Collaborative learning with block-based programming: investigating human-centered artificial intelligence in education

References

• Akinwalere, S. N., and V. Ivanov. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities.” Border Crossing 12 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. 2019. Mutual Development in Online Collaborative Processes. Three case studies of artifact co-creation at different levels of participation. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R., and A. Mørch. 2009. “Mutual Development: A Case Study in Customer-Initiated Software Product Development.” In IS-EUD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5435, edited by V. Pipek, M. B. Rosson, B. de Ruyter, and V. Wulf, 31–49. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R., A. I. Mørch, and K. T. Litherland. 2021. “Learning Domain Knowledge Using Block-Based Programming: Design-Based Collaborative Learning.” In End-User Development. IS-EUD 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12724, edited by D. Fogli, D. Tetteroo, B. R. Barricelli, S. Borsci, P. Markopoulos, and G. A. Papadopoulos, 119–135. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Batalas, N., I. Lykourentzou, V. J. Khan, and P. Markopoulos. 2021. “Reconsidering End-User Development Definitions.” In End-User Development. IS-EUD 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12724, edited by D. Fogli, D. Tetteroo, B. R. Barricelli, S. Borsci, P. Markopoulos, and G. A. Papadopoulos, 19–35. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. 2013. “Gears of our Childhood: Constructionist Toolkits, Robotics, and Physical Computing, Past and Future.” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’13). Association for Computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., A. Chioccariello, and J. Earp. 2018. The Nordic Approach to Introducing Computational Thinking and Programming in Compulsory Education. Report prepared for the Nordic@ BETT2018 Steering Group, pp. 397‒400.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2 Research Designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, edited by H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K.J. Sher, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., and M. Resnick. 2012. “New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking.” Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association, Vancouver, Canada Vol. 1, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1996. The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corral, L., I. Fronza, and C. Pahl. 2021. “Block-based Programming Enabling Students to Gain and Transfer Knowledge with a No-Code Approach.” In Proceedings of the 22st annual Conference on information technology education (SIGITE 21). Association for Computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–56.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J., J. Finney, P. de Halleux, M. Moskal, T. Ball, and S. Hodges. 2019. “MakeCode and CODAL: Intuitive and Efficient Embedded Systems Programming for Education.” Journal of Systems Architecture 98: 468–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., and H. Abelson. 1986. “Boxer: A Reconstructible Computational Medium.” Communications of the ACM 29 (9): 859–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverría, L., R. Cobos, and M. Morales. 2019. “Improving the Students Computational Thinking Skills with Collaborative Learning Techniques.” IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje 14 (4): 196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. 2005. “The Material Side of Educational Technology.” Communications of the ACM 48 (1): 51–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. 1994. “Domain-oriented Design Environments.” Automated Software Engineering 1: 177–203.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. 2021. “End-User Development: Empowering Stakeholders with Artificial Intelligence, Meta-Design, and Cultures of Participation.” In End-User Development: Is-EUD 2021. LNCS, vol. 12724, edited by D. Fogli, D. Tetteroo, B. R. Barricelli, S. Borsci, P. Markopoulos, and G. A. Papadopoulos, 3–16. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., A. C. Lemke, R. McCall, and A. I. Mørch. 1996. Making Argumentation Serve Design. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, edited by T. P. Moran, and J. M. Carroll, 267–293. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fogli, D., P. Peroni, and C. Stefini. 2017. “ImAtHome: Making Trigger-Action Programming Easy and fun.” Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 42: 60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. 1999. “Teaching Gifted Pupils.” Journal of Biological Education 33 (4): 185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennari, R., M. Matera, A. Melonio, M. Rizvi, and E. Roumelioti. 2022. “The Evolution of a Toolkit for Smart-Thing Design with Children Through Action Research.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 31, doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammond, J., and P. Gibbons. 2005. “Putting Scaffolding to Work: The Contribution of Scaffolding in Articulating ESL Education.” Prospect 20 (1): 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. P. 2002. “Creating Context: Design-Based Research in Creating and Understanding.” In Proceedings of computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL), Boulder, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ingalls, D., S. Wallace, Y. Y. Chow, F. Ludolph, and K. Doyle. 1988. “Fabrik: A Visual Programming Environment.” ACM SIGPLAN Notices 23 (11): 176–190.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., W. Zhao, N. Zhang, and F. Qiu. 2022. “Programming Trajectories Analytics in Block-Based Programming Language Learning.” Interactive Learning Environments 30 (1): 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., and A. Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1): 39–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopache, M. E., and E. P. Glinert. 1988. “C2: A Mixed Textual/Graphical Environment for C.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Visual Languages, 231–238. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kortuem, G., F. Kawsar, V. Sundramoorthy, and D. Fitton. 2010. “Smart Objects as Building Blocks for the Internet of Things.” IEEE Internet Computing 14 (1): 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, A. C. Graesser, L. C. Benson, L. D. English, and R. A. Duschl. 2019. “Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education.” Journal for STEM Education Research 2: 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, H., F. Paternò, M. Klann, and V. Wulf. 2006. “End-user Development: An Emerging Paradigm.” In End-User Development, edited by H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, and V. Wulf, 1–7. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., K. Hakkarainen, and S. Paavola. 2004. “Practices and Orientations of CSCL.” In What we Know About CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 3, edited by J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, and R. L. Martens, 31–50. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MakeCode. 2021. Introducing Microsoft MakeCode. Retrieved from https://makecode.com/blog/makecode-overview.
   Google Scholar
• Markoff, J. 2016. Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., and T. C. Reeves. 2018. Conducting Educational Design Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mönks, F. J. 1992. “Development of Gifted Children: The Issue of Identification and Programming.” In Talent for the Future. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, edited by F. J. Mönks, and W. A. M. Peters, 191–202. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Mönks, F. J., and M. W. Katzko. 2005. “Conceptions of Giftedness.” Conceptions of Giftedness 2: 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, A. I., I. Engeness, V. C. Cheng, W. K. Cheung, and K. C. Wong. 2017. “EssayCritic: Writing to Learn with a Knowledge-Based Design Critiquing System.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20: 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mørch, A. I., K. T. Litherland, and R. Andersen. 2019. “End-User Development Goes to School: Collaborative Learning with Makerspaces in Subject Areas.” In End-User Development. IS-EUD 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11553, edited by A. Malizia, S. Valtolina, A. Morch, A. Serrano, and A. Stratton, 200–208. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mørch, A., and L. Zhu. 2013. “Component-based Design and Software Readymades.” In IS-EUD 2013. LNCS, vol. 7897, edited by Y. Dittrich, M. Burnett, A. Mørch, and D. Redmiles, 278–283. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Namli, N. A., and B. Aybek. 2022. “An Investigation of The Effect of Block-Based Programming and Unplugged Coding Activities on Fifth Graders’ Computational Thinking Skills.” Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance. Contemporary Educational Technology 14 (1): 1–16. ep341.
   Google Scholar
• Pelánek, R., and T. Effenberger. 2022. “Design and Analysis of Microworlds and Puzzles for Block-Based Programming.” Computer Science Education 32 (1): 66–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylla, M., and R. Romeike. 2014. “Physical Computing and its Scope - Towards a Constructionist Computer Science Curriculum with Physical Computing.” Informatics in Education 13 (2): 225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Reichertz, J. 2014. “Induction, Deduction, Abduction.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 123–135. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., and J. S. Renzulli. 2004. “Current Research on the Social and Emotional Development of Gifted and Talented Students: Good News and Future Possibilities.” Psychology in the Schools 41 (1): 119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. 1978. “What Makes Giftedness? Reexamining a Definition.” Phi Delta Kappan 60 (3): 180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, A., A. Ioannidou, and J. Zola. 2000. “AgentSheets: End-User Programmable Simulations.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 3 (3): 351–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., J. Maloney, A. Monroy-Hernández, N. Rusk, E. Eastmond, K. Brennan, A. Millner, et al. 2009. “Scratch.” Communications of the ACM 52 (11): 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., and B. Silverman. 2005. “Some Reflections on Designing Construction Kits for Kids.” Proceedings of the 2005 conference on interaction design and children (IDC'05). Association for Computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Rienties, B., B. Giesbers, D. Tempelaar, S. Lygo-Baker, M. Segers, and W. Gijselaers. 2012. “The Role of Scaffolding and Motivation in CSCL.” Computers & Education 59 (3): 893–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Root, E., W. Heuten, and S. Boll. 2019. “Maker Cards: Evaluating Design Cards for Teaching Physical Computing to Middle-School Girls.” Proceedings of mensch und computer 2019 (MuC’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sarı, U., H. M. Pektaş, ÖF Şen, and H. Çelik. 2022. “Algorithmic Thinking Development Through Physical Computing Activities with Arduino in STEM Education.” Education and Information Technologies 1: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., J. S. Kinnebrew, S. Basu, G. Biswas, and D. Clark. 2013. “Integrating Computational Thinking with K-12 Science Education Using Agent-Based Computation: A Theoretical Framework.” Education and Information Technologies 18 (2): 351–380.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Cámara, L. M., M. Paredes-Velasco, C. M. Alcover, and JÁ Velazquez-Iturbide. 2014. “An Evaluation of Students’ Motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning of Programming Concepts.” Computers in Human Behavior 31: 499–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheriff, A., R. Sadan, Y. Keats, and O. Zuckerman. 2017. “From Smart Homes to Smart Kids: Design Research for CataKit.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’17). Association for Computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. 2020. “Human-centered Artificial Intelligence: Three Fresh Ideas.” AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 12 (3): 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. 2006. Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. 2016. “From Intersubjectivity to Group Cognition.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25: 355–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., T. Koschmann, and D. Suthers. 2006. “Computer-supported Collaborative Learning: An Historical Perspective.” In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 409–426. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., S. Ludvigsen, N. Law, and U. Cress. 2014. “CSCL Artifacts.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 9 (3): 237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2022. Artificial intelligence in education. https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/education.
   Google Scholar
• Utting, I., S. Cooper, M. Kölling, J. Maloney, and M. Resnick. 2010. “Alice, Greenfoot, and Scratch -- A Discussion.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education 10 (4): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, F., I. Kollar, F. Fischer, K. Reiss, and S. Ufer. 2022. “Adaptable Scaffolding of Mathematical Argumentation Skills: The Role of Self-Regulation When Scaffolded with CSCL Scripts and Heuristic Worked Examples.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 17: 39–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., D. C. Shepherd, P. Francis, and D. Franklin. 2017. “Blockly Goes to Work: Block-Based Programming for Industrial Robots.” Proceedings 2017 IEEE blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B), pp. 29-36.
   Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., and U. Wilensky. 2017. “Comparing Block-Based and Text-Based Programming in High School Computer Science Classrooms.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education 18: 1. Article 3, 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, V., and B. Golombek. 2001. “Direct Activation: A Concept to Encourage Tailoring Activities.” Behaviour & Information Technology 20 (4): 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. J., H. Ogata, T. Matsui, and N. S. Chen. 2021. “Human-centered Artificial Intelligence in Education: Seeing the Invisible Through the Visible.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2, doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100008.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., and J. Nouri. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Learning Computational Thinking Through Scratch in K-9.” Computers & Education 141: 103607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar