Can smart technology make group members more creative? The effect of interactive feedback using sociometric badges on members’ creativity

References

• Aguinis, H. 2019. Performance Management for Dummies. New York, NY: For Dummies.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. 1988. “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 10: 123–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreev, L. 2016. Sociometric badges in a high-stakes setting: living proof a sociometric feedback visualization. [Unpublished student thesis]. University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., J. E. McGrath, and J. L. Berdahl. 2000. Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. “The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4 (3): 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., N. E. Adams, and J. Beyer. 1977. “Cognitive Processes Mediating Behavioral Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (3): 125–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah, J., and P. Paulus. 2008. “Effects of Training on Idea Generation in Groups.” Small Group Research 39 (5): 523–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S. M., and M. A. West. 1998. “Reflexivity, Effectiveness, and Mental Health in BBC-TV Production Teams.” Small Group Research 29 (5): 583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Černe, M., C. G. Nerstad, A. Dysvik, and M. Škerlavaj. 2014. “What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (1): 172–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Q. Zhao, S. Chen, S. Xu, S. Li, J. Chen, and Z. Zhou. 2021. “The Effect of Precisely Defined Associative Distance and Stimulus Acquisition Mode in Individual Creativity Support Systems.” Behaviour & Information Technology 40 (3): 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., S. Y. Sung, K. Lee, and D. S. Cho. 2011. “Balancing Cognition and Emotion: Innovation Implementation as a Function of Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Reactions Toward Innovation.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 32 (1): 107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and P. Cohen. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., and E. F. Loftus. 1975. “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing.” Psychological Review 82 (6): 407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N., P. Kiekel, E. Salas, C. Bowers, R. Stout, and J. Cannon-Bowers. 2003. “Measuring Team Knowledge: A Window to the Cognitive Underpinnings of Team Performance.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 7 (3): 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun, H., P. B. Paulus, V. Brown, and J. J. Sherwood. 2000. “Cognitive Stimulation and Problem Presentation in Idea-Generating Groups.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4 (4): 307–329.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, I., T. Baur, and E. André. 2016, October. “Measuring the Impact of Multimodal Behavioural Feedback Loops on Social Interactions.” Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 201-208).
   Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., F. Dochy, and P. Van Den Bossche. 2010. “Grasping the Dynamic Complexity of Team Learning: An Integrative Model for Effective Team Learning in Organisations.” Educational Research Review 5 (2): 111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. 2007. “Cooperative Outcome Interdependence, Task Reflexivity, and Team Effectiveness: A Motivated Information Processing Perspective.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (3): 628–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., M. Baas, and B. A. Nijstad. 2008. “Hedonic Tone and Activation Level in the Mood-Creativity Link: Toward a Dual Pathway to Creativity Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (5): 739–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., B. A. Nijstad, and D. van Knippenberg. 2008. “Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (1): 22–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShon, R. P., S. W. Kozlowski, A. M. Schmidt, K. R. Milner, and D. Wiechmann. 2004. “A Multiple-Goal, Multilevel Model of Feedback Effects on the Regulation of Individual and Team Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (6): 1035–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMicco, J. M., K. J. Hollenbach, A. Pandolfo, and W. Bender. 2007. “The Impact of Increased Awareness While Face-to-Face.” Human–Computer Interaction 22 (1-2): 47–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnette, M. D., J. Campbell, and K. Jaastad. 1963. “The Effect of Group Participation on Brainstorming Effectiveness for 2 Industrial Samples.” Journal of Applied Psychology 47 (1): 30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, D. L., D. M. Landers, and U. Raeder. 1979. “Enhancing Self-Efficacy in High-Avoidance Motor Tasks: A Comparison of Modeling Techniques.” Journal of Sport Psychology 1 (2): 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Gabelica, C., P. Van den Bossche, S. De Maeyer, M. Segers, and W. Gijselaers. 2014. “The Effect of Team Feedback and Guided Reflexivity on Team Performance Change.” Learning and Instruction 34: 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galegher, J., R. E. Kraut, and C. Egido. 2014. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. New York. NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., and K. Chittipeddi. 1991. “Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation.” Strategic Management Journal 12 (6): 433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. T. 1999. “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1): 82–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and N. J. Rockwood. 2020. “Conditional Process Analysis: Concepts, Computation, and Advances in the Modeling of the Contingencies of Mechanisms.” American Behavioral Scientist 64 (1): 19–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V. B., R. S. Tindale, and D. A. Vollrath. 1997. “The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups as Information Processors.” Psychological Bulletin 121 (1): 43–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S., X. Deng, Y. Miyake, and T. Nozawa. 2019. “Head Movement Synchrony and Idea Generation Interference – Investigating Background Music Effects on Group Creativity.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2577.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hülsheger, U. R., N. Anderson, and J. F. Salgado. 2009. “Team-level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (5): 1128–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D., and C. Davis. 2000. “Bearing bad News: Reactions to Negative Performance Feedback.” Applied Psychology 49 (3): 550–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., A. Chang, L. Holland, and A. S. Pentland. 2008, November. “Meeting Mediator: Enhancing Group Collaborationusing Sociometric Feedback.” Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 457-466).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J., J. N. Choi, and K. Lee. 2016. “Trait Affect and Individual Creativity: Moderating Roles of Affective Climate and Reflexivity.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 44 (9): 1477–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, A. P. 2018. “Innovations in Unobtrusive Methods.” In Unconventional Methodology in Organization and Management Research, edited by A. Bryman, and D. A. Buchanan, 64–83. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., M. C. Schippers, Y. Garbers, and C. Steenfatt. 2015. “Effects of Guided Reflexivity and Team Feedback on Team Performance Improvement: The Role of Team Regulatory Processes and Cognitive Emergent States.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 24 (5): 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg, T. R., and T. M. Amabile. 2001. “From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black box of Team-Level Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 13 (3-4): 285–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, S., X. Chen, and J. Schaubroeck. 2002. “Participative Decision Making and Employee Performance in Different Cultures: The Moderating Effects of Allocentrism/ Idocentrism and Efficacy.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (5): 905–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., R. F. Piccolo, C. L. Jackson, J. E. Mathieu, and J. R. Saul. 2008. “A Meta-Analysis of Teamwork Processes: Tests of a Multidimensional Model and Relationships with Team Effectiveness Criteria.” Personnel Psychology 61 (2): 273–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshed, G., D. Perez, J. T. Hancock, D. Cosley, J. Birnholtz, S. Lee, P. L. McLeod, and G. Gay. 2009. “Visualizing Real-Time Language-Based Feedback on Teamwork Behavior in Computermediated Groups.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 537-546.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. W. 2018. “Effects of an Online Team Project-Based Learning Environment with Group Awareness and Peer Evaluation on Socially Shared Regulation of Learning and Self-Regulated Learning.” Behaviour & Information Technology 37 (5): 445–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley, D. H., D. J. Brass, and J. B. Thomas. 1995. “Efficacy-performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 645–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusik, J. G., R. Heidl, J. R. Hollenbeck, A. Yu, H. W. Lee, and M. Howe. 2019. “Wearable Bluetooth Sensors for Capturing Relational Variables and Temporal Variability in Relationships: A Construct Validation Study.” Journal of Applied Psychology 104 (3): 357–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. 2018. Defense of Troublemakers: The Power of Dissent in Life and Business. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G. A. 2001. “Structuring Change: Familiarity and Formal Interventions in Problem-Solving Groups.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 794–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, M., and F. Pozzi. 2012. “Digital Games as Creativity Enablers for Children.” Behaviour & Information Technology 31 (10): 1011–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, G., A. M. Schmidt, C. Scheu, and R. P. DeShon. 2007. “A Process Model of Goal Orientation and Feedback Seeking.” Human Performance 20 (2): 119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, P., and V. Brown. 2007. “Toward More Creative and Innovative Group Idea Generation: A Cognitive-Social-Motivational Perspective of Brainstorming.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 1 (1): 248–265.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., and B. A. Nijstad. (Eds.) 2003. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., and H. C. Yang. 2000. “Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1): 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., and C. E. Shalley. 2003. “The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 28: 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, D. G., and K. Bussey. 1979. “The Social Learning Theory of sex Differences: Imitation is Alive and Well.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (10): 1699–1712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., A. R. Hanson, and P. D. Cox. 1987. “Peer-model Attributes and Children's Achievement Behaviors.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (1): 54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. 2006. “The Effects of Leadership Style and Team Process on Performance and Innovation in Functionally Heterogeneous Teams.” Journal of Management 32 (1): 132–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C., S. Mao, Z. Xing, and S. Naumann. 2022. “Improving Student Creativity Through Digital Technology Products: A Literature Review.” Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12: 101032.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., and S. Farmer. 2002. “Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 45: 1137–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. 1996. “Reflexivity and Work Group Effectiveness: A Conceptual Integration.” In Handbook of Work Group Psychology, edited by M. A. West, 555–579. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A., D. Tjosvold, and F. Su. 2007. “Social Face for Innovation in Strategic Alliances in China: The Mediating Roles of Resource Exchange and Reflexivity.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 28 (8): 961–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokozuka, T., H. Miyamoto, M. Kasai, Y. Miyake, and T. Nozawa. 2021. “The Relationship Between Turn-Taking, Vocal Pitch Synchrony, and Rapport in Creative Problem-Solving Communication.” Speech Communication 129: 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., and J. M. George. 2003. “Awakening Employee Creativity: The Role of Leader Emotional Intelligence.” The Leadership Quarterly 14 (4-5): 545–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar