‘How should my family assistant be?’: initial perceptions about prospective and anticipated use of in-home virtual assistants in an emerging context

References

• Alam, M. R., M. B. I. Reaz, and M. A. M. Ali. 2012. “A Review of Smart Homes—Past, Present, and Future.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 42 (6): 1190–1203. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2189204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, F. 2003. “Smart Homes: Past, Present and Future.” In Inside the Smart Home, edited by R. Harper, 17–36. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Austerjost, J., M. Porr, N. Riedel, D. Geier, T. Becker, T. Scheper, D. Marquard, P. Lindner, and S. Beutel. 2018. “Introducing a Virtual Assistant to the Lab: A Voice User Interface for the Intuitive Control of Laboratory Instruments.” SLAS TECHNOLOGY: Translating Life Sciences Innovation 23 (5): 476–482. doi:10.1177/2472630318788040.
   Google Scholar
• Balcı, E. 2019. “Overview of Intelligent Personal Assistants.” Acta Infologica 3 (1): 22–33. doi:10.26650/acin.454522.
   Google Scholar
• Balsa, J., P. Neves, I. Félix, M. P. Guerreiro, P. Alves, M. B. Carmo, and A. P. Cláudio. 2019, September. Intelligent Virtual Assistant for Promoting Behaviour Change in Older People with t2d. In EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 372–383). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, N. 2009, August. What is the difference between the Purpose of Usability and User Experience Evaluation Methods. In Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM (Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1–4).
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., and S. K. Biklen. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, H. E., and K. Cheverst. 2004. “Utilizing Context History to Provide Dynamic Adaptations.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 18 (6): 533–548. doi:10.1080/08839510490462894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. 2022. Privacy. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/privacy.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, C., L. Zhao, and Y. Hu. 2019. Anthropomorphism of Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs): Antecedents and Consequences. Proceedings of 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2019/187.
   Google Scholar
• Cerekovic, A., O. Aran, and D. Gatica-Perez. 2016. “Rapport with Virtual Agents: What do Human Social Cues and Personality Explain?” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 8 (3): 382–395. doi:10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2545650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiari, G. 2017. Personal Construct Theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T. Shackelford (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_988-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, M., S. S. Lee, and K. P. Lee. 2019a. Once a Kind Friend is now a Thing: Understanding how Conversational Agents at Home are Forgotten. Proceedings of the 2019 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (pp. 1557–1569). doi:10.1145/3322276.3322332.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, E., M. D. Molina, and J. Wang. 2019b. “The Effects of Modality, Device, and Task Differences on Perceived Human Likeness of Voice-Activated Virtual Assistants.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 22 (8): 515–520. doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., and E. Rader. 2020. The Role of Conversational Grounding in Supporting Symbiosis between people and Digital Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, (pp.1–28). doi:10.1145/3392838.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, H., M. Iorga, J. Voas, and S. Lee. 2017. “Alexa, Can I Trust you?” Computer 50 (9): 100–104. doi:10.1109/MC.2017.3571053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, E., and A. Weber. 2016. What Can I Say? Addressing user Experience Challenges of a Mobile Voice User Interface for Accessibility. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, (pp. 72–82).
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, B. R., N. Pantidi, D. Coyle, K. Morrissey, P. Clarke, S. Al-Shehri, D. Earley, and N. Bandeira. 2017. “What Can I help You With?": Infrequent Users’ Experiences Of Intelligent Personal Assistants. Proceedings of the MobileHCI ‘17: 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, (pp. 1–12). doi:10.1145/3098279.3098539.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, K. E., and P. Madhavan. 2013. “A Note of Caution Regarding Anthropomorphism in HCI Agents.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (3): 577–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czibula, G., A.-M. Guran, I. G. Czibula, and G. S. Cojocar. 2009. IPA - An Intelligent Personal Assistant Agent for Task Performance Support. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, (pp. 31– 34). doi:10.1109/ICCP.2009.5284791.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Druga, S., R. Williams, C. Breazeal, and M. Resnick. 2017. “Hey Google is it OK if I eat you?": Initial Explorations in Child-agent Interaction. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (pp. 595–600). doi:10.1145/3078072.3084330.
   Google Scholar
• Easwara Moorthy, A., and K. P. L. Vu. 2015. “Privacy Concerns for use of Voice Activated Personal Assistant in the Public Space.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31 (4): 307–335. doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.986642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallman, D., and J. Waterworth. 2010. “Capturing User Experiences of Mobile Information Technology with the Repertory Grid Technique.” Human Technology 6 (2): 250–268.
   Google Scholar
• Foehr, J., and C. C. Germelmann. 2020. “Alexa, Can I Trust you? Exploring Consumer Paths to Trust in Smart Voice-Interaction Technologies.” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 5 (2): 181–205. doi:10.1086/707731.
   Google Scholar
• Fuckner, M., J. Barthes, and E. E. Scalabrin. 2014. Using a Personal Assistant for Exploiting Service Interfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, (pp. 89–94). doi:10.1109/CSCWD.2014.6846822.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazali, T. K., and N. H. Zakaria. 2018. “Security, Comfort, Healthcare, and Energy Saving: A Review on Biometric Factors for Smart Home Environment.” Journal of Computers 29 (1): 189–208. doi:10.3966/199115992018012901017.
   Google Scholar
• Günay, A., and Ç Erbuğ. 2014. “Eliciting Positive User Experiences with Self-Service Kiosks: Pursuing Possibilities.” Behaviour & Information Technology 34 (1): 81–93. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2014.937459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, J. 1982. “A Means-end Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes.” The Journal of Marketing 90: 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. L. 2019. “Voices in and of the Machine: Source Orientation Toward Mobile Virtual Assistants.” Computers in Human Behavior 90: 343–350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., and H. Yang. 2018. “Understanding Adoption of Intelligent Personal Assistants: A Parasocial Relationship Perspective.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 118 (3): 618–636. doi:10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauswald, J., M. A. Laurenzano, Y. Zhang, C. Li, A. Rovinski, A. Khurana, R. G. Dreslinski, et al. 2015. Sirius: An Open end-to-end Voice and Vision Personal Assistant and its Implications for Future Warehouse Scale Computers. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, (pp. 223–238). doi:10.1145/2775054.2694347.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, J., T. Olsson, and K. Väänänen. 2009. Expectations for User Experience in Haptic Communication with Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ‘09). doi:10.1145/1613858.1613895.
   Google Scholar
• Heudin, J. C. 2017. Emotion Selection in a Multi-personality Conversational Agent. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 34–41). doi:10.5220/0006113600340041International.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., A. Hassan Awadallah, R. Jones, U. Ozertem, I. Zitouni, R. Gurunath Kulkarni, and O. Z. Khan. 2015. Automatic Online Evaluation of Intelligent Assistants. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, (pp. 506–516). doi:10.1145/2736277.2741669.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanoğlu, A., and Ç Erbuğ. 2011. Perceived Qualities of Smart Wearables: Determinants of User Acceptance. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (p. 26:1–26:8). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Karapanos, E., J. Zimmerman, J. Forlizzi, and J. B. Martens. 2009, April. User Experience Over Time: An Initial Framework. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 729–738).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. 1991. Psychology of Personal Constructs: Volume One: Theory and Personality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ketola, P., and V. Roto. 2009. “On User Experience Measurement Needs: Case Nokia.” International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI) 5 (3): 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. J., and H. Han. 2020. “ Hotel of the Future: Exploring the Attributes of a Smart Hotel Adopting a Mixed-Methods Approach.” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 37 (7): 804–822. doi:10.1080/10548408.2020.1835788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, B., and A. Mutchler. 2019. Smart Speaker Consumer Adoption Report 2019. https://voicebot.ai/smart-speaker-consumer-adoption-report-2019/.
   Google Scholar
• Kiseleva, J., K. Williams, J. Jiang, A. Hassan Awadallah, A. C. Crook, I. Zitouni, and T. Anastasakos. 2016. Understanding User Satisfaction with Intelligent Assistants. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, (pp. 121–130). doi:10.1145/2854946.2854961.
   Google Scholar
• Knote, R., A. Janson, L. Eigenbrod, and M. Söllner. 2018. The What and How of Smart Personal Assistants: Principles and Application Domains for IS Research. Proceedings of the 2018 Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 1083–1094). https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/252796.
   Google Scholar
• Knote, R., A. Janson, M. Söllner, and J. M. Leimeister. 2019. Classifying Smart Personal Assistants: An Empirical Cluster Analysis. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (pp. 2024–2033). doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2019.245.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B. J., B. C. Newell, T. Timan, I. Škorvánek, T. Chokrevski, and M. Galič. 2017. “A Typology of Privacy.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 38 (2): 483–575. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol38/iss2/4/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuebel, H., and R. Zarnekow. 2015. Exploring Platform Adoption in the Smart Home Case. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, (pp. 1–23).
   Google Scholar
• Lau, J., B. Zimmerman, and F. Schaub. 2018. Alexa, are You Listening?: Privacy Perceptions, Concerns and Privacy-seeking Behaviors with Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, (pp. 1–31). doi:10.1145/3274371.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., S. Kim, and S. Lee. 2019. “What does Your Agent Look Like?": A Drawing Study to Understand Users’ Perceived Persona of Conversational Agent. Proceedings of CHI EA’19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 1–6). doi:10.1145/3290607.3312796.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, T., V. Fors, S. Pink, and K. Osz. 2020. “Anticipatory Experience in Everyday Autonomous Driving.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 24: 747–762. doi:10.1007/s00779-020-01410-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisetti, C., R. Amini, U. Yasavur, and N. Rishe. 2013. “I Can Help you Change! an Empathic Virtual Agent Delivers Behavior Change Health Interventions.” ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 4 (4): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lovato, S., and A. M. Piper. 2015. “Siri, is this you?": Understanding Young Children's Interactions with Voice Input Systems. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (pp. 335–338). doi:10.1145/2771839.2771910.
   Google Scholar
• Luger, E., and A. Sellen. 2016. “Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf Between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 5286–5297). doi:10.1145/2858036.2858288.
   Google Scholar
• Markets and Markets. 2017. Intelligent Virtual Assistant Market by Product (Chatbots, IVA smart speakers), User Interface (Text-based, Text-to-speech based, Automatic Speech Recognition), Industry (Consumer Electronics, BFSI, Retail), and Geography - Global Forecast to 2023. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/intelligent-virtual-assistant-market-184337393.html.
   Google Scholar
• Markets and Markets. 2021. Smart Home Market with COVID-19 Impact Analysis by Product (Lighting Control, Security & Access Control, HVAC Control, Smart Speaker, Smart Kitchen, Smart Furniture), Software & Services, Sales Channel, and Region - Global Forecast to 2026. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/smart-homes-and-assisted-living-advanced-technologie-and-global-market-121.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, G., and K. Osei-Frimpong. 2019. “Hey Alexa … Examine the Variables Influencing the use of Artificial Intelligent in-Home Voice Assistants.” Computers in Human Behavior 99: 28–37. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTear, M., Z. Callejas, and D. Griol. 2016. The Conversational Interface: Talking to Smart Devices. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mols, A., Y. Wang, and J. Pridmore. 2021. “Household Intelligent Personal Assistants in the Netherlands: Exploring Privacy Concerns Around Surveillance, Security, and Platforms.” Convergence, doi:10.1177/13548565211042234.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. V., III, P. N. Sharma, and T. M. Hult. 2015. “Cross-National Differences in Consumer Satisfaction: Mobile Services in Emerging and Developed Markets.” Journal of International Marketing 23 (2): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussawi, S., and R. Benbunan-Fich. 2020. “The Effect of Voice and Humour on Users’ Perceptions of Personal Intelligent Agents.” Behaviour & Information Technology 40 (15): 1603–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, D. K., C. Koopman, and N. Doty. 2016. “Privacy is an Essentially Contested Concept: A Multi-Dimensional Analytic for Mapping Privacy.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 374: 2083. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, U. B., B. Hannibal, and N. N. Larsen. 2018. “Reviewing Emerging Markets: Context, Concepts and Future Research.” International Journal of Emerging Markets 13 (6): 1679–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oduor, E., C. Neustaedter, W. Odom, A. Tang, N. Moallem, M. Tory, and P. Irani. 2016. The frustrations and benefits of mobile device usage in the home when co-present with family members. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (pp. 1315–1327). doi:10.1145/2901790.2901809.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Y. H., K. Chung, and D. Y. Ju. 2020. “Differences in Interactions with a Conversational Agent.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (9): 3189. doi:10.3390/ijerph17093189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Standardization. 2019. Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction — Part 210: Human-centred Design for Interactive Systems (ISO 9241-210). https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html.
   Google Scholar
• Paay, J., J. Kjeldskov, K. M. Hansen, T. Jørgensen, and K. L. Overgaard. 2020b. “Digital Ethnography of Home use of Digital Personal Assistants.” Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–17. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1834620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paay, J., J. Kjeldskov, E. Papachristos, K. M. Hansen, T. Jørgensen, and K. L. Overgaard. 2020a. “Can Digital Personal Assistants Persuade People to Exercise?” Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., and Y. K. Lim. 2020. Investigating User Expectations on the Roles of Family-shared AI speakers. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 1–13). doi:10.1145/3313831.3376450.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Porcheron, M., J. E. Fischer, S. Reeves, and S. Sharples. 2018, April. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 1–12). doi:10.1145/3173574.3174214.
   Google Scholar
• Poslad, S. 2009. Ubiquitous Computing: Smart Devices, Environments, and Interaction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Purington, A., J. G. Taft, S. Sannon, N. N. Bazarova, and S. H. Taylor. 2017. “Alexa is My New BFF": Social Roles, User Satisfaction, and Personification of the Amazon Echo. Proceedings of CHI EA’17: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 2853–2859). doi:10.1145/3027063.3053246.
   Google Scholar
• PWC. 2013. Emerging Markets. https://www.pwc.com.br/pt/publicacoes/servicos/assets/consultoria-negocios/emerging-markets-tsp-13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PWC. 2016. Emerging Markets Top 30 Software Companies - Methodology. http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/technology/publications/global-100-software-leaders/about-the-report.html#emerging.
   Google Scholar
• PWC. 2017. The Long View: How will the Global Economic Order Change by 2050? https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/world-2050/assets/pwc-world-in-2050-summary-report-feb-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, J. D. 2002. “Constructivism in Psychology: Personal ConstructPsychology, Radical Constructivism, and SocialConstructionism.” American Communication Journal 5 (3): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rawassizadeh, R., T. Sen, S. J. Kim, C. Meurisch, H. Keshavarz, M. Mühlhäuser, and M. Pazzani. 2019. “Manifestation of Virtual Assistants and Robots Into Daily Life: Vision and Challenges.” CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction 1 (3): 163–174. doi:10.1007/s42486-019-00014-1.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T. J., and J. Gutman. 1988. “Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation.” Journal of Advertising Research 28 (1): 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk, S. A., and E. J. Hultink. 2009. “How Today’s Consumers Perceive Tomorrow’s Smart Products.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (1): 24–42. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijsdijk, S. A., E. J. Hultink, and A. Diamantopoulos. 2007. “Product Intelligence: Its Conceptualization, Measurement and Impact on Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35 (3): 340–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., U. Kayande, and R. K. Srivastava. 2015. “What’s Different About Emerging Markets, and What Does it Mean for Theory and Practice?” Customer Needs and Solutions 2 (4): 245–250. doi:10.1007/s40547-015-0056-x.
   Google Scholar
• Roto, V. 2007. “User Experience from Product Creation Perspective.” In Proceedings of the COST294-MAUSE AffiliatedWorkshop: Towards a UX Manifesto, edited by E. Law, A. P. O. S. Vermeeren, M. Hassenzahl, and M. Blythe, 31–34. Landcaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Saad, U., U. Afzal, A. El-Issawi, and M. Eid. 2017. “A Model to Measure QoE for Virtual Personal Assistant.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 76 (10): 12517–12537. doi:10.1007/s11042-016-3650-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciuto, A., A. Saini, J. Forlizzi, and J. I. Hong. 2018. “Hey Alexa, What's Up?": A Mixed-methods Studies of In-home Conversational Agent Usage. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (pp. 857–868). doi:10.1145/3196709.3196772.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. T. 2020. “Marketing via Smart Speakers: What Should Alexa say?” Journal of Strategic Marketing 28 (4): 350–365. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2018.1541924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solaimani, S., W. Keijzer-Broers, and H. Bouwman. 2013. “What we do - and Don’t - Know About the Smart Home: An Analysis of the Smart Home Literature.” Indoor and Built Environment 24 (3): 370–383. doi:10.1177/1420326X13516350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. 2021a. Digital Market Outlook, Smart Homes, Turkey. https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/smart-home/turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Süner, S., and Ç Erbuğ. 2016. “Evaluation of Construct Elicitation as a Research Method to Obtain Design-Relevant Data from Children.” METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 33 (2): 19–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töre Yargın, G., and Ç Erbuğ. 2012. “Information System for Visualizing User Research to Lead Innovation.” In Proceedings of the DMI 2012 International Research Conference, edited by E. Bohemia, J. Liedtka, and A. Rieple, 71–85. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Collage of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Tussyadiah, I., and G. Miller. 2019. “Nudged by a Robot: Responses to Agency and Feedback.” Annals of Tourism Research 78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. 2013. “The Influence of Technology on Family Dynamics.” Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association 2012 (1): 10.
   Google Scholar
• Warell, A. 2008. Modelling Perceptual Product Experience –Towards a Cohesive Framework of Presentation and Representation in Design. Presented at the Design & Emotion Conference, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., J. Heafner, and N. Epley. 2014. “The Mind in the Machine: Anthropomorphism Increases Trust in an Autonomous Vehicle.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52: 113–117. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. W. 2018. “Skill Discovery in Virtual Assistants.” Communications of the ACM 61 (11): 106–113. doi:10.1145/3185336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., and H. Lee. 2019. “Understanding User Behavior of Virtual Personal Assistant Devices.” Information Systems and e-Business Management 17 (1): 65–87. doi:10.1007/s10257-018-0375-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., W. Lee, and H. Lee. 2018. “IoT Smart Home Adoption: The Importance of Proper Level Automation.” Journal of Sensors 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/6464036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogasara, T., V. Popovic, B. Kraal, and M. Chamorro-Koc. 2011. “General Characteristics of Anticipated User Experience (AUX) with Interactive Products.” Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., C. Kim, and R. Kang. 2020. “Positive User Experience over Product Usage Life Cycle and the Influence of Demographic Factors.” International Journal of Design 14 (2): 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar