Reading multiple documents on a health-related issue: the roles of a text-highlighting tool and re-reading behaviour in integrated understanding

References

• Afflerbach, P., and B.-Y. Cho. 2009. “Determining and Describing Reading Strategies: Internet and Traditional Forms of Reading.” In Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction, edited by H. S. Waters and W. Schneider, 201–225. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., and S. G. West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., M. Nyström, and K. Holmqvist. 2010. “Sampling Frequency and Eye-tracking Measures: How Speed Affects Durations, Latencies, and more and Eye-tracking Measures: How Speed Affects Durations, Latencies, and More.” Journal of Eye Movement Research 3 (3): 1–12. doi:10.16910/jemr.3.3.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø, I. Bråten, and H. I. Strømsø. 2014. “Multiple-documents Literacy: Strategic Processing, Source Awareness, and Argumentation When Reading Multiple Conflicting Documents.” Learning and Individual Differences 30: 64–76. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger, D. 2022. InteractionPoweR: Power analysis for interactions via simulation. R package version 0.1.0.5, https://dbaranger.github.io/InteractionPoweR.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., A. R. Zohar, and S. Mor-Hagani. 2018. “Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts: A Review of Instructional Approaches and Practices.” Educational Psychology Review 30 (3): 973–999. doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Yehudah, G., and Y. Eshet-Alkalai. 2014. “The Influence of Text Annotation Tools on Print and Digital Reading Comprehension.” Proceedings of the 9th chais conference for innovation in learning technologies, November 2014, 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Yehudah, G., and Y. Eshet-Alkalai. 2018. “The Contribution of Text-Highlighting to Comprehension: A Comparison of Print and Digital Reading.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 27 (2): 153–178.
   Google Scholar
• Björnsson, C. 1968. Läsbarhet [Readability]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ø Anmarkrud, C. Brandmo, and H. I. Strømsø. 2014. “Developing and Testing a Model of Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Individual Differences, Processing, and Multiple-Text Comprehension.” Learning and Instruction 30: 9–24. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., L. E. Ferguson, H. I. Strømsø, and Ø Anmarkrud. 2014. “Students Working with Multiple Conflicting Documents on a Scientific Issue: Relations Between Epistemic Cognition While Reading and Sourcing and Argumentation in Essays.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (1): 58–85. doi:10.1111/bjep.12005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., C. A. Perfetti, R. Sandak, and J.-F. Rouet. 1999. “Content Integration and Source Separation in Learning from Multiple Texts.” In Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence, edited by S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, and P. Van den Broek, 209–232. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., and J.-F. Rouet. 2012. “Learning with Multiple Documents.” In Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Dispositions, Instructions, and Learning Processes, edited by J. R. Kirby, and M. J. Lawson, 276–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139048224.017.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., J.-F. Rouet, and A. Durik. 2018. “Representations and Processes in Multiple Source use.” In Handbook of Multiple Source Use, edited by J. L. G. Braasch, I. Br̊aten, and M. T. McCrudden, 17–33. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315627496.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., P. Wiemer-Hastings, Aaron. A. Larson, and C. A. Perfetti. 2004. “Using Intelligent Feedback to Improve Sourcing and Integration in Students’ Essays.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14 (3): 359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, E., M. Gumbrecht, and L. Hong. 2007. “Visual Foraging of Highlighted Text: An Eye-Tracking Study.” In Human-Computer Interaction, Part III, HCII 2007, edited by J. A. Jacko, 589–598. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73110-8_64.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., and L. Salmerón. 2022. “Cognitive Effort in Text Processing and Reading Comprehension in Print and on Tablet: An eye-Tracking Study.” Discourse Processes 59 (4): 237–274. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2022.2030157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., E. Stang Lund, L. Salmerón, and I. Bråten. 2020. “To Click or not to Click: Investigating Conflict Detection and Sourcing in a Multiple Document Hypertext Environment.” Reading and Writing 33: 2049–2072. doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10030-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H., and A. List. 2020. “Researching and Writing Based on Multiple Texts.” Learning and Instruction 66: 101297. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. “Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., and I. Bråten. 2013. “Student Profiles of Knowledge and Epistemic Beliefs: Changes and Relations to Multiple-Text Comprehension.” Learning and Instruction 25: 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. L., and A. S. Barker. 1974. “Effectiveness of Highlighting for Retention of Text Material.” Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (3): 358–364. doi:10.1037/h0036750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, L., R. Kopak, and H. O’Brien. 2016. “The Effects of Textual Environment on Reading Comprehension: Implications for Searching as Learning.” Journal of Information Science 42 (1): 79–93. doi:10.1177/0165551515614472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., and X. P. Kotval. 1999. “Computer Interface Evaluation Using eye Movements: Methods and Constructs.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24 (6): 631–645. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., J. L. G. Braasch, J. Wiley, A. C. Graesser, and K. Brodowinska. 2012. “Comprehending and Learning from Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners.” Reading Research Quarterly 47 (4): 356–381. doi:10.1002/RRQ.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A. P., S. J. Cho, D. Reynolds, K. Brady, and J. Salas. 2020. “Digital Versus Paper Reading Processes and Links to Comprehension for Middle School Students.” American Educational Research Journal 57 (4): 1837–1867. doi:10.3102/0002831219890300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber, J., M. A. Nacenta, and S. Carpendale. 2014. “Paper vs. Tablets: The Effect of Document Media in co-Located Collaborative Work.” In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, edited by F. Garzotto, A. de A. Paolini, G. Jacucci, A. Malizia, M. Matera, and R. Lanzilotti, 89–96. Como, Italy: ACM. doi:10.1145/2598153.2598170.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. L. 1988. “Effects of Underlining Textbook Sentences on Passage and Sentence Retention.” Reading Research and Instruction 28 (1): 18–32. doi:10.1080/19388078809557955.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension.” Psychological Review 87 (4): 329–354. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., N. Meier, and E. Stahl. 2016. “Fostering Secondary-School Students’ Intertext Model Formation When Reading a Set of Websites: The Effectiveness of Source Prompts.” Computers & Education 102: 52–64. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., D. Z. Hambrick, S. W. Tuholski, O. Wilhelm, T. W. Payne, and R. W. Engle. 2004. “The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (2): 189–217. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., and D. J. Leu. 2019. “Exploring the Collaborative Synthesis of Information During Online Reading.” Computers in Human Behavior 95: 146–157. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. 2007. “The Influence of Critical Reading Orientation on External Strategy Ese During Expository Text Reading.” Educational Psychology 27 (3): 363–375. doi:10.1080/01443410601104171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. 2009. “Comprehension of Relations among Controversial Texts: Effects of External Strategy Use.” Instructional Science 37 (4): 311–324. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9041-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latini, N., I. Bråten, and L. Salmerón. 2020. “Does Reading Medium Affect Processing and Integration of Textual and Pictorial Information? A Multimedia Eye-tracking Study.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 62: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, C., P. Gerjets, U. Oestermeier, and Y. Kammerer. 2021. “Simultaneous Presentation of Multiple Documents and Text-Highlighting: Online Integrative Processes and Offline Integrated Understanding.” Scientific Studies of Reading 25 (2): 179–192. doi:10.1080/10888438.2020.1784903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. Y., S. T. Tseng, and G. D. Chen. 2016. “Effect of Hypertext Highlighting on Browsing, Reading, and Navigational Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 54: 318–325. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., and P. A. Alexander. 2017. “Text Navigation in Multiple Source use.” Computers in Human Behavior 75: 364–375. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., and P. A. Alexander. 2018. “Corroborating Students’ Self-Reports of Source Evaluation.” Behaviour & Information Technology 37 (3): 198–216. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1430849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., and P. A. Alexander. 2020. “Strategy Use in Learning from Multiple Texts: An Investigation of the Integrative Framework of Learning from Multiple Texts.” Frontiers in Education 5: Article 578062. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.578062.
   Google Scholar
• List, A., and H. Du. 2021. “Reasoning Beyond History: Examining Students’ Strategy Use When Completing a Multiple Text Task Addressing a Controversial Topic in Education.” Reading and Writing 34 (4): 1003–1048. doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10095-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., H. Du, Y. Wang, and H. Y. Lee. 2019. “Toward a Typology of Integration: Examining the Documents Model Framework.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 58: 228–242. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liversedge, S. P., and J. M. Findlay. 2000. “Saccadic Eye Movements and Cognition.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (1): 6–14. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01418-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, J., F. Amadieu, I. Bråten, and C. Van de Leemput. 2018. “Reading Multiple Documents on Tablet: Effects of Applications and Strategic Guidance on Performance and Acceptance.” In Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Design, Development and Technological Innovation. Vol. 10924, edited by P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou, 157–169. Las Vegas, NV: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_12.
   Google Scholar
• Mahlow, N., C. Hahnel, U. Kroehne, C. Artelt, F. Goldhammer, and C. Schoor. 2020. "More Than (Single) Text Comprehension? – On University Students’ Understanding of Multiple Documents.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: Article 562450. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., C. Driscoll, M. J. Toland, and J. L. Kegler. 2013. “E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27 (4): 512–519. doi:10.1002/acp.2930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyatsu, T., K. Nguyen, and M. A. McDaniel. 2018. “Five Popular Study Strategies: Their Pitfalls and Optimal Implementations.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 (3): 390–407. doi:10.1177/1745691617710510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, T., J. F. Rouet, E. François, and V. Zampa. 2008. “Summarizing Digital Documents: Effects of Alternate or Simultaneous Window Display.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (4): 541–558. doi:10.1002/acp.1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., J.-F. Rouet, and M. A. Britt. 1999. “Toward a Theory of Documents Representation.” In The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading, edited by H. Von Oostendorp and S. R. Goldman, 88–108. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. E. 1991. “The Cognitive Functions of Underlining as a Study Technique.” Reading Research and Instruction 31 (2): 49–56. doi:10.1080/19388079209558078.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, H. R., and R. E. Mayer. 2014. “An Eye Movement Analysis of Highlighting and Graphic Organizer Study Aids for Learning from Expository Text.” Computers in Human Behavior 41: 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primor, L., and T. Katzir. 2018. “Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 2009. “The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (8): 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., M. A. Britt, and A. M. Durik. 2017. “RESOLV: Readers’ Representation of Reading Contexts and Tasks.” Educational Psychologist 52 (3): 200–215. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., T. Baccino, J. J. Cañas, R. I. Madrid, I. Fajardo, J. J. Canas, R. I. Madrid, and I. Fajardo. 2009. “Do Graphical Overviews Facilitate or Hinder Comprehension in Hypertext?” Computers & Education 53 (4): 1308–1319. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., L. Gil, and I. Bråten. 2018. “Effects of Reading Real Versus Print-out Versions of Multiple Documents on Students’ Sourcing and Integrated Understanding.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 52: 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., L. Gil, I. Bråten, and H. Strømsø. 2010. “Comprehension Effects of Signalling Relationships Between Documents in Search Engines.” Computers in Human Behavior 26 (3): 419–426. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., and A. C. Llorens. 2019. “Instruction of Digital Reading Strategies Based on Eye-Movements Modeling Examples.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 57 (2): 343–359. doi:10.1177/0735633117751605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiter, K., and T. Van Gog. 2009. “Using Eye Tracking in Applied Research to Study and Stimulate the Processing of Information from Multi-Representational Sources.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (9): 1209–1214. doi:10.1002/acp.1524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharafi, Z., T. Shaffer, and B. Sharif. 2015. “Eye-tracking Metrics in Software Engineering.” In Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), 96–103. New Delhi, India: IEEE. doi:10.1109/APSEC.2015.53.
   Google Scholar
• Stang Lund, E., I. Bråten, C. Brandmo, E. W. Brante, and H. I. Strømsø. 2019. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Textual and Individual Factors on Source-Content Integration When Reading About a Socio-Scientific Issue.” Reading and Writing 32 (2): 335–356. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9868-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang Lund, E., I. Bråten, E. W. Brante, and H. I. Strømsø. 2017. “Memory for Textual Conflicts Predicts Sourcing When Adolescents Read Multiple Expository Texts.” Reading Psychology 38 (4): 417–437. doi:10.1080/02702711.2016.1278417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobelt, H., D. Oelke, B. C. Kwon, T. Schreck, and H. Pfister. 2016. “Guidelines for Effective Usage of Text Highlighting Techniques.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22 (1): 489–498. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., I. Bråten, Ø Anmarkrud, and L. E. Ferguson. 2016. “Beliefs About Justification for Knowing When Ethnic Majority and Ethnic Minority Students Read Multiple Conflicting Documents.” Educational Psychology 36 (4): 638–657. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.920080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., I. Bråten, and M. A. Britt. 2010. “Reading Multiple Texts About Climate Change: The Relationship Between Memory for Sources and Text Comprehension.” Learning and Instruction 20 (3): 192–204. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winchell, A., A. Lan, and M. Mozer. 2020. “Highlights as an Early Predictor of Student Comprehension and Interests.” Cognitive Science 44 (11): Article 12901. doi:10.1111/cogs.12901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. 1991. “Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence.” Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeari, M., M. Oudega, and P. Van den Broek. 2017. “The Effect of Highlighting on Processing and Memory of Central and Peripheral Text Information: Evidence from Eye Movements.” Journal of Research in Reading 40 (4): 365–383. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. L., B. C. Storm, N. Kornell, and E. L. Bjork. 2014. “Highlighting and its Relation to Distributed Study and Students’ Metacognitive Beliefs.” Educational Psychology Review 27 (1): 69–78. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9277-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar