Route to Team Learning and Performance.” Team Performance Management 24 (7/8): 363–379. doi:10.1108/TPM-09-2017-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani, A., R. Barrett, and P. Khosravi. 2019. “Investigating the Relationships among Team Emotional Intelligence, Trust, Conflict and Team Performance.” Team Performance Management 25 (1/2): 120–137. doi:10.1108/TPM-03-2018-0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L. P., A. R. Denis, and Y. T. C. Hung. 2009. “Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members.” Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (2): 241–279. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, C. P., and S. J. Harrington. 2000. “The Relationship of Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment and Innovation.” Journal of Business Ethics 25 (4): 313–328. doi:10.1023/A:1006290432594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., S. S. K. Lam, and A. C. Peng. 2011. “Cognition-based and Affect-Based Trust as Mediators of Leader Behavior Influences on Team Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (4): 863–871. doi:10.1037/a0022625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T. L., and R. S. Peterson. 2000. “Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust.” Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (1): 102–111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. 1987. “Method Variance as an Artifact in Self-Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work: Myth or Significant Problem?” Journal of Applied Psychology 72: 438–443.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, J. P., E. D. Heaphy, A. Carmeli, G. M. Spreitzer, and J. E. Dutton. 2013. “Relationship Quality and Virtuousness: Emotional Carrying Capacity as a Source of Individual and Team Resilience.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 49 (1): 13–41. doi:10.1177/0021886312471193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S. M. B., and P. C. Patel. 2011. “Demographic Faultlines: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature.” Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (6): 1119–1139. doi:10.1037/a0024167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., C. K. W. De Dreu, and A. C. Homan. 2004. “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (6): 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, D., and M. Crossan. 2005. “Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams.” Organization Science 16 (3): 203–224. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. S. 2008. “Development of Cognitive and Affective Trust in Teams: A Longitudinal Study.” Small Group Research 39 (6): 746–769. doi:10.1177/1046496408323569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., and N. R. Anderson. 1996. “Innovation in top Management Teams.” Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (6): 680–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., S. G. Straus, and B. McEvily. 2006. “All in due Time: The Development of Trust in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Teams.” Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 99 (1): 16–33. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., and K. W. Mossholder. 2004. “Decoupling Task and Relationship Conflict: The Role of Intragroup Emotional Processing.” Journal of Organizational Behaviour: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behaviour 25 (5): 589–605. doi:10.1002/job.258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., & Peñarroja, V. (2009). Relational Capital in Virtual Teams: The Role Played by Trust. Social Science Information, 48(2), 257–281. doi:10.1177/0539018409102414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar