Human–robot interface design – the ‘Robot with a Tablet’ or ‘Robot only’, which one is better?

References

• Adams, J. A. 2009. “Multiple Robot/Single Human Interaction: Effects on Perceived Workload.” Behaviour & Information Technology 28 (2): 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, M. I., O. Mubin, and J. Orlando. 2017. “Adaptive Social Robot for Sustaining Social Engagement During Long-Term Children–Robot Interaction.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 33 (12): 943–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billard, A. 2003. “Robota: Clever Toy and Educational Tool.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (3–4): 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogårdh, T. 2007. “Present and Future Robot Control Development—An Industrial Perspective.” Annual Reviews in Control 31 (1): 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., H. W. Park, and C. Breazeal. 2020. “Teaching and Learning with Children: Impact of Reciprocal Peer Learning with a Social Robot on Children’s Learning and Emotive Engagement.” Computers & Education 150: 103836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., J. Zhou, G. Tao, J. Yang, and L. Hu. 2018. “Wearable Affective Robot.” IEEE Access 6: 64766–64776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. W., P. C. Sun, and N. S. Chen. 2018. “The Essential Applications of Educational Robot: Requirement Analysis from the Perspectives of Experts, Researchers and Instructors.” Computers & Education 126: 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Heuvel, J., N. Corral, L. Bruckschen, and M. Bennewitz. 2022. “Learning Personalized Human-Aware Robot Navigation Using Virtual Reality Demonstrations from a User Study.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.14741.
   Google Scholar
• Dhir, A., P. Kaur, S. Chen, and S. Pallesen. 2019. “Antecedents and Consequences of Social Media Fatigue.” International Journal of Information Management 48: 193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diyas, Y., Brakk D., Aimambetov Y., and Sandygulova A. 2016. “Evaluating Peer Versus Teacher Robot Within Educational Scenario of Programming Learning.” In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction(HRI) (pp. 425–426), March. IEEE. Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Donnermann, M., Schaper P, and Lugrin B. 2020. “Integrating a Social Robot in Higher Education–A Field Study.” In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 573–579). IEEE. Napoli, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., C. Edwards, P. R. Spence, C. Harris, and A. Gambino. 2016. “Robots in the Classroom: Differences in Students’ Perceptions of Credibility and Learning Between “Teacher as Robot” and “Robot as Teacher”.” Computers in Human Behavior 65: 627–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., A. Edwards, B. Stoll, X. Lin, and N. Massey. 2019. “Evaluations of an Artificial Intelligence Instructor's Voice: Social Identity Theory in Human-Robot Interactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 90: 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., C. Edwards, D. Westerman, and P. R. Spence. 2019. “Initial Expectations, Interactions, and Beyond with Social Robots.” Computers in Human Behavior 90: 308–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J., and Puerta. A. 2000. “Adaptation in Automated User-Interface Design.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 74–81), January.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., Yu S., van de Mortel D., Barakova E., Hu J., and Rauterberg M. 2019. “LiveNature: Ambient Display and Social Robot-Facilitated Multi-Sensory Engagement for People with Dementia.” In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 1321–1333), June.
   Google Scholar
• Gockley, R., A. Bruce, J. Forlizzi, M. Michalowski, A. Mundell, S. Rosenthal, … J. Wang. 2005. “Designing Robots for Long-Term Social Interaction.” In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 1338–1343), August. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, G., S. Spaulding, J. K. Westlund, J. J. Lee, L. Plummer, M. Martinez, … C. Breazeal. 2016. “Affective Personalization of a Social Robot Tutor for Children’s Second Language Skills.” In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, March.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., and D. Kim. 2009. “r-Learning Services for Elementary School Students with a Teaching Assistant Robot.” In 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 255–256), March. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. H., D. H. Kim, and J. W. Kim. 2009. “Physical Learning Activities with a Teaching Assistant Robot in Elementary School Music Class.” In 2009 Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC (pp. 1406–1410), August. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C. C., M. H. Chen, I. Yuadi, and N. S. Chen. 2022. “The Effects of Constructing Robot-Based Storytelling System on College Students’ Computational Thinking Skill and Technology Comprehension.” In 2022 24th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (pp. 496–500), February. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., Y. Lu, Z. Pan, Y. Gong, and Z. Yang. 2021. “Can AI Artifacts Influence Human Cognition? The Effects of Artificial Autonomy in Intelligent Personal Assistants.” International Journal of Information Management 56: 102250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C. C., H. T. Tseng, M. H. Chen, G. P. I. Alexis, and N. S. Chen. 2020. “Comparing the Effects of Robots and IoT Objects on STEM Learning Outcomes and Computational Thinking Skills Between Programming-Experienced Learners and Programming-Novice Learners.” In 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 87–89), July. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C. C., H. C. Yeh, and N. S. Chen. 2021. “Teacher Development in Robot and IoT Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes with the Use of the TPACK-Based Support-Stimulate-Seek Approach.” Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., L. H. Yang, and S. Y. Wang. 2013. “A Concept Map-Embedded Educational Computer Game for Improving Students’ Learning Performance in Natural Science Courses.” Computers & Education 69: 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. E., and D. Halpern. 2014. “Attitudes Towards Robots Suitability for Various Jobs as Affected Robot Appearance.” Behaviour & Information Technology 33 (9): 941–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khamassi, M., G. Velentzas, T. Tsitsimis, and C. Tzafestas. 2018. “Robot Fast Adaptation to Changes in Human Engagement During Simulated Dynamic Social Interaction with Active Exploration in Parameterized Reinforcement Learning.” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 10 (4): 881–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijn, E. A., and J. F. Hoorn. 2020. “Robot Tutor and Pupils’ Educational Ability: Teaching the Times Tables.” Computers & Education 157: 103970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahey, B., W. Burleson, C. N. Jensen, N. Freed, and P. Lu. 2008. “Integrating Video Games and Robotic Play in Physical Environments.” In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (pp. 107–114), August.
   Google Scholar
• Le, T. D., V. R. Ponnambalam, J. G. Gjevestad, and P. J. From. 2020. “A low-Cost and Efficient Autonomous row-Following Robot for Food Production in Polytunnels.” Journal of Field Robotics 37 (2): 309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marienko, M., Y. Nosenko, and M. Shyshkina. 2020. “Personalization of Learning Using Adaptive Technologies and Augmented Reality.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.05802.
   Google Scholar
• Mubin, O., C. J. Stevens, S. Shahid, A. Al Mahmud, and J. J. Dong. 2013. “A Review of the Applicability of Robots in Education.” Journal of Technology in Education and Learning 1: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Orefice, P. H., M. Ammi, M. Hafez, and A. Tapus. 2016. “Let's Handshake and I'll Know Who You Are: Gender and Personality Discrimination in Human-Human and Human-Robot Handshaking Interaction.” In 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) (pp. 958–965), November. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. 1992. “Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill in Statistics: A Cognitive-Load Approach.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (4): 429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, A. K., and R. Gelin. 2018. “A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of its Kind.” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 25 (3): 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakostas, G. A., A. K. Strolis, F. Panagiotopoulos, and C. N. Aitsidis. 2018. “Social Robot Selection: A Case Study in Education.” In 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) (pp. 1–4), September. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., D. Choi, J. Yi, S. Lee, J. E. Lee, B. Choi, … G. Kyung. 2017. “Effects of Display Curvature, Display Zone, and Task Duration on Legibility and Visual Fatigue During Visual Search Task.” Applied Ergonomics 60: 183–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. J., J. H. Han, B. H. Kang, and K. C. Shin. 2011. “Teaching Assistant Robot, ROBOSEM, in English Class and Practical Issues for its Diffusion.” In Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (pp. 8–11), October. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, K., X. Xu, H. Liu, J. Bai, and S. Luo. 2022. “Environment-Adaptive Learning from Demonstration for Proactive Assistance in Human–Robot Collaborative Tasks.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 151: 104046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, B., K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and A. Billard. 2005. “Robotic Assistants in Therapy and Education of Children with Autism: Can a Small Humanoid Robot Help Encourage Social Interaction Skills?” Universal Access in the Information Society 4 (2): 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Y. Koren, and G. Gordon. 2020. “Robot-Supported Collaborative Learning (RSCL): Social Robots as Teaching Assistants for Higher Education Small Group Facilitation.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, M., C. Ahler, N. Hoff, A. Cabrera, and R. Nagpal. 2014. “Kilobot: A Low Cost Robot with Scalable Operations Designed for Collective Behaviors.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 62 (7): 966–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, M., C. Ahler, and R. Nagpal. 2012. “Kilobot: A Low Cost Scalable Robot System for Collective Behaviors.” In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 3293–3298), May. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Salichs, M. A., R. Barber, A. M. Khamis, M. Malfaz, J. F. Gorostiza, R. Pacheco, … D. García. 2006. “Maggie: A Robotic Platform for Human-Robot Social Interaction.” In 2006 IEEE conference on robotics, automation and mechatronics (pp. 1–7), June. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Seok, S., A. Wang, M. Y. Chuah, D. J. Hyun, J. Lee, D. M. Otten, … S. Kim. 2014. “Design Principles for Energy-Efficient Legged Locomotion and Implementation on the MIT Cheetah Robot.” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 20 (3): 1117–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegenthaler, E., Y. Bochud, P. Bergamin, and P. Wurtz. 2012. “Reading on LCD vs e-Ink Displays: Effects on Fatigue and Visual Strain.” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 32 (5): 367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, M., D. Sergio, M. Garzón, M. Múnera, and C. A. Cifuentes. 2019. “Human–Robot–Environment Interaction Interface for Smart Walker Assisted Gait: AGoRA Walker.” Sensors 19 (13): 2897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, N., P. Singh, M. Gupta, and P. Singh. 2020. “Robotics at Workplace: An Integrated Twitter Analytics–SEM Based Approach for Behavioral Intention to Accept.” International Journal of Information Management 55: 102210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., J. J. Van Merrienboer, and F. G. Paas. 1998. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design.” Educational Psychology Review 10 (3): 251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, D., B. Yusuf, J. Botzheim, N. Kubota, and C. S. Chan. 2015. “A Novel Multimodal Communication Framework Using Robot Partner for Aging Population.” Expert Systems with Applications 42 (9): 4540–4555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berghe, R., J. Verhagen, O. Oudgenoeg-Paz, S. van der Ven, and P. Leseman. 2019. “Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review.” Review of Educational Research 89 (2): 259–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Yperen, N. W., and M. Hagedoorn. 2003. “Do High Job Demands Increase Intrinsic Motivation or Fatigue or Both? The Role of Job Control and Job Social Support.” Academy of Management Journal 46 (3): 339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Yperen, N. W., and O. Janssen. 2002. “Fatigued and Dissatisfied or Fatigued but Satisfied? Goal Orientations and Responses to High Job Demands.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (6): 1161–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega, J., and J. M. Cañas. 2019. “Open Vision System for Low-Cost Robotics Education.” Electronics 8 (11): 1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., A. Di Nuovo, A. Cangelosi, and R. Jones. 2019. “Temporal Patterns in Multi-Modal Social Interaction Between Elderly Users and Service Robot.” Interaction Studies 20 (1): 4–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedenborn, A., P. Wik, O. Engwall, and J. Beskow. 2019. “The Effect of a Physical Robot on Vocabulary Learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10461.
   Google Scholar
• You, Z. J., C. Y. Shen, C. W. Chang, B. J. Liu, and G. D. Chen. 2006. “A Robot as a Teaching Assistant in an English Class.” In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06) (pp. 87–91), July. IEEE.
   Google Scholar